Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

To date, no meta-analyses have comprehensively assessed the association of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized and nonrandomized settings. In addition, there exists controversy concerning the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with NSCLC with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels less than 1%.

Objective

To compare neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with chemotherapy by adverse events and surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes using recently published randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized trials.

Data Sources

MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched from January 1, 2013, to October 25, 2023, for all clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy that included at least 10 patients.

Study Selection

Observational studies and trials reporting the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, or immunotherapy monotherapy, were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Surgical, pathological, and efficacy end points and adverse events were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

Among 43 eligible trials comprising 5431 patients (4020 males [74.0%]; median age range, 55-70 years), there were 8 randomized clinical trials with 3387 patients. For randomized clinical trials, pooled overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; I2 = 0%), event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67; I2 = 14.9%), major pathological response (risk ratio, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.83-4.15; I2 = 31.2%), and complete pathological response (risk ratio, 5.52; 95% CI, 4.25-7.15; I2 = 27.4%) favored neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with baseline tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1%, there was a significant benefit in event-free survival for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion and Relevance

This study found that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy across surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes. These findings suggest that patients with resectable NSCLC with tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1% may have an event-free survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Perioperative Immunotherapy for Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Current Evidence and Future Directions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has gone from an idea to an indication in locally advanced lung cancer. Several phase III trials have demonstrated the superiority of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy in this setting. Although such progress has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced disease, the unmet needs of stage I and stage II patients without lymph node disease have largely been underrepresented in existing trials. Up-front resection with few patients going on to complete adjuvant therapy remains the norm for most stage I and II patients. Emerging evidence now supports the exploration of supplemental checkpoint blockade in well-selected early-stage, node-negative patients with large tumors and no actionable driver mutations. Although concerns surrounding safety and risk exist, patient selection could be substantially improved using novel biomarker approaches that leverage our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment of lung cancer. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and controversies of perioperative immunotherapy in node-negative lung cancer.

Visualizing NETosis Using a Novel Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Specific Marker

As the most abundant leukocyte in circulation, the neutrophil plays a far-reaching role in maintaining homeostasis. Within the context of disease, however, neutrophils can potentiate various pathophysiological mechanisms with disastrous consequences for patients. The role of the neutrophil in disease is complex with mechanisms like NETosis driving the progression of several pathologies. NETosis involves neutrophils extruding protein-decorated DNA webs called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which facilitate the progression of inflammatory, non-infectious, and neoplastic pathologies. The need to visualize NETs has thus never been greater. Current approaches for visualizing NETs are limited in specificity and sensitivity, involving non-specific fluorescent DNA dyes or co-stains of neutrophil and DNA markers. Improved methodologies are needed to robustly distinguish NETs from other cell-free DNA. Excitingly, a novel NET-specific posttranslational modification involving cleavage on the N-terminus of histone H3 has recently been identified. Here, we demonstrate that this single marker is superior to the conventional use of the co-stain of the neutrophil marker, myeloperoxidase, and, the DNA marker, histone H3 citrullination in visualizing neutrophil NETosis. This is due to this single marker's unparalleled ability to identify, not only more NETs but also their formation at earlier stages of NETosis. Moreover, we additionally propose a stepwise mechanism of neutrophil NETosis in which a histone H3 cleavage event precedes histone H3 citrullination. Taken together, these results demonstrate a novel method for visualizing NETs, allowing for continued exploration of their multifaceted roles in immunity and disease.