1
|
Hügel M, Stöhr J, Kuhnt T, Nägler F, Papsdorf K, Klagges S, Hambsch P, Güresir E, Nicolay NH, Seidel C. Long-term survival in patients with brain metastases-clinical characterization of a rare scenario. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:335-345. [PMID: 37646818 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02123-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess clinical, treatment, and prognostic features in patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid tumors achieving long-term survival (LTS). Further, the accuracy of diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment scores (ds-GPA) to predict LTS was evaluated. METHODS Patients admitted for radiotherapy of BM between 2010 and 2020 at a large tertiary cancer center with survival of at least 3 years from diagnosis of BM were included. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics and ds-GPA were compiled retrospectively. RESULTS From a total of 1248 patients with BM, 61 (4.9%) survived ≥ 3 years. In 40 patients, detailed patient charts were available. Among LTS patients, median survival time from diagnosis of BM was 51.5 months. Most frequent primary tumors were lung cancer (45%), melanoma (20%), and breast cancer (17.5%). At the time of diagnosis of BM, 11/40 patients (27.5%) had oligometastatic disease. Estimated mean survival time based on ds-GPA was 19.7 months (in 8 cases estimated survival < 12 months). Resection followed by focal or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was often applied (60%), followed by primary stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) (20%) or WBRT (20%). 80% of patients received systemic treatment, appearing particularly active in specifically altered non-small lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, and HER2-positive breast cancer. Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and the presence of oligometastatic disease at BM diagnosis were persisting prognostic factors in LTS patients. CONCLUSION In this monocentric setting reflecting daily pattern of care, LTS with BM is heterogeneous and difficult to predict. Effective local treatment and modern systemic therapies often appear crucial for LTS. The impact of concomitant diseases and frailty is not clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hügel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - J Stöhr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - T Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - F Nägler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - K Papsdorf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Klagges
- Clinical Cancer Registry, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hambsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - E Güresir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - N H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - C Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruhle A, Roesch J, Oertel M, Fabian A, Wegen S, Trommer M, Hering D, Maeurer M, Dobiasch S, von der Grün J, Medenwald D, Süß C, Hoeck M, Fleischmann DF, Löser A, Heß S, Tamaskovic B, Vinsensia M, Hecht M, Nicolay NH. MRI, FDG-PET/CT and Image-Guidance for Re-Irradiation of Locoregionally Recurrent or Second Primary Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients - Results of a Multicenter Cohort Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e619-e620. [PMID: 37785856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To investigate patterns of care and prognostic benefits of MRI, FDG-PET/CT and image-guidance in re-irradiation of locoregionally recurrent or second primary head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas (r/s HNSCCs) within a multicenter cohort study. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients receiving re-irradiation for r/s HNSCC between 2009 and 2020 at 16 tertiary cancer centers in Germany were retrospectively analyzed in terms of MRI and FDG-PET/CT usage for treatment planning and regarding image-guidance frequency during re-irradiation. Patterns of use of these modalities over time were analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis, and the association between the usage of these modalities and best locoregional treatment response was analyzed with chi-square tests. Cumulative incidence analyses of locoregional failures with death as competing event were performed. RESULTS In the total cohort of 297 patients, 226 (76%) were male, median age was 62 years (IQR, 56-70), and median ECOG was 1 (IQR, 1-2). There were 260 locoregionally recurrent HNSCCs, and 37 second primary HNSCCs; 44 patients (15%) had distant metastases at the time of re-irradiation. MRI and FDG-PET/CT was used for re-irradiation planning in 117 (39%) and 71 patients (24%), respectively. In median, image guidance (IGRT) was performed twice weekly (IQR, 1-5), usually with cone beam CTs or megavolt-CTs, and 85 patients (29%) received daily IGRT during re-irradiation. Usage of MRI (OR = 0.967; 95% CI, 0.892-1.048; p = .416), FDG-PET/CT (OR = 1.053; 95% CI, 0.960-1.156; p = .274), or daily IGRT (OR = 1.057; 95% CI, 0.968-1.115; p = .218) did not increase in frequency over time within the analyzed time span but was significantly dependent on the treatment center (χ2(15), P<.001 for all modalities). Daily IGRT was associated with a higher rate of at least stable disease after re-irradiation as assessed by RECIST criteria (χ2(1) = 4.011, p<.05). There was a trend towards better RECIST-assessed treatment response for MRI (χ2(1) = 3.223, p = .073) and FDG-PET/CT (χ2(1) = 2.792, p = .095) as part of the re-irradiation planning process. Incidence of locoregional failures was not dependent on MRI (SHR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.67-1.33; p = 0.741, Fine-Gray), FDG-PET/CT (SHR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.59-1.33; p = 0.552) or daily IGRT (SHR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.51-1.14, p = 0.182), There was a trend towards lower acute grade 3/4-toxicities in patients receiving daily IGRT (χ2(1) = 3.354, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that daily IGRT may increase disease control and should be regularly applied for re-irradiation of r/s HNSCCs. MRI and FDG-PET/CT usage were not associated with the incidence of locoregional failures after re-irradiation. However, prospective trials with multiparametric MRI and/or FDG-PET/CT for optimal re-irradiation planning are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ruhle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - J Roesch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - A Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - S Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - M Maeurer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - S Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - J von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Medenwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - C Süß
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - M Hoeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - D F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Löser
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Outpatient Center of the UKE GmbH, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - S Heß
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Tamaskovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Vinsensia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Hecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - N H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spohn SKB, Adebahr S, Huber M, Jenkner C, Wiehle R, Nagavci B, Schmucker C, Carl EG, Chen RC, Weber WA, Mix M, Rühle A, Sprave T, Nicolay NH, Gratzke C, Benndorf M, Wiegel T, Weis J, Baltas D, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. Feasibility, pitfalls and results of a structured concept-development phase for a randomized controlled phase III trial on radiotherapy in primary prostate cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:337. [PMID: 35351058 PMCID: PMC8960686 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Failure rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is > 50%, includes safety-problems, underpowered statistics, lack of efficacy, lack of funding or insufficient patient recruitment and is even more pronounced in oncology trials. We present results of a structured concept-development phase (CDP) for a phase III RCT on personalized radiotherapy (RT) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients implementing prostate specific membrane antigen targeting positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Materials and methods The 1 yr process of the CDP contained five main working packages: (i) literature search and scoping review, (ii) involvement of individual patients, patients’ representatives and patients’ self-help groups addressing the patients’ willingness to participate in the preparation process and the conduct of RCTs as well as the patient informed consent (PIC), (iii) involvement of national and international experts and expert panels (iv) a phase II pilot study investigating the safety of implementation of PSMA-PET for focal dose escalation RT and (v) in-silico RT planning studies assessing feasibility of envisaged dose regimens and effects of urethral sparing in focal dose escalation. Results (i) Systematic literature searches confirmed the high clinical relevance for more evidence on advanced RT approaches, in particular stereotactic body RT, in high-risk PCa patients. (ii) Involvement of patients, patient representatives and randomly selected males relevantly changed the PIC and initiated a patient empowerment project for training of bladder preparation. (iii) Discussion with national and international experts led to adaptions of inclusion and exclusion criteria. (iv) Fifty patients were treated in the pilot trial and in- and exclusion criteria as well as enrollment calculations were adapted accordingly. Parallel conduction of the pilot trial revealed pitfalls on practicability and broadened the horizon for translational projects. (v) In-silico planning studies confirmed feasibility of envisaged dose prescription. Despite large prostate- and boost-volumes of up to 66% of the prostate, adherence to stringent anorectal dose constraints was feasible. Urethral sparing increased the therapeutic ratio. Conclusion The dynamic framework of interdisciplinary working programs in CDPs enhances robustness of RCT protocols and may be associated with decreased failure rates. Structured recommendations are warranted to further define the process of such CDPs in radiation oncology trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09434-2.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dapper H, Belka C, Bock F, Budach V, Budach W, Christiansen H, Debus J, Distel L, Dunst J, Eckert F, Eich H, Eicheler W, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Fietkau R, Fleischmann DF, Frerker B, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Herfarth K, Hildebrandt G, Kaul D, Kölbl O, Krause M, Krug D, Martin D, Matuschek C, Medenwald D, Nicolay NH, Niewald M, Oertel M, Petersen C, Pohl F, Raabe A, Rödel C, Rübe C, Schmalz C, Schmeel LC, Steinmann D, Stüben G, Thamm R, Vordermark D, Vorwerk H, Wiegel T, Zips D, Combs SE. Integration of radiation oncology teaching in medical studies by German medical faculties due to the new licensing regulations : An overview and recommendations of the consortium academic radiation oncology of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:1-11. [PMID: 34786605 PMCID: PMC8594460 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01861-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The new Medical Licensing Regulations 2025 (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) will soon be passed by the Federal Council (Bundesrat) and will be implemented step by step by the individual faculties in the coming months. The further development of medical studies essentially involves an orientation from fact-based to competence-based learning and focuses on practical, longitudinal and interdisciplinary training. Radiation oncology and radiation therapy are important components of therapeutic oncology and are of great importance for public health, both clinically and epidemiologically, and therefore should be given appropriate attention in medical education. This report is based on a recent survey on the current state of radiation therapy teaching at university hospitals in Germany as well as the contents of the National Competence Based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Medicine 2.0 (Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin 2.0, NKLM) and the closely related Subject Catalogue (Gegenstandskatalog, GK) of the Institute for Medical and Pharmaceutical Examination Questions (Institut für Medizinische und Pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen, IMPP). The current recommendations of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) regarding topics, scope and rationale for the establishment of radiation oncology teaching at the respective faculties are also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
| | - C Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F Bock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - V Budach
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - W Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - H Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - J Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Distel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - J Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - F Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany
| | - H Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - W Eicheler
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - R Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - R Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Frerker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - F A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany
| | - K Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - D Kaul
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - O Kölbl
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - M Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - D Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - C Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - D Medenwald
- Deptartment of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - N H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Niewald
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - C Petersen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - F Pohl
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - A Raabe
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - C Rübe
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - C Schmalz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - L C Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - D Steinmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - G Stüben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - R Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - D Vordermark
- Deptartment of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - H Vorwerk
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - D Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany
| | - S E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to alcohol- and nicotine-induced head and neck tumors, human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma rather affects younger patients, and the incidence of this entity is continuously increasing. Due to the significantly better prognosis of HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, various treatment de-escalation strategies are currently being investigated, with the aim of reducing toxicity without affecting the good survival rates of these patients. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the evidence for treatment de-escalation in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search was performed and relevant studies are critically discussed. RESULTS De-escalation strategies for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma using induction chemotherapy or radiation dose reduction have demonstrated good oncological results in phase II trials, with lower toxicity rates compared to historical controls. However, both of the first published phase III trials investigating de-escalation of concomitant chemotherapy regimens demonstrated inferior outcomes for the deescalated treatment strategies without improvements in treatment-associated toxicities. Additional phase-III trials investigating other de-escalation strategies have not yet been published. CONCLUSION Treatment de-escalation should be performed exclusively in prospective studies and can currently not be recommended in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rühle
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.,Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) Partnerstandort Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - N H Nicolay
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. .,Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) Partnerstandort Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bostel T, Dreher C, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, König F, Bickelhaupt S, Schlemmer HP, Huber PE, Sterzing F, Bäumer P, Debus J, Nicolay NH. Exploring MR regression patterns in rectal cancer during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with daily T2- and diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:171. [PMID: 32653003 PMCID: PMC7353746 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01613-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, only limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data are available concerning tumor regression during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) of rectal cancer patients, which is a prerequisite for adaptive radiotherapy (RT) concepts. This exploratory study prospectively evaluated daily fractional MRI during neoadjuvant treatment to analyze the predictive value of MR biomarkers for treatment response. Methods Locally advanced rectal cancer patients were examined with daily MRI during neoadjuvant RCT. Contouring of the tumor volume was performed for each MRI scan by using T2- and diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI)-sequences. The daily apparent-diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated. Volumetric and functional tumor changes during RCT were analyzed and correlated with the pathological response after surgical resection. Results In total, 171 MRI scans of eight patients were analyzed regarding anatomical and functional dynamics during RCT. Pathological complete response (pCR) could be achieved in four patients, and four patients had a pathological partial response (pPR) following neoadjuvant treatment. T2- and DWI-based volumetry proved to be statistically significant in terms of therapeutic response, and volumetric thresholds at week two and week four during RCT were defined for the prediction of pCR. In contrast, the average tumor ADC values widely overlapped between both response groups during RCT and appeared inadequate to predict treatment response in our patient cohort. Conclusion This prospective exploratory study supports the hypothesis that MRI may be able to predict pCR of rectal cancers early during neoadjuvant RCT. Our data therefore provide a useful template to tailor future MR-guided adaptive treatment concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Bostel
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - C Dreher
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - D Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - A Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - F König
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Bickelhaupt
- Division of Medical Imaging and Radiology - Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 2, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - H P Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P E Huber
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F Sterzing
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Radiation Oncology, Kempten Clinic, Robert-Weixler-Strasse 50, 87439, Kempten, Germany
| | - P Bäumer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,dia.log, Altoetting Center for Radiology, Vinzenz-von-Paul-Strasse 10, 84503, Altoetting, Germany
| | - J Debus
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N H Nicolay
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanner JM, Nicolay NH. [When a name becomes a unit: Rolf Maximilian Sievert]. Radiologe 2017; 58:153-158. [PMID: 29127447 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-017-0321-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J M Tanner
- Klinik für RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - N H Nicolay
- Klinik für RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nicolay NH, Herfarth K. [Use of cetuximab with definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer results in decreased overall survival]. Strahlenther Onkol 2013; 190:233-4. [PMID: 24362504 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0523-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N H Nicolay
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland,
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang J, Parsons J, Nicolay NH, Caporali S, Harrington CF, Singh R, Finch D, D'Atri S, Farmer PB, Johnston PG, McKenna WG, Dianov G, Sharma RA. Cells deficient in the base excision repair protein, DNA polymerase beta, are hypersensitive to oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Oncogene 2009; 29:463-8. [PMID: 19838217 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
A significant proportion of human cancers overexpress DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta), the major DNA polymerase involved in base excision repair. The underlying mechanism and biological consequences of overexpression of this protein are unknown. We examined whether Pol beta, expressed at levels found in tumor cells, is involved in the repair of DNA damage induced by oxaliplatin treatment and whether the expression status of this protein alters the sensitivity of cells to oxaliplatin. DNA damage induced by oxaliplatin treatment of HCT116 and HT29 colon cancer cells was observed to be associated with the stabilization of Pol beta protein on chromatin. In comparison with HCT116 colon cancer cells, isogenic oxaliplatin-resistant (HCT-OR) cells were found to have higher constitutive levels of Pol beta protein, faster in vitro repair of a DNA substrate containing a single nucleotide gap and faster repair of 1,2-GG oxaliplatin adduct levels in cells. In HCT-OR cells, small interfering RNA knockdown of Pol beta delayed the repair of oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage. In a different model system, Pol beta-deficient fibroblasts were less able to repair 1,2-GG oxaliplatin adducts and were hypersensitive to oxaliplatin treatment compared with isogenic Pol beta-expressing cells. Consistent with previous studies, Pol beta-deficient mouse fibroblasts were not hypersensitive to cisplatin treatment. These data provide the first link between oxaliplatin sensitivity and DNA repair involving Pol beta. They demonstrate that Pol beta modulates the sensitivity of cells to oxaliplatin treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Yang
- Cancer Research UK-Medical Research Council Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology & Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxon OX37DQ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In cases of near-total ear avulsions, replantation is often successful without microsurgery. The purpose of our study was to investigate the relevant vascular anatomy associated for ear survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Four cases of successful surgical intervention in near-total ear avulsions are presented. Injection studies using latex were performed to identify the blood supply to the auricle on 13 cadaveric ears. RESULTS A small superior branch of the superficial temporal artery above the tragus was identified extending along the upper border of the auricle and connecting with the helical arcade. Below the tragus, a second small horizontal branch of the superficial temporal artery was identified. CONCLUSION The auricle can survive near-total amputation based on a skin bridge above or below the tragus. One of the auricular branches of the superficial temporal artery seems sufficient for the blood supply to the ear and allows for a successful non-microsurgical operative repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N H Nicolay
- Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|