An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains

Food consumption play a crucial role in human life, yet conventional food production and consumption patterns can be detrimental to the environment. Thus, research and development has been directed towards alternative proteins, with edible insects being promising sources. Edible insects have been recognised for their sustainable benefits providing protein, with less emission of greenhouse gas, land and water usage compared to sources, such as beef, chicken, and dairy products. Among the over 2000 known edible insect species, only four, namely yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), migratory locust/grasshopper (Locusta migratoria), grain mould beetle, also known as lesser mealworm which is a larval form of Alphitobius diaperinus (from the family of Tenebrionidae of darkling beetles) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus), are currently authorised in specific products through specific producers in the EU. The expansion of such foods into Western diets face challenges such as consumer barriers, gaps in microbiological and chemical safety hazard data during production and processing, and the potential for fraudulent supply chain activity. The main aim of this study was to map the supply chain, through interviews with personnel along the supply chain, coupled with searches for relevant publications and governmental documents. Thus, the main potential points of food safety and fraud along the edible insect supply chain were identified. Feed substrate was identified as the main area of concern regarding microbiological and chemical food safety and novel processing techniques were forecast to be of most concern for future fraudulent activity. Despite the on-going authorisation of insect species in many countries there are substantial food safety and authenticity information gaps in this industry that need to be addressed before edible insects can be viewed as a safe and sustainable protein sources by Western consumers.

Production and evaluation of the utility of novel phage display-derived peptide ligands to Salmonella spp. for magnetic separation

AIMS

The objectives of this study were to produce Salmonella-specific peptide ligands by phage display biopanning and evaluate their use for magnetic separation (MS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four-phage display biopanning rounds were performed, and the peptides expressed by the two most Salmonella-specific (on the basis of phage-binding ELISA results) phage clones, MSal020401 and MSal020417, were chemically synthesized and coupled to MyOne™ tosylactivated Dynabeads(®). Peptide capture capability for whole Salmonella cells from nonenriched broth cultures was quantified by MS + plate counts and MS + Greenlight™ detection and compared to capture capability of anti-Salmonella (antibody-coated) Dynabeads(®). MS + Greenlight™ gave a more comprehensive picture of capture capability than MS + plate counts and showed that Peptide MSal020417-coated beads exhibited at least similar, if not better, capture capability to anti-Salmonella Dynabeads(®) (mean capture values of 36·0 ± 18·2 and 31·2 ± 20·1%, respectively, over Salmonella spp. concentration range 3 × 10(1) -3 × 10(6) CFU ml(-1)) with cross-reactivity of ≤1·9% to three other foodborne pathogens: Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Campylobacter jejuni.

CONCLUSIONS

One of the phage display-derived peptide ligands was demonstrated by MS + Greenlight™ to be a viable antibody alternative for MS of Salmonella spp.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This study demonstrates an antibody-free approach to Salmonella detection and opens substantial possibilities for more rapid tests for this bacterium.