Outcomes Following Dose Escalated Radiotherapy for High Grade Meningioma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (RT) is a defined treatment following surgery for atypical and malignant meningioma. However, the optimal radiotherapeutic approach is not well defined. We present the results of our dose-escalation strategy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Consecutive patients with a histopathologic grade 2 or 3 meningioma treated with RT were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included cause-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), local failure and incidence of radiation necrosis. We specifically compared the dose-escalation cohort, defined as those treated with ≥66 Gy EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions, a/b = 10), to the standard dose cohort receiving <66 Gy EQD2. We defined adjuvant as RT delivered within 6 months of surgery otherwise the treatment was salvage.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with Grade 2 (111/118) or 3 (7/118) meningioma were identified. 54/118 (45.8%) received dose-escalation and 64/118 (54.2%) standard dosing. 34/54 (63.0%) dose-escalated and 45/64 (70.3%) standardly dosed were treated adjuvantly. The median follow-up was 45.4 months (IQR: 24.0-80.0 months) and median OS was 9.7 years. Post-operative residual disease was present in all dose-escalated patients, as compared to 65.6% in the standard dose cohort. PFS at 3-, 4- and 5-years in the dose-escalated vs. standard dose cohort were 78.9%, 72.2% and 64.6% vs. 57.2%, 49.1% and 40.8%, respectively, (p = 0.030). On multivariable (MVA) analysis, dose-escalation (HR: 0.544, 95% CI: 0.303-0.977, p = 0.042) was associated with improved PFS, whereas ≥2 surgeries (HR: 1.989, 95% CI: 1.049-3.773, p = 0.035) and older age (HR: 1.035, 95% CI:1.015-1.056, p<0.001) associated with worse PFS. The cumulative risk of local failure at 3-, 4- and 5-years in the dose-escalated vs. standard dose cohort were 16.9%, 23.8% and 31.8% vs. 39.6%, 45.6% and 53.9%, respectively, favoring dose-escalation (p = 0.016). MVA confirmed dose-escalation as predictive of a lower risk of LF (HR: 0.483, 95% CI: 0.263-0.887, p = 0.019), while ≥2 surgeries prior to RT predicted for greater LF rates (HR:2.145, 95% CI:1.220-3.771, p = 0.008). A trend was observed for prolonged CSS and OS in the dose escalation cohort (p = <0.1). Seven patients (5.9%) developed symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) with no significant difference between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Dose-escalated radiotherapy for high grade meningioma to at least 66 Gy is associated with significantly improved rates of local control and PFS with an acceptable risk of RN.

Predictors of Tumor Dynamics during a 6-Week Course of Chemoradiotherapy for Glioblastoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Our prior imaging studies have shown geometrically meaningful inter-fraction tumor dynamics specific to glioblastoma (GBM). We aim to identify predictors associated with tumor dynamics during a 6-week course of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for GBM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients enrolled in a prospective serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study were reviewed. All patients were treated with 54-60 Gy in 30 fractions. The gross tumor volume (GTV) included the surgical cavity and T1c enhanced residual tumor; clinical tumor volume (CTV) included GTV with a 15mm isotropic expansion, respecting anatomical boundaries; planning target volume (PTV) was 4mm expansion. MRIs were obtained at RT planning (F0), fraction 10 (F10), and fraction 20 (F20). Tumor dynamic metrics (relative to F0) assessed included the GTV volume (Vrel), Hausdorff distance (dH) and migration distance (dM). dH is the average distance between two datasets in metric space. dM is the maximum linear displacement of the GTV in any direction. Factors to be determined associated with tumor dynamics included: age, sex, corpus callosum (CC) involvement, extent of surgery (gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy alone (Bx)), MGMT methylation and IDH mutation status.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients were reviewed. Median GTV was 20.9cc at F0, 17.6cc at F10 (Vrel 0.85), and 16.1cc at F20 (Vrel 0.78). Patients without CC involvement had more marked GTV volume reduction: Vrel 0.82 vs 1.02 with CC involvement at F10 (P = 0.05), and Vrel 0.77 vs 0.88 with CC involvement at F20 (P = 0.03). Patients with GTR (vs STR vs Bx) had more marked GTV volume reduction across all time points: Vrel 0.78, 0.85 and 1.07 respectively at F10 (P = 0.001), and Vrel 0.69, 0.80, 1.04 respectively at F20 (P = 0.001). The median dH was 8.1mm at F10 and 9.2mm at F20. Patients with CC involvement (vs without CC involvement) had a larger dH: 54% vs 25% had dH>10mm respectively at F10 (P = 0.03), and 73% vs 28% had dH>10mm respectively at F20 (P<0.005). Patients with a GTR had smaller dH at both F10 (P = 0.02) and F20 (P = 0.006). At F20, 20%, 47% and 37% of patients with GTR, STR and Bx had dH>10mm (P = 0.04). The median dM were 4.7mm at F10 and 4.7mm at F20. Patients with CC involvement (vs without CC involvement) had larger dM: 41% vs 12% had dM >10mm respectively at F10 (P = 0.01), and 45% vs 9% had dM >10mm respectively at F20 (P<0.001). Patients with GTR had smaller dM at F10 (P = 0.03) and F20 (P0.002). At F20, 0%, 25% and 19% of patients with GTR, STR and Bx had dM>10mm (P = 0.002). Age, sex, MGMT methylation and IDH mutation status were not associated with Vrel, dH and dM at F10 and F20.

CONCLUSION

We identified CC involvement and extent of surgery to be associated with tumor dynamics at F10 and F20 over the course of CRT for GBM. This offers opportunities to better select patients who may benefit from earlier/ more frequent RT replan/ adaptation to ensure adequate tumor coverage, or to reduce RT toxicities.

A psychiatric primer for the functional neurosurgeon

There is increasing attention in the neurosurgical literature towards surgery, specifically deep brain stimulation (DBS), for psychiatric indications. Several positive trials have spurred intense investigation and research in this area, owing to rapid advances in the neurosciences. As a result, the scope of neurosurgical practice is evolving to now include disorders that weren't traditionally in the purview of the average functional neurosurgeon. Further, functional neurosurgeons are now being charged with taking care of patients as part of a multi-disciplinary group that includes psychologists and psychiatrists. As DBS for psychiatry continues to evolve, and as further indications are explored, it is incumbent on neurosurgeons who treat these disorders to familiarize themselves with current standards of diagnosis and treatment. Just as the movement disorder surgeon should be familiar with the biology, physiology, diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease, so they should become familiar with similar aspects of commonly referred psychiatric conditions. Specifically, much of the interest in the DBS literature currently surrounds major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette's syndrome. Here, we review the epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, hypothesized neurocircuitry and current treatments, both medical and surgical of each of these conditions to serve as a centralized, introductory primer for the practicing functional neurosurgeon.