[Natural cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer: Spontaneous ovulation or triggering by HCG].
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018;
46:466-473. [PMID:
29656071 DOI:
10.1016/j.gofs.2018.03.006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) outcomes in natural cycles according to ovulation induction: spontaneous versus recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (r-hCG) triggering.
METHODS
This retrospective study included all patients monitored for natural cycle FET during one year. When serial monitoring were performed until spontaneous LH rise, patients were included in group A (n=38) whereas those receiving r-hCG for ovulation triggering formed group B (n=43). All embryos had been cryopreserved by a vitrification method following a previous IVF cycle. No luteal phase support had been given. We compared outcomes between the 2 groups.
RESULTS
After checking groups comparability, we didn't find significant difference for the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth (31% vs 45%, 32% vs 51% et 21% vs 32%, respectively for group A and B). The number of monitoring was significantly lower in group B (1,9±0,8 versus 2,5±1, P=0,006).
DISCUSSION
Although no consensus has been yet established, natural cycle seems indicated for normo-ovulating patients but the question of ovulation induction is still debated. In our study, triggering ovulation by r-hCG, respecting strict criteria, seems provide good results while reducing both protocol's constraints and cost.
Collapse