Fully automated liquid culture system compared with Löwenstein-Jensen solid medium for rapid recovery of mycobacteria from clinical samples

The aim of this study was to compare the rate of recovery of mycobacteria and the time to detection in 5208 samples using the MB/BacT culture system (Organon Teknika, USA) and Löwenstein-Jensen medium. Mycobacteria were recovered from 301 (5.7%) samples. Two hundred fifty-seven (85.3%) isolates from 114 patients were Mycobacterium tuberculosis [135 (52.5%) smear-positive, 122 (47.4%) smear-negative], and 44 (14.6%) were potentially pathogenic environmental mycobacteria. The yield with the MB/BacT was higher than that with Löwenstein-Jensen [287 (95.3%) vs. 200 (66.4%), P<0.001] for both Mycobacterium tuberculosis [247 (96.1%) vs. 187 (72.7%), P<0.001] and potentially pathogenic environmental mycobacteria [40 (90.9%) vs. 13 (29.5%), P<0.001], mainly at the expense of the smear-negative samples. Moreover, 70 (27.2%) samples were positive only in the MB/BacT, whereas ten (3.8%) samples were positive only in Löwenstein-Jensen. The number of patients with tuberculosis detected by the MB/BacT was higher than that detected by Löwenstein-Jensen medium [111 (97.3%) vs. 89 (78%), P<0.001]. In 25 (21.9%) patients the diagnosis was established solely by means of the MB/BacT. In smear-positive and smear-negative samples, the mean times to detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were 16.7 and 26.3 days, respectively, with Löwenstein-Jensen and 11.5 and 19.3 days, respectively, with the MB/BacT. These results indicate that the MB/BacT is more efficient and faster than Löwenstein-Jensen for the recovery of mycobacteria.

Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with solid and liquid culture media for routine detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in nonrespiratory specimens

The aim of this study was to compare the results of a commercial assay based on the ligase chain reaction [(LCR) LCx Probe System MTB; Abbott, USA] with those of culture in liquid medium (Septi-Chek AFB; Becton-Dickinson, USA) and culture on the egg-based Löwenstein-Jensen solid medium for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in nonrespiratory specimens. The results were analyzed according to the standard definition of a true-positive result. Two hundred thirty-five nonrespiratory samples routinely submitted to rule out tuberculosis were analyzed. All samples were smear-negative. Mycobacterial growth in either culture medium was detected in 18 (7.6%) specimens: Mycobacterium tuberculosis was recovered from seven (38.9%) specimens cultured on Löwenstein-Jensen medium and from 18 (100%) specimens cultured in Septi-Chek AFB. The LCR protocol was positive in 22 specimens. None of the LCR-negative controls showed positive results. All samples positive by culture on Löwenstein-Jensen medium were positive by culture in liquid medium and by the LCR assay. However, Mycobacterium tuberculosis was detected by culture in liquid medium in two specimens that were negative by the LCR assay, whereas six specimens negative by culture in liquid medium were positive by the LCR protocol; three of these were identified as true-positive results of the LCR assay. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 33.3%, 100%, 100%, and 93.8%, respectively, for Löwenstein-Jensen medium; 85.7%, 100%, 100%, and 98.6% for the liquid medium; and 90.4%, 98.5%, 86.3%, and 99% for the LCR assay. These findings indicate that the LCR assay may be a valid method of high diagnostic yield for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in nonrespiratory specimens.