Phase I study of bortezomib and cetuximab in patients with solid tumours expressing epidermal growth factor receptor

Bortezomib inhibits nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). Cetuximab is a chimeric mouse-human antibody targeted against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We hypothesised that concomitant blockade of NF-kappaB and EGFR signalling would overcome EGFR-mediated resistance to single-agent bortezomib and induce apoptosis through two molecular pathways. The aim of this phase I trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for bortezomib plus cetuximab in patients with EGFR-expressing epithelial tumours. The 21-day treatment cycle consisted of bortezomib administered on days 1 and 8 through dose escalation (1.3-2 mg m(-2)). Cetuximab was delivered at a dose of 250 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 (400 mg m(-2) day 1 cycle 1). A total of 37 patients were enroled and given a total 91 cycles. No grade > or =3 haematological toxicity was noted. Non-hematological grade > or =3 toxicities included fatigue (22% of patients), dyspnoea (16%) and infection (11%). The MTD was not reached at the highest tested bortezomib dose (2.0 mg m(-2)). Efficacy outcomes included disease progression in 21 patients (56.7%) and stable disease (SD) at 6 weeks in 16 patients (43.3%). Five of the six patients with SD at 12 weeks were diagnosed with cancers of the lungs or head and neck. This combination therapy was moderately effective in extensively pretreated patients with non-small cell lung or head and neck cancers and warrants further investigation.

Benefit of postoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Postopertative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy recently became an established modality for patients with selected high-risk locally advanced head and neck cancers. The optimal treatment of unknown primary squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) continues to be controversial, since major randomized studies excluded those patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated during 1995 to 2002 for unknown primary SCCHN. All patients were treated with a neck dissection followed by concurrent high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) and bilateral neck radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were identified with nodal disease distribution of N1 (5%), N2a (22%), N2b (41%), N2c (8%), N3 (22%), and Nx (3%). Modified neck dissection was done on the majority (30/37 = 81%) of patients. With a median follow-up of 42 months among the survivors, very few patients had regional recurrence (5%) or distant failure (11%), and 89% of patients were alive. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rate could not be estimated because there were no deaths beyond 20 months after surgery. Substantial yet acceptable acute and late morbidities were demonstrated in this cohort of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy is of potential benefit to patients with unknown primary SCCHN by improving survival and reducing failures. This treatment warrants further prospective evaluation.

Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma with eosinophilia of the thyroid: a case report and review of the literature

We present the clinical and histopathologic findings of a 38-year-old woman recently diagnosed with sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma with eosinophilia of the thyroid (SMECE). This case is of particular interest because of its extremely aggressive clinical course. After total thyroidectomy, there was extensive bilateral thyroid lobe involvement with extension into perithyroidal soft tissues and the modified radical neck dissection contained 35 of 35 positive lymph nodes. This patient underwent 2 further surgeries; the first was a second right neck and supraclavicular surgery for lymph node metastases in which 8 of 11 were positive, followed a few months later by posterior neck surgery in which multiple lymph nodes were positive. Tumor was also documented by histological review from a right axillary lymph node. Imaging evidence of tumor in the lungs and liver was also present. Establishing the correct diagnosis of SMECE involves an awareness of the cyto- and histomorphologic features of this rare malignancy. As evidence that the biologic behavior of this neoplasm may well be more aggressive than previously considered, we briefly present the clinical and biologic course of this patient's neoplasm and a review of the literature.