The use of colchicine as an anti-inflammatory agent for stroke prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective is to evaluate the use of colchicine as an anti-inflammatory agent for stroke prevention in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

There has been a rising number of randomized controlled trials conducted in patients with coronary artery disease on the use of colchicine in reducing cardiovascular complications. Recent publications suggest colchicine reduces the risk of stroke and other cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of known trials in the current literature to characterize the clinical characteristics and outcomes of colchicine treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and SCOPUS using a suitable keyword search strategy from inception to 4 June 2021. All studies evaluating cardiovascular outcomes of colchicine treatment in patients with coronary artery disease were included.

RESULTS

The systemic review included 5 randomized controlled trials assessing a total of 11,790 patients. Majority of studies used a colchicine dosing regimen of 0.5 mg once daily, with the median follow-up duration ranging from 6 to 36 months. Meta-analytic estimates for stroke incidence highlighted a statistically significant benefit for patients that were administered colchicine compared to placebo (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81, p = 0.006), and a non-significant benefit for myocardial infarction. There was no significant association between colchicine treatment and the adverse effects of gastrointestinal symptoms and myopathy/myalgia.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of colchicine reduces the risk of stroke in patients with a history of coronary artery disease, without a significant increase in gastrointestinal and myopathy/myalgia adverse effects.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke patients with a history of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is labelled as a contraindication for the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) based on expert opinion. However, there is a paucity of data available regarding the benefits and risks of IV-tPA in this population. Recent small retrospective cohort studies reporting its off-label use suggest it may be beneficial. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on IV-tPA use in AIS patients with and without previous ICH. We searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library from inception to 20 April 2021. Outcomes measured included symptomatic ICH (sICH), 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and 3-month mortality. We included seven retrospective cohort studies comprising 5760 AIS patients who had received IV-tPA, of which 134 had previous ICH. There was no significant difference in the odds of sICH (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.78-3.15, p = 0.21) and 3-month mRS (mRS 0-1: OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37-1.65, p = 0.52; mRS 0-2: OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.36-3.15, p = 0.90) between patients with and without previous ICH. There was a trend towards higher 3-month mortality in patients with previous ICH (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.98-2.91, p = 0.06), although this did not reach statistical significance. The use of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH was not associated with an increased risk of sICH or disability at 3 months. Further larger studies are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA use in this population.