Gray LS, Strang NC, Winfield N, Gilmartin B, Winn B. The magnitude and distribution of open-loop accommodation using three different methods of opening the loop.
Optom Vis Sci 1998;
75:897-902. [PMID:
9875995 DOI:
10.1097/00006324-199812000-00012]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
The present study examines the magnitude, distribution, and relationship of open-loop accommodation obtained using the three most common methods of opening the accommodation loop.
METHODS
Open-loop accommodation was measured in 93 young, emmetropic subjects using a Canon R1 objective infrared optometer, and the accommodation loop was opened using the following methods: (1) dark empty field (DA), (2) bright empty field (BA), and (3) viewing a target through a small artificial pupil (PA).
RESULTS
PA was found to elicit significantly (p = 0.0001) higher values of open-loop accommodation than either DA or BA and demonstrated a much wider distribution of values than DA or BA. A further experiment demonstrated that the higher PA was attributable to the proximal effect of placing a small artificial pupil close to the eye.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that using a small artificial pupil to open the accommodation loop may not produce a veridical measure of open-loop accommodation.
Collapse