Nailfold Videocapillaroscopy as a Candidate Biomarker for Organ Involvement and Prognosis in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Background:

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, multisystemic connective tissue disease associated with significant morbidity. Early recognition of patients at risk for adverse prognosis may help towards optimized monitoring and treatment, thus improving disease outcome.

Objective:

To correlate nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) findings (‘early’, ‘active’, ‘late’ scleroderma patterns and non-specific capillary abnormalities) with major organ involvement and prognosis in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods:

Patients from the Scleroderma cohort followed at the Rheumatology clinic of the University Hospital of Heraklion will be included. The study will include a prospective and a retrospective part. Prospective part: All newly diagnosed patients will undergo NVC at baseline and subsequently every six months. We will review demographics, clinical features and autoantibodies status. Major organ involvement will be monitored (Pulmonary Function Test, DLCO, heart echocardiogram, chest XR, modified Rodnan skin score) at baseline and then every 6–12 months. Retrospective part: Existing SSc patients with available NVC data at diagnosis will be included. We will correlate the NVC findings at the time of diagnosis with disease outcomes such as major organ involvement, end stage organ failure, need for hospitalization, and death. We will also correlate longitudinal changes of the NVC patterns with treatment responses and outcomes.

The value of the 2011 ASAS classification criteria in patients with Spondyloarthritis and the prognosis of non-radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis: data from a large cohort of a tertiary referral hospital

Spondyloarthritides (SpA) are a group of interrelated rheumatic disorders that includes ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), arthritis related to inflammatory bowel disease and reactive arthritis. Since the latest classification criteria published from the ASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society), patients with these diagnoses can be classified either as having axial or peripheral SpA. In this study, these new criteria of ASAS will be applied to all patients with a clinical diagnosis of SpA that are followed in the Rheumatology Clinic of University Hospital of Heraklion. Furthermore, patients with non-radiographic axial SpA (nrAxSpA) will be monitored, both retrospectively and prospectively, for their long-term outcome in terms of imaging and clinical aspects (remission, disability, severe complications, eg, uveitis). This study is expected to give valuable information of the performance of these new criteria in daily clinical practice and of the prognosis of patients with non-radiographic axial SpA.

Rituximab for refractory eosinophilic fasciitis: a case series with long-term follow-up and literature review

KEY MESSAGE

RTX could be an effective and safe alternative treatment for refractory EF. Rituximab (RTX) is a successful therapeutic option for various autoimmune diseases. Our aim is to report our experience with RTX in eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) and review published data on its efficacy for the treatment of EF. We reviewed the medical charts of all patients with a diagnosis of EF treated with RTX from 2008 to 2020 in the Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology in the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece. We also reviewed the English literature for cases of EF treated with RTX. Demographics, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, prior treatments, response to RTX, cumulative RTX dose, duration of treatment and follow-up are reported. We report three cases of EF refractory to conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) that responded to RTX. Furthermore, literature review revealed five cases. In our case series in all patients, RTX was the first biologic. RTX could be effective in cases of (EF) refractory to standard immunosuppressive treatment.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients initiating rituximab with low number of previous bDMARDs failures may effectively reduce rituximab dose and experience fewer serious adverse events than patients on full dose: a 5-year cohort study

Background

Rituximab is used for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. In the present study, we examined the long-term flare risk and safety of reduced doses of rituximab.

Patients-methods

This was a prospective, observational, single-center study of patients starting rituximab on standard dose (SD). Patients were switched to low dose (LD) (1 g every 6 months), based on the treating rheumatologist’s decision after having achieved sustained clinical responses, while the rest of the patients continued on standard dose (SD). During a 60-month period, we assessed (Kaplan–Meier survival analysis) the relapse rate (increase ≥ 1.2 in DAS28-ESR for ≥ 6 months) and discontinuations due to treatment failure in the low dose group, and we compared the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) between LD and SD groups.

Results

Out of 361 patients [females 83.4%, mean age 61.9 (10.6) years, seropositive 50.3%, median total comorbidities count 4], 81 patients (22.4%) entered LD in a median time of 24 months (95% CI 18–30 months). Seropositivity (OR 1.823), more than 2 previous bDMARDs failures (OR 0.428), and DAS28 < 4.88 at 6 months (OR 2.329) predicted the odds of entering LD (p < 0.05 for all). During 60 months of follow-up, only 7.5% of patients on LD relapsed. Patients on LD had significantly less SAEs and all-cause hospitalizations as compared to the SD group (p < 0.05 for all). Linear regression analysis showed that previous hospitalization while on bDMARDs (p < 0.0001), use of prednisolone > 5 mg/day while on rituximab (p < 0.0001), and a history of ≥ 2 previous csDMARDs (p = 0.041) predicted the risk of SAEs.

Conclusion

In a cohort of patients with established RA and significant comorbidities who taper rituximab after substantial initial disease activity improvement, a low rate of relapses and lower risk of SAEs compared to SD were recorded. Seropositivity, a lower number of previous bDMARDs use, and lower DAS28 at 6 months predicted the probability of entering the LD regimen.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02826-6.

Comparative analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the classification criteria and correlation with prognosis of disease in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Background:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by significant clinical heterogeneity with early diagnosis being a major challenge, complicated by the absence of formal diagnostic criteria. Instead, classification criteria have been developed to enable the homogenous inclusion of patients in clinical trials, with the most commonly used those of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR 1997) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria (SLICC 2012). These criteria are widely used in clinical practice as diagnostic tools, although they fail to diagnose up to 20% of patients with SLE or may delay diagnosis. These restrictions have led to the recent (2018) introduction of new classification criteria jointly by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and ACR.

Aims of the Study:

We will compare the sensitivity and specificity of the earlier and new classification criteria after a systematic analysis (retrospective study) of a group of SLE patients. In addition, we will examine which set of criteria permits the earliest classification of the disease in a prospective cohort of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). The prognostic impact (permanent organ damage) of the classification of SLE patients with the three sets of criteria will also be examined.

Methods:

Data from the existing Cretan lupus registry will be used to retrospectively include consecutively registered patients aged ≥15 years diagnosed with SLE during 01/2005–12/2016 by an expert physician and followed-up for at least 6 months. All sets of criteria (ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, EULAR/ACR 2018) will be tested at the time of physician-based diagnosis and also at last follow-up. A prospective study arm will include cases with a diagnosis of UCTD and will be followed-up in the outpatient clinic for 3–5 years.

Anticipated Benefits:

This is the first study to include the application of the new criteria (EULAR/ACR 2018) to a group of SLE patients. Determining their diagnostic value in comparison to existing criteria or diagnosis by a specialist will provide important information both for the value of their application at the level of clinical studies and for their use in clinical practice as diagnostic criteria.

Pragmatic targets for moderate/severe SLE and their implications for clinical care and trial design: sustained DORIS or LLDAS for at least 6 months is sufficient while their attainment for at least 24 months ensures high specificity for damage-free progression

OBJECTIVES

Treatment targets in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated in unselected-in terms of severity-cohorts, which limits their generalisability. We assessed remission (Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS)) and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in a historical cohort of 348 patients with active moderate-to-severe disease and median follow-up of 5 years.

METHODS

Active SLE was defined as Physician Global Assessment ≥1.5 and/or SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 ≥6, requiring therapy intensification. DORIS/LLDAS, organ damage, flares and adverse events were monitored. Shared frailty survival, generalised linear models and K-means clustering were applied.

RESULTS

Sustained DORIS and LLDAS for ≥6 months occurred in 41.1% and 80.4%, respectively, and resulted in reduced damage accrual (HR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93 and 0.61; 0.43 to 0.86) and severe flares (HR: 0.14; 0.08 to 0.27 and 0.19; 0.13 to 0.27). LLDAS without DORIS was also protective (HR: 0.65; 0.43 to 0.98 for damage, 0.49; 0.36 to 0.67 for flares). Models fitting increasing duration of targets showed that DORIS ≥50% and LLDAS ≥60% of time, or alternatively, ≥24 and ≥36 months, achieved optimal balance between feasibility (20.2-41.7%) and specificity (73.3-86.1%) for damage-free outcome. These targets were linked to reduced serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR): 0.56-0.71), hospitalisation (RR: 0.70) and mortality (RR: 0.06-0.13). Patients with predominant arthritis and mucocutaneous disease experienced reduced DORIS/LLDAS, compared with counterparts with major organ involvement. Conventional drugs were more frequently used in the former group, whereas potent immunosuppressive/biological agents in the latter.

CONCLUSIONS

In moderate-to-severe SLE, sustained DORIS/LLDAS for at least 6 months is sufficient, while attainment for at least 24 months ensures higher specificity for damage-free progression, thus facilitating treat-to-target strategies and clinical trials. Arthritis and skin disease represent unmet therapeutic needs that could benefit from novel biologics.

Cost of Illness, Quality of Life, and Work Productivity in Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients Receiving Biological Treatments in Greece

Objectives

To estimate the cost of illness, quality of life and work productivity in patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis (Axial SpA) under biological treatment in Greece.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of 12-month duration, of patients with Axial SpA from a tertiary hospital in Greece. Adult patients fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria were enrolled at the beginning of biological treatment due to active disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) >4] and failure of first line treatment. All participants completed questionnaires about quality of life, financial costs and work productivity at the same time with the disease activity assessment.

Results

74 patients of whom 57 (77%) with a paid job, were included in the study. The total annual cost for Axial SpA patients is € 9,012.40 while the average cost of acquisition and administration of the drugs is € 8,364. The mean BASDAI in the 52 weeks of follow-up, was decreased from 5.74 to 3.2 and the mean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) also from 1.13 to 0.75. Work productivity of these patients as measured with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), was significantly impaired at the baseline and improved after the initiation of biological treatment.

Conclusions

The cost of illness in patients receiving biological treatments in Greece is high. However, these treatments except from the well-established positive effect on disease activity, can improve remarkably the work productivity and quality of life of Axial SpA patients.

Comorbidities Burden and Implementation of the Treat-to-Target Strategy in Predicting Real-World Patient Outcomes in Spondyloarthritides

New biologic and small molecule targeted agents have expanded the armamentarium of Spondyloarthritides (SpA), allowing more therapeutic options for patients who do not respond to therapy. The implementation of the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy with close monitoring and frequent treatment adaptations targeting disease remission has been proposed as the means to prevent radiographic progression and long-term adverse outcomes. In this project we will employ the "University of Crete Rheumatology Clinic Registry" to prospectively study in real-world practice musculoskeletal and extraarticular disease activity, patient function, comorbidities, sociodemographics, imaging, compliance to therapy and other lifestyle factors in axial and peripheral SpA patients. The predictive value of these variables in long-term (2years) outcomes will be evaluated. We will also assess the implementation of the T2T approach as well as its impact on long-term patients' outcomes (quality of life, productivity, adverse events). The successful completion of this study could pave the way for improved and personalized therapy in patients with SpA.

Patterns of comorbidities differentially affect long-term functional evolution and disease activity in patients with 'difficult to treat' rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Characterisation of the long-term outcome of patients with 'difficult to treat' (D2T) rheumatoid arthritis and factors contributing to its evolution are unknown. Herein, we explored the heterogeneity and contributing factors of D2T long-term outcome.

METHODS

Patients included from a prospective single centre cohort study. The EULAR definition of D2T was applied. Longitudinal clustering of functional status (modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ)) and disease activity (Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28)) were assessed using latent-class trajectory analysis. Multiple linear mixed models were used to examine the impact of comorbidities and their clusters on the long-term outcome.

RESULTS

251 out of 1264 patients (19.9%) were identified as D2T. Younger age, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at first biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/ts-DMARD) initiation and failure to reduce DAS28-ESR scores within the first 6 months of b/ts-DMARD therapy were significant predictors of patients becoming D2T. Long-term follow-up (total of 5872 person-years) revealed four groups of functional status evolution: 18.2% had stable, mildly compromised mHAQ (mean 0.41), 39.9% had gradual improvement (1.21-0.87) and two groups had either slow deterioration or stable significant functional impairment (HAQ>1). Similarly, four distinct groups of disease activity evolution were identified. Among the different clusters of comorbidities assessed, presence of 'mental-health and pain-related illnesses' or 'metabolic diseases' had significant contribution to mHAQ worsening (p<0.0001 for both) and DAS28 evolution (p<0.0001 and p=0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

D2T patients represent a heterogeneous group in terms of long-term disease course. Mental-health/pain-related illnesses as well as metabolic diseases contribute to long-term adverse outcomes and should be targeted in order to optimise the prognosis of this subset of rheumatoid arthritis.

Combination of clinical factors predicts successful glucocorticoid withdrawal in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): results from a multicentre, retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Glucocorticoid (GC) tapering and withdrawal to reduce damage represents a key aspect of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) SLE recommendations. However, optimal strategies for relapse-free GC cessation remain ill-defined. We characterised clinical predictors and their combined effect on flares in patients with SLE who discontinued GC.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of 324 patients with active SLE (PGA ≥1.5 and/or SLEDAI-2K ≥6) who received GC as part of treatment intensification (median follow-up 60 months). Survival and generalised linear models estimated SELENA-SLEDAI flare risks and their predictors.

RESULTS

GCs were discontinued in 220 (67.9%) patients with 1-year risks for overall and severe flares of 50% and 25%, respectively (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.96 for overall flares; HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.25 for severe flares, compared with non-withdrawers). Flare risk was lowered when GCs were ceased during remission (DORIS) or Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS; excluding remission) (HR for severe flares: 0.23; 0.12 to 0.43 and 0.30; 0.18 to 0.50, respectively), with each additional month in targets providing further protection. Hydroxychloroquine prevented total (HR: 0.37; 0.26 to 0.53) and severe flares (HR: 0.33; 0.21 to 0.52), while mycophenolate and azathioprine reduced overall flares. Prednisone tapering from 7.5 mg/day to 0 over >6 months improved severe flare-free outcome (HR: 0.57; 0.37 to 0.90). Random survival forests identified DORIS/LLDAS, hydroxychloroquine use and slow GC tapering as top predictors, whose coexistence reduced overall and severe flares by ~25 fold and ~50 fold, respectively. This combination reduced damage (IRR: 0.31; 0.08 to 0.84) without inducing flares (IRR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.16) compared with GC non-withdrawers.

CONCLUSION

Low or absent disease activity, slow tapering and hydroxychloroquine use minimise the risk of flares, facilitating GC discontinuation-a major goal in SLE.

Performance of Lung Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Subclinical Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The screening strategy for interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is currently debated. Although high-resolution CT (HRCT) imaging is the gold standard for diagnosing ILD, its systematic use as a screening tool is not yet recommended. The role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in assessing ILD has been previously explored.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the performance of LUS for ILD diagnosis in asymptomatic patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study involving 203 asymptomatic patients with rheumatoid arthritis from outpatient clinics in Argentina, Greece, France, and Mexico. Participants underwent clinical evaluations, pulmonary function tests, and LUS. An HRCT scan was performed on each patient within 30 days of the LUS. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for LUS and pulmonary function tests.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 26% were diagnosed with ILD. The median age was 63 years (52-89 years), and 161 (79.3%) patients were female. The median duration from rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis to inclusion was 7 years (range, 2-16 years). LUS exhibited a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI, 70.2%-91.9%) and a specificity of 81.2% (95% CI, 74.2%-87.2%), with a negative predictive value of 93.1% (95% CI, 87.4%-96.8%) and a positive predictive value of 61.1% (95% CI, 58.9%-72.4%). LUS outperformed pulmonary function tests, underscoring its potential as a primary screening tool.

INTERPRETATION

LUS is a promising tool for ILD screening in asymptomatic patients with rheumatoid arthritis, offering high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Its incorporation into routine clinical practice could optimize ILD screening strategies and enhance patient outcomes through early detection and intervention.

Liver safety of non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatic patients with past hepatitis B virus infection: an observational, controlled, long-term study

OBJECTIVES

The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation with non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (non-TNFi) biologic agents in patients with rheumatic diseases and past HBV infection has not been definively elucidated. We assessed the comparative safety of non-TNFi and TNFi biologic agents in such patients in real-life clinical settings.

METGODS

We carried out a retrospective cohort study from the Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Heraklion. Patients who received abatacept (ABA), tocilizumab (TCZ) or rituximab (RTX) during the period 2003-2016 and were HbsAg(-), anti-HBc(+), anti-HBs(±) at baseline, were monitored for HBV reactivation. Patients treated with TNFi agents during the same period were used as a control group.

RESULTS

101 cases of non-TNFi (39 ABA, 32 RTX and 30 TCZ) and 111 cases of TNFi treatment were identified. In non-TNFi, 76 cases (75.2%) were anti-HBc(+)/anti-HBs(+) and 25 (24.8%) were anti-HBc(+)/anti-HBs(-), as compared to 82 (73.9%) and 29 (26.1%) in TNFi-treated, respectively. After a median (IQR) observation of 24.0 (34.7) months, two cases (2.0%) of HBV reactivation were identified in the non-TNFi group; one with ABA, successfully treated with entecavir, and one fatal case with RTX and prior exposure to cyclophosphamide. No reactivation was observed in the TNFi group (p=0.226 vs. non-TNFi). Αnti-HBs titres were significantly reduced compared to baseline in the non-TNFi group [median (IQR) 203.9 (954.7) mIU/ml before treatment versus 144.9 (962.9) mIU/ml after treatment, p=0.03].

CONCLUSIONS

Two cases of HBV reactivation highlight the risk for this complication in patients with past HBV infection under biologic therapy.

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Consequence of Patient-Intrinsic or -Extrinsic Factors?

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a severe demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) caused by reactivation of the polyomavirus JC (JCV) typically in immunocompromised individuals. The risk of PML among rheumatic diseases may be higher for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), without, however, a clear association with the type and intensity of background therapy. We present the development and outcome of PML in a 32-year-old female lupus patient under mild immunosuppressive treatment, yet with marked B-cell lymphopenia in the peripheral blood and bone marrow (<1% of total lymphocytes). Despite treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, the patient showed progressive neurological and brain imaging deterioration and eventually died 15 months after PML diagnosis. To unveil possible underlying genetic liabilities, whole exome sequencing was performed which identified deleterious variants in GATA2 and CDH7 genes, which both have been linked to defective T- and/or B-lymphocyte production. These findings reiterate the possible role of disease-/patient-intrinsic factors, rather than that of drug-induced immunosuppression, in driving immune dysregulation and susceptibility to PML in certain patients with SLE.

Bilateral Recurrent Uveitis in a Young Patient with Family History of Spondyloarthritis: Spondyloarthritis or Not?

We present the case of a young man with a strong family history of SpA, who was referred to the Rheumatology Clinic due to bilateral uveitis refractory to treatment with corticosteroids. The patient’s renal function gradually deteriorated and a subsequent biopsy was positive for interstitial nephritis. After excluding all other systemic diseases, the diagnosis of TINU syndrome was confirmed. Although rare, TINU syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis of non-infective uveitis especially in the presence of urinalysis abnormalities.

Distinct long-term disease activity trajectories differentiate early on treatment with etanercept in both rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthritis patients: a prospective cohort study

To characterize disease activity trajectories and compare long-term drug retention between rheumatoid (RA) and spondylarthritis (SpA) patients initiating tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment (etanercept). Prospective observational study of RA, axial (AxSpA) and peripheral SpA (PerSpA) patients initiating etanercept during 2004-2020. Kaplan-Meier plots were used for drug retention comparisons and multivariable Cox regression models for predictors of discontinuation. Long-term disease activity trajectories were identified by latent class growth models using DAS28-ESR or ASDAS-CRP as outcome for RA and AxSpA respectively. We assessed 711 patients (450 RA, 178 AxSpA and 83 PerSpA) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 12 (5-32) months. At 5 years, 22%, 30% and 21% of RA, AxSpA and PerSpA patients, respectively, remained on therapy. Etanercept discontinuation was independent of the diagnosis and was predicted by gender and obesity in both RA and SpA groups. Four disease activity (DA) trajectories were identified from 6th month of treatment in both RA and AxSpA. RA patients in remission-low DA groups (33.7%) were younger, had shorter disease duration, fewer comorbidities and lower baseline disease activity compared to moderate (40.6%) & high DA (25.7%) groups. In AxSpA 74% were in inactive-low DA and they were more often males, non-obese and had lower number of comorbidities compared to higher ASDAS-CRP trajectories. In RA and AxSpA patients, disease activity trajectories revealed heterogeneity of TNFi treatment responses and prognosis. Male gender, lower baseline disease activity and fewer comorbidities, characterize a favourable outcome in terms of disease burden accrual and TNFi survival.

A Peripheral Blood Signature of Increased Th1 and Myeloid Cells Combined with Serum Inflammatory Mediators Is Associated with Response to Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig)-a monoclonal antibody which restricts T cell activation-is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, only 50% of RA patients attain clinical responses, while predictors of response are rather limited. Herein, we aimed to investigate for early biomarkers of response to abatacept, based on a detailed immunological profiling of peripheral blood (PB) cells and serum proteins. We applied flow cytometry and proteomics analysis on PB immune cells and serum respectively, of RA patients starting abatacept as the first biologic agent. After 6 months of treatment, 34.5% of patients attained response. At baseline, Th1 and FoxP3+ T cell populations were positively correlated with tender joint counts (p-value = 0.047 and p-value = 0.022, respectively). Upon treatment, CTLA4-Ig effectively reduced the percentages of Th1 and Th17 only in responders (p-value = 0.0277 and p-value = 0.0042, respectively). Notably, baseline levels of Th1 and myeloid cell populations were significantly increased in PB of responders compared to non-responders (p-value = 0.009 and p-value = 0.03, respectively). Proteomics analysis revealed that several inflammatory mediators were present in serum of responders before therapy initiation and strikingly 10 amongst 303 serum proteins were associated with clinical responses. Finally, a composite index based on selected baseline cellular and proteomics' analysis could predict response to abatacept with a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88.24%).