Can the UK 'Netflix' Payment Model Boost the Antibacterial Pipeline?

The silent pandemic of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue needing prompt attention. A comprehensive one-health approach across human and animal health, agriculture and the environment is needed to solve this, addressing overuse of antibacterials, and of course, optimising measures for preventing and controlling infection. We also need a robust pipeline of new antibacterials. However, the current pipeline is inadequate and several companies with new antibacterials have gone bankrupt due to low sales, leading to a 'broken market'. To address this, the UK has completed a project using novel approaches to value assessment and reimbursement for two antibacterials. The new funding arrangements for these products commenced on 1st July 2022, delinking reimbursement from volume of sales; a so-called 'pull incentive', with payments based on the added value to the whole-health and social-care system, not just to individual patients. This article describes how the project was devised, developed, and progressed. The learning from this work might help other countries to adopt or adapt the approach to fit with their national systems, and collectively achieve a global incentive to reinvigorate the antibacterial pipeline.

Outcome-based reimbursement in Central-Eastern Europe and Middle-East

Outcome-based reimbursement models can effectively reduce the financial risk to health care payers in cases when there is important uncertainty or heterogeneity regarding the clinical value of health technologies. Still, health care payers in lower income countries rely mainly on financial based agreements to manage uncertainties associated with new therapies. We performed a survey, an exploratory literature review and an iterative brainstorming in parallel about potential barriers and solutions to outcome-based agreements in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and in the Middle East (ME). A draft list of recommendations deriving from these steps was validated in a follow-up workshop with payer experts from these regions. 20 different barriers were identified in five groups, including transaction costs and administrative burden, measurement issues, information technology and data infrastructure, governance, and perverse policy outcomes. Though implementing outcome-based reimbursement models is challenging, especially in lower income countries, those challenges can be mitigated by conducting pilot agreements and preparing for predictable barriers. Our guidance paper provides an initial step in this process. The generalizability of our recommendations can be improved by monitoring experiences from pilot reimbursement models in CEE and ME countries and continuing the multistakeholder dialogue at national levels.

Recognizing that Evidence is Made, not Born

Therapeutic product development, licensing and reimbursement may seem a well-oiled machine, but continuing high attrition rates, regulatory refusals, and patients' access issues suggest otherwise; despite serious efforts, gaps persist between stakeholders' stated evidence requirements and actual evidence supplied. Evidentiary deficiencies and/or human tendencies resulting in avoidable inefficiencies might be further reduced with fresh institutional cultures/mindsets, combined with a context-adaptable practices framework that integrates emerging innovations. Here, Structured Evidence Planning, Production, and Evaluation (SEPPE) posits that evidence be treated as something produced, much like other manufactured goods, for which "built-in quality" (i.e., "people" and "process") approaches have been successfully implemented globally. Incorporating proactive, iterative feedback-and-adjust loops involving key decision-makers at critical points could curtail avoidable evidence quality and decision hazards-pulling needed therapeutic products with high quality evidence of beneficial performance through to approvals. Critical for success, however, is dedicated, long-term commitment to systemic transformation.

The Health Technology Assessment of companion diagnostics: experience of NICE

Companion diagnostics are used to aid clinical decision making to identify patients who are most likely to respond to treatment. They are becoming increasingly important as more new pharmaceuticals receive licensed indications that require the use of a companion diagnostic to identify the appropriate patient subgroup for treatment. These pharmaceuticals have proven benefit in the treatment of some cancers and other diseases, and also have potential to precisely tailor treatments to the individual in the future. However, the increasing use of companion diagnostics could place a substantial burden on health system resources to provide potentially high volumes of testing. This situation, in part, has led policy makers and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies to review the policies and methods used to make reimbursement decisions for pharmaceuticals requiring companion diagnostics. The assessment of a pharmaceutical alongside the companion diagnostic used in the clinical trials may be relatively straightforward, although there are a number of challenges associated with assessing pharmaceuticals where a range of alternative companion diagnostics are available for use in routine clinical practice. The UK HTA body, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), has developed policy for considering companion diagnostics using its Technology Appraisal and Diagnostics Assessment Programs. Some HTA bodies in other countries have also adapted their policies and methods to accommodate the assessment of companion diagnostics. Here, we provide insight into the HTA of companion diagnostics for reimbursement decisions and how the associated challenges are being addressed, in particular by NICE. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, "The Precision Medicine Conundrum: Approaches to Companion Diagnostic Co-development."

Chromatographic approaches to the quality control of chiral propionate anti-inflammatory drugs and herbicides

The chiral analysis of a range of propionate anti-inflammatory drugs and herbicides was accomplished by gas chromatographic separation of their R-alpha-phenylethylamide diastereomeric derivatives. Using a packed column (3% OV-l on Chromosorb G) good separations were obtained but analysis times were rather long. Examination of the same crystalline derivatives using a capillary column (bonded methylsilicone) resulted in good separations together with much reduced total analysis times. The technique was validated through the analysis of several derivatives prepared on a micro scale and examined directly by gas chromatography without any crystallisation step. Racemic materials all gave virtually 50:50 response ratios while the analysis of optically pure samples produced no evidence of significant racemization. Derivatives of phenoxyacetic acid and myristic acid were also prepared and chromatographed as potential internal standards.

Chiral high-performance liquid chromatographic studies of 2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)propanoic acid

The direct enantiomeric resolution of the racemic herbicide 2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)propanoic acid (CMPP) was demonstrated on an Enantiopac (alpha 1-acid glycoprotein) chiral high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) column. The HPLC separation of various amide derivatives of CMPP on a chiral "Ionic Pirkle" column comprising of N-(3,5-dinitrobenzoyl) (R)-(-)phenylglycine as chiral ligand, was also accomplished. These amides and racemic ibuprofen, however could not be separated on the Enantiopac system. The performance, stability and cost of the two systems were compared. Using optically pure CMPP enantiomers the elution order was determined and shown to reverse between the two systems. It was also shown that negligible racemisation occurred during derivatization.