Haematuria increases progression of advanced proteinuric kidney disease

Background

Haematuria has been traditionally considered as a benign hallmark of some glomerular diseases; however new studies show that haematuria may decrease renal function.

Objective

To determine the influence of haematuria on the rate of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in 71 proteinuric patients with advanced CKD (baseline eGFR <30 mL/min) during 12 months of follow-up.

Results

The mean rate of decline in eGFR was higher in patients with both haematuria and proteinuria (haemoproteinuria, HP, n=31) than in patients with proteinuria alone (P patients, n=40) (-3.8±8.9 vs 0.9±9.5 mL/min/1.73m2/year, p<0.05, respectively). The deleterious effect of haematuria on rate of decline in eGFR was observed in patients <65 years (-6.8±9.9 (HP) vs. 0.1±11.7 (P) mL/min/1.73m2/year, p<0.05), but not in patients >65 years (-1.2±6.8 (HP) vs. 1.5±7.7 (P) mL/min/1.73m2/year). Furthermore, the harmful effect of haematuria on eGFR slope was found patients with proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h (-5.8±6.4 (HP) vs. -1.37± 7.9 (P) mL/min/1.73m2/year, p<0.05), whereas no significant differences were found in patients with proteinuria < 0.5 g/24 h (-0.62±7.4 (HP) vs. 3.4±11.1 (P) mL/min/1.73m2/year). Multivariate analysis reported that presence of haematuria was significantly and independently associated with eGFR deterioration after adjusting for traditional risk factors, including age, serum phosphate, mean proteinuria and mean serum PTH (β=-4.316, p=0.025).

Conclusions

The presence of haematuria is closely associated with a faster decrease in renal function in advanced proteinuric CKD patients, especially in younger CKD patients with high proteinuria levels; therefore this high risk subgroup of patients would benefit of intensive medical surveillance and treatment.

A Spanish multicentric study to evaluate the clinical activity of nephrology fellows during in-hospital on-call shifts

BACKGROUND

Nephrologists develop their work in diverse scenarios. A training programme must qualify trainees to assist different kinds of problems. The aim of this study was to characterize patients and pathologies that Spanish nephrology fellows face while on-call.

METHODS

This is a descriptive study with clinical and demographic data gathered with a form by 10 nephrology fellows of five university hospitals of Madrid (Spain), throughout their in-hospital 24 h on-call shifts in February and March 2013.

RESULTS

We collected 409 episodes over 338 patients, through 72 shifts. Among these, 16.7% had previous normal renal function, 24.6% chronic kidney disease, 39.5% were on dialysis and 18.2% had a kidney transplant. Most of the consults came from the emergency room (35.9%) or the previous on-call team (13.7%). Afterwards, the most usual destiny was admittance to a nephrology department (32.8%) or discharge (20.5%). The most frequent reason for consulting was a decline in renal function (31.6%) and the second motive an infection. Thirty-four episodes (8.3%) were related to dialysis access problems. Medical treatment was prescribed in 79.2% of the cases, primarily fluids (47.2%) and antibiotics (42.2%). The fellow had to place a central venous catheter in 24 cases (5.9%). Renal replacement therapy was prescribed in 19.8% of the episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific renal reasons for consulting nephrologists are common, such as acute kidney injury or dialysis access complications. These patients benefit from a specialized approach to their problems. Clinical activities during in-hospital out-of-hours shifts are a priceless tool as part of the training programme of nephrology fellows.