1
|
Stuart CM, Bronsert MR, Meguid RA, Mott NM, Abrams BA, Dyas AR, Gleisner AL, Colborn KL, Henderson WG. The deimplementation of laboratory testing in low-risk patients as recommended by the American society of anesthesiologists: An ACS-NSQIP longitudinal analysis. World J Surg 2024; 48:1014-1024. [PMID: 38549187 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2012, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) published guidelines recommending against routine preoperative laboratory testing for low-risk patients to reduce unnecessary medical expenditures. The aim of this study was to assess the change in routine preoperative laboratory testing in low-risk versus higher-risk patients before and after release of these guidelines. METHODS The ACS-NSQIP database, 2005-2018, was separated into low-risk versus higher-risk patients based upon a previously published stratification. The guideline implementation date was defined as January 2013. Changes in preoperative laboratory testing over time were compared between low- and higher-risk patients. A difference-in-differences model was applied. The primary outcome included any laboratory test obtained ≤90 days prior to surgery. RESULTS Of 7,507,991 patients, 972,431 (13.0%) were defined as low-risk and 6,535,560 (87.0%) higher-risk. Use of any preoperative laboratory test declined in low-risk patients from 66.5% before to 59.6% after guidelines, a 6.9 percentage point reduction, versus 93.0%-91.9% in higher-risk patients, a 1.1 percentage point reduction (p < 0.0001, comparing percentage point reductions). After risk-adjustment, the adjusted odds ratio for having any preoperative laboratory test after versus before the guidelines was 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78) in low-risk versus 0.93 (0.92-0.94) in higher-risk patients. In low-risk patients, lack of any preoperative testing was not associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS While a majority of low-risk patients continue to receive preoperative laboratory testing not recommended by the ASA, there has been a decline after implementation of guidelines. Continued effort should be directed at the deimplementation of routine preoperative laboratory testing for low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Stuart
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael R Bronsert
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert A Meguid
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Benjamin A Abrams
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Adam R Dyas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ana L Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kathryn L Colborn
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - William G Henderson
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stuart CM, Mott NM, Dyas AR, Byers S, Gergen AK, Mungo B, Stewart CL, McCarter MD, Randhawa SK, David EA, Mitchell JD, Meguid RA. ASO Visual Abstract: The Effect of Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Before Esophagectomy on Anastomotic Stricture Rate Compared with Esophagectomy-Alone Control. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15189-w. [PMID: 38498088 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15189-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Stuart
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adam R Dyas
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sara Byers
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anna K Gergen
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Benedetto Mungo
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Martin D McCarter
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Simran K Randhawa
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth A David
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John D Mitchell
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert A Meguid
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stuart CM, Mott NM, Dyas AR, Byers S, Gergen AK, Mungo B, Stewart CL, McCarter MD, Randhawa SK, David EA, Mitchell JD, Meguid RA. The Effect of Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Esophagectomy on Anastomotic Stricture Rate and Comparison with Esophagectomy-Alone Controls. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15096-0. [PMID: 38413507 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15096-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benign anastomotic stricture is a recognized complication following esophagectomy. Laparoscopic gastric ischemic preconditioning (LGIP) prior to esophagectomy has been associated with decreased anastomotic leak rates; however, its effect on stricture and the need for subsequent endoscopic intervention is not well studied. METHODS This was a case-control study at an academic medical center using consecutive patients undergoing oncologic esophagectomies (July 2012-July 2022). Our institution initiated an LGIP protocol on 1 January 2021. The primary outcome was the occurrence of stricture within 1 year of esophagectomy, while secondary outcomes were stricture severity and frequency of interventions within the 6 months following stricture. Bivariable comparisons were performed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable regression controlling for confounders was performed to generate risk-adjust odds ratios and to identify the independent effect of LGIP. RESULTS Of 253 esophagectomies, 42 (16.6%) underwent LGIP prior to esophagectomy. There were 45 (17.7%) anastomotic strictures requiring endoscopic intervention, including three patients who underwent LGIP and 42 who did not. Median time to stricture was 144 days. Those who underwent LGIP were significantly less likely to develop anastomotic stricture (7.1% vs. 19.9%; p = 0.048). After controlling for confounders, this difference was no longer significant (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.82; p = 0.29). Of those who developed stricture, there was a trend toward less severe strictures and decreased need for endoscopic dilation in the LGIP group (all p < 0.20). CONCLUSION LGIP may reduce the rate and severity of symptomatic anastomotic stricture following esophagectomy. A multi-institutional trial evaluating the effect of LGIP on stricture and other anastomotic complications is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Stuart
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adam R Dyas
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sara Byers
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anna K Gergen
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Benedetto Mungo
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Martin D McCarter
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Simran K Randhawa
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth A David
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John D Mitchell
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert A Meguid
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mott NM, Ryder CY, Snyderman CH, McKean EL. Survey of Skull Base Surgeons' Approach to Carcinomas Involving the Cavernous Sinus. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85:38-43. [PMID: 38274486 PMCID: PMC10807955 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Carcinomas involving the cavernous sinus are challenging to resect without compromising important neurovascular structures. Given the morbidity and mortality of these operations, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy are more often utilized. Although limited to case reports and small series, radical resection of the cavernous sinus has been proposed. We aimed to study surgeons' willingness to perform cavernous sinus exenteration (CSE) under different clinical scenarios. Design, Setting, Participants, Main Outcome Measures We conducted an online survey from April to July 2021 among members of the Skull Base Congress and the North American Skull Base Society. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the main outcome measure of willingness to perform CSE . Results The analytic sample ( n = 112) included 54% otolaryngologists and 43% neurosurgeons. Eighty-six percent practiced in an academic setting. Surgeons' willingness to perform CSE was low (6-16% under different clinical scenarios), citing a belief that they could not obtain oncologic margins and the procedure's morbidity. Forty-five percent had at least one patient undergo CSE with 72% of patients surviving no more than 2 years. Complications included chronic intractable pain, cerebrospinal fluid leak, cerebrovascular accident, and/or intraoperative/postoperative death within 30 days. Sixty percent agreed that the availability of immunotherapy and genomic sequencing has affected their willingness to offer CSE. Conclusion Overall, most of the surgeons surveyed were unwilling to offer CSE for carcinomatous cavernous sinus invasion, whether for primary disease or recurrence. Given the rarity of these tumors and the limited data on CSE, these results may provide more information for clinicians and patients for these treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M. Mott
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - C. Yoonhee Ryder
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Carl H. Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Erin L. McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mott NM, Huynh V, Vemuru S, Parris HJ, Colborn K, Ahrendt G, Christian N, Kim S, Matlock DD, Cumbler E, Tevis SEA. Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework. Am J Surg 2024; 228:180-184. [PMID: 37741803 PMCID: PMC11044988 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic. METHODS We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively. RESULTS Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Victoria Huynh
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sudheer Vemuru
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hannah J Parris
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn Colborn
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gretchen Ahrendt
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole Christian
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Simon Kim
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Ethan Cumbler
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sarah E A Tevis
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ryder CY, Mott NM, Gross CL, Anidi C, Shigut L, Bidwell SS, Kim E, Zhao Y, Ngam BN, Snell MJ, Yu BJ, Forczmanski P, Rooney DM, Jeffcoach DR, Kim GJ. Using Artificial Intelligence to Gauge Competency on a Novel Laparoscopic Training System. J Surg Educ 2024; 81:267-274. [PMID: 38160118 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Laparoscopic surgical skill assessment and machine learning are often inaccessible to low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC). Our team developed a low-cost laparoscopic training system to teach and assess psychomotor skills required in laparoscopic salpingostomy in LMICs. We performed video review using AI to assess global surgical techniques. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of artificial intelligence (AI) generated scoring measures of laparoscopic simulation videos by comparing the accuracy of AI results to human-generated scores. DESIGN Seventy-four surgical simulation videos were collected and graded by human participants using a modified OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills). The videos were then analyzed via AI using 3 different time and distance-based calculations of the laparoscopic instruments including path length, dimensionless jerk, and standard deviation of tool position. Predicted scores were generated using 5-fold cross validation and K-Nearest-Neighbors to train classifiers. SETTING Surgical novices and experts from a variety of hospitals in Ethiopia, Cameroon, Kenya, and the United States contributed 74 laparoscopic salpingostomy simulation videos. RESULTS Complete accuracy of AI compared to human assessment ranged from 65-77%. There were no statistical differences in rank mean scores for 3 domains, Flow of Operation, Respect for Tissue, and Economy of Motion, while there were significant differences in ratings for Instrument Handling, Overall Performance, and the total summed score of all 5 domains (Summed). Estimated effect sizes were all less than 0.11, indicating very small practical effect. Estimated intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of Summed was 0.72 indicating moderate correlation between AI and Human scores. CONCLUSIONS Video review using AI technology of global characteristics was similar to that of human review in our laparoscopic training system. Machine learning may help fill an educational gap in LMICs where direct apprenticeship may not be feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Chioma Anidi
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Leul Shigut
- Department of Surgery, Soddo Christian General Hospital, Soddo, Ethiopia
| | | | - Erin Kim
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yimeng Zhao
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Mark J Snell
- Department of Surgery, Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Mbingo, Cameroon
| | - B Joon Yu
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Pawel Forczmanski
- Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Deborah M Rooney
- Department of Learning Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David R Jeffcoach
- Department of Surgery, Community Regional Medical Center, Fresno, California
| | - Grace J Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bach K, Ansari P, Ansari H, Mott NM, Elfenbein DM, Underwood H, Pitt SC. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review Examining the Extent of Thyroidectomy. Thyroid 2024; 34:14-25. [PMID: 37861284 PMCID: PMC10818048 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2023.0328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Background: Total thyroidectomy (TT) and hemithyroidectomy (HT) are acceptable surgical options for the treatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). While previous data suggest similar disease-free and disease-specific survival regardless of initial surgical treatment, the effect of the extent of surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is less clear. This systematic review aimed to examine HRQOL in low-risk DTC survivors after TT compared with HT. Methods: A search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify studies published between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, that assessed HRQOL predominantly in patients with low-risk DTC who underwent open thyroid surgery. Covidence™ software was used to apply the inclusion criteria, and a validated instrument was used to assess study quality. Results: Sixteen of the 1402 identified studies were included: 5 prospective and 11 retrospective cohort studies. The majority of included studies were of good quality (n = 14) and were from Asia and the Middle East (n = 11). Overall, six studies concluded that HT led to a better HRQOL than TT, two concluded that HT only resulted in better HRQOL compared with TT with central neck dissection (CND), and two concluded HT resulted in better short-term HRQOL that dissipated by 6 months postoperatively. The HRQOL domains found across all studies to be most consistently improved after HT included physical health, psychological/emotional, and social function. Factors found to be associated with HRQOL in more than one study included age, stage, and marital status. Conclusion: Differences in HRQOL after HT and TT tended to favor HT particularly when measured <6 months after surgery or when compared with TT with CND. Additional prospective and ideally randomized data are needed to fully determine the impact of the extent of surgery on HRQOL in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Bach
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Palvishey Ansari
- CMH-Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | - Nicole M. Mott
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Dawn M. Elfenbein
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Hunter Underwood
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Susan C. Pitt
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Raven SA, Mott NM, Ibrahim NI, Cole CA, Munzer TG, Handelsman J, Vereb AF, Hashikawa AN, Bohm LA. Hearing Loss in Children: Critical Medical Education Delivered as Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2023; 8:1003-1010. [PMID: 38721311 PMCID: PMC11075641 DOI: 10.1044/2023_persp-23-00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Although early identification of pediatric hearing loss is crucial, a formal online training course has not been freely accessible to a global audience. In response, we created a novel course for health professionals worldwide. Method Course development occurred from February 2019 to May 2020. Seventeen multidisciplinary experts provided video lectures and demonstrations, including a tour of ear anatomy, operating footage of cochlear implant insertion, and demonstrations of children undergoing hearing testing. Content also included steps for interpreting audiograms, an overview of early screening programs, interviews with Deaf/Hard of Hearing children, and an introduction to public health/educational infrastructure. The course was hosted on Coursera and launched on May 4, 2020. Results The course was approved for 11.5 Continuing Medical Education (CME) and American Board of Pediatrics Maintenance of Certification (MOC)-Part 2 credits and spanned five modules comprised of 50 video learning segments: 1) Ear Anatomy, 2) Hearing Loss and Assessments, 3) Hearing Loss Diagnosis and Impact on Speech and Language Development, 4) Interventions for Hearing Loss, 5) Pediatric Vestibular System and Balance. Since its launch, 6,556 learners have enrolled and 1,540 have fully completed the course; Fifty percent were 25-34 years old, 62% were female, and 43% were from Asia. Average rating was 4.9/5 (n=180 reviews). Conclusions We created a freely accessible course for a global audience that provides a broad overview of pediatric hearing loss. Our multidisciplinary approach addresses an educational gap and can serve as a model for developing other online courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole M. Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Colorado, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO
| | - Nadine I. Ibrahim
- University of Michigan, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Crystal A. Cole
- University of Michigan, Center for Academic Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Jaynee Handelsman
- University of Michigan, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anita F. Vereb
- University of Michigan, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Andrew N. Hashikawa
- University of Michigan, Department of Pediatrics, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lauren A. Bohm
- University of Michigan, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leonard LD, de Araujo TB, Quinn C, Thomas MB, Beaty L, Mott NM, Colborn K, Heelan AA, Tevis SEA, Christian N, Arhendt G, Gleisner AL. De-implementation of Axillary Dissection in Women Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5692-5702. [PMID: 37326811 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13698-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was standard treatment for breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) until 2011, when data from the Z11 and AMAROS trials challenged its survival benefit in early stage breast cancer. We assessed the contribution of patient, tumor, and facility factors on cALND use in patients undergoing mastectomy and SLN biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, patients diagnosed from 2012 to 2017 who underwent upfront mastectomy and SLN biopsy with at least one positive SLN were included. A multivariable mixed effects logistic regression model was used to determine the effect of patient, tumor, and facility variables on cALND use. Reference effect measures (REM) were used to compare the contribution of general contextual effects (GCE) to variation in cALND use. RESULTS From 2012 to 2017, the overall use of cALND decreased from 81.3% to 68.0%. Overall, younger patients, larger tumors, higher grade tumors, and tumors with lymphovascular invasion were more likely to undergo cALND. Facility variables, including higher surgical volume and facility location in the Midwest, were associated with increased use of cALND. However, REM results showed that the contribution of GCE to the variation in cALND use exceeded that of the measured patient, tumor, facility, and time variables. CONCLUSIONS There was a decrease in cALND use during the study period. However, cALND was frequently performed in women after mastectomy found to have a positive SLN. There is high variability in cALND use, mainly driven by interfacility practice variation rather than specific high-risk patient and/or tumor characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D Leonard
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Thiago B de Araujo
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christopher Quinn
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Madeline B Thomas
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Laurel Beaty
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn Colborn
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alicia A Heelan
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sarah E A Tevis
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole Christian
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gretchen Arhendt
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ana L Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leonard LD, de Araujo TB, Quinn C, Thomas MB, Beaty L, Mott NM, Kathryn Colborn, Heelan AA, Tevis SEA, Christian N, Ahrendt G, Gleisner AL. ASO Visual Abstract: De-implementation of Axillary Dissection in Women Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5703-5704. [PMID: 37386306 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13803-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D Leonard
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Thiago B de Araujo
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christopher Quinn
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Madeline B Thomas
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Laurel Beaty
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn Colborn
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alicia A Heelan
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sarah E A Tevis
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole Christian
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gretchen Ahrendt
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ana L Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kercheval JB, Mott NM, Kim EK, Boscardin CK, Klein BA, Hauer KE, Daniel M. Students' Perspectives on Basic and Clinical Science Integration When Step 1 is Administered After the Core Clerkships. Teach Learn Med 2023; 35:117-127. [PMID: 35138966 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2030235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Phenomenon: According to adult learning theories, effective cognitive integration of basic and clinical science may promote the transfer of knowledge to patient care. The placement of the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 after the core clerkships is one strategy intended to facilitate cognitive integration, though learner experiences with this model are unexplored. The purpose of this study is to understand students' perspectives on basic and clinical science integration in a post-clerkship Step 1 curriculum. Approach: Focus groups were conducted between August and September 2020 with senior medical students from the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine and University of Michigan Medical School. Data were analyzed using a constructivist approach to thematic analysis. Findings: Thirty-three students participated in six focus groups. Participants described multiple barriers to cognitive integration in the clerkship learning environment, though they also identified examples of teaching and learning that facilitated integration. Early in their clerkships, students struggled to integrate because of their tenuous basic science foundation, cognitive overload, and difficulty perceiving the relevance of basic science to patient care. They felt that educators primarily focused on clinical science, and many basic science teaching sessions during clerkships felt irrelevant to patient care. However, students also described experiences that made the connection between basic and clinical science more explicit, including modeling by educators and clerkship learning activities that more overtly encouraged the application of basic science to clinical care. In addition, the return to basic science studying during the post-clerkship dedicated Step 1 study period offered powerful integration opportunities. These facilitators of cognitive integration helped students recognize the value of integration for enduring learning. Insights: There are myriad barriers to cognitive integration of basic and clinical science during clerkships in a post-clerkship Step 1 curriculum. The relevance of basic science to patient care needs to be made more explicit to students through modeling by clinician educators to augment the potential benefits of curricular change. The post-clerkship Step 1 study period appears to offer a unique opportunity for cognitive integration later in a learner's trajectory that may be related to curricular design. When learners recognize the applicability of basic science to patient care, they may more intentionally transfer basic science knowledge to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacquelyn B Kercheval
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Office of Medical Student Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Office of Medical Student Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Eric K Kim
- Department of Undergraduate Medical Education, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, California, USA
| | - Christy K Boscardin
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, California, USA
| | - Barbie A Klein
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, California, USA
| | - Karen E Hauer
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, California, USA
| | - Michelle Daniel
- Office of Medical Student Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mott NM, Markovitz NH, Wang T, Hughes TM, Pilewskie M, Jagsi R, Dossett LA. Avoiding Overtreatment of Women ≥70 With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Provider-Level Deimplementation Strategy. J Surg Res 2023; 284:124-130. [PMID: 36566589 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION National guidelines recommend against routine axillary staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in women ≥70 y with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and clinically negative axilla; however, these practices remain common. METHODS We conducted a prospective pilot study from August 2021 to 2022 using an intervention targeting breast surgeons and radiation oncologists in Michigan that aimed to reduce SLNB and RT in eligible patients. The intervention consisted of (1) a geriatric assessment, (2) an assessment of the patient's medical maximizing-minimizing preferences, and (3) a tailored script with counterpoints to reasons patients commonly seek SLNB or RT. At the end of the study period, participants completed a survey providing feedback with the primary outcomes being: acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and intention and motivation to use the materials based on validated measures. RESULTS Participants (n = 23) included 15 breast surgeons and 8 radiation oncologists. Collectively, the materials were used with 115 patients. Considering all materials holistically, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the intervention were high; participants also intended and were motivated to use the intervention. Scores across all measures were highest for the geriatric assessment and lowest for the tailored script. The major barriers to using the intervention were limited time and instances of disagreement on treatment recommendations among surgeons and radiation oncologists. CONCLUSIONS The omission of SLNB and adjuvant RT should be discussed in appropriately selected patients. A multifaceted provider-level deimplementation strategy may be an effective means for achieving this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Ton Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ellsworth BL, Settecerri DJ, Mott NM, Vastardis A, Hider AM, Thompson J, Dossett LA, Hughes TM. Surgeon Perspectives on Determinants of Same-Day Mastectomy: A Roadmap for Implementing Change. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1712-1720. [PMID: 36536198 PMCID: PMC9762864 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12934-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge after mastectomy without immediate reconstruction (MwoR) has been shown to be safe, with improved patient satisfaction when compared with patients discharged 1 or more days after surgery. Nevertheless, only 16% of patients undergoing MwoR in Michigan are discharged on the day of surgery, with significant variation between facilities (3-88%). Our objective was to explore determinants of same-day discharge and offer strategies for broader implementation of this practice. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with surgeons performing MwoR across the state of Michigan. Recruitment utilized purposeful and snowball sampling methods. The Tailored Implementation in Chronic Disease (TICD) framework was used to inform the creation of the interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and then analyzed using directed content analysis guided by the TICD framework. Salient determinants were organized into patient, provider, and system-level factors. RESULTS Participants (n = 26) included general surgeons, breast surgeons, and surgical oncologists. Most surgeons (n = 18, 69%) reported that they discharged fewer than 60% of patients the same day after MwoR. The most common barriers included patient knowledge at the patient level; awareness of evidence, surgeon dogma, and peer influence at the provider level; and team processes and operating room logistics at the system level. CONCLUSION We identified surgeon-defined determinants of same-day discharge after MwoR. For the identified barriers, potential implementation strategies could include incorporation of preoperative drain teachings for patients, utilizing consensus statements and opinion leaders to disseminate evidence supporting same-day mastectomies, and conducting workshops with relevant stakeholders to establish consistent facility practice patterns among surgical teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel J Settecerri
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Vastardis
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ahmad M Hider
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jessica Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Farlow JL, Mott NM, Standiford TC, Dermody SM, Ishman SL, Thompson DM, Malloy KM, Bradford CR, Malekzadeh S. Sponsorship and Negotiation for Women Otolaryngologists at Midcareer: A Content Analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:384-391. [PMID: 35639485 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221102305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore challenges and opportunities for supporting midcareer women otolaryngologists in the areas of negotiation and sponsorship. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative approach using semistructured interviews. SETTING Online multi-institutional interviews. METHODS This study was performed from June to August 2021. Women otolaryngologists representing diverse subspecialties, training, and practice environments were recruited via a purposive criterion-based sampling approach. Semistructured interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed via an inductive-deductive approach to produce a thematic content analysis. RESULTS Among the 12 women interviewees, who represented 7 subspecialties, the majority were Caucasian (58%) and in academic practice (50%). The median residency graduation year was 2002 (range, 1982-2013). Participants expressed several challenges that women otolaryngologists face with respect to negotiation, including the absence of systematic formal negotiation training, gendered expectations that women experience during negotiations, and a perceived lack of power in negotiations. Obstacles to effective sponsorship included difficulty in the identification of sponsors and the influence of gender and related systemic biases that hindered sponsorship opportunities. CONCLUSION Notable gender disparities exist for negotiation and sponsorship in the midcareer stage for women otolaryngologists. Women start at a disadvantage due to a lack of negotiation training and access to sponsors, which is exacerbated by systemic gender bias and power differentials as women advance in their careers. This study highlights opportunities to improve negotiation and sponsorship for women, with the goal of promoting a more diverse workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice L Farlow
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Taylor C Standiford
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sarah M Dermody
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stacey L Ishman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Dana M Thompson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kelly M Malloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Carol R Bradford
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Sonya Malekzadeh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ellsworth BL, Settecerri DJ, Mott NM, Vastardis A, Hider AM, Thompson J, Dossett LA, Hughes TM. ASO Visual Abstract: Surgeon Perspectives on Determinants of Same-Day Mastectomy: A Roadmap for Implementing Change. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1721. [PMID: 36627456 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13040-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel J Settecerri
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Vastardis
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ahmad M Hider
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mott NM, Duncan ZN, Pesavento CM, Vastardis AF, Bredbeck BC, Harter CA, Dossett LA, Broman KK, Hughes TM. Implementation of melanoma guidelines in the multidisciplinary setting: A qualitative analysis. Am J Surg 2023; 225:335-340. [PMID: 36180302 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data suggest variation in utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and adjuvant systemic therapy (AT) for sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. We aimed to explore how clinicians consider multidisciplinary treatment options. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews of surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and otolaryngologists to produce a thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants (n = 26) described melanoma care as inherently "multidisciplinary," noting the importance of conversations facilitated by shared clinic days or space. Despite believing that their practice mirrored other clinicians, participants revealed diverging perspectives on CLND and AT. Multidisciplinary care presented challenges for surveillance as surgeons expressed desire to retain ownership of patients but did not feel comfortable overseeing AT needs. Participants questioned the fidelity of nodal ultrasounds, noted redundancy in their roles, and described a "surveillance burden" for patients. CONCLUSION Opportunities exist to improve multidisciplinary melanoma care through broader consensus of how to translate emerging data into patient care and delineating surveillance roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Zoey N Duncan
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Brooke C Bredbeck
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Lesly A Dossett
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kristy K Broman
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hayward L, Mott NM, McKean EL, Dossett LA. Survey of student mistreatment experienced during the core clinical clerkships. Am J Surg 2023:S0002-9610(22)00830-3. [PMID: 36669940 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to learn more about the potential impact of medical student mistreatment on patient safety and care. METHODS A web-based survey was sent to members of the class of 2021 and 2022 who have completed their core clerkships at a single academic institution. Descriptive statistics were performed to understand how prior and future mistreatment impacted communication among students and team members. RESULTS We received 290 of 376 responses (77.1%). 26% of respondents indicated that past mistreatment negatively impacted their communication with other team members. 30% of respondents reported that fear of future mistreatment negatively impacted their communication with other team members. CONCLUSION Mistreatment of medical students has many sources and occurs throughout the clinical curriculum. Past and fear of future student mistreatment can negatively impact intrateam communication and therefore negatively impact patient care, with the potential of causing poor patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Hayward
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Erin L McKean
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Underwood HJ, Mott NM, Saucke MC, Roman BR, Voils CI, Pitt SC. What do patients want to know about surgery for low-risk thyroid cancer? A qualitative study. Surgery 2023; 173:226-231. [PMID: 36336505 PMCID: PMC10353734 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making about treatment for low-risk thyroid cancer requires patients and surgeons to work together to select treatment that best balances risks and expected outcomes with patient preferences and values. To participate, patients must be activated and ask questions. We aimed to characterize what topics patients prioritize during treatment decision-making. METHODS We identified substantive questions by patients with low-risk (cT1-2, N0) thyroid cancer during audio-recorded consultations with 9 surgeons at 2 unique health care systems. Logistics questions were excluded. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify major themes among patients' questions and surgeon responses. RESULTS Overall, 28 of 30 patients asked 253 substantive questions, with 2 patients not asking any substantive questions (median 8, range 0-25). Patients were 20 to 71 years old, mostly White (86.7%) and female (80.0%). The questions addressed extent of surgery, hormone supplementation, risk of cancer progression, radioactive iodine, and etiology of thyroid cancer. When patients probed for a recommendation regarding extent of surgery, surgeons often responded indirectly. When patients asked how surgery could impact quality of life, surgeons focused on oncologic benefits and surgical risk. Patients commonly asked about hormone supplementation and radioactive iodine. CONCLUSION Patient questions focused on the decision regarding extent of surgery, quality of life, and nonsurgical aspects of thyroid cancer care. Surgeon responses do not consistently directly answer patients' questions but focus on the risks, benefits, and conduct of surgery itself. These findings suggest an opportunity to help surgeons with resources to improve shared decision-making by providing information that patients prioritize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter J Underwood
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. https://twitter.com/@HJUnderwoodMD
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. https://twitter.com/@nmmott
| | - Megan C Saucke
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. https://twitter.com/@megan_saucke
| | - Benjamin R Roman
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Corrine I Voils
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. https://twitter.com/@VoilsCorrine
| | - Susan C Pitt
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mott NM, Mierzwa ML, Casper KA, Shah JL, Mallen-St Clair J, Ho AS, Zumsteg ZS, Prince ME, Dossett LA, Chen MM. Financial Hardship in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e925-e937. [PMID: 35167324 PMCID: PMC9797234 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial hardship is a growing concern for patients with cancer. Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are particularly vulnerable, given that a third leave the workforce following treatment. The goal of our study was to characterize financial hardship in the psychologic response (response to increased expenses) and coping behaviors (behaviors patients adopt to manage their care in the setting of increased expenses) domains in patients with HNC compared with patients with other cancers. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of nationally representative public survey data from 2013 to 2018 in the National Health Interviews Survey, an annual cross-sectional household survey. We included respondents age ≥ 18 years who reported a diagnosis of cancer and identified a subset of patients with HNC. Our main outcomes were financial hardship in the psychologic response and coping behaviors domains. RESULTS Our sample included a weighted population of 357,052 patients with HNC and 21.4 million patients with other cancers. Compared with patients with other cancers, patients with HNC reported greater levels of coping behaviors hardship (31% v 23%, P = .015), but similar levels of psychologic financial hardship (73% v 72%, P = .787). Medicaid or uninsured patients more often reported coping behaviors hardship. On multivariable analysis, HNC (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.24) was independently associated with coping behaviors hardship. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate financial hardship in patients with HNC compared with patients with other cancers that includes Medicaid and uninsured patients, who are more often to have financial hardship. Patients with HNC have greater levels of hardship in the coping behaviors domain compared with patients with other cancers, but similar levels in the psychologic response domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Keith A. Casper
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer L. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jon Mallen-St Clair
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA,Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Allen S. Ho
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA,Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zachary S. Zumsteg
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mark E.P. Prince
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lesly A. Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (CBSSM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI,Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michelle M. Chen
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA,Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA,Michelle M. Chen, MD, MHS, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 8635 West Third St, Suite 590W, Los Angeles, CA 90048; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bredbeck BC, Mott NM, Wang T, Sinco BR, Hughes TM, Nathan H, Dossett LA. ASO Visual Abstract: Facility-Level Variation of Low-Value Breast Cancer Treatments in Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Analysis of a Statewide Claims Registry. Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11743-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- From the University of Michigan Medical School (N.M.M.), and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan (D.A.M., M.M.H.) - both in Ann Arbor; and the Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk (J.B.C.)
| | - J Bryan Carmody
- From the University of Michigan Medical School (N.M.M.), and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan (D.A.M., M.M.H.) - both in Ann Arbor; and the Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk (J.B.C.)
| | - David A Marzano
- From the University of Michigan Medical School (N.M.M.), and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan (D.A.M., M.M.H.) - both in Ann Arbor; and the Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk (J.B.C.)
| | - Maya M Hammoud
- From the University of Michigan Medical School (N.M.M.), and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan (D.A.M., M.M.H.) - both in Ann Arbor; and the Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk (J.B.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bredbeck BC, Mott NM, Wang T, Sinco BR, Hughes TM, Nathan H, Dossett LA. Facility-Level Variation of Low-Value Breast Cancer Treatments in Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Analysis of a Statewide Claims Registry. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:10.1245/s10434-022-11631-z. [PMID: 35380309 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11631-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2004, national guidelines have supported the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and radiotherapy for women ≥ 70 years of age with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, but many women continue to receive at least one of these services. Provider- and patient-level factors may contribute to persistent utilization, but the role of facility-level factors is unknown. We aimed to determine facility-level variation of SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy utilization in older women with early-stage, HR+ breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Additionally, we aimed to explore factors associated with SLNB and radiotherapy utilization and the intra-facility correlation in their utilization. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a statewide registry of claims data. We included women ≥70 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent BCS from 2012 to 2019 at 80 hospitals in the Michigan Value Collaborative. The main outcome was inter-facility rates and variation of SLNB and radiotherapy, as well as intra-facility correlation in their utilization. RESULTS The cohort included 7253 women (median age 77 years). Only 20% (n = 1440) underwent BCS alone, whereas 71% (n = 5122) underwent SLNB and 52% (n = 3793) received radiotherapy. Inter-facility rates of SLNB ranged from 35 to 82% (median 70%), and radiotherapy ranged from 19 to 72% (median 49%). SLNB and radiotherapy were positively correlated (r = 0.27, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS SLNB and radiotherapy rates remain high with significant variation in utilization at the facility level. High utilizers of SLNB are likely to be high utilizers of radiotherapy, suggesting the opportunity for strategic targeting of these facilities and their clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke C Bredbeck
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ton Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brandy R Sinco
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Hari Nathan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mott NM, Dossett LA. Opportunities and Challenges of Defining "Value" in Oncology Care. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6518-6519. [PMID: 35316434 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11548-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Program for Value Enhancement, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Michigan Program for Value Enhancement, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ellsworth BL, Metz AK, Mott NM, Kazemi R, Stover M, Hughes T, Dossett LA. ASO Visual Abstract: Review of Cancer-Specific Quality Measures Promoting the Avoidance of Low-Value Care. Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [PMID: 35235088 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11394-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allan K Metz
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ruby Kazemi
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael Stover
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tasha Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. .,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ellsworth BL, Metz AK, Mott NM, Kazemi R, Stover M, Hughes T, Dossett LA. Review of Cancer-Specific Quality Measures Promoting the Avoidance of Low-Value Care. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3750-3762. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11303-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
26
|
Bredbeck BC, Baskin AS, Wang T, Sinco BR, Berlin NL, Shubeck SP, Mott NM, Greenup RA, Nathan H, Hughes TM, Dossett LA. Incremental Spending Associated with Low-Value Treatments in Older Women with Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:1051-1059. [PMID: 34554342 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10807-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In most women ≥ 70 years old with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, axillary staging and adjuvant radiotherapy provide no survival advantage over surgery and hormone therapy alone. Despite recommendations for their omission, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and adjuvant radiotherapy rates remain high. While treatment side effects are well documented, less is known about the incremental spending associated with SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS Using a statewide multipayer claims registry, we examined spending associated with breast cancer treatment in a retrospective cohort of women ≥ 70 years old undergoing surgery. RESULTS 9074 women ≥70 years old underwent breast cancer resection between 2012 and 2019, with 78% (n = 7122) receiving SLNB and/or adjuvant radiotherapy within 90 days of surgery. Women undergoing SLNB were more likely to receive radiation (51% vs. 28%; p < 0.001 and OR = 2.68). Average 90-day spending varied substantially based upon treatment received, ranging from US$10,367 (breast-conserving surgery alone) to US$27,370 (mastectomy with SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy). The relative increases in 90-day treatment spending in the breast-conserving surgery cohort was 65% for SLNB, 82% for adjuvant radiotherapy, and 120% for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy have significant spending implications in older women with breast cancer, even though they are unlikely to improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke C Bredbeck
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alison S Baskin
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ton Wang
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brandy R Sinco
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicholas L Berlin
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sarah P Shubeck
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Hari Nathan
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dossett LA, Mott NM, Bredbeck BC, Wang T, Jobin CTC, Hughes TM, Hawley ST, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Using Tailored Messages to Target Overuse of Low-Value Breast Cancer Care in Older Women. J Surg Res 2022; 270:503-512. [PMID: 34801801 PMCID: PMC8734932 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National recommendations allow for the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy in women ≥ 70 y/o with early-stage, hormone-receptor positive invasive breast cancer, but these therapies remain common. Previous work demonstrates an individual's maximizing-minimizing trait-an inherent preference for more or less medical care-may influence the preference for low-value care. MATERIALS AND METHODS We recruited an equal number of women ≥ 70 yrs who were maximizers, minimizers, or neutral based on a validated measure between September 2020 and November 2020. Participants were presented a hypothetical breast cancer diagnosis before randomization to one of three follow-up messages: maximizer-tailored, minimizer-tailored, or neutral. Tailored messaging aimed to redirect maximizers and minimizers toward declining SLNB and radiotherapy. The main outcome measure was predicted probability of choosing SLNB or radiotherapy. RESULTS The final analytical sample (n = 1600) was 515 maximizers (32%), 535 neutral (33%) and 550 (34%) minimizers. Higher maximizing tendency positively correlated with electing both SLNB and radiotherapy on logistic regression (P < 0.01). Any tailoring (maximizer- or minimizer-tailored) reduced preference for SLNB in maximizing and neutral women but had no effect in minimizing women. Tailoring had no impact on radiotherapy decision, except for an increased probability of minimizers electing radiotherapy when presented with maximizer-tailored messaging. CONCLUSIONS Maximizing-minimizing tendencies are associated with treatment preferences among women facing a hypothetical breast cancer diagnosis. Targeted messaging may facilitate avoidance of low-value breast cancer care, particularly for SLNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesly A. Dossett
- University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (CBSSM), Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M. Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brooke C. Bredbeck
- University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ton Wang
- University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Chad TC. Jobin
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tasha M. Hughes
- University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (CBSSM), Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sarah T. Hawley
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (CBSSM), Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Department of Health Education and Health Behavior, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (CBSSM), Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,University of Michigan, Department of Health Education and Health Behavior, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mott NM, Guduguntla BA, Bohm LA. Opportunity for Improved Transparency on Otolaryngology Residency Websites for Prospective Applicants. OTO Open 2021; 5:2473974X211060825. [PMID: 34870064 PMCID: PMC8637723 DOI: 10.1177/2473974x211060825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Otolaryngology residency applicants often struggle to gauge their
competitiveness at programs due to the lack of information available,
resulting in a rising number of applications. We aimed to evaluate
otolaryngology websites for information pertaining to prospective
applicants. Study Design Systematic content analysis. Setting Web. Methods We reviewed 50 otolaryngology websites from June to July 2021. We searched
for information pertaining to the application process, including
requirements, screening and/or selection processes, and average interviewee
or matched resident statistics. Results All websites had a page for prospective applicants. Under half (n = 24, 48%)
explicitly listed required application components. Only 23 (46%) mentioned
the desired number of letters of recommendation, and only 2 (4%) noted the
need for a letter from the department chair. The majority (n = 35, 70%)
provided no information regarding the number of applications received or
interviews granted. Most (n = 35, 70%) did not mention how candidates are
evaluated. A minority (n = 14, 30%) provided very general metrics on which
candidates are scored or ranked. Almost all (n = 49, 98%) did not mention
screening processes in place to select applicants for interview. None
provided information about the academic characteristics or demographics of
their interviewed applicants, and only 1 (2%) included this information for
matched applicants. Conclusion Otolaryngology websites contain limited information pertaining to the
residency application process for prospective applicants, making it
difficult for candidates to discern their competitiveness at programs and
potentially contributing to match inefficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Lauren A Bohm
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chen MM, Mott NM, Miller J, Kazemi R, Stover M, Graboyes EM, Divi V, Malloy KM, Wallner LP, Pitt SC, Dossett LA. Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs About Deintensifying Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 148:43-51. [PMID: 34734995 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.2824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Surveillance imaging and visits are costly and have not been shown to improve oncologic outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, the benefit of surveillance visits may extend beyond recurrence detection. To better understand surveillance and potentially develop protocols to tailor current surveillance paradigms, it is important to elicit the perspectives of the clinicians who care for patients with HNC. Objective To characterize current surveillance practices and explore clinician attitudes and beliefs on deintensifying surveillance for patients with HNC. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study was performed from January to March 2021. Guided by an interpretive description approach, interviews were analyzed to produce a thematic description. Data analysis was performed from March to April 2021. Otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were current practice, attitudes, and beliefs about deintensifying surveillance and survivorship as well as patients' values and perspectives collected from interviews of participating physicians. Results Twenty-one physicians (17 [81%] men) were interviewed, including 13 otolaryngologists and 8 radiation oncologists with a median of 8 years (IQR, 5-20 years) in practice. Twelve participants (57%) stated their practice comprised more than 75% of patients with HNC. Participants expressed that there was substantial variation in the interpretation of the surveillance guidelines. Participants were open to the potential for deintensification of surveillance or incorporating symptom-based surveillance protocols but had concerns that deintensification may increase patient anxiety and shift some of the burden of recurrence monitoring to patients. Patient and physician peace of mind, the importance of maintaining the patient-physician relationship, and the need for adequate survivorship and management of treatment-associated toxic effects were reported to be important barriers to deintensifying surveillance. Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study, clinicians revealed a willingness to consider altering cancer surveillance but expressed a need to maintain patient and clinician peace of mind, maintain the patient-clinician relationship, and ensure adequate monitoring of treatment-associated toxic effects and other survivorship concerns. These findings may be useful in future research on the management of posttreatment surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Jacquelyn Miller
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ruby Kazemi
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Vasu Divi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kelly M Malloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lauren P Wallner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Susan C Pitt
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mott NM, Kercheval JB, Daniel M. Exploring Students' Perspectives on Well-Being and the Change of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 to Pass/Fail. Teach Learn Med 2021; 33:355-365. [PMID: 33851887 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1899929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In February 2020, the Federation of State Medical Boards and National Board of Medical Examiners announced that Step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination would transition from a three-digit numerical score to a pass/fail outcome. While several opinion pieces have been authored on the potential implications of this change, no study has formally assessed the student voice. The purpose of this study is to explore medical students' perspectives of a pass/fail Step 1, with an emphasis on how this transition will impact their well-being. Approach: We conducted virtual focus groups from May 2020-June 2020 with first- and second-year medical students from six institutions (n = 30). We analyzed focus group content following the inductive and iterative constructivist approach to produce a thematic analysis. Findings: Participants included females (50%), males (47%), and one non-binary student. The majority were Caucasian (57%), followed by Asian (27%), African American (10%), and Hispanic or Latino/a (7%). Overall, students were confused regarding the decision to transition Step 1 to a pass/fail outcome. They expressed anxiety over the uncertainty of how a pass/fail Step 1 may impact future residency applications and pressure to re-allocate time and resources to other academic pursuits that would make them competitive. Students explicitly stated skepticism or disbelief that a pass/fail Step 1 would improve their well-being. Insights: While the decision to make Step 1 pass/fail was in part intended to decrease stress associated with performance on a single high-stakes exam designed for licensing purposes, it has led to increased worries for students, and secondary, unanticipated consequences remain to be seen. In this new setting, it will be imperative to provide clarity regarding the metrics used to evaluate students and to incorporate their perspectives in future policy changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Michelle Daniel
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Baskin AS, Wang T, Mott NM, Hawley ST, Jagsi R, Dossett LA. Gaps in Online Breast Cancer Treatment Information for Older Women. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:950-957. [PMID: 32734367 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08961-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For women older than 70 years with early-stage breast cancer, the routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and adjuvant radiotherapy offers no overall survival benefit and may be perceived as undesirable by many women. National guidelines allow possible omission of these practices for older women. This study aimed to assess the availability of web-based educational materials targeting older women and their age-specific treatment recommendations. METHODS The study systematically assessed the websites of the top 25 "Best Hospitals for Cancer" ranked by the U.S. News & World Report, as well as the websites of four prominent national cancer organizations. RESULTS Websites for the leading cancer hospitals and national cancer organizations contain extremely limited information directed toward older patients with breast cancer. Both SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy are described as treatments "typically," "most often," or "usually" used in combination with breast-conserving surgery without circumstances noted for possible omission. Specifically, no hospital website and only one national organization in this study included information on the recommendation to avoid routine SLNB. Only two hospitals and two national organizations included information suggesting possible omission of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients older than 70 years. CONCLUSION The absence of online material for older patients with breast cancer represents a gap potentially contributing to overtreatment by framing SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy as necessary. Informational resources available to women aged 70 years or older may aid in informed physician-patient communication and decision-making, which may reduce SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy for patients who might opt out of these procedures if fully informed about them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ton Wang
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. .,Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|