1
|
Yu Y, El-Sayed IH, McDermott MW, Theodosopoulos PV, van Zante A, Kased N, Glastonbury CM, Garsa AA, Yom SS. Dural recurrence among esthesioneuroblastoma patients presenting with intracranial extension. Laryngoscope 2018; 128:2226-2233. [PMID: 29427378 DOI: 10.1002/lary.27126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Revised: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the rate of late intracranial recurrences among esthesioneuroblastoma patients treated with surgical resection and postoperative radiation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. METHODS All patients receiving definitive-intent therapy for esthesioneuroblastoma between March 1995 and September 2015 were reviewed. Presenting disease extent was categorized based on radiologic, operative, and pathologic findings. Between-group survival differences were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Of 38 patients initially treated at our institution, 53% (20 of 38) presented with intracranial extension. At a median follow-up of 90 months (range, 6-199), 37% (14 of 38) recurred; 5- and 8-year disease-free survival rates were 69% and 54%; and overall survival rates were 81% and 72%, respectively. Among these patients, the dura was the most commonly involved site of relapse (8), followed by local (6), regional (5), and distant extracranial (3) sites; and five patients had ≥ two categories of failure. Eight-year dural disease-free survival was 57% versus 90% (P = 0.017) and 0% versus 87% (P < 0.0001), with and without intracranial extension and subtotal resection, respectively. Of six patients treated at recurrence, five (83%) experienced dural-based failure such that, among all 44 patients, 13 (65%) of 20 recurrences involved the dura. After dural recurrence, the median survival time was 42 months (range, 12-125); salvage treatments were effective in rare cases of isolated low-volume recurrence. CONCLUSION Esthesioneuroblastoma patients presenting with intracranial extension are at substantial and unique risk for long-term dural-based relapse. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2226-2233, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Philip V Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Annemieke van Zante
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Norbert Kased
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Christine M Glastonbury
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Adam A Garsa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Sue S Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu Y, El-Sayed IH, McDermott MW, Kased N, Glastonbury CM, Garsa AA, Yom SS. (P053) Patterns of Failure After Multimodality Treatment of Esthesioneuroblastoma: High Risk for Meningeal Failure Among Patients With Dural Invasion at Long-Term Followup. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
3
|
Descovich M, McGuinness C, Kannarunimit D, Chen J, Pinnaduwage D, Pouliot J, Kased N, Gottschalk AR, Yom SS. Comparison between target margins derived from 4DCT scans and real-time tumor motion tracking: Insights from lung tumor patients treated with robotic radiosurgery. Med Phys 2015; 42:1280-7. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4907956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
4
|
Park CK, Kim YH, Kim JW, Kim TM, Choi SH, Kim YJ, Choi BS, Lee SH, Kim CY, Kim IH, Lee DZ, Kheder A, Forbes M, Craven I, Hadjivassiliou M, Shonka NA, Kessinger A, Aizenberg MR, Weller M, Meisner C, Platten M, Simon M, Nikkhah G, Papsdorf K, Sabel M, Braun C, Reifenberger G, Wick W, Alexandru D, Haghighi B, Muhonen MG, Chamberlain MC, Sumrall AL, Burri S, Brick W, Asher A, Murillo-Medina K, Guerrero-Maldonado A, Ramiro AJ, Cervantes-Sanchez G, Erazo-Valle-Solis AA, Garcia-Navarro V, Sperduto PW, Shanley R, Luo X, Kased N, Sneed PK, Roberge D, Chao S, Weil R, Suh J, Bhatt A, Jensen A, Brown PD, Shih H, Kirkpatrick J, Gaspar LE, Fiveash J, Chiang V, Knisely J, Sperduto CM, Lin N, Mehta MP, Anderson MD, Raghunathan A, Aldape KD, Fuller GN, Gilbert MR, Robins HI, Wang M, Gilbert MR, Chakravarti A, Grimm S, Penas-Prado M, Chaudhary R, Anderson PJ, Elinzano H, Gilbert RA, Mehta M, Aoki T, Ueba T, Arakawa Y, Miyatake SI, Tsukahara T, Miyamoto S, Nozaki K, Taki W, Matsutani M, Shakur SF, Bit-Ivan E, Watkin WG, Farhat HI, Merrell RT, Zwinkels H, Dorr J, Kloet A, Taphoorn MJ, Vecht CJ, Bogdahn U, Stockhammer G, Mahapatra A, Hau P, Schuknecht B, van den Bent M, Heinrichs H, Yust-Katz S, Liu V, Sanghee K, Groves M, Puduvalli V, Levin V, Conrad C, Colman H, Hsu S, Yung AW, Gilbert MR, Kunz M, Armbruster L, Thon N, Jansen N, Lutz J, Herms J, Egensperger R, Eigenbrod S, Kretzschmar H, La CF, Tonn JC, Kreth FW, Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Agati R, Poggi R, Dall'Occa P, Bartolotti M, Di Battista M, Marucci G, Girardi F, Ermani M, Sherman W, Raizer J, Grimm S, Ruckser R, Tatzreiter G, Pfisterer W, Oberhauser G, Honigschnabel S, Aboul-Enein F, Ausch C, Kitzweger E, Hruby W, Sebesta C, Green RM, Woyshner EA, Suchorska B, Jansen NL, Janssen H, Kretzschmar H, Simon M, Hentschel B, Poepperl G, Kreth FW, Linn J, LaFougere C, Weller M, Tonn JC, Suchorska B, Jansen NL, Graute V, Eigenbrod S, Bartenstein P, Kreth FW, LaFougere C, Tonn JC, Hassanzadeh B, Tohidi V, Levacic D, Landolfi JC, Singer S, DeBraganca K, Omuro A, Grommes C, Omar AI, Jalan P, Pandav V, Bekker S, Fuente MIDL, Kaley T, Zhao S, Chen X, Soffietti R, Magistrello M, Bertero L, Bosa C, Crasto SG, Garbossa D, Lolli I, Trevisan E, Ruda R, Ruda R, Bertero L, Bosa C, Trevisan E, Pace A, Carapella C, Dealis C, Caroli M, Faedi M, Bomprezzi C, Thomas AA, Dalmau J, Gresa-Arribas N, Fadul CE, Kumthekar PU, Raizer J, Grimm S, Herrada J, Antony N, Richards M, Gupta A, Landeros M, Arango C, Campos-Gines AF, Friedman P, Wilson H, Streeter JC, Cohen A, Gilreath J, Sageser D, Ye X, Bell SD, McGregor J, Bourekas E, Cavaliere R, Newton H, Sul J, Odia Y, Zhang W, Shih J, Butman JA, Hammoud D, Kreisl TN, Iwamoto F, Fine HA, Berriel LG, Santos FN, Levy AC, Fanelli MF, Chinen LT, da Costa AA, Bourekas E, Wayne Slone H, Bell SD, McGregor J, Bokstein F, Blumenthal DT, Shpigel S, Phishniak L, Yust-Katz S, Garciarena P, Liue D, Yuan Y, Groves MD, Wong ET, Villano JL, Engelhard HH, Ram Z, Sahebjam S, Millar BA, Sahgal A, Laperriere N, Mason W, Levin VA, Hess KR, Choucair AK, Flynn PJ, Jaeckle KA, Kyritsis AP, Yung WKA, Prados MD, Bruner JM, Ictech S, Nghiemphu PL, Lai A, Green RM, Cloughesy TF, Zaky W, Gilles F, Grimm J, Bluml S, Dhall G, Rosser T, Randolph L, Wong K, Olch A, Krieger M, Finlay J, Capellades J, Verger E, Medrano S, Gonzalez S, Gil M, Reynes G, Ribalta T, Gallego O, Segura PP, Balana C, Gwak HS, Joo J, Kim S, Yoo H, Shin SH, Han JY, Kim HT, Yun T, Lee JS, Lee SH, Kim W, Vogelbaum MA, Wang M, Peereboom DM, Macdonald DR, Giannini C, Suh JH, Jenkins RB, Laack NN, Brackman DG, Shrieve DC, Souhami L, Mehta MP, Leibetseder A, Wohrer A, Ackerl M, Flechl B, Sax C, Spiegl-Kreinecker S, Pichler J, Widhalm G, Dieckmann K, Preusser M, Marosi C, Sebastian C, Alejandro M, Bernadette C, Naomi A, Kavan P, Sahebjam S, Garoufalis E, Guiot MC, Muanza T, Del Maestro R, Petrecca K, Sharma R, Curry R, Joyce J, Rosenblum M, Jaffe E, Matasar M, Lin O, Fisher R, Omuro A, Yin C, Iwamoto FM, Fraum TJ, Nayak L, Diamond EL, DeAngelis LM, Pentsova E, Vera-Bolanos E, Gilbert MR, Aldape K, Necesito-Reyes MJ, Fouladi M, Gajjar A, Goldman S, Metellus P, Mikkelsen T, Omuro A, Packer R, Partap S, Pollack IF, Prados M, Ian Robins H, Soffietti R, Wu J, Armstrong TS, Nakada M, Hayashi Y, Miyashita K, Kinoshita M, Furuta T, Sabit H, Kita D, Hayashi Y, Uchiyam N, Kawakami K, Minamoto T, Hamada JI, Diamond EL, Rosenblum M, Heaney M, Carrasquillo J, Krauthammer A, Nolan C, Kaley TJ, Gil MJ, Fuster J, Balana C, Benavides M, Mesia C, Etxaniz O, Canellas J, Perez-Martin X, Hunter K, Johnston SK, Bridge CA, Rockne RC, Guyman L, Baldock AL, Rockhill JK, Mrugala MM, Beard BC, Adair JE, Kiem HP, Swanson KR, Ranjan T, Desjardins A, Peters KB, Alderson L, Kirkpatrick J, Herndon J, Bailey L, Sampson J, Friedman AH, Friedman H, Vredenburgh JJ, Theeler BJ, Ellezam B, Melguizo-Gavilanes I, Shonka NA, Bruner JM, Puduvalli VK, Taylor JW, Flanagan E, O'Neill B, Seigal T, Omuro A, DeAngelis L, Baerhing J, Hoang-Xuan K, Chamberlain M, Batchelor T, Nishikawa R, Pinto F, Blay JY, Korfel A, Schiff D, Fu BD, Kong XT, Bota D, Omuro A, Beal K, Ivy P, Gutin P, Wu N, Kaley T, Karimi S, DeAngelis L, Pentsova H, Nolan C, Grommes C, Chan T, Mathew R, Droms L, Shimizu F, Tabar V, Grossman S, Yovino S, Campian J, Wild A, Herman J, Brock M, Balmanoukian A, Ye X, Portnow J, Badie B, Synold T, Lacey S, D'Apuzzo M, Frankel P, Chen M, Aboody K, Letarte N, Gabay MP, Bressler LR, Stachnik JM, Villano JL, Jaeckle KA, Anderson SK, Willson A, Moreno-Aspitia A, Colon-Otero G, Patel T, Perez E, Peters KB, Reardon DA, Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE, Coan A, McSherry F, Lipp E, Brickhouse A, Massey W, Friedman HS, Alderson LM, Desjardins A, Ranjan T, Peters KB, Friedman HS, Vredenburgh JJ, Ranjan T, Desjardins A, Peters KB, Alderson L, Kirkpatrick J, Herndon J, Bailey L, Sampson J, Friedman AH, Friedman H, Vredenburgh J, Welch MR, Omuro A, Grommes C, Westphal M, Bach F, Reuter D, Ronellenfitsch M, Steinbach J, Pietsch T, Connelly J, Hamza MA, Puduvalli V, Neal ML, Trister AD, Ahn S, Bridge C, Lange J, Baldock A, Rockne R, Mrugala M, Rockhill JK, Lai A, Cloughesy T, Swanson KR, Neuwelt AJ, Nguyen TM, Tyson RM, Nasseri M, Neuwelt EA, Bubalo JS, Barnes PD, Phuphanich S, Hu J, Rudnick J, Chu R, Yu J, Naruse R, Ljubimova J, Sanchez C, Guevarra A, Naor R, Black K, Mahta A, Bhavsar TM, Herath K, Huang C, McClain J, Rizzo K, Sheehan J, Chamberlain M, Glantz M, McClain J, Glantz MJ, Zoccoli C, Nicholas MK, Xie T, White D, Liker S, Gajewski T, Selfridge J, Piccioni DE, Zurayk M, Mody R, Quan J, Li S, Chen W, Chou A, Liau L, Green R, Cloughesy T, Lai A, Gomez-Molinar V, Ruiz-Gonzalez S, Valdez-Vazquez R, Arrieta O, Stenner JI. CLIN-NEURO/MEDICAL ONCOLOGY. Neuro Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
5
|
Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X, Sneed PK, Chao ST, Weil RJ, Suh J, Bhatt A, Jensen AW, Brown PD, Shih HA, Kirkpatrick J, Gaspar LE, Fiveash JB, Chiang V, Knisely JP, Sperduto CM, Lin N, Mehta M. Reply to M.C. Chamberlain et al. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.43.0256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W. Sperduto
- University of Minnesota; Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Norbert Kased
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David Roberge
- McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Ryan Shanley
- University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Xianghua Luo
- University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center; University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Penny K. Sneed
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Helen A. Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - John B. Fiveash
- University of Alabama Medical Center at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Yale University School of Medicine; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | - Jonathan P.S. Knisely
- Hofstra University School of Medicine; North Shore–Long Island Jewish Health System, Manhasset, NY
| | | | - Nancy Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Créhange G, Chen CP, Hsu CC, Kased N, Coakley FV, Kurhanewicz J, Roach M. Management of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement: a rapidly evolving paradigm. Cancer Treat Rev 2012; 38:956-67. [PMID: 22703831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2011] [Revised: 05/15/2012] [Accepted: 05/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Although widespread PSA screening has inevitably led to increased diagnosis of lower risk prostate cancer, the number of patients with nodal involvement at baseline remains high (nearly 40% of high risk patients initially staged cN0). These rates probably do not reflect the true incidence of prostate cancer with lymph node involvement among patients selected for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), as patients selected for surgery often have more favorable prognostic features. At many institutions, radical treatment directed only at the prostate is considered standard and patients known to have regional disease are often managed palliatively with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for presumed systemic disease. New imaging tools such as MR lymphangiography, choline-based PET imaging or combined SPECT/CT now allow surgeons and radiation oncologists to identify and target nodal metastasis and/or lymph nodes with a high risk of occult involvement. Recent advances in the field of surgery including the advent of extended nodal dissection and sentinel node procedures have suggested that cancer-specific survival might be improved for lymph-node positive patients with a low burden of nodal involvement when managed with aggressive interventions. These new imaging tools can provide radiation oncologists with maps to guide delivery of high dose conformal radiation to a target volume while minimizing radiation toxicity to non-target normal tissue. This review highlights advances in imaging and reports how they may help to define a new paradigm to manage node-positive prostate cancer patients with a curative-intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, CA-94143, San Francisco, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X, Sneed PK, Chao ST, Weil RJ, Suh J, Bhatt A, Jensen AW, Brown PD, Shih HA, Kirkpatrick J, Gaspar LE, Fiveash JB, Chiang V, Knisely JPS, Sperduto CM, Lin N, Mehta M. Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 2011; 30:419-25. [PMID: 22203767 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.38.0527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1005] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our group has previously published the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), a prognostic index for patients with brain metastases. Updates have been published with refinements to create diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment indices. The purpose of this report is to present the updated diagnosis-specific GPA indices in a single, unified, user-friendly report to allow ease of access and use by treating physicians. METHODS A multi-institutional retrospective (1985 to 2007) database of 3,940 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with outcomes by primary site and treatment. Significant prognostic factors were used to define the diagnosis-specific GPA prognostic indices. A GPA of 4.0 correlates with the best prognosis, whereas a GPA of 0.0 corresponds with the worst prognosis. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis. For lung cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score, age, presence of extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases, confirming the original Lung-GPA. For melanoma and renal cell cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score and the number of brain metastases. For breast cancer, prognostic factors were tumor subtype, Karnofsky performance score, and age. For GI cancer, the only prognostic factor was the Karnofsky performance score. The median survival times by GPA score and diagnosis were determined. CONCLUSION Prognostic factors for patients with brain metastases vary by diagnosis, and for each diagnosis, a robust separation into different GPA scores was discerned, implying considerable heterogeneity in outcome, even within a single tumor type. In summary, these indices and related worksheet provide an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival, potentially select appropriate treatment, and stratify clinical trials for patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- University of Minnesota Gamma Knife, Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, MN, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moriera F, So K, Gould P, Kamnasaran D, Jensen RL, Hussain I, Gutmann DH, Gorovets D, Kastenhuber ER, Pentsova E, Nayak L, Huse JT, van den Bent MJ, Gravendeel LA, Gorlia T, Kros JM, Wesseling P, Teepen J, Idbaih A, Sanson M, Smitt PAS, French PJ, Zhang W, Zhang J, Hoadley K, Carter B, Li S, Kang C, You Y, Jiang C, Song S, Jiang T, Chen C, Grimm C, Weiler M, Claus R, Weichenhan D, Hartmann C, Plass C, Weller M, Wick W, Jenkins RB, Sicotte H, Xiao Y, Fridley BL, Decker PA, Kosel ML, Kollmeyer TM, Fink SR, Rynearson AL, Rice T, McCoy LS, Smirnov I, Tehan T, Hansen HM, Patoka JS, Prados MD, Chang SM, Berger MS, Lachance DH, Wiencke JK, Wiemels JL, Wrensch MR, Gephart MH, Lee E, Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou S, Milenkovic L, Xun X, Hou Y, Kui W, Edwards M, Batzoglou S, Jun W, Scott M, Hobbs JE, Tipton J, Zhou T, Kelleher NL, Chandler JP, Schwarzenberg J, Czernin J, Cloughesy T, Ellingson B, Geist C, Phelps M, Chen W, Nakada M, Hayashi Y, Obuchi W, Ohtsuki S, Watanabe T, Ikeda C, Misaki K, Kita D, Hayashi Y, Uchiyama N, Terasaki T, Hamada JI, Hiddingh L, Tops B, Hulleman E, Kaspers GJL, Vandertop WP, Wesseling P, Noske DP, Wurdinger T, Jeuken JW, See AP, Hwang T, Shin D, Shin JH, Gao Y, Lim M, Hutterer M, Michael M, Gerold U, Karin S, Ingrid G, Florian D, Armin M, Eugen T, Eberhard G, Gunther S, Cook RW, Oelschlager K, Sevim H, Chung L, Wheeler HT, Baxter RC, McDonald KL, Chaturbedi A, Yu L, Zhou YH, Chaturbedi A, Wong A, Fatuyi R, Linskey ME, Zhou YH, Lavon I, Shahar T, Zrihan D, Granit A, Ram Z, Siegal T, Brat DJ, Cooper LA, Gutman DA, Chisolm CS, Appin C, Kong J, Kurc T, Van Meir EG, Saltz JH, Moreno CS, Abuhusain HJ, McDonald KL, Don AS, Nagarajan RP, Johnson BE, Olshen AB, Smirnov I, Xie M, Wang J, Sundaram V, Paris P, Wang T, Costello JF, Sijben AE, Boots-Sprenger SH, Boogaarts J, Rijntjes J, Geitenbeek JM, van der Palen J, Bernsen HJ, Wesseling P, Jeuken JW, Schnell O, Adam SA, Eigenbrod S, Kretzschmar HA, Tonn JC, Schuller U, Schwarzenberg J, Cloughesy T, Czernin J, Geist C, Phelps M, Chen W, Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X, Sneed PK, Chao ST, Weil RJ, Suh J, Bhatt A, Jensen AW, Brown PD, Shih HA, Kirkpatrick J, Gaspar LE, Fiveash JB, Chiang V, Knisely JP, Sperduto CM, Lin N, Mehta MP, Kwatra MM, Porter TM, Brown KE, Herndon JE, Bigner DD, Dahlrot RH, Kristensen BW, Hansen S, Sulman EP, Cahill DP, Wang M, Won M, Hegi ME, Mehta MP, Aldape KD, Gilbert MR, Sadr ES, Tessier A, Sadr MS, Alshami J, Sabau C, Del Maestro R, Neal ML, Rockne R, Trister AD, Swanson KR, Maleki S, Back M, Buckland M, Brazier D, McDonald K, Cook R, Parker N, Wheeler H, Jalbert L, Elkhaled A, Phillips JJ, Yoshihara HA, Parvataneni R, Srinivasan R, Bourne G, Chang SM, Cha S, Nelson SJ, Aldape KD, Gilbert M, Cahill D, Wang M, Won M, Hegi M, Colman H, Mehta M, Sulman E, Elkhaled A, Jalbert L, Constantin A, Phillips J, Yoshihara H, Srinivasan R, Bourne G, Chang SM, Cha S, Nelson S, Gunn S, Reveles XT, Tirtorahardjo B, Strecker MN, Fichtel L. -OMICS AND PROGNOSTIC MARKERS. Neuro Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nor167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
9
|
Seymour Z, Kased N, Chuang C, Larson D, McDermott M, Sneed P. Single-fraction versus Multi-fraction Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastases: The UCSF Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
10
|
Dasgupta T, Shugard E, Weinberg V, Kased N, Huang K, Glastonbury C, Orloff L, Clark O, Yom S, Quivey J. Retrospective Outcome Analysis of High-Risk Thyroid Cancer treated with High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) at a Single Institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
11
|
Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Shanley R, Chao ST, Bhatt AK, Brown PD, Shih HA, Kirkpatrick J, Gaspar LE. The effect of tumor subtype on survival and the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) for patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.27_suppl.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
238 Background: The Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) was published to clarify prognosis for patients with brain metastases. This study refines the existing Breast GPA by analyzing a larger cohort and tumor subtype. Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective database of 400 breast cancer patients treated for newly-diagnosed brain metastases was generated. Prognostic factors significant for survival were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression (MCR) and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Factors were weighted by magnitude of their regression coefficients to define the GPA index. A GPA score of 4.0 represents the best prognosis, 0.0, the worst. Results: Significant prognostic factors by MCR and RPA were Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), HER2, ER/PR status, and the interaction between ER/PR and HER2. RPA showed age was significant for patients with KPS 60-80. The median survival time (MST) overall was 13.8 months, and for GPA scores of 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0 was 3.4 (n=23), 7.7 (n=104), 15.1 (n=140) and 25.3 (n=133) months, respectively (p < 0.0001). See table. Among HER2-negative patients, being ER/PR-positive improved MST from 6.4 to 9.7 months whereas in HER2-positive patients, being ER/PR-positive improved MST from 17.9 to 20.7 months. The log-rank statistic (predictive power) was 110 for the Breast-GPA versus 55 for tumor subtype. Conclusions: The Breast-GPA documents wide variation in prognosis and shows clear separation between subgroups of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. This tool will aid clinical decision-making and stratification of clinical trials. These data confirm the effect of tumor subtype on survival and show the Breast-GPA offers significantly more predictive power than the tumor subtype alone. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. W. Sperduto
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - N. Kased
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D. Roberge
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - R. Shanley
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S. T. Chao
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A. K. Bhatt
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - P. D. Brown
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - H. A. Shih
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J. Kirkpatrick
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - L. E. Gaspar
- Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Waconia, MN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Seo Y, Aparici CM, Chen CP, Hsu C, Kased N, Schreck C, Costouros N, Hawkins R, Shinohara K, Roach Iii M. Mapping of lymphatic drainage from the prostate using filtered 99mTc-sulfur nanocolloid and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med 2011; 52:1068-72. [PMID: 21680690 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED We have developed a practice procedure for prostate lymphoscintigraphy using SPECT/CT and filtered (99m)Tc-sulfur nanocolloid, as an alternative to the proprietary product (99m)Tc-Nanocoll, which is not approved in the United States. METHODS Ten patients were enrolled for this study, and all received radiotracer prepared using a 100-nm membrane filter at a commercial radiopharmacy. Whole-body scans and SPECT/CT studies were performed within 1.5-3 h after the radiotracer had been administered directly into 6 locations of the prostate gland under transrectal ultrasound guidance. The radiation dose was estimated from the first 3 patients. Lymphatic drainage mapping was performed, and lymph nodes were identified. RESULTS The estimated radiation dose ranged from 3.9 to 5.2 mSv/MBq. The locations of lymph nodes draining the prostate gland were similar to those found using the proprietary product. CONCLUSION When the proprietary radiolabeled nanocolloid indicated for lymphoscintigraphy is not available, prostate lymph node mapping and identification are still feasible using filtered (99m)Tc-sulfur nanocolloid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngho Seo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California 94107-1739, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kased N, El-Sayed I, Weinberg V, Kaplan M, McDermott M, Nakamura J, Quivey J, Yom S. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esthesioneuroblastoma: Clinical Outcomes and Toxicities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Kased N, Sneed PK. In Response to Drs. Weltman and Brandt. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
15
|
Hanna RF, Aguirre DA, Kased N, Emery SC, Peterson MR, Sirlin CB. Cirrhosis-associated Hepatocellular Nodules: Correlation of Histopathologic and MR Imaging Features. Radiographics 2008; 28:747-69. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.283055108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
16
|
Leite NP, Kased N, Hanna RF, Brown MA, Pereira JM, Cunha R, Sirlin CB. Cross-sectional imaging of extranodal involvement in abdominopelvic lymphoproliferative malignancies. Radiographics 2008; 27:1613-34. [PMID: 18025507 DOI: 10.1148/rg.276065170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Extranodal lymphoproliferative diseases are common, and their prevalence is increasing. Non-Hodgkin lymphomas and Hodgkin disease, in particular, frequently involve extranodal structures in the abdomen and pelvis, including both the solid organs (liver, spleen, kidneys, and pancreas) and the hollow organs of the gastrointestinal tract. Because virtually any abdominopelvic tissue may be involved, many different imaging manifestations are possible, and lymphoproliferative diseases may mimic other disorders. Familiarity with the imaging manifestations that are diagnostically specific for extranodal lymphoproliferative diseases is important because imaging plays an important role in the noninvasive management of disease. However, a definitive diagnosis requires a biopsy (of bone marrow, a lymph node, or a mass), a peripheral blood analysis, and other laboratory tests. In patients with known disease, the goals of imaging are staging, evaluation of response to therapy, and identification of new or recurrent disease or of complications of therapy. In patients without known disease, imaging permits a provisional diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuno Pinto Leite
- Department of Radiology, Division of Body Imaging, University of California-San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kased N, Binder D, Larson D, Nakamura J, Huang K, Berger M, McDermott M, Sneed P. Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases From Primary Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
18
|
Lometti M, Kased N, Jackson A, Aubin M, Morin O, Speight J, Hsu I, Gottschalk A, Pouliot J, Roach III M. On-line Prostate Localization Using Radiopaque Markers and an Electronic Portal Imaging Device: Analysis of Seed Migration and Interfraction Gland Rotation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.1467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
19
|
Kased N, Huang K, Nakamura JL, Sahgal A, Larson DA, McDermott MW, Sneed PK. Gamma knife radiosurgery for brainstem metastases: the UCSF experience. J Neurooncol 2007; 86:195-205. [PMID: 17628747 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-007-9458-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2007] [Accepted: 06/25/2007] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess clinical and imaging outcomes in patients treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brainstem metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed all patients with brain metastases treated with SRS at the University of California, San Francisco from 1991-2005 to identify patients who had SRS to a brainstem metastasis. Survival time and freedom from progression (FFP) were calculated from date of SRS using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS From 1991 through 2005, 42 consecutive patients with brainstem metastases had SRS to 44 lesions (seven midbrain, 31 pontine, and six medullary) in 42 sessions. Primary diagnoses included 14 cases of lung cancer (one small-cell), 10 melanoma, 12 breast cancer, five renal cell, and one unknown. The median age was 55 years (range, 25-79). The median survival time was 9 months after SRS. Longer survival time was associated with single metastasis, non-melanoma histology, and extracranial disease control. The median target volume was 0.26 ml (0.015-2.8 ml) and the median prescribed dose was 16.0 Gy (10.0-19.8 Gy). Brainstem lesion FFP was 90% at 6 months and 77% at 1 year. Four patients had brainstem complications following treatment. Poor brainstem outcome was associated with melanoma and renal cell histology as well as brainstem lesion volume > or =1 ml. CONCLUSIONS In this series, SRS using a median dose of 16 Gy provided excellent local control with relatively low morbidity in patients with brainstem metastases less than 1 ml or non-melanoma, non-renal cell histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Kased
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0226, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|