Factor structure and internal reliability of an exercise health belief model scale in a Mexican population

Background

Mexico is one of the countries with the highest rates of overweight and obesity around the world, with 68.8% of men and 73% of women reporting both. This is a public health problem since there are several health related consequences of not exercising, like having cardiovascular diseases or some types of cancers. All of these problems can be prevented by promoting exercise, so it is important to evaluate models of health behaviors to achieve this goal. Among several models the Health Belief Model is one of the most studied models to promote health related behaviors. This study validates the first exercise scale based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) in Mexicans with the objective of studying and analyzing this model in Mexico.

Methods

Items for the scale called the Exercise Health Belief Model Scale (EHBMS) were developed by a health research team, then the items were applied to a sample of 746 participants, male and female, from five cities in Mexico. The factor structure of the items was analyzed with an exploratory factor analysis and the internal reliability with Cronbach’s alpha.

Results

The exploratory factor analysis reported the expected factor structure based in the HBM. The KMO index (0.92) and the Barlett’s sphericity test (p < 0.01) indicated an adequate and normally distributed sample. Items had adequate factor loadings, ranging from 0.31 to 0.92, and the internal consistencies of the factors were also acceptable, with alpha values ranging from 0.67 to 0.91.

Conclusions

The EHBMS is a validated scale that can be used to measure exercise based on the HBM in Mexican populations.

Selective Prevention for Anxiety and Resilience Promotion: Outcomes of an Anxiety Prevention and Resilience Program with Girls at Risk

Introduction: Research has shown that the number of children and adolescents experiencing emotional difficulties such as anxiety is escalating, especially for those groups at risk. Living in an orphanage has been considered a risk factor for delays in an individuals’ social, emotional and behavioral development. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Spanish version of the FRIENDS program, a CBT-based resilience program, with 57 girls from low socioeconomic status (SES) background that were living in an orphanage. Method: Participants received the program for 10 consecutive weeks, and pre- and post-test measures were collected.  Measures evaluated participants’ anxiety symptoms, level of self-concept, hope, coping skills, and psychosocial difficulties. Social validity was also assessed. Results: Results showed positive changes, including a decrease in anxiety symptoms and psychosocial difficulties, as well as an increase in their proactive coping skills. Several subscales and items of the self-concept and hope outcome measures also reported statistically significant improvements. Conclusions: Participants and parents/caregivers reported that the program was both enjoyable and useful. Implications of the findings and directions for further research are discussed.

Validation of the Children’s Inventory of Anger (ChIA) with a Mexican sample

The Children’s Inventory of Anger (ChIA) is a self-report measure that assesses the level of anger experienced by children and youth. Anger is a significant predictor of aggression, peer relationships difficulties and antisocial behavior; therefore, is crucial to have a valid and reliable measure to evaluate it. The purpose of this study was to validate the ChIA for the Mexican children (ChIA-M). Participants were 638 students (M = 9.8 years; SD = 1.51), 49% were females from primary and secondary Mexican public schools. The exploratory factor analysis supported the four-factor structure with a shared variance of 47.60%, but a different distribution of items. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model to be an acceptable fit with the data χ 2 (338) = 1089.75, p ≤ .001, NFI = .82; IFI = .907, CFI = .906, RMSEA = .047. Good internal consistency was obtained for Total score α = .94 and subscales: Frustration α = .90, Aggression α = .88 , Peer Relationships α = .76 and Authority Relations α = .81. Convergent and divergent validity was supported through positive and significant correlations with the Anger Inventory for Mexican Children and the negligible correlations with the Children Questionnaire of Positive Emotions. Results suggest that the Spanish version of the ChIA for Mexican population is a valid and reliable measure of child anger. However, attention should be paid to the cultural differences related to the experience of anger. Further research should continue evaluating the ChIA with clinical samples and children from different ages and regions in Mexico

"Salud Mamaria", an internet-based psychoeducational program during the breast cancer diagnosis process: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Some of the key challenges during the breast cancer diagnosis process include a lack of information and negative psychological consequences, such as distress and anxiety about the process. Implementing a psychoeducational program during the diagnosis process may enhance the well-being of women. "Salud Mamaria" is an Internet-Based Psychoeducational Program (IBPP) that comprises three interventions: A ("Improving Your Health Habits and Self-Care"), B ("Waiting for the Result of Your Biopsy"), and C ("Supporting You After Your Breast Cancer Diagnosis").

Objective

1) To evaluate changes in the study variables following each of the three interventions (A, B, and C), and 2) To assess the differences in study variables between the IBPP and an active control group.

Methods

This is a superiority trial employing an experimental design with two independent groups: an experimental group and an active control group. All participants will be randomized to one of the two conditions. Anxiety symptoms, negative screening of consequences, sense of coherence, satisfaction with the intervention, and system usability will be measured. Patients will be assigned to an intervention based on their clinical situation: without cancer suspicion (A), with cancer suspicion (B), or diagnosed with cancer (C). Questionnaires will be administered via the online platform before and after each intervention.

Conclusions

A psychoeducational program implemented during the breast cancer screening and diagnosis process may promote the health and well-being of women. It may also encourage adherence to medical screening recommendations, mitigating the lack of information and reducing associated distress.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05830461.

Factores individuales que protegen o favorecen el riesgo de suicidio adolescente: estudio cualitativo con grupos focales

El objetivo del presente estudio fue conocer los factores individuales asociados al riesgo y protección ante el suicidio en adolescentes de una preparatoria de la Universidad de Guadalajara, México; desde la visión de estudiantes, profesores y terapeutas. Mediante un análisis cualitativo de la información obtenida a través de los grupos focales, se encontró que los principales factores de riesgo son la depresión, el manejo inadecuado de emociones y la carencia de un sentido de vida; mientras que los factores que protegen del riesgo suicida son, la capacidad de resolución de problemas, el optimismo y la autoestima. Los hallazgos se discuten desde el soporte de la literatura especializada, así mismo se realizan recomendaciones e implicaciones prácticas.

Validation of the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory for the Mexican Population: Cross-Cultural Discrepancies

To facilitate research on the cognitive model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), leaders in the field of OCD (Obsessive-Compulsive Cognitions Working Group [OCCWG]) developed and validated the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory-31 (III-31). The current sought to adapt and validate this important measure for the Mexican population using a large sample of emerging adults (N = 457). Specifically, we evaluated the factor structure and convergent validity of the III-31 for the Mexican population. Based on a series of confirmatory factor analyses, previously established one-, two-, and three-factor models were found to be a poor fit with current data. However, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution, with one factor assessing the harmfulness and danger of intrusive thoughts (Harmfulness/Danger), and the other assessing exaggerated responsibility and efforts to control intrusions (Responsibility/Control). Satisfactory convergent validity was found with the severity of dysfunctional beliefs and OCD symptoms. Implications and limitations of study results are discussed.