Assessment and Treatment Outcomes of Persistent Radiation-Induced Alopecia in Patients With Cancer

Importance

Persistent radiation-induced alopecia (pRIA) and its management have not been systematically described.

Objective

To characterize pRIA in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors or head and neck sarcoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study of patients from January 1, 2011, to January 30, 2019, was conducted at 2 large tertiary care hospitals and comprehensive cancer centers. Seventy-one children and adults diagnosed with primary CNS tumors or head and neck sarcomas were evaluated for pRIA.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The clinical and trichoscopic features, scalp radiation dose-response relationship, and response to topical minoxidil were assessed using standardized clinical photographs of the scalp, trichoscopic images, and radiotherapy treatment plans.

Results

Of the 71 patients included (median [range] age, 27 [4-75] years; 51 female [72%]), 64 (90%) had a CNS tumor and 7 (10%) had head and neck sarcoma. Alopecia severity was grade 1 in 40 of 70 patients (56%), with localized (29 of 54 [54%]), diffuse (13 of 54 [24%]), or mixed (12 of 54 [22%]) patterns. The median (range) estimated scalp radiation dose was 39.6 (15.1-50.0) Gy; higher dose (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.28) and proton irradiation (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.05-30.8) were associated with greater alopecia severity (P < .001), and the dose at which 50% of patients were estimated to have severe (grade 2) alopecia was 36.1 Gy (95% CI, 33.7-39.6 Gy). Predominant trichoscopic features included white patches (16 of 28 [57%]); in 15 patients, hair-shaft caliber negatively correlated with scalp dose (correlation coefficient, -0.624; P = .01). The association between hair density and scalp radiation dose was not statistically significant (-0.381; P = .16). Twenty-eight of 34 patients (82%) responded to topical minoxidil, 5% (median follow-up, 61 [interquartile range, 21-105] weeks); 4 of 25 (16%) topical minoxidil recipients with clinical images improved in severity grade. Two patients responded to hair transplantation and 1 patient responded to plastic surgical reconstruction.

Conclusions and Relevance

Persistent radiation-induced alopecia among patients with primary CNS tumors or head and neck sarcomas represents a dose-dependent phenomenon that has distinctive clinical and trichoscopic features. The findings of this study suggest that topical minoxidil and procedural interventions may have benefit in the treatment of pRIA.

Treatment Outcomes of Immune-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study was to report the efficacy of topical and systemic treatments for immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) attributed to checkpoint inhibitors in an uncontrolled cohort of patients referred to oncodermatology clinics.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with ircAEs evaluated by dermatologists from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017, at three tertiary care hospitals and cancer centers were identified through electronic medical records. Clinicopathologic characteristics, dermatologic therapy outcome, and laboratory data were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 285 patients (median age, 65 years [range, 17 to 89 years]) with 427 ircAEs were included: pruritus (n = 138; 32%), maculopapular rash (n = 120; 28%), psoriasiform rash (n = 22; 5%), and others (n = 147; 34%). Immune checkpoint inhibitor class was associated with ircAE phenotype (P = .007), where maculopapular rash was predominant in patients who received combination therapy. Severity of ircAEs was significantly reduced (mean Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade: 1.74 v 0.71; P < .001) with dermatologic interventions, including topical corticosteroids, oral antipruritics, and systemic immunomodulators. A total of 88 ircAEs (20%) were managed with systemic immunomodulators. Of these, 22 (25%) of 88 persisted or worsened. In seven patients with corticosteroid-refractory ircAEs, improvement resulted from targeted biologic immunomodulatory therapies that included rituximab and dupilumab. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) was elevated in 34 (52%) of 65 patients; grade 3 or greater ircAEs were associated with increased absolute eosinophils (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 13.4) and IL-10 (odds ratio, 23.8; 95% CI, 2.1 to 262.5); mean immunoglobulin E serum levels were greater in higher-grade ircAEs: 1,093 kU/L (grade 3), 245 kU/L (grade 2), and 112 kU/L (grade 1; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Most ircAEs responded to symptom- and phenotype-directed dermatologic therapies, whereas biologic therapies were effective in patients with corticosteroid-refractory disease. Increased eosinophils, IL-6, IL-10, and immunoglobulin E were associated with ircAEs, and they may represent actionable therapeutic targets for immune-related skin toxicities.

A randomized phase 2 trial of the efficacy and safety of a novel topical povidone-iodine formulation for Cancer therapy-associated Paronychia

Purpose Cancer therapy-associated paronychia (CAP) is a frequent adverse event associated with cytotoxic and targeted therapies that may impact dosing of anticancer therapies and patient quality of life (QoL). There are currently no evidence-based management strategies or approved treatments for CAP. Materials and Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6 to 8 weeks of 1% or 2% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) topical solution versus vehicle-control in adult patients with CAP. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms administered twice daily: 1% PVP-I (Cohort A), 2% PVP-I (Cohort B), or vehicle-control (Cohort C). The primary endpoint was a two-grade reduction (or reduction to grade 0 if involved nails were grade 1) on the six-point Paronychia Severity Grading (PSG) scale. Secondary endpoints included safety and the effect on QoL and microbiota. Results A total of 102 patients with cancer were randomized to the study. In Cohort A, 83 of 205 (40.5%, P = 0.6059) affected nails met the primary endpoint versus Cohort C. In Cohort B, 88 of 167 (52.7%, P = 0.0063) affected nails met the primary endpoint versus 64 of 169 (37.9%) in Cohort C. Nineteen of 29 patients (65.5%) in Cohort B reported moderately or very painful nails at baseline that decreased to 15 patients (51.7%) at visit 2 and five patients (17.2%) at visit 3. Conclusions Treatment with twice-daily topical 2% PVP-I was safe and resulted in improvement in CAP compared with control. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03207906. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03207906.

Persistent radiation-induced alopecia in patients with central nervous system tumors and head and neck sarcomas

e23072

Background: Persistent radiation-induced alopecia (pRIA), or incomplete hair regrowth 6 months following radiotherapy (RT) completion, poses a significant quality of life burden, but its clinical characteristics and management outcomes are not well understood. Methods: Retrospective database query of patients with primary central nervous system tumors or head and neck sarcomas evaluated at an oncodermatology clinic and diagnosed with pRIA between 1/1/11 and 9/19/18. Clinical data and standardized clinical photographs were analyzed. Alopecia was graded according to the CTCAE v5. Results: Sixty-two patients with pRIA were identified (mean [SD] age, 33 [19]; 75% female; 18 < 21 years at pRIA diagnosis). The most common diagnoses were medulloblastoma (20, 32%) and glioblastoma multiforme (17, 27%). Mean duration between RT and pRIA diagnosis was 3.1 years (95% CI, 2.3-4.2). Additional cancer therapies included surgery (57, 92%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (35, 57%), and combination cytotoxic + targeted therapy (24, 39%). Cancer type, age, number of chemotherapy agents, and duration between RT and pRIA diagnosis were significantly associated with alopecia type: mixed pattern (localized and diffuse) alopecia was predominant in younger patients with medulloblastoma exposed to greater number of agents (p < .005). Alopecia grade 2 ( > 50% hair loss) was predominant in patients that received concurrent chemotherapy and RT (p = .046). Among 22 patients treated with 5% minoxidil topical solution, a response was noted in 16 (73%) (Table). One patient receiving hair transplantation and one receiving scalp reconstruction had complete resolution of pRIA. Conclusions: Concurrent chemotherapy with RT may be a risk factor for grade 2 pRIA. Topical minoxidil may provide some benefit in pRIA; however, prospective trials are needed to assess efficacy. Procedural interventions should be considered as a viable therapeutic option in a subset of patients. [Table: see text]

Abstract P4-16-07: The CHANCE study: Mechanical skin changes among women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and endocrine therapy

Background: The persistent effects on skin hydration and elasticity resulting from cytotoxic and endocrine agents used in early stages of breast cancer are poorly understood. The objective of this preliminary analysis of the CHANCE study is to describe the pattern of persistent biomechanical skin changes in non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapies and/or endocrine therapies.

Methods: This is an ongoing single-center, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapies and/or endocrine therapies. Objective skin hydration and elasticity measurements of the forearm were measured using Tewameter® (TM 300; Courage & Khazaka) and Cutometer® (MPA 580; Courage & Khazaka) devices under a controlled ambient environment at baseline and 6 months after chemotherapy completion, or one year after initiation of endocrine therapy.

Results: A total of 107 patients were assessed at baseline and follow-up for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) (median age 53, range 26-82) and 106 patients for skin elasticity (median age 53.5, range 26-82). Fifty-three healthy controls were evaluated at baseline with median age 47 (range, 22-73). The mean TEWL at baseline and follow-up among patients were 6.922 g/h/m2 and 8.521 g/h/m2, respectively (p&lt;.0001). Skin firmness (0.420 versus 0.421 mm, p=0.949) and elasticity (77.2% versus 77.4%, p=0.836) did not significantly change during follow-up. When comparing chemotherapy recipients with endocrine therapy recipients, chemotherapy patients had a mildly lower TEWL at follow-up (8.369 versus 8.928 g/h/m2, p=.247) but a greater net increase in TEWL (1.687 versus 1.359 g/h/m2, p=.5) compared to endocrine patients over the study period.

Conclusions: An increase in TEWL was observed in patients receiving cytotoxic and endocrine therapies, suggesting a deterioration of the protective skin barrier possibly attributed to these therapies. No significant changes in skin firmness or elasticity were found in this preliminary analysis. Further studies are needed to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in persistent skin changes after systemic breast cancer therapies.

Objective skin hydration and elasticity in patients receiving breast cancer therapy Control (n=53)Baseline (n=107)Follow-Up (n=107)p-value*TEWL (g/h/m2)9.4626.9228.521&lt;.0001Cutometer Baseline (n=106)Follow-Up (n=106) Immediate recovery, R0 (mm)0.4150.4200.4210.949Gross elasticity, R2 (%)79.3%77.2%77.4%0.836*p-value calculated from baseline and follow-up only

Citation Format: Lacouture ME, Phillips GS, Freites-Martinez A, Patil S, Samuels A, Shapiro J, Kukoyi O, Goldfarb S. The CHANCE study: Mechanical skin changes among women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-07.