A 3-Year Study Investigating the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 for Long-Term Follow-Up in Adult Spinal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) significantly impacts the quality of life due to three-dimensional spinal abnormalities. Patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), play a crucial role in assessing postoperative outcomes. This study aims to investigate trends in PROMIS-29 scores over 36 months in patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion for ASD and provide insights into its long-term utility.

METHODS

A retrospective study including 163 ASD patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion was conducted. PROMIS-29 scores were collected at baseline and at postoperative (0-), 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses was performed to assess significant score changes from baseline and in consecutive recordings.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in all PROMIS-29 categories were observed at 36 months, with the greatest changes in pain intensity (-35.19%, P < 0.001), physical function (+29.13%, P < 0.001), and pain interference (-28.8%, P < 0.001). Between the 0 and 3 month mark, the greatest significant changes were recorded in pain intensity (-26.5%, P < 0.001), physical function (+24.3%, P < 0.001), and anxiety (-16.9%, P < 0.018). However, scores plateaued after the 3-month mark, with zero categories showing significant changes with subsequent consecutive recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS-29 scores demonstrated notable improvements in ASD patients particularly in pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function. However, scores plateaued beyond the 3-month mark, suggesting PROMIS-29's limited sensitivity to nuanced changes in long-term patient recovery. Future investigations exploring optimal combinations of patient reported outcome measures for comprehensive short- and long-term outcome assessments in ASD surgery would be beneficial.

Identifying Correlation Among Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Study of PROMIS-29, ODI, and VAS in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is becoming increasingly common in aging populations. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are self-reported patient surveys administered pre- and postoperatively that provide insight into patient improvement. We aim to compare 3 of the most utilized PROMs: PROMIS-29, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), to investigate whether they provide unique and independent assessments of patient outcomes when assessed longitudinally.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of ASD at UT Southwestern Medical Center between 2016 and 2021. Adult patients (>18 years old) were included if they underwent long-segment (>4 levels) thoracolumbar fusion. PROMIS-29, ODI, and VAS scores were collected preoperatively and at 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month follow-ups. Scores were recorded ±1 month of the time points. Pearson correlation coefficients for each PROM were then calculated in a pairwise fashion.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were included in our analysis. ODI and VAS showed significant covariance, with VAS Neck and VAS Back having Pearson coefficients of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. ODI and PROMIS-29 also showed significant covariance, with Physical Function and ODI showing a Pearson coefficient of 0.95. PROMIS-29 and VAS demonstrated less correlation regarding Pain and Physical Function; however, they showed a significantly high Pearson coefficient when comparing VAS Back with PROMIS-29 Sleep and Pain Intensity (r = 0.97 and r = 0.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 PROMs demonstrated significant correlation over 36 months, indicating that simultaneous administration of each during follow-up is redundant. The measure that provided the least unique information was ODI, as both VAS and PROMIS-29 demonstrated similar progression and assessed additional metrics. PROMIS-29 provided the same information as VAS and ODI, with extra facets of patient-reported outcomes, indicating that it may be a more comprehensive measure of longitudinal patient improvement.

A Comparative Analysis of Frailty, Disability, and Sarcopenia With Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series study.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare preoperative indices, including the modified frailty index-11 (mFI-11), modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and psoas muscle index (PMI), as they relate to outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

We identified 235 patients who underwent thoracolumbar ASD surgery (≥4 levels). The mFI-11, mFI-5, ODI, and PMI were determined from preoperative visits and correlated to outcome measures, including perioperative transfusion, duration of anesthesia, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, readmission, change in ODI at last follow-up, revision surgery, and mortality.

RESULTS

Our cohort had a mean age of 69.6 years and a male:female ratio of 1:2 with 177 undergoing an index surgery and 58 patients presenting after a failed multilevel fusion. The average number of levels fused was 9.3. The mFI-11 and mFI-5 were similar in predicting the need for intraoperative and postoperative transfusion. However, the mFI-11 was able to predict longer ICU and hospital LOS and mortality. The average preoperative ODI was 44.9% with an average decrease of 10.1% at the last follow-up. Preoperative ODI was the most significant predictor of postoperative change of ODI. Sarcopenia, defined as the lowest quartile of PMI values measured at L3 and L4, was not associated with any meaningful outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The mFI-11 better correlated with outcomes, indicating its increased prognostic value compared to other preoperative indices in ASD surgery. Preoperative ODI remains a significant predictor of postoperative change in ODI when evaluating ASD patients.

Psoas Muscle Index as a Predictor of Perioperative Outcomes in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of psoas muscle mass defined sarcopenia with perioperative outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

METHODS

We included geriatric patients undergoing thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Total psoas surface area (TPA) was measured on preoperative axial computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging at the L3 vertebra and normalized to the L3 vertebral body area. Patients were divided into quartiles by normalized TPA, and the fourth quartile (Q4) was compared to quartiles 1-3 (Q1-3). Outcomes included perioperative transfusions, length of stay (LOS), delirium, pseudoarthrosis, readmission, discharge disposition, revision surgery, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the patients who met inclusion criteria (n = 196), the average age was 73.4 y, with 48 patients in Q4 and 148 patients in Q1-3. Q4 normalized TPA cut-off was <1.05. Differences in Q4 preoperative characteristics included significantly lower body mass index, baseline creatinine, and a greater proportion of females (Table 1). Q4 patients received significantly more postoperative red blood cell and platelet transfusions and had longer ICU LOS (P < .05; Table 2). There was no difference in intraoperative transfusion volumes, delirium, initiation of walking, discharge disposition, readmission, pseudoarthrosis, or revision surgery (Tables 2 and 3). Mortality during follow-up was higher in Q4 but was not statistically significant (P = .075).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative TPA in geriatric patients undergoing elective spine surgery is associated with increased need for intensive care and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative normalized TPA is a convenient measurement and could be included in geriatric preoperative risk assessment algorithms.

Transfusion guidelines in adult spine surgery: a systematic review and critical summary of currently available evidence

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Red blood cell transfusion can be associated with complications in medical and surgical patients. Acute anemia in ambulatory patients undergoing surgery can also impede wound healing and independent self-care. Current transfusion threshold guidelines are still based on evidence derived from critically-ill intensive care unit medical patients and may not apply to spine surgery candidates.

PURPOSE

We aimed to provide the reader with a synthesis of the best available evidence to recommend transfusion trigger thresholds and guidelines in adult patients undergoing spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a systematic review.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physiological measure: Blood transfusion thresholds and associated posttransfusion complications (morbidity, mortality, length of stay, infections, etc) of the published articles.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adult spine surgery patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science electronic databases was made according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Focus was set on papers discussing thresholds for blood transfusion in adult surgical spine patients, as well as complications associated with transfusion after acute surgical blood loss in the operating room or postoperative period. Publications discussing pediatric cases, blood type analyses, blood loss prevention strategies and protocols, systematic reviews and letters to the editor were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 22 articles fitting our search criteria were reviewed. Patients who received blood transfusion in these studies were older, of female gender, had more severe comorbidities except for smoking, and had prolonged surgical time. Blood transfusion was associated with multiple adverse postoperative complications, including a higher rate of superficial or deep surgical site infections, sepsis, urinary and pulmonary infections, cardiovascular complications, return to the operating room, and increased postoperative length of stay and 30 day readmission. Analysis of transfusion thresholds from these studies showed that a pre-operative hemoglobin (Hb) of > 13 g/dL, and an intraoperative and post-operative Hb nadir above 9 and 8 g/dL, respectively, were associated with better outcomes and fewer wound infections than lower thresholds (Level B Class III). Additionally, it was generally recommended to transfuse autologous blood that was < 28 days old, if possible, with a limit of 2 to 3 units to minimize patient morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood transfusion thresholds in surgical patients may be specialty-specific and different than those used for critically-ill medical patients. For adult spine surgery patients, red blood cell transfusion should be avoided if Hb numbers remain > 9 and 8 g/dL in the intraoperative and direct post-operative periods, respectively.

Open Paddle Lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an accepted treatment for certain chronic pain syndromes. It is imperative that patients undergo a stimulation screening trial. For trial stimulation, typically patients undergo a percutaneous lead placement. Due to technical considerations, there exists a subset of patients who are not candidates for a percutaneous trial.

OBJECTIVE

We present our experience with open paddle trial for spinal cord stimulation and review the characteristics of this patient population as well as the technique and efficacy of an open paddle lead trial for spinal cord stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 25 patients undergoing a paddle lead trial for spinal cord stimulation from September 2014 to September 2019.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent a paddle lead trial for spinal cord stimulation. The average age was 61 with a range of 40 to 82 years; 19 were women and 6 were men. Twenty-two patients (88%) had failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Nine patients had attempted percutaneous trials that were unsuccessful, and 14 patients had extensive hardware and/or scar tissue, necessitating an open paddle trial. Twenty-three (92%) patients had a positive trial and went on to permanent implantation.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature is a major limitation as well as loss to follow-up on several patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients, who have either failed or are deemed suboptimal for percutaneous trialing for spinal cord stimulation, should be considered for open paddle lead trialing. A multidisciplinary approach improves communication and helps to identify that subset of patients who otherwise may be left to pursue conservative measures only.

Laser speckle imaging to evaluate scalp flap blood flow during closure in neurosurgical procedures

Background:

To measure the degree of relative ischemia caused by skin closure, we explored the potential utility of intraoperative surface blood flow measurement with laser speckle imaging (LSI).

Methods:

Prospective observational study of eight subjects that underwent intraoperative LSI during elective cranial neurosurgical procedures at the time of skin closure.

Results:

Seven 1st time incisions, with closure techniques including sutures (n = 3), staples (n = 3), and one after galeal sutures. When compared to the control region, there was a mean 63.7% reduction in flow across all seven subjects (range 18.7–95.32%). Comparing by closure type, a higher flow reduction in the three subjects with suture closure (80.7% reduction) compared to staples (61.9% reduction, P = 0.0379). One subject had a complex wound where tightening and loosening of sutures were performed to ensure adequate perfusion. Suturing resulted in significantly more local decreased flow compared to staples (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

These findings demonstrate the relative feasibility of using LSI for preoperative vascular flow assessment in planning complex incision closure. These data also provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that skin closure itself causes relative ischemia compared to deep approximation or cautery of the skin edge and that the relative ischemia from staples closure is generally less than from suture closure.

The Clinical Use of Serum Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review Stratified by Injury Severity

BACKGROUND

Serum biomarkers have gained significant popularity as an adjunctive measure in the evaluation and prognostication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, a concise and clinically oriented report of the major markers in function of TBI severity is lacking. This systematic review aims to report current data on the diagnostic and prognostic utility of blood-based biomarkers across the spectrum of TBI.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed/Medline electronic database was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We excluded systematic reviews and meta-analyses that did not provide novel data. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association criteria were used to assess levels of evidence.

RESULTS

An initial 1463 studies were identified. In total, 115 full-text articles reporting on 94 distinct biomarkers met the inclusion criteria. Glasgow Coma Scale scores, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, and injury severity scores were the most used clinical diagnostic variables. Glasgow Outcome Scores and 1-, 3-, and 6-month mortality were the most used clinical prognostic variables. Several biomarkers significantly correlated with these variables and had statistically significant different levels in TBI subjects when compared with healthy, orthopedic, and polytrauma controls. The biomarkers also displayed significant variability across mild, moderate, and severe TBI categories, as well as in concussion cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarizes existing high-quality evidence that supports the use of severity-specific biomarkers in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of TBI. These data can be used as a launching platform for the validation of upcoming clinical studies.

Delayed Surgical Intervention in Acute Subdural Hematoma

Background Current guidelines recommend an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) with a thickness greater than or equal to 10 mm or a midline shift greater than or equal to 5 mm be evacuated regardless of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). A large craniotomy versus craniectomy is the preferred surgical treatment for ASDH. A subset of patients who are typically older if not elderly meet the above criteria but have a monitorable neurologic exam. These patients can be followed and taken in a delayed manner allowing the ASDH to become chronic. The delay in treatment allows for a smaller surgery in regards to size of incision, size of craniotomy, and duration of anesthesia.  Methods Between February 2013 and July 2019, we retrospectively identified 19 patients who underwent delayed evacuation of an ASDH, with the primary outcome being Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge and three-month follow-up. Results Eight patients (42%) were female and 11 patients (58%) were male. The median age was 77 years, with a range from 49 to 93 years. Sixteen patients (84%) were 60 years of age or older. Mechanism of injury was a fall for 10 patients (53%). Median number of days from initial evaluation and surgical evacuation was 11 days with a range from 6 to 31 days. Thirteen patients (68%) had a GOS of 4-5 at three-month follow-up. Six patients (32%) had a GOS 1-3 at three-month follow-up. Two mortalities (11%) recorded in the postoperative period. Conclusion Surgically evacuated ASDH in the elderly population is known to carry a significant mortality and morbidity. With close neuromonitoring, delayed intervention in older patients with an ASDH, initially meeting surgical criteria with a good neurologic exam, is a safe practice. Delayed treatment allows for smaller surgery, decreased operative time, and decreased surgical risk which affects older patients even more than younger patients.

Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Brain Tissue Oxygenation in Traumatic Brain Injury

The effectiveness of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage in lowering high intracranial pressure (ICP) is well established in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Recently, however, the use of external ventricular drains (EVDs) and ICP monitors in TBI has come under question. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effect of CSF drainage on brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO₂). Using a multi-modality monitoring system, we continuously monitored PbtO₂ and parenchymal ICP during CSF drainage events via a ventriculostomy in 40 patients with severe TBI. Measurements were time-locked continuous recordings on a Component Neuromonitoring System in a neuroscience intensive care unit. We further selected for therapeutic CSF drainage events initiated at ICP values above 25 mm Hg and analyzed the 4-min periods before and after drainage for the physiologic variables ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and PbtO₂. We retrospectively identified 204 CSF drainage events for ICP EVD-opening values greater than 25 mm Hg in 23 patients. During the 4 min of opened EVD, ICP decreased by 5.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg, CPP increased by 4.1 ± 1.2 mm Hg, and PbtO₂ increased by 1.15 ± 0.26 mm Hg. ICP, CPP, and PbtO₂ all improved with CSF drainage at ICP EVD-opening values above 25 mm Hg. Although the average PbtO₂ changes were small, a clinically significant change in PbtO₂ of 5 mm Hg or greater occurred in 12% of CSF drainage events, which was correlated with larger decreases in ICP, displaying a complex relationship between ICP and PbtO₂ that warrants further studies.

A novel single twist-drill access device for multimodal intracranial monitoring: a 5-year single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Multimodal intracranial monitoring in the neurosurgical patient requires insertion of probes through multiple craniostomies.

OBJECTIVE

To report our 5-year experience with a novel device allowing multimodal monitoring though a single twist-drill hole.

METHODS

All devices (Hummingbird Synergy, Innerspace) were placed at the Kocher point between 2008 and 2013 at our institution. An independent clinical research nurse prospectively collected data on all bedside placements. Placement accuracy was graded on computed tomography scan as grade 1 (ipsilateral frontal horn or third ventricle), grade 2 (contralateral lateral ventricle), and grade 3 (anywhere else). Infection was monitored with serial cerebrospinal fluid samples.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-five devices (198 at bedside, 77 in operating room) were placed in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (49%), traumatic brain injury (47%), and others (4%) for a median duration of 6 days. A junior (postgraduate year 1-2), midlevel (postgraduate year 3-4), or senior resident (postgraduate year 5-6) placed 39%, 32%, and 29% of the devices, respectively. Ninety-two percent of all devices placed were draining cerebrospinal fluid, ie, were grade 1 (75%) or 2 (17%). Placement accuracy did not vary with level of training. Complications included hemorrhage (10%) and infection (4%), with 1 patient requiring intraparenchymal hematoma evacuation and a second requiring abscess drainage. These rates were lower than reported in the literature for standard external ventricular drains.

CONCLUSION

Hummingbird Synergy is a novel single-port access device for multimodal intracranial monitoring that can be placed safely at the bedside or in the operating room with placement accuracy and has a complication profile similar to or better than that for standard external ventricular drains.