Stimulant Treatment Effect on Anxiety Domains in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With and Without Anxiety Disorders: A 12-Week Open-Label Prospective Study

Objectives: The effect of stimulants on anxiety domains has not been systematically studied. We assessed prospectively the impact of stimulant treatment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on the severity of anxiety domains and on ADHD with comorbid anxiety disorders. Methods: Children with ADHD (n = 57, aged 6-15 years) started a stimulant or were switched from one stimulant to another. Assessments were conducted at four time points (baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 12) and consisted of parental questionnaires (ADHD rating scale, screen for child anxiety related disorders [SCARED]), and side effect questionnaire completed by a child psychiatrist. Results: A significant improvement in total SCARED scores was obtained after 12 weeks stimulant treatment in children both with and without anxiety disorders. Significant reductions were detected in generalized anxiety, separation anxiety, and school avoidance SCARED subscales, but not in panic and social anxiety subscales. ADHD symptoms significantly improved both in children with and without anxiety comorbidities. Conclusion: We found specific effects of stimulants on anxiety domains. Stimulant treatment, even for ADHD children diagnosed with comorbid anxiety disorders, is relatively safe regarding the risk of anxiety exacerbation. Moreover, the presence of anxiety symptoms or disorders does not interfere with the beneficial effect of the stimulants on the ADHD core symptoms. Clinical trial regestration number: IRB SMC-6893-20.

Delivering Difficult News: Simulation-Enhanced Training Improves Psychiatry Residents' Clinical Communication Skills

Background: Delivering difficult news to individuals diagnosed with mental health disorders and their family members can be challenging. The use of simulated patients (SP) is an effective teaching method to enhance clinical skills, particularly those around communication. We developed, implemented, and evaluated the effectiveness of an SP-based training module to improve psychiatric residents' clinical communication skills in delivering difficult news. Methods: We conducted 5-h workshops consisting of 3 components: (1) a high-fidelity simulation session with a professional actor; (2) a 30-min lecture; and (3) role-playing of 3 short scenarios, during which residents rotated taking on different roles (as psychiatrist, patient, or family member). We observed through a 1-way mirror and videotaped each resident's simulation session and followed it with personalized debriefing. Following the workshop, each resident received the full-length video of their simulated interview, together with a list of questions as a take-home assignment. Two months after the workshop, the residents were invited to a second SP-based session, during which 2 independent evaluators, each a board-certified psychiatrist with expertise in medical simulation, evaluated the participants' communication skills using a previously validated instrument. To avoid observation bias, the 2 evaluators rated the videotapes blind to the timing of the simulation (pre- vs. post-training). Participants completed self-report questionnaires on satisfaction and self-confidence, before, after, and 2 months following the workshop. Findings: Of the 28 psychiatric residents who participated in the training day, 24 (86%) completed the post-workshop evaluation. Mean communication score increased from 24.9 to 27.8 (paired t-test: 5.6, p < 0.001). The mean score for the self-confidence questionnaire, calculated on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, increased from 3.4 to 4.0 after the training day, and remained unchanged (4.2) 2 months later (p < 0.001). Conclusions: An SP-based training module proved useful in improving the objectively measured communication skills of psychiatric residents delivering difficult news. The training further enhanced participants' subjective sense of confidence in those clinical skills.

Single-Day Simulation-Based Training Improves Communication and Psychiatric Skills of Medical Students

BACKGROUND

Use of standardized (or simulated) patients (SP) is considered an effective teaching method for improving clinical and communication skills. This study assesses the effect of a single-day simulated patients (SP)-based training course on medical students' communication and basic skills in clinical psychiatry during their psychiatry rotation in a university-affiliated tertiary medical center.

METHODS

Forty-two third-year medical students participated. Communication and basic skills in clinical psychiatry were evaluated by a modified Four Habits Coding Scale (4HCS) and the psychiatric interview coding scale before and after SP training. An actual patient interview by the students 1 week after the training was evaluated by an attending psychiatrist blinded to the student's score during the SP-based training. Self-report questionnaires on satisfaction from the training and its impact on their self-confidence were administered at the end of training.

FINDINGS

The mean pre-training 4HCS score of 33.9 increased to 52.3 post-training (p < 0.001). The mean psychiatric interview coding scale score increased from 4.33 to 5.36 (p = 0.002). The self-report questionnaire yielded a mean score of 4.21 on a 1-5 Likert scale, implying high levels of satisfaction and self-confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

A single SP-based training course of medical students sufficed to improve clinical and communication skills in psychiatric settings and enhance their subjective perception of those skills.