Comparing the quality of care in physician networks to usual care for elderly patients in three German regions: a quasi-experimental cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Patients in Germany have free choice of physicians in the ambulatory care sector and can consult them as often as they wish without a referral. This can lead to inefficiencies in treatment pathways. In response, some physicians have formed networks to improve the coordination and quality of care. This study aims to investigate whether the care provided by these networks results in better health and process outcomes than usual care.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a quasi-experimental cohort study.

METHODS

We analysed claims data from 2017 to 2018 in Bavaria, Brandenburg, and Westphalia-Lippe. Our study population includes patients aged 65 years or older with heart failure (n = 267,256), back pain (n = 931,672), or depression (n = 483,068). We compared condition-specific and generic quality indicators between patients treated in physician networks and usual care. Ambulatory care-sensitive emergency department cases were used as a primary outcome measure. Imbalances between the groups were minimized using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Rates of ambulatory care-sensitive emergency department cases yielded insignificant differences between networks and usual care in the depression and heart failure subgroups. For back pain patients, rates were 0.17 percentage points higher (P < 0.01) in network patients compared with usual care. Among network patients, generic indicators for prevention and coordination showed significantly better performance. For instance, the rate of completed vaccination against influenza is 3.03 percentage points higher (P < 0.01), and the rate of specialist visits after referral is 1.6 percentage points higher (P < 0.01) in heart failure patients, who are treated in physician networks. This is accompanied by higher rates of polypharmacy. Furthermore, the results for condition-specific indicators suggest that for most indicators, a greater proportion of the care provided by physician networks adhered to national treatment guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that physician networks in Germany do not reduce rates of ambulatory care-sensitive emergency department cases but perform better than usual care in terms of care coordination and prevention. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and explore the implications of the potentially higher rates of polypharmacy seen in physician networks.

The role of regional health policy for socioeconomic inequality in health services utilization

Background

“J1” is a preventative routine examination in Germany recommended for adolescents at the age of 12-14 years. In contrast to the well-established U1-U9 examinations for younger children, with participation rates above 90%, the attendance of the J1 examination is approximately only 40%. The most frequent reason for not attending J1 is the unawareness of this examination. “Ticket to J1” is an intervention including an information leaflet introduced in Bavaria in 2017 to inform adolescents about J1. The aims of the present analysis are to investigate (1) if the regional policy was effective in increasing the attendance in J1, (2) if the effects vary by family socioeconomic status (SES), and (3) which meso-level characteristics of the healthcare system correlate with attendance rates in J1.

Methods

We used anonymised data of a large statutory health insurance in Germany for the timeframe of 2016-2018. To investigate the effect of the policy, a difference-in-differences design at the individual level was used. Assuming a parallel trend at the level of federal states, the likelihood of attendance in J1 of 13- and 14-year-olds was compared between Bavaria and other federal German states before and after policy introduction. All analyses were additionally stratified by SES.

Results

The introduction of “Ticket to J1” increased participation in J1 by 1% after controlling for all confounders. Furthermore, the effect was stronger for children from families with lower SES (an increase of 5%). Density of pediatricians was positively significantly correlated with participation in J1.

Discussion

Regional health policy intervention had a significant positive impact on attendance of J1 and appears to have the potential to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare utilization. Informing adolescents about J1 seems to increase the attendance, in particular for children from families with lower SES.