Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel or cisplatin in patients with stage III-C/IV ovarian cancer. Is there any difference?

OBJETIVE

To compare the results of the administration of HIPEC with Paclitaxel or Cisplatin after cytoreduction in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer, especially focused on disease-free survival.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of patients operated after being diagnosed with stage III-C/IV serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Patients included in the study were treated between January 2008 and March 2015. After cytoreduction, Paclitaxel (doses of 60 mg/m(2)O or Cisplatin (doses of 75 mg/m(2)) were used.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were included. Median age was 61 years. In 60 of them (54%) Paclitaxel was used during HIPEC treatment and 51 patients (46%) were treated with Cisplatin. PCI was similar between groups (PCI = 11 in both cases). Median follow up was 34 months (12-96 months). The median disease free survival in Paclitaxel Group was 27 months and 33 months in Cisplatin Group (p = 0.551). In patients treated with Paclitaxel disease free survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 79%, 60% and 46%. In patients treated with Cisplatin disease free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years were 64%, 50% and 40% respectively. After a multivariate analysis, incomplete cytoreduction (HR: 6.54, 95% CI 2.98-10.17, p < 0.01) and PCI >11 (HR: 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-6.68, p < 0.05) were identified as independent factors associated with a reduced disease-free survival. Cystotatic used was not relevant regarding disease free survival analysis.

CONCLUSION

HIPEC with paclitaxel or cisplatin after cytoreduction in patients with ovarian cancer IIIC-IV has not shown different results in disease-free survival outcomes.

Cytoreduction and HIPEC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer. Critical analysis in elderly patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free and overall survival in patients older than 75 years undergoing interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

STUDY DESIGN

Were included a series of consecutive patients diagnosed with stages IIIC/IV ovarian carcinoma, intervened after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) between January 2008 and June 2013. After completion of cytoreduction HIPEC was administered using paclitaxel (60mg/m(2)) or cisplatin (75mg/m(2)). We analyzed and compared the results of postoperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free survival and overall survival in patients ≥75 years compared to patients with lower ages intervened in the same time period.

RESULTS

From a total of 66 patients tested, 9 patients were ≥75 years (14%). Grade I-IV morbidity was significantly higher in patients ≥75 years (78% vs 35%, p<0.05) as well as grade III-IV disease (56% vs 16%, p<0.05). There were no procedure-related mortality. In patients ≥75 years the median disease-free survival was 6 months (95% CI: 3.5-8.5 months) vs 24 months (95% CI: 10.5-37.5 months) in younger patients. The median overall survival in patients ≥75 years was 13 months (95% CI: 4.7-21.3), not having reached at time of analysis of the database in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≥75 years received no benefit in prognosis after interval cytoreduction with HIPEC and paid a high price in terms of postoperative morbidity. This age group should be excluded from this therapeutic procedure.

[Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy associated toxicity in treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis]

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a form of intra-abdominal dissemination of several tumours, which is associated with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an alternative treatment. The aim of this study is to describe the toxicity associated with this procedure in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

METHOD

We conducted a descriptive, retrospective, single-centre study, including all patients undergoing this procedure between December 2007 and January 2010. The following data were recorded: anthropometric data, personal and surgical events, indication, previous treatments, extent of carcinomatosis, intervention duration, hospital stay, and type of complications and/or adverse events following application of the multidisciplinary treatment.

RESULTS

We performed 46 interventions on 45 patients diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis from different causes, mainly ovarian cancer (83%). Paclitaxel was the most-used drug (35 interventions). There was no associated mortality, the average intervention time was 6.4 hours and the average hospital stay 7 days. We recorded adverse effects for 42 procedures, being grade 3-4 in 28.3% of the patients. The severe adverse events were: 10.9% gastrointestinal, 10.9% infectious, 6.5% haemorrhage or bleeding, 6.5% medullary toxicity, 4.4% respiratory, 2.2% coagulation and 2.2% hepatobiliary disorders. One patient developed grade III neutropaenia, probably associated with cisplatin.

CONCLUSION

The morbidity and mortality is in line with the average of published studies, and has mainly been attributed to surgical complications. Toxicity data lower than other studies can be due to using more tolerable chemotherapy regimens, not including drug combinations and given that paclitaxel was the main drug.