Consolidative Radio therapy in Place of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Low-Risk Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) Treated with Nivolumab plus Brentuximab Vedotin: CheckMate 744

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Standard of care treatment for patients with relapsed and refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (RRHL) involves second line therapy followed by high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) and carries with it significant costs and toxicities to the patient. Some patients with RRHL may not require such intensive therapy, especially in the era of targeted chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. CheckMate 744 (NCT02927769) evaluated a novel second-line therapy that omits HDT/ASCT by combining brentuximab vedotin (BV) and a nivolumab (N) followed by consolidative ISRT for low risk RRHL.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Pts were aged 5-30 y and had one prior treatment without HDT/ASCT. Low-risk RRHL were those at relapse without B symptoms or extranodal disease, limited sites of relapse (≤4 sites of disease above the diaphragm or ≤3 sites above/below the diaphragm) AND with initial Stage IA, IIA with relapse <1 year if they received ≤3 cycles of chemotherapy and no RT OR Stage IA/B, IIA/B, IIIA ≥ 1 year. Patients received 4 cycles of N + BV induction. Patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) received an additional 2 cycles of N + BV before RT consolidation. Patients with suboptimal response received 2 cycles of BV + bendamustine intensification. Those patients achieving CMR proceeded to RT consolidation. RT was delivered to a dose of 30-30.6 Gy at 1.5-1.8 Gy/fraction to an ISRT volume.

RESULTS

Among 28 pts treated, the median age (range) was 17 (6-27) years old and 64% of patients were aged < 18 y. Most (79%) pts had stage II disease at diagnosis and 82% had relapsed ≥ 12 months after first line treatment. Of 27 pts continuing in study after induction N + BV, 6 received bendamustine + BV intensification, and 92.9% achieved complete metabolic response. Twenty-two patients received RT consolidation. RT consolidation was delivered using 3D-CRT, IMRT, or proton therapy. After a median (range) follow-up of 31.8 (2.2-55.1) months, the 3-y event-free survival rate and progression-free survival were 86.9% (69.5-94.7%) and 95% (76.7-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A novel combination of N + BV followed by ISRT was an effective second line therapy. This treatment regimen allowed patients to forgo high dose therapy and transplant in favor of consolidative radiotherapy using ISRT. Larger studies challenging the role of high dose therapy and transplant are needed for RRHL.

Treatment of EBV-associated T cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder with CNS involvement in a pediatric solid-organ transplant patient

9040

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a known complication of immunosuppression following solid organ and stem cell transplantation. It ranges from benign lymphoid hyperplasia to fulminant systemic disease with high mortality. Most cases are B lineage and associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV+). T cell PTLD is rare and usually EBV negative. To date only 5 cases of EBV+ T cell PTLD have been reported in pediatric patients and none have had documented involvement of the central nervous system (CNS). Methods: We provide clinical, histologic, immunophenotypic and molecular details of a case of fulminant EBV+ T cell PTLD with CNS involvement and compare our data to the clinical presentations, biology and outcomes of the other reported cases of pediatric T cell PTLD (these include 5 EBV+ CNS− cases, 3 EBV− CNS+ cases, and 4 EBV− CNS− cases with dissemination or marrow involvement). Results: A 4.5 year old male developed EBV+ T cell PTLD with CNS involvement 3 years following a cadaveric renal transplantation. His fulminant presentation included fever, hypotension, splenomegaly, pancytopenia, coagulopathy, and bilateral pleural effusions. He had lymphocytosis in his CSF and his MRI showed brain white matter changes consistent with leukoencephalopathy. T lineage was confirmed by the presence of T cell markers CD3, 5, 7, 45 and TCRγ. The presence of EBV was demonstrated by in situ hybridization for EBER. His treatment followed the Children’s Oncology Group protocol A5971 for disseminated lymphoblastic lymphoma that employs a standard NHL/BFM-95 regimen with cyclophosphamide and anthracycline intensification during the induction and delayed intensification phases with a treatment duration of 2 years. He has received no irradiation. After 16 months, he has no measurable disease. Conclusions: EBV+ T cell PTLD is extremely rare in pediatrics and has resulted in mortality in 12 of 17 reported cases. This is the first report of EBV+ T cell PTLD with CNS involvement in a pediatric patient. Although no standardized treatment exists, the fulminant presentation, T lineage disease, and CNS involvement warranted aggressive systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.