Oral anticoagulants: Interventional pharmaceutical study with reminder of good practices, and iatrogenic impact

OBJECTIVES

Study of the impact of geriatricians' training on the improvement of their prescribing practices, and comparison of iatrogenesis between the two classes of oral anticoagulants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Before/after and here/there comparison between a trained prescribers group and a control group, before and after the pharmacist intervention, with comparison of the iatrogenesis of two oral anticoagulant classes. Patients in the acute and post-acute geriatric departments treated with a vitamin K antagonist or a direct oral anticoagulant were included. Criteria for Good practice were rated according to a scale of severity: calculation of a score and a percentage of compliance per patient, and then an average of the percentage of compliance (main criterion) within the populations to be compared. The proportion of iatrogenic elements between the two classes was compared. We used statistical tests (significance threshold of 5%).

RESULTS

Vitamin K antagonist: a decreasing trend in the control group (P=0.086) and an increasing trend in the trained group (P=0.183) was observed in prescription compliance before/after training. Direct oral anticoagulants: the compliance before/after decreased in the control group (P=0.005) and increased in the trained group (P=0.024). After training, compliance is higher among the group of trained prescribers for both vitamin K antagonist (P=0.018) and direct oral anticoagulant (P=0.003). The proportion of iatrogenic events in the two oral anticoagulants classes was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Interest of good practice reminders in the quality of oral anticoagulants prescriptions with no difference in safety of use between the two classes.

Orocecal transit time in humans assessed by sulfapyridine appearance in saliva after sulfasalazine intake

PURPOSE

We propose a noninvasive method for the measurement of orocecal transit time assessed by the sulfapyridine appearance time in saliva after ingestion of sulfasalazine.

METHOD

In 12 healthy volunteers, we studied the correlation between plasma and saliva sulfapyridine appearance times and then the sulfapyridine appearance times in saliva under various experimental conditions to assess the reproducibility, the effects of meals, and the role of the formulation, and the effects of gastrointestinal kinetic drugs.

RESULTS

The correlation between saliva and plasma sulfapyridine appearance times was strong (r = 0.84; p = 0.0004). The sulfapyridine saliva appearance time was significantly delayed by the meal. Compared with placebo, the saliva sulfapyridine appearance time was reduced by cisapride (312 +/- 128 versus 551 +/- 97 minutes; p = 0.0001) and increased by loperamide (674 +/- 267 versus 501 +/- 131 minutes; p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

We propose the salivary sample method as a validated simplification of the plasma sulfasalazine-sulfapyridine test for the measurement of orocecal transit time.