AB0608 TIME OF DIAGNOSIS AND INITIATION OF TREATMENT OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS (GCA) ACCORDING TO CLINICAL PHENOTYPE AND REFERRAL ORIGIN

Background

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) presents two phenotypic patterns: cranial and extracranial. Cranial manifestations are relatively easier to recognize and to diagnose, however since the extracranial are more insidious and less known, it may lead to a delay in diagnosis and in treatment. The main treatment are glucocorticoids (GC) at high doses followed by a descending pattern. The time between the begin of the symptoms and the start of the treatment with GC it’s of vital importance in the prognosis of the disease.

Objectives

The present AUDIT describes our cohort’s clinical features, the time from symptom onset to rheumatology visit and diagnosis of GCA, as well as the differences in time according to the service originating the referral.

Methods

Audit retrospective, descriptive study of patients diagnosed with GCA by the CGA 1990 criteria. All patients diagnosed with GCA from 2011 to 2021, in a single hospital center and referred to the Rheumatology Service were included.

Patients were classified as: cranial phenotype, extracranial or mixed. Demographic and clinical variables and complementary examinations were collected. As well as the time from the first symptom until the patients are referred and diagnosed.

Results

Seventy patients were included in the study. Fifty-one patients (72.9%) were female, their clinical features are shown in Table 1. Twelve of them (17,39%) had a cranial phenotype, sixteen (23,18%) an extracranial phenotype and forty-one (60,42%) a mixed one.

Extracranial phenotype patients showed to be younger at the time of the diagnoses than the other groups. Cranial phenotype patients had a lower increase of the acute phase reactants than the other phenotypes (without finding statistically significant differences). In Table 2 are shown the other demographic, clinical and analytic data.

Table 1.

Disease Characteristics of the Patients at Baseline according to their phenotype

PHENOTYPECRANIALEXTRACRANIALMIXEDTOTALN=12N=17N=41N=70Age75.543 ± 7.4873.543 ± 8.176.356 ±7.4675.56 ±7.46Smoker8.3% (n=1)11.8% (n=3)14.6% (n=6)12.9% (n=9)Headache91.7% (n=11)0%90.2% (n=37)68.6% (n= 48)Ocular involvement58.3% (n=7)0%34.1% (n=14)30% (n=21)Fever of unknow origin0%29.4% (n=5)34.1% (n=14)27.1% (n=19)Polymyalgia rheumatica0%41.2% (n=7)53.7% (n=22)41.4% (n=29)Constitutional syndrome0%23.5% (n=4)36.6% (n=15)27.1% (n=19)Cutaneous hyperalgesia25% (n=3)0%31.7% (n=13)22.9% (n=16)Anaemia0%41.2% (n=7)46.3% (n=19)37% (n=26)C reactive protein51.33 ± 40.1677.83 ± 75.3085.55 ± 81.6777.58 ± 74.57Erythrocyte sedimentation rate60.64 ± 33.1376.20 ± 36.3577.93 ± 3574.65 ± 35.07

Patient referral were made from: Emergency room/ Internal Medicine hospitalization (30%, 21 patients), Primary Care (21.4%, 15 patients), Internal Medicine outpatient clinic (15.7%, 11 patients), Neurology (18.6%, 13 patients) and other specialties outpatient clinic (cardiology, vascular surgery, ophthalmology, hematology and gastroenterology).

The median of the time from the first symptom until the patients are diagnosed are 12,9, 13,97 and 7,91 weeks in the cranial, extracranial and mixed respectively.

The median of time from the first symptom until the patient referral to rheumatology are 9.34, 12.74 and 5.87 weeks in the cranial, extracranial and mixed respectively.

The median of time from patient referral to rheumatology to be assessed are 3.73, 5.59 and 3.43 weeks in the cranial, extracranial and mixed respectively.

75.7% of the patients received treatment with glucocorticoids before being referral to rheumatology.

Conclusion

In our cohort, most of the patients with CGA had a mixed phenotype. The patient referral to rheumatology is made mainly from the emergency room, internal medicine hospitalization and primary care.

Patients with mixed phenotype are diagnosed faster than the ones with an exclusively extracranial phenotype.

The time between the first symptom and the referral to rheumatology is still long.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0796 TREATMENT, ADVERSE EVENTS AND FOLLOW UP IN PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS IN THE ARTESER MULTICENTER STUDY

Background

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the mainstay therapy in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), initially at high doses (40-60 mg/day) followed by gradual glucocorticoid tapering. This treatment, especially in older patients, is associated with numerous adverse effects (AE). In addition, there are frequent relapses. Therefore, conventional synthetic immunosuppressants such as methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate, have been used with controversial results. Studies with biological immunosuppressants, such as TNFi have been ineffective; in contrast, tocilizumab (TCZ) has obtained positive results and was approved for the treatment of GCA.

Objectives

In the ARTESER study we describe a) treatment with GC, synthetic or biological immunosuppressants; b) AE of CG; and c) evolution.

Methods

ARTESER is a retrospective observational study sponsored by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. 26 Spanish centers participated and all new patients diagnosed with GCA from June 1, 2013 to March 29, 2019 were included. Data on GC and immunosuppressants were collected at the beginning and during the follow-up of GCA patients. For the calculation of the cumulative dose of GC, an application was developed that, by including the periods of time, dose and type of GC received during follow-up, performs the automatic calculation in mg of prednisone.

Results

Of the 1675 patients included, GC treatment was adequately recorded in 1650 patients (Table 1). All received oral treatment, being prednisone the most frequently drug used (N=1602, 97.09%). In addition, 426 (25.82%) patients received at least one iv pulse of methylprednisolone, being the 1000 mg regimen the most frequent (n=217; 50.9%). The total mean duration of GC treatment was 22.65 months. The mean cumulative dose per patient at the end of follow-up was 8514.98 mg of prednisone.

Table 1.

Corticosteroid treatment and immunosuppressive treatment

Patients taking oral corticosteroid1650 Prednisone, n (%)1602 (97.09) Methylprednisolone, n (%)164 (9.94) Deflazacort, n (%)64 (3.88)Patients receiving intravenous corticosteroid, n (%)426 (25.82)Mean duration of steroid treatment, mean (SD)22.65 (17.36)Mean cumulative dose at the end of follow-up per patient, mg of prednisone, mean (SD)8514.98 (6570.21)Methotrexate at diagnosis*, n (%)165 (9.9)Leflunomide at diagnosis*, n (%)2 (0.1)Azathioprine at diagnosis*, n (%)3 (0.2)Cyclophosphamide at diagnosis*, n (%)7 (0.4)Mycophenolate at diagnosis*, n (%)1 (0.1)Tocilizumab at diagnosis*, n (%)22 (1.3)Methotrexate during follow-up, n (%)532 (31.8)Leflunomide during follow-up, n (%)19 (1.2)Azathioprine during follow-up, n (%)26 (1.5)Cyclophosphamide during follow-up, n (%)10 (0.6)Mycophenolate during follow-up, n (%)10 (0.6)Tocilizumab during follow-up, n (%)153 (9.1)

The most widely used immunosuppressant was MTX both at diagnosis (n=165; 9.9%) and during follow-up (n=532; 31.8%), followed by TCZ, at diagnosis (22; 1.3%) and at follow-up (153; 9.1%).

AE with GC were described in 393 patients (23.8%), highlighting serious infections (n=67; 10.03%) followed by diabetes mellitus (n=63; 9.43%), steroid myopathy (n=53; 7.9%), vertebral fractures (n=47; 7.04%), non-vertebral fractures (n=36; 5.39%), heart failure (n=36; 5.39%), arterial hypertension (n=34; 5.09%) and neuropsychiatric alterations (n=27; 4.04%).

During the follow-up, 334 (19.9%) patients had relapses, 532 (31.8%) were hospitalized on some occasion, and 142 patients (8.48%) died. The main cause of death were infections (n=44; 30.99%), neoplasms (n=23; 16.2%), cardiovascular (n=15; 10.56%), and cerebrovascular (n=10; 7.04%).

Conclusion

The main treatment for GCA was oral GC, which were required for almost two years on average, in a quarter of patients associated with IV pulses. The cumulative steroid dose was high as well as the side effects. MTX was the most widely used immunosuppressant and TCZ was prescribed in 10%. Relapses and admissions at the hospital were relatively frequent.

Acknowledgements

This study has been funded by ROCHE Farma. The funder has not participated in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1381 ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF ENTHESOPATHY IN IDIOPATHIC DIFFUSED SKELETAL HYPEROSTOSIS. APPLICABILITY OF THE MASEI INDEX

Background

In Diffuse idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH) o Forestier-Rotés disease the enthesis is also the hallmark of extraspinal manifestations. Despite being a characteristic hallmark of the disease, it has been poorly investigated.

Objectives

To assess the usefulness of the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI) to classify patients with DISH and to analyse the ultrasound findings in hyperostotic entheses.

Methods

We recruited 35 patients with DISH, according to Resnick classification criteria, who were compared with 33 healthy patients age, sex and body mass index-matched. An ultrasound was performed strictly following the MASEI protocol. The ultrasound examiners, with extensive experience in musculoskeletal ultrasound (ECOCAT group), were blinded to the diagnosis of the patients. The interobserver reliability of MASEI index measured by an ICC was 0.97 (95%, CI 89-99) [1]. Demographic, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical, radiological and MASEI-related variables were collected. We categorized into MASEI- inflammatory (MASEI-I) and MASEI-damage (MASEI-D) as previously published [2]but also into MASEI-DISH, which included the variables of thickness, structure and calcification. In the statistical analysis, patients’ data were depicted by using descriptive statistics and the comparison between groups with the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the T-Student test for numerical variables. The validity of the index was examined using the area under the ROC curve and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The optimal cut-off point was defined as the one that maximizes sensitivity (S) and specificity. (Spe). The statistical program used was R software.

Results

In the analysis of the elemental lesions, the alterations in structure, thickness and calcification of the distal quadriceps (DQT) and Achilles tendons (AQT) stood out (p <0.05). In the total MASEI, the ultrasound score of ≥ 16.50 (S80%, Spe 85%), obtained with an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.96), was the best cut-off to differentiate patients from healthy subjects. In the categorized indices, MASEI-I: cut-off 5.50 (S 89%, Spe 76%) and AUC 0.835 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.94); MASEI-D: 7.50 (S 86%, Spe 76%) and AUC 0.850 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.94) and MASEI-DISH: 16.50 (S 74%, Spe 91%) and AUC (95% CI 0.76 to 0.95). The total MASEI in the DISH group was 27.46 (SD 14.4) compared to 10.30 (SD 6.4) in healthy controls (p<0.001) as well as in those categorized as MASEI-I, MASEI-D or MASEI-DISH (p <0.001).

Conclusion

Entheses lesions of the AQT and the DQT mark the differences between DISH and healthy patients. The optimal cut-off point was 16.50, and we did not observe any advantages in establishing MASEI categorizations that could be useful in clinical practice. Although the MASEI is an index designed to classify patients with spondyloarthritis, our study shows that it also allows differentiating DISH patients from healthy subjects. It would also be interesting to analyse the capacity of the MASEI to distinguish DISH from spondyloarthritis.

References

[1]Moya Alvarado P, et al. Rheumatol Int. 2020.

[2]Eder L et al. J Rheumatol. 2014; 41(3): 466-72.

This study has received a grant from the Catalan Rheumatology Society (2019)

Acknowledgements

Investigation Unit Sociedad Española de Reumatología

Catalan Rheumatology Society (Grant)

Disclosure of Interests

Teresa Clavaguera Speakers bureau: 2021 Jansen, UCB, Novartis, Marta Valls Speakers bureau: 2021 Lilly, Nordic, Maria Buxó: None declared, MANEL PUJOL BUSQUETS Speakers bureau: abbvie, pfizer, lilly, UCB, Janssen, Novartis, Georgina Salvador Alarcon Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Roche, abbvie, Sanofi, Eulàlia Armengol Speakers bureau: Novartis, Jansen, Xavier González-Giménez: None declared, Mireia Moreno Speakers bureau: Many: Novartis, MSD, Marta Arévalo: None declared, Vicenç Torrente: None declared, Lourdes Mateo: None declared, Susana Holgado: None declared, Xabier Michelena: None declared, Juan José De Agustín De Oro: None declared, Meritxell Sallés Lizarzaburu Speakers bureau: Lilly, Sanofi, Sonia Mínguez: None declared, ANDRES PONCE FERNANDEZ: None declared, Rosa Morlà: None declared, Paula Estrada: None declared, D Reina-Sanz Speakers bureau: Novartis, UCB, Patricia Moya: None declared, Hector Corominas Speakers bureau: Gebro, Abbvie, Fresenius, Judith Font Urgellés: None declared, Patricia Reyner Speakers bureau: Lilly, Sanofi, Nordic

POS0795 EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS IN PATIENTS INCLUDED IN THE ARTESER MULTICENTER STUDY

Background

Epidemiological information on Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) comes mainly from the Scandinavian countries of northern Europe, which show a higher incidence than the countries of southern Europe. GCA clinical manifestations can be divided into cranial, extracranial, and general syndrome.

Objectives

In a large series of GCA from Spain, we studied a) the incidence of GCA, b) clinical manifestations, and c) comorbidities at the time of disease diagnosis.

Methods

ARTESER is a retrospective epidemiological observational study of GCA promoted by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology in which 26 hospitals participate. The inclusion criteria were: all new patients diagnosed with GCA by a) ACR criteria, b) positive diagnostic test (temporal artery biopsy, temporal artery ultrasound or other relevant imaging techniques) and/or c) investigator’s clinical judgment. The patient recruitment period ranged from June 1, 2013 to March 29, 2019. The overall incidence of GCA per 100,000 people ≥50 years for the whole period and the mean annual incidence were evaluated. The clinical variables were collected by reviewing the patient’s medical history.

Results

1675 patients were included. The average annual incidence rate was 7.42 (95% CI: 6.57-8.27). All the cases were older than 50 years, and the age group with the highest annual incidence was that of 80 to 84 years, where it reached a value of 22.63 (95% CI: 22.04 -23.22). The mean annual incidence is higher in women than in men 10.07 (95% CI: 8.74-11.55) vs 4.81 (95% CI 3.84-5.93) (Table 1).

Table 1.

General characteristics, comorbidities and clinical manifestations

Epidemiologic, demographic and diagnosisMenWomenTotalGender, n (%)497 (29.7)1178 (70.3)1675Incidence annual rate (95% CI)4.81 (3.84-5.93)10.07 (8.74-11.55)7.42 (6.57-8.27)Age at diagnosis, years, mean (SD)76.9 (8.3)76.9 (8.0)76.9 (8.1)Diagnosis only by ACR Criteria89 (17.91)266 (22.58)355 (21.19)Diagnosis only with objective tests73 (14.69)140 (11.88)213 (12.72)Diagnosis ACR criteria + diagnosis objective tests311 (62.58)734 (62.31)1045 (62.39)Diagnosis by clinical judgment24 (4.8)38 (3.2)62 (3.7)Comorbidities at diagnosisArterial hypertension, n (%)330 (66.8)749 (63.7)1079 (64.6)Dyslipidemia, n (%)238 (48.3)563 (47.9)801 (48.0)Cranial clinical manifestationsNew-onset headache, n (%)382 (76.9)955 (81.1)1337 (79.9)Visual Clinic, n (%)194 (39.0)411 (34.9)605 (36.1)Extracranial manifestations and general syndromePolymyalgia rheumatica, n (%)178 (35.8)521 (44.3)699 (41.8)Asthenia, n (%)239 (48.1)634 (53.9)873 (52.2)Analysis at diagnosisErythrocyte sedimentation rate mm/h, mean (SD)72.3 (34.7)77.4 (33.0)75.9 (33.6)

The principal clinical characteristics of the population is shown in Table 1, the mean age at diagnosis was 76.9±8.1 years, 1178 (70.3%) were women. 1045 patients (62.39%) had ACR criteria and some positive objective test, 355 patients (21.9%) presented only ACR criteria and 213 (12.72%) only had a positive diagnostic test; 62 (3.7%) of the patients underwent diagnosis based on clinical judgment. The more frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (n=1079; 64.6%), followed by dyslipidemia (n=801, 48%). The predominant cranial manifestation was headache (n= 1337; 79.9%) and 605 patients experienced visual symptoms (36.1%). Polymyalgia rheumatica (n=699; 41.8%) and asthenia (n=837; 52.2%) were the most frequent extracranial and general syndrome manifestation, respectively. Regarding laboratory parameters, the most characteristic data was the increase of ESR (75.9±33.6 mm/1st h).

Conclusion

The mean annual incidence of GCA in Spain, 7.42 (95% CI: 6.57-8.27), is lower than that of the Scandinavian countries. It is higher in people older than 80 years. More than 60% of the patients met the ACR criteria and had a positive diagnostic test. Cranial manifestations constituted the most clinical features. The most frequent clinical manifestations are cranial. Up to a third of patients had visual manifestations.

Acknowledgements

This study has been funded by ROCHE Farma. The funder has not participated in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB1366 ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOCILIZUMAB IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. STUDY OF 26 PATIENTS FROM CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background

Large-vessel vasculitis are characterized by the wall inflammation of the involved vessels, which can be detected by imaging tools (1-3). Ultrasound (US) is one of the most commonly used tools for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA), especially in patients with a cranial phenotype. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) including GCA (4,5). However, the improvement objectified by imaging techniques such as US after TCZ therapy is poorly documented.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of TCZ improving the wall vessel inflammation by US.

Methods

Observational, multicenter study of 26 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed according to: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) biopsy of temporal artery, and/or c) presence of signs of vessel wall inflammation by US, defined by the presence of halo sign. In all the cases a baseline US and in the follow-up was mandatory.

Patients were divided into two subgroups: a) with, and b) without signs of improvement (partial or total) in the follow-up US.

Results

We studied 26 patients (19 women/7 men; mean age, 76.3±9.7 years). Main clinical features of GCA with and without US improvement are shown in Table 1. We found no significant differences in any of the variables studied between the two groups.

Table 1.

Main features of 27 GCA patients treated with tocilizumab followed by Ultrasound (US).

With US improvement (n=21)Without US improvement (n=5)pBaseline characteristics at TCZ onsetGeneral characteristicsAge(years), mean±SD77.3±8.972.2±12.90.270Sex, female/male (% female)17/4 (80,95)2/3 (40)0.101Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]6 [3-9]3 [1-6]0.452Systemic manifestations, n (%)Fever, n (%)1/21 (4.76)1/5 (20)0.354Constitutional syndrome, n (%)10/21 (47.62)2/5 (40)0.999PmR, n (%)11/21 (52.38)1/5 (20)0.330Ischaemic manifestations, n (%)Visual involvement, n (%)1/21 (4.76)1/5 (20)0.354Headache, n (%)15/21 (71.43)5/5 (100)0.298Jaw claudication, n (%)4/15 (26.67)¼ (25)0.999Laboratory dataESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]33 [22-49]55 [54-80]0.216CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.5 [0.7-6.7]3.8 [1-4.2]0.948Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]13.7 [10-30]30 [12.5-30]0.505Time from TCZ onset and follow-up US (months)3.9±3.63.1±2.10.456

After TCZ onset, 21 of 26 patients (80.7%) showed US signs of improvement (12 complete, 9 partial). In 4 out of 5 patients in whom there was no improvement in US findings, clinical improvement was observed at first month after starting TCZ.

Conclusion

TCZ seems to be effective controlling GCA including vascular involvement detected by US. This improvement can be seen by follow-up US, especially when performed at least 3 months after TCZ onset.

References

[1]Loricera J, et al. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2015; 34: 372-7. PMID: 26272121

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015; 33: S19-31. PMID: 25437450

[3]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[4]Martínez-Rodríguez I, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 47: 530-537. PMID: 28967430

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48: 720-727. PMID: 29903537

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group: Juan C. González Nieto (H. Gregorio Marañón), Juan R. de Dios (H.U. Araba), Esther Fernández (H. Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca), Isabel de la Morena (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Patricia Moya (H. Sant Pau), Roser Solans i Laqué (H. Valle de Hebrón), Eva Pérez Pampín (H.U. de Santiago), José L. Andréu (H.U. Puerta de Hierro), Marcelino Revenga (H. Ramón y Cajal), Juan P. Baldivieso Achá (H. U. de La Princesa), Eztizen Labrador (H. San Pedro), Andrea García-Valle (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Adela Gallego (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz), Carlota Iñíguez (H.U. Lucus Augusti), Cristina Hidalgo (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca), Noemí Garrido-Puñal (H. Virgen del Rocío), Ruth López-González (Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora), José A. Román-Ivorra (H.U. y Politécnico La Fe), Sara Manrique (H. Regional de Málaga), Paz Collado (H.U. Severo Ochoa), Enrique Raya (H. San Cecilio), Valvanera Pinillos (H. San Pedro), Francisco Navarro (H. General Universitario de Elche), Alejandro Olivé-Marqués (H. Trías i Pujol), Francisco J. Toyos (H.U. Virgen Macarena), María L. Marena Rojas (H. La Mancha Centro), Antoni Juan Más (H.U. Son Llàtzer), Beatriz Arca (H.U. San Agustín), Carmen Ordás-Calvo (H. Cabueñes), María D. Boquet (H. Arnau de Vilanova), Noelia Álvarez-Rivas (H.U. Lucus Augusti), María L. Velloso-Feijoo (H.U. de Valme), Cristina Campos (H. General Universitario de Valencia), Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa (H. Doctor Negrín), Antonio García (H. Virgen de las Nieves), Carlos Vázquez (H. Miguel Servet), Pau Lluch (H. Mateu Orfila), Carmen Torres (Complejo Asistencial de Ávila), Cristina Luna (H.U. Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria), Elena Becerra (H.U. de Torrevieja), Nagore Fernández-Llanio (H. Arnáu de Vilanova), Arantxa Conesa (H.U. de Castellón), Eva Salgado (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense).

Disclosure of Interests

Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto González: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Eztizen Labrador-Sánchez: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

POS1351 CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL VS ADALIMUMAB IN THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA DUE TO BEHÇET’S DISEASE. MULTICENTER STUDY

Background

Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) is the leading cause of blindness in non-infectious uveitis. Behçet’s disease (BD) is one of the diseases most frequently associated with CME [1-4].

Objectives

to compare the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab (CZP) and Adalimumab (ADA) in CME due to BD refractory to conventional therapy.

Methods

multicenter study of patients with CME secondary to BD refractory to glucocorticoids (GC) and at least 1 conventional immunosuppressant. All patients had CME (OCT>300µ) at baseline. Efficacy was assessed with the following ocular parameters: macular thickness (µm), visual acuity (BCVA) and GC-sparing effect. The efficacy of CZP vs. ADA was compared between the baseline visit, 1st and 6th month, and 1st and 2nd year. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics v.23.

Results

We studied 21 patients/38 affected eyes were studied. 10 patients were treated with CZP (200 mg c/2 weeks) and 11 with ADA (loading dose of 80 mg and subsequently 40 mg c/2 weeks).

No statistically significant baseline differences were observed in both groups (CZP vs. ADA) in sex (♂/♀; 3/7 vs 5/6; p=0.65) and mean age (36.1±8.0 vs 42.2±8.6; p=0.10). However, CZP group was more severe with a longer time between EB diagnosis and biologic initiation (91.6±71.4 vs 34.4±21.3 months, p=0.02), and a greater median [IQR] number of previous biologic drugs (2 [0.75-3] vs 0 [0-0]). In CZP group, 8 patients were previously treated with ADA.

Combined therapy with conventional DMARDs was used with ADA in 81.8% vs. 18.2% of CZP patients.

Regarding the efficacy outcomes analyzed, a rapid and maintained improvement in macular thickness, measured by OCT, was observed after 2 years of follow-up in both groups with no statistically significant differences between them (Table 1). Improvement in visual acuity and a GC-sparing effect was also observed (Table 1).

Table 1.

main ocular parameters compared in the CZP-treated group and in the ADA-treated group.

CZP(n=10)ADA(n=11)PBaseline  OCT (µm, mean±SD)380.7±96.4416.9±171.10.56 BCVA (mean±SD)0.72±0.300.57±0.200.21 Prednisone (mg/dl, mean±SD)13.1±11.434.1±18.90.071st month  OCT (µm, mean±SD)333.7±60.4302±44.20.19 BCVA (mean±SD)0.80±0.270.72±0.180.45 Prednisone (mg/dl, mean±SD)8.1±5.5112.1±6.40.316th month  OCT (µm, mean±SD)284.4±45.5272.8±38.90.53 BCVA (mean±SD)0.82±0.230.86±0.160.65 Prednisone (mg/dl, mean±SD)6.8±6.66.1±2.80.921st year  OCT (µm, mean±SD)269.0±46.8260.9±39.50.67 BCVA (mean±SD)0.82±0.230.89±0.170.48 Prednisone (mg/dl, mean±SD)6.2±3.05.8±2.10.872nd year  OCT (µm, mean±SD)289.4±49.3248.0±42.00.16 BCVA (mean±SD)0.87±0.200.87±0.171.0 Prednisone (mg/dl, mean±SD)3.7±1.23.1±2.30.90

No serious adverse events were observed in either group.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that both CZP and ADA are effective in the treatment of CME due to BD refractory to conventional treatment. CZP was equally effective despite most patients were refractory to ADA.

References

[1]Schaap-Fogler M, et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;252(4):633-40. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2552-8.

[2]Martín-Varillas JL, et al. Ophthalmology 2018; 125:1444-1451 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.020

[3]Martín-Varillas JL, et al. J Rheumatol. 2021;48:741-750. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200300

[4]Vegas-Revenga N et al Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.12.019

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1350 UVEITIS DUE TO IMMUNE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY DISEASES TREATED WITH CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL. MULTICENTER STUDY OF 80 PATIENTS

Background

Adalimumab remains the only biologic approved by the EMA and FDA for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis [1-6]. The reports on efficacy of other anti-TNF drugs such as Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) are scarce.

Objectives

to determine the efficacy and safety of CZP in refractory uveitis secondary to Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs).

Methods

national multicenter study of 80 patients with uveitis due to IMID refractory to glucocorticoids and conventional immunosuppressants treated with CZP. Efficacy was assessed with the following ocular parameters: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anterior chamber cells, vitritis, macular thickness and presence of retinal vasculitis. The efficacy of CZP was compared between the baseline visit, 1st week, 1st and 6th month, and 1st year. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics v.23.

Results

we studied 80 patients/111 affected eyes (33 men/47 women) with a mean age of 41.6±11.7 years. The IMIDs included were: spondyloarthritis (n=43), Behçet’s disease (10), psoriatic arthritis (8), Crohn’s disease (4), sarcoidosis (2), JIA (1), reactive arthritis (1), rheumatoid arthritis (1), relapsing polychondritis (1), TINU (1), pars planitis (1), Birdshot (1) and idiopathic uveitis (6). Anterior was the most frequent uveitis pattern (n=61).

In 20 patients, besides the presence of refractory uveitis, desire of pregnancy was the reason for CZP initiation.

Prior to CZP, patients had received: methotrexate (n=38), sulfasalazine (28), azathioprine (14), cyclosporine (10), leflunomide (3), mycophenolate mofetil (4), and cyclophosphamide (1). Previous biologic therapy was administered in 52 patients (63%), with a median [IQR] of 2 [1-3] drugs per patient. The most used biologic was adalimumab (n=48), followed by infliximab (32), golimumab (15), tocilizumab (5), etanercept (7), rituximab (1), anakinra (1) and secukinumab (1). CZP was administered as monotherapy in 39 patients.

After 24 [12-36] months of follow-up, all parameters analyzed showed a rapid and maintained improvement (Table 1). A decrease in the mean number of uveitis flares was observed before and after CZP, (2.6±2.3 vs. 0.6±0.4, p<0.001). CZP was discontinued in 16 patients due to: ocular remission (n=3), insufficient ocular response (4) and incomplete response of extraocular manifestations (9). No serious adverse effects were found.

Table 1.

main ocular parameters analyzed in 80 patients with uveitis due to IMID and treated with CZP.

Baseline1st week1st month3rd month6th month1st yearBCVA (mean±SD)0.68±0.270.73±0.26*0.79±0.26*0.82±0.25*0.85±0.24*0.86±0.23*Tyndall improvement, n (%)Patients with Tyndall + at baseline (n=57)-23 (40.3)45 (78.9)47 (82.4)57 (100)57 (100)Vitritis improvement, n (%)Patients with Vitritis at baseline (n=14)-5 (35.7)8 (57.1)13 (92.8)14 (100)14 (100)OCT (µm) (mean±SD)297.5±48.1297.1±45.5286.5±39.8*277.6±43.3*271.5±38.6*269.0±38.8*Choroiditis, affected eyes, n (%)3 (2.4)3 (2.4)2 (1.6)2 (1.6)1 (0.8)1 (0.8)Retinal vasculitis, affected eyes, n (%)3 (2.4)2 (1.6)1 (0.8)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)

*p<0.01

Conclusion

CZP seems to be effective and safe in the control of uveitis associated to different IMIDs.

References

[1]Jaffe GJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:932-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509852.

[2]Nguyen QD, et al. Lancet 2016;388:1183-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31339-3.

[3]Martín-Varillas JL, et al. Ophthalmology 2018; 125:1444-1451 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.020

[4]Martín-Varillas JL, et al. J Rheumatol. 2021;48:741-750. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200300

[5]Atienza-Mateo B. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:2081-2089. doi: 10.1002/art.41026.

[6]Vegas-Revenga N et al Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.12.019

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0804 TOCILIZUMAB IN LARGE-VESSEL GIANT CELL ARTERITIS AND TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: MULTICENTRIC OBSERVATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (1-5). However, LVV-GCA and TAK show different demographic and clinical features that may influence on TCZ therapeutic response.

Objectives

To compare the effectiveness of TCZ in patients with LVV-GCA and patients with TAK.

Methods

Observational multicenter study of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK who received TCZ. Outcome variables were: a) proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical improvement along with normalization of laboratory markers (CRP ≤0.5mg/dL and/or ESR ≤ 20 mm/1st hour) at 12 months b) complete improvement in imaging techniques. A comparative study between patients with LVV-GCA and TAK was performed.

Results

We evaluated 70 LVV-GCA and 57 TAK patients who received TCZ. Main clinical and demographic characteristic are described in Table 1. Patients with TAK were younger, had longer disease duration, had received more commonly previous biologic therapy and were receiving higher doses of prednisone at baseline. TCZ intravenous administration was more common in TAK patients (80.7% vs 48.6%; p<0.01). Follow-up time after TCZ onset was similar in both groups. At 12 months, about 75% of patients achieved complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization in both groups. A follow-up imaging technique was performed in 37 LVV-GCA patients after a mean time of 12.9±6.0 months and 38 TAK patients after 9.5±5.0 months. Complete improvement in imaging techniques was only observed in 18.9% and 21.1% of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, respectively (Figure 1).

Table 1.LVV-GCA (n=70)TAK (n=57)pGeneral featuresAge (years), mean ± SD67.2 ± 10.540.5 ± 16.3< 0.01Sex (female), n (%)51 (72.9)49 (86)0.07Disease evolution before TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]5 [2-15]12 [3-37]<0.01Baseline laboratory parametersESR (mm/1st hour), median [IQR]32 [12.5-54.7]31 [10-52]0.82CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.4 [0.5-2.4]1.4 [0.5-3.5]0.41Baseline prednisone dose (mg/day), median [IQR]15 [10-20]30 [15-50]< 0.01Previous therapyConventional DMARDs, n(%)45 (64.3)44(77.2)0.51Biologic therapy, n (%)0(0)12 (21.1)<0.01TCZ therapyIntravenous, n (%)34 (48.6)46 (80.7)< 0.01Combined with MTX, n(%)24 (34.3)24 (42.1)0.37Follow-up time after TCZ onset, median [IQR]20 [10-36]18 [7-41]0.73Complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization at 12 months, n/N (%)35/47 (74.4)30/39 (76.9)0.79Complete improvement in imaging techniques, n/N(%)7/37 (18.9)8/38 (21.1)0.85

CRP: C-reactive protein; DMARDs: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; LVV: large vessel; MTX: methotrexate; n: Number of patients; N: total number of patients: TCZ: tocilizumab; TAK:takayasu

Figure 1.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of TCZ was similar in patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, despite a more refractory disease in TAK patients. A discordance between clinical and imaging activity improvement was observed in both LVV-GCA and TAK, as reported in previous studies (3).

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003

[2]Prieto-Peña D et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;13:175. PMID: 34211589.

[3]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39 Suppl 129:69-75. PMID: 33253103.

[4]González-Gay MA, et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019;19:65-72. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1556256.

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(4):720-727. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.05.007

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0503 DISEASE CONTROL IN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL ARTHRITIS IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE IN SPAIN: MiDAS STUDY RESULTS

Background:

MIDAS study assessed disease activity in patients (pts) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated in clinical practice in Spain.

Objectives:

This subanalysis compared disease activity status between AS pts with and without peripheral arthritis (PA).

Methods:

Observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Pts ≥18 years with ≥6 months diagnosis, fulfilling ASAS and modified New York criteria; undergoing treatment ≥3 months. Disease activity was measured by BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP. The number of painful and swollen joints was recorded in AS pts according to the OMERACT recommendations.1

Results:

313 AS pts included: 251 (80.2%) without PA and 62 (19.8%) with PA (Table 1). The most frequently involved painful joints in pts with PA were knees (29.0%) and hips (25.8%), while the swollen ones were proximal interphalangeal joints of the hands (17.7%), knees (9.7%) and wrists (8.1%). According to BASDAI (Figure 1A), pts with PA showed a higher score 4.2 (2.4) and a lower percentage 58.1% had disease activity controlled (BASDAI<4) than total AS pts (3.1 [2.2] and 64.5%, respectively) and pts without PA (2.8 [2.1] and 70.1%, respectively). According to ASDAS-CRP (Figure 1B), mean (SD) score was 1.9 (1.1) for AS pts, 2.4 (1.1) for pts with PA and 1.8 (1.1) for pts without PA, while 29.4% AS pts, 14.5% pts with PA and 33.1% pts without PA had inactive disease (ASDAS-PCR<1.3). By combining both indices (ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI), 51.8% AS pts showed adequate control (inactive disease/remission) of disease activity, 29.0% of pts with PA and 57.4% of pts without PA.

Table 1.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the AS pts

AS(n=313)AS without PA(n=251)AS with PA(n=62)Age (years), mean (SD)50.4 (12.0)50.1 (11.9)51.5 (12.5)Sex (male), n (%)237 (75.7%)193 (76.9%)44 (71.0%)Time since diagnosis (years), mean (SD)15.5 (11.6)15.4 (11.4)16.0 (12.6)Time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis (years), mean (SD)5.0 (7.2)4.9 (7.1)5.6 (7.6)Presence of HLA-B*27+, n (%)245 (78.5%)197 (78.8%)48 (77.4%)Family history of AS, n (%)66 (21.1%)55 (21.9%)11 (17.7%)Family history of psoriasis, n (%)43 (13.7%)34 (13.5%)9 (14.5%)Pts previously treated with bDMARD, n (%)99 (31.6%)79 (31.5%)20 (32.3%)Swollen joint count (0-66), mean (SD)0.1 (0.9)0.0 (0.0)0.7 (1.9)Painful joint count (0-68), mean (SD)0.6 (2.4)0.0 (0.0)3.0 (4.7)CRP levels (mg/l), mean (SD)5.1 (8.2)4.7 (7.6)6.7 (10.3)Active disease, n (%)* BASDAI ≥4111 (35.5%)26 (41.9%)75 (29.9%) ASDAS-CRP ≥2.1133 (42.4%)93 (37.1%)40 (64.5%) BASFI, mean (SD)3.4 (2.7)3.1 (2.6)4.5 (2.8) MASES index, mean (SD)0.2 (0.8)0.2 (0.7)0.4 (1.2) SPARCC index, mean (SD)0.4 (1.1)0.3 (1.0)0.6 (1.4) Pts perceived disease control (PASS), n (%)270 (86.3%)221 (88.0%)49 (79.0%) ASAS-HI, mean (SD)5.8 (4.4)5.4 (4.2)7.6 (4.6)

*Refers to the percentage of pts with active disease according to BASDAI≥4 and ASDAS-CRP ≥2.1.

Figure 1.

Disease status according to peripheral joints involvement A)Disease control according to BASDAI B)Disease activity according to ASDAS-CRP

Conclusion:

Patients of the MiDAS study with peripheral disease showed higher disease activity and worse physical function, suggesting a severe and complex phenotype more than the one of the AS pts without PA.

References:

[1]J Rheumatol 1993;20:526-91.

AS, ankylosing spondylitis; ASDAS-CRP, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score- C-reactive protein; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; PA, peripheral arthritis.

Acknowledgements:

We thank to MIDAS group investigators and patients included in the study.

Disclosure of Interests:

Xavier Juanola Speakers bureau: Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, Lilly, Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Cristina Fernández-Carballido Speakers bureau: I have received lectures fees from Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB., Consultant of: I have worked as a paid consultant for Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., Alejandro Muñoz Jimenez.: None declared., Jesus Sanz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Lilly, Consultant of: Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Patricia Moya Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Novartis and UCB, Consultant of: Roche, Joaquin Maria Belzunegui Otano Speakers bureau: Lilly, Amgen, Novartis, Abbvie, Janssen., Cristina Sanabra Employee of: Novartis employee, Carlos Sastré Employee of: Novartis employee.

AB0804 ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP SAFETY AND EFFICACY RESULTS OF VACCINATION PROTOCOL FROM A RHEUMATOLOGY CLINIC

Background:

Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) have a higher burden of infectious diseases compared to the general population. This could be explained by the disturbances in their immune system response, comorbidities and immunosuppressive treatment.Vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent infections.

Objectives:

To describe a cohort of patients with AIIRD referred to the infectious disease´s unit according to the vaccination protocol.

Methods:

Restrospective and descriptive study of a cohort of 286 patients with AIIRD who were evaluated in the rheumatology service of a tertiary hospital in Barcelona and referred to the infectious disease´s unit according to the vaccination protocol among 1 year,between January 1rst December 31st, 2019. The vaccination protocol included serologies of human immunodeficiency virus,hepatitis A,B and C, varicella zoster,tuberculosis,measles,mumps and rubella virus.The recommended vaccines were H.influenzae b,S.pneumonia,influenza,hepatitis A and B(immunity absence),meningococcus c,tetanus – diphtheria (low antigenic load),poliomyelitis and human papillomavirus (not vaccinated).The patients included were diagnosed with a rheumatologic condition under immunosuppressive therapy. Demographic variables,diagnosis,treatment,vaccines administered,infections and adverse effects were collected.

Results:

Of 286 patients reviewed the mean age was 61, 4 (±14.4) years. The characteristics of the cohort are shown in Table 1. Most of the patients used csDMARDs 149 (52.1%), 77(26.9%) patients used combined treatment. Measles and rubella are part of the triple virus vaccines included in the systematic Spanish vaccination schedule, in our cohort 20 (7%) patients had negative serologies for measles and 26 (9%) for rubella. 57 (20%) patients had latent TB with positive Quantiferon.Forty-one (14.3%) were vaccinated before receiving immunosuppressive treatment. The less administered vaccine was influenza with 44.9% (vaccination rate in Spain in healthy population, in 2019-2020 was 51.2%).No serious adverse effects were reported in relation to the vaccination. The infectious complications during the follow-up period were bronchopneumonia in a patient with RA treated with certolizumab (1), herpes zoster infection in RA on adalimumab(1), recurrent otitis in RA on adalimumab(1), mycobacterium avium infection in RA on etanercept(1), TB reactivation in RA with GCs and csDMARDs(1) and Papilloma virus infection in SpA on ustekinumab (1).

Table 1.

CHARACTERISTICS OF COHORT OF PATIENTS

Sex n % (women/men)193/93 (67,5/32,5)Age, years ± DE61.4 ± 14.4Diagnoses AIIRD, n (%)Rheumatoid arthritis n (%)164 (57.3)Systemic lupus erythematosus n (%)6 (2.1)Sjögren´s syndrome n (%)9 (3.1)Systemic sclerosis n (%)1 (0.35)Inflammatory myopathie n (%)5 (1.7)Vasculitis n (%)36 (12.6)Polymyalgia rheumatica n (%)4 (1.4)Spondyloarthropathy n (%)46 (16.1)Others n (%)15 (5.2)Treatment AIIRDGCs n (%)116 (40.7)csDMARDs n (%)149 (52.1)bDMARDs n (%)80 (27.8)tsDMARDs n (%)7 (2.4)Others1 n (%)12 (4.2)GCs + csDMARDs n (%)59 (21)GCs + bDMARDs n (%)14 (4.9)GCs + csDMARDs + bDMARDs n (%)4 (1.4)VaccinesPCV 13 n (%)283 (99)PPSV23 n (%)265 (93)HiB n (%)265 (93)NM n (%)247 (86.7)Influenza n (%)128 (44.9)HBV n (%)121 (42.3)Vaccination before IS n (%)41 (14.3)Vaccination with IS n (%)244 (85.3)

Other: Behcet,Adult Stills,Relapsing polychondritis,IGg4 related disease,Sarcoidosis

Others1: Mycophenolic acid,cyclosporine and tacrolimus

Conclusion:

In our cohort, the vaccination protocol proved to be a good tool to improve the vaccination rate of rheumatological patients, despite this, the vaccination of Hepatitis B and specially of influenza, continues to have a lower prevalence to general population.The vaccines were effective since none of the preventable infections occurred during follow up, despite the use of an immunosuppressant. Vaccination showed a good safety profile, without reported serious adverse effects or worsening of the underlying disease.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0129 IL-6R GENETIC VARIANTS AS PREDICTORS OF CLINICAL RESPONSE TO TOCILIZUMAB IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory autoimmune disease of unknown etiology. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a first-line biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) which inhibits Interleukin 6 (IL-6) pathway through blockade of its receptor. At present, there is a lack of evidence to recommend the treatment of one bDMARD over another.(1) Seeking for genetic biomarkers to predict response to treatment could be key towards a personalized treatment strategy in rheumatology.(2)

Objectives:

We aimed to evaluate whether functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the IL6R gene could predict response and/or toxicity to TZC in Caucasian patients diagnosed with RA.

Methods:

Retrospective analytical preliminar study of a cohort of 31 patients diagnosed with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) who received treatment with TCZ within the last 10 years. Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data were collected. DNA was extracted from EDTA blood samples. Three SNPs in the IL-6 receptor gene (rs12083537, rs2228145, rs4329505) were genotyped by real-time PCR with TaqMan probes. The associations between polymorphisms and clinicopathological features were evaluated using parametric tests. Efficacy was assessed as the difference of DAS-28 CRP at 6 months. The toxicities recorded were hepatotoxicity, infections, hypersensibility, gastrointestinal, hematological and dyslipidemia.

Results:

The 31 DNA samples from patients included were mainly female (83.9%) and had a mean age at diagnosis of 46.8 years. The mean duration of treatment was 51.3 months and, previously to initiate TCZ, they received a mean of 2,6 csDMARD and 1,7 bDMARD.

The more frequent adverse effects were hypertransaminasemia (22.6%) and neutropenia (32.3%). Most relevant epidemiologic and clinical data is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics. RA=Rheumatoid Arthritis. CCP= anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptides. RF=Rheumatoid factor. csDMARDs= conventional synthetic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. bDMARD= biological Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. BMI=Body Mass Index. Sc=subcutaneous. Ev=endovenous. DAS28= Disease Activity Score in 28 joints

Sex (n=31), n (% women/men) 26/5 (83,9%/16,1%)Age at diagnosis (n=31), years +- SD 46,8+- 12,8Erosive RA (n=31), n(%) 14 (45,2%)Anti-CCP positive (n=31), n(%)UI+- SD 23 (74,2%)259,7 +- 137,3RF positive (n=31), n (%)UI+-SD 21 (67,7%)189,4+- 114Previous csDMARD (n=31), n°+-SD2,6 +-1,3Previous bDMARD (n=31), n°+- SD1,7 +- 1,4BMI (n=29), mean +- SD29,3+- 5,1Duration of treatment (n=31), months +-SD51,3 +- 36,3-Active treatment (n=12)-80,9+- 18,3-Finished treatment (n=19)-32,6+- 32,2Route of administration (n=31), n (%) sc/ev 11/20 (35,5/64,5)Basal DAS28 (n=30), mean+- SD5,3 +- 1,1DAS28 reduction at 6 months (n=28), mean+-SD2,9 +-1,1

The univariate analyses showed that the rs2228145 variant was statistically associated with differences in DAS28 reduction at 6 months (p=0.042). Regarding efficacy, we also found a trend with the SNP rs4329505 (p=0.173), which could achieve statistical significance with the projected inclusion of more patients. No associations were found regarding adverse effects.

Conclusion:

The rs2228145 polymorphisms in the IL6R gene may be considered as a pharmacogenetic biomarker of TCZ response in RA patients. More studies are required in order to investigate the clinical use of pharmacogenetic biomarkers in rheumatic diseases.

References:

[1]Smolen, Josef S., Robert B., et al. 2020. “EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Synthetic and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 2019 Update.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79 (6): 685–99.

[2]Tarnowski, Maciej, Agnieszka Paradowska-Gorycka, et al. 2016. “The Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on Patient Responses to Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy.” Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 12 (1): 41–55.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0827 HEPATOTROPIC VIRUSES WITH HIGHER RHEUMATOID FACTOR, BUT NOT RHEUMATIC DISEASES LINK TO PREVALENT CRYOGLOBULINEMIA. CORRELATION OF CLINICAL AND SEROLOGICAL MARKERS WITH ETIOLOGICAL CAUSES

Background:

Cryoglobulinemia (CG) is a rare phenomenon, which is defined as the persistent presence in serum of abnormal immunoglobulins (Igs) that precipitate in vitro at less than 37°C and dissolve when the temperature rises again. Is related to hematological disorders, infections and autoimmunes diseases.

Objectives:

To describe the differential clinical features, serological and demographics in a cohort of patients diagnosed with CG.

Methods:

We describe a retrospective cohort of 252 cryoglobulin (Cg) positive samples, obtained from a database from the immunology laboratory of a tertiary hospital (November 2018-November 2019). We obtained 182 patients with CG, classified according to their etiology into 4 groups: 1)Rheumatic diseases (RD) that includes rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren´s syndrome and Systemic scleroderma, 2)Hepatotropic viruses (HV) with patients diagnosed with Hepatitis C virus, B virus and both, 3)Hematological diseases (HD) and 4)Essential cryoglobulinemia (CGE). Demographic variables, clinical and serological data were collected. A comparative analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the multivariate Kruskal-Wallis test, nonparametric variables were compared using a Wilcoxon test. Ten patients, with more than one disease from 4 groups, were excluded from the study.

Results:

Out of 182 reviewed patients, 172 were included in the study. Mean age at diagnosis was 59.7(±14.0). Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics are described in table 1. Mixed CG was the predominant subtype, in 116 (67.4%) patients. The most prevalent CG-associated diseases were HV infection with 91(53%) patients. CGE mostly presented with cutaneous manifestations (p=0.0001), particularly purpura. In RD group the presence of Raynaud and non-erosive arthritis (p=0.0001) was relevant. Laboratory findings showed that CG titration varies according to the etiology, being HD the one with the highest values with 292.2 (±546.2). There is significant difference in terms of the average of rheumatoid factor (RF) being higher in the group by CGE. On other hand, the group HV presented more consumption of complement, and showed the lowest average p=0.0001, without more severe clinical manifestations.

RD (n=47)HV (n=91)HD (n=17)CGE (n=17)Gender,n(%) F42 (89.4)57 (62.6)7 (41.2)11 (64.7)Age at dg, years, (± SD)60.6 (±14)59.6 (±13.1)61.1(±16.6)56.3(±20.8)p=0.8CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICSSkin n (%)18 (38.3)10 (11.0)2 (11.8)9 (52.9)p<0.001Raynaud n (%)14 (29.8)1 (5.9)3 (17.6)p<0.001Purpura n (%)6 (12.8)9 (9.9)2 (11.8)6 (35.3)p=0.04Acrocyanosis n (%)6 (12.8)1 (5.9)p=0.0033Ulcers n (%)3 (6.4)2 (2.2) -2 (11.8)p=0.19Peripheric Neuro n (%)10 (21.3)9 (9.9)1 (5.9)4 (23.5)p=0.13N-E arthritis n (%)22 (46.8)8 (8.8)1 (5.9)4 (23.5)p<0.001GMN n (%)5 (10.6)3 (3.3)1 (5.9)3 (17.6)p=0.11LABORATORYCg (mg/dL) x (± SD)26.7 (±63.2)65.8 (±256.5)292.4 (±546.2)47.59 (±79.1)p<0.001Isotype IgG, n (%)G+M 26 (55.3)G+M 72 (79.1)M 8 (47.1)G+M 12 (70.6)β2M (≥1.8 mg/L), n (%)7/40 (17.5%)1/5 (20.0%)3/12 (25.0%)-p= 0.44RCP (mg/L) p 5010.3 (±26.2)3.9 (±3.0)13.4 (±18.3)8.5 (±12.0)p= 0.47ESR (mm/h) p5040.0 (±28.5)20.3 (±20.2)35.4 (±35.1)24.5 (±25.0)p= 0.0003RF + (>20UI/mL), n (%)19/46 (41.3)44/86 (51.2)5/11 (45.5)7/17 (41.2)p= 0.09p5090.6 (±175.9)161.0 (±219.5)94.8 (±135.6)284.5 (±619.3)p<0.001C3 (<85mg/dL), n %)20 (42.6)47 (51.6)3 (17.6)3 (17.6)p= 0.13x (± SD)90.1 (±28.6)68.5 (±10.8)99.1 (±29.0)114.8 (±12.7)p<0.001C4 (<12mg/dL), n (%)17 (36.2)36 (39.6) -3 (17.6)p= 0.02x (± SD)15.6 (±9.0)7.6 (±3.5)20.4 (±7.4)21.1 (±9.5)p<0.001

Conclusion:

In our cohort, not all patients with CG presented clinical manifestations being those associated with CGE and RD those with the highest skin and joint expression. The most prevalent association of CG continues to be the HV and we confirmed the characteristic decrease in C3 and C4 complement levels, together with the positivity for RF.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0064 TOCILIZUMAB IN CRANIAL AND EXTRACRANIAL REFRACTORY GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF 312 CASES

Background:

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) may be divided into cranial, and extracranial GCA. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy and safety in GCA and other large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) (1-5).

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy of TCZ in cranial and extracranial GCA.

Methods:

Multicenter observational study of 312 patients with GCA treated with TCZ. They were divided into 3 groups a) only cranial (cGCA), b) only extracranial (ecGCA), c) mixed affection (mixGCA). GCA was diagnosed by a) ACR criteria, and/or b) positive temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) LVV by imaging. Remission and sustained remission was defined according to EULAR definitions (1). In ecGCA and mixGCA we also studied the improvement (complete or partial) by imaging techniques.

Results:

We studied 312 patients (218 females; mean age, 73.4±9.6 years). TABLE shows the main features of the 3 groups. Remission at month 6 was higher in cGCA, as well as the sustained remission at month12 (FIGURE). At 18 and 24months, were similar in the 3 groups. Improvement by imaging techniques was partial/complete at 6,12,18 and 24 months, in 50%/0%,71%/0%, 61%/15% and 67%/17% respectively, in ecGCA, and in 75%/0%,53%/18%, 64%/12% and 50%/28% in mixGCA.

Table 1.

Main features of 312 patients at TCZ onset.

Cranial GCA(n=152)Extracranial GCA(n=49)Mixed GCA(n=111)Cranial vs Extracranial GCApAge at TCZ onset, years, mean± SD76.0±8.265.4±12.273.5±8.10.000*Sex, female/male, n (% female)105/47 (69)33/16 (67)80/31 (72)0.960Time from diagnosis to TCZ onset (months, median [IQR]6 [2-21]7 [2-20]9 [3-25]0.765Biopsy-proven GCA, n (%)87/128 (68)0 (0)50/87 (57)0.000*Systemic manifestations at TCZ onset109 (72)32 (65)84 (76)0.501Fever, n (%)18 (12)1 (2)8 (7)0.048*Constitutional syndrome, n (%)52 (34)16 (33)47 (42)0.933PmR, n (%)88 (58)29 (59)71 (64)0.999Ischemic manifestations at TCZ onset117 (77)0 (0)70 (63)0.000*Visual involvement, n (%)31 (20)0 (0)16 (14)0.000*Headache, n (%)103 (85)0 (0)63 (57)0.000*Jaw claudication, n (%)39 (26)0 (0)21 (19)0.000*Acute phase reactantsESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]28 [9-53]24 [10-43]28 [15-48]0.462CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.2 [0.3-3.4]0.7 [0.4-1.8]1.6 [0.4-3.8]0.153Prednisone dose at TCZ onset, mean ± SD26.2±17.615.4±14.220.1±14.90.000*TCZmono/TCZcombo, n (% TCZ mono)116/36 (76)26/23 (53)69/42 (62)0.003*Follow-up (months), mean ± SD27.3±21.132.7±23.327.9±22.00.143Figure 1.

Remission and sustained remission of cGCA, ecGCA and mixGCA according to EULAR (1). In the first 3 months we only could assess cGCA because in ecGCA and mixGCA a control imaging was not performed

Conclusion:

TCZ seems to be effective in all phenotypes but it is faster in cGCA in reaching remission. However, improvement by imaging techniques was partial and very rarely complete in ecGCA and mixGCA.

References:

[1]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30.

[2]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 317-28.

[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003.

[4]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.

[5]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507

Disclosure of Interests:

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Juan Pablo Valdivieso-Achá: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Juan Ramón De Dios: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto González: None declared, Eva Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Valvanera Pinillos: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Ruth López-González: None declared, Cristina Campos Fernández: None declared, Antonio Juan-Mas: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, María Dolors Boquet: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, Adela Gallego: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

AB0366 TOCILIZUMAB FOR TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: MULTICENTER STUDY OF 54 WHITE PATIENTS

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (1-3). Most evidence in TAK comes from Asian patients. However, white patients seem to have different clinical and prognostic features.

Objectives:

Our aims were to: a) assess the efficacy and safety of TCZ in white patients with refractory TAK, b) determine if clinical improvement correlates with imaging outcomes, c) compare TCZ in monotherapy (TCZMONO) vs combined with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (TCZCOMBO)

Methods:

Multicenter study of white patients with refractory TAK who received TCZ.Outcomes variables were remission, glucocorticoid-sparing effect, improvement in imaging techniques, and adverse events. A comparative study between patients who received TCZMONO and TCZCOMBO was performed.

Results:

54 patients (46 women/8 men; median age 42.0 [32.5-50.5] years). TCZ was started after 12.0 [3.0-31.5] months since TAK diagnosis. Remission was achieved in 12/54 (22.2%), 19/49 (38.8%), 23/44 (52.3%) and 27/36 (75%) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Prednisone dose was reduced from 30.0 [12.5-50.0] to 5.0 [0.0-5.6] mg/day at 12 months (Table 1). 10 (26.3%) of the 38 patients in whom an imaging follow-up test was performed showed no radiographic improvement after a median of 9.0 [6.0-14.0] months. 4 of them were in clinical remission.23 (42.6%) patients were on TCZMONO and 31 (57.4%) on TCZCOMBO: MTX (n=28), cyclosporine A (n=2), azathioprine (n=1). Patients on TCZCOMBO were younger (38.0 [27.0-46.0] vs 45 [38.0-57.0] years; p= 0.048), with a trend to longer TAK duration (21.0 [6.0-38.0] vs 6.0 [1.0-23.0] months; p= 0.08) and higher C-reactive protein (2.4 [0.7-5.6] vs 1.3 [0.3-3.3] mg/dL; p=0.16). Despite these differences, similar outcomes were observed in both groups (log rank p=0.862) (Figure 1). Relevant adverse events were reported in 6 (11.1%) patients, but only 3 developed severe events that required TCZ withdrawal.

Table 1.Baselinen=54Month 1N=54Month 3N=49Month 6N=44Month 12N=36Clinical remission, n (%)12 (22.2)19 (38.8)23 (52.3)27 (75.0)Laboratory improvementCRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.5 [0.5-3.5]0.2 [0.1-0.7]*0.2 [0.5-0.5]*0.2 [0.1-0.5]*0.1 [0.0-0.4]*ESR (mm/1sthour), median [IQR]30.5 [8.7-52.7]7.0 [3.0-14.0]*4.5 [2.0-8.0]*5.0[2.0-6.0]*4.0 [2.0-9.5]*Hemoglobin (g/dL), mean ± SD12.4 ±1.513.0 ±1.2*13.0 ±1.4*13.2 ±1.5*12.9 ±1.6*Prednisone dose, median [IQR]30.0 [12.5-50.0]20.0 [10.0-30.0]*10.0 [5.0-20.0]*5.0 [5.0-10.5]*5.0 [0.0-5.6]*

CRP: C-Reactive Protein; ESR: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; IQR: interquartile range; n: number. *p<0.01 vs baseline (Wilcoxon test).

Conclusion:

TCZ is effective and safe in white patients with refractory TAK. A discordance between clinical and imaging activity assessment may exist.

References:

[1]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507.

[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. PMID: 30655091

Disclosure of Interests:

Diana Prieto-Peña Grant/research support from: DP-P has received research support from UCB Pharma, Roche, Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie and Lilly., Pilar Bernabéu: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Beatriz González-Alvarez: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz: None declared, Esteban Rubio Romero: None declared, SALVADOR GARCÍA MORILLO: None declared, Mauricio Minguez: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Sheila Melchor: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Beatriz Bravo: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Juan Salvatierra: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, C. Romero-Gómez: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Javier Mendizabal: None declared, Francisco Miguel Ortiz Sanjuan: None declared, I. Pérez de Pedro: None declared, JOSE LUIS ALONSO VALDIVIESO: None declared, Pérez Sánchez Laura: None declared, Roldán Molina Rosa: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Ricardo Gómez de la Torre: None declared, Silvia Suarez: None declared, María Jesús Montesa: None declared, Monica Delgado Sanchez: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Belén Atienza-Mateo: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: MAG-G received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: RB received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD.

POS1340 MULTICENTER STUDY OF 71 PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY UVEITIS RELATED TO IMMUNE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY DISEASES ON CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL TREATMENT

Background:

Prognosis of non-infectious refractory uveitis has improved markedly with biologic therapy (BT) (1-5). Most data are with monoclonal anti-TNF drugs, especially Adalimumab (ADA) and Infliximab (IFX). However, there is not enough evidence for the use of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP).

Objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CZP in refractory uveitis secondary to Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMID).

Methods:

Multicenter study of 71 patients with uveitis due to IMID refractory to glucocorticoids and conventional immunosuppressants. Efficacy was assessed with the following ocular parameters: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anterior chamber cells, vitritis, macular thickness and presence of retinal vasculitis. These outcomes were compared between baseline, 1st week, 1st and 6th month, and 1st and 2nd year. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics v.23.

Results:

71 patients/100 affected eyes (29 men/42 women) with mean age of 40.0±11.3 years were studied. Underlying IMIDs were: spondyloarthritis (n=38), Behçet (10), psoriatic arthritis (8), Crohn disease (3), sarcoidosis (2), JIA (1), reactive arthritis (1), rheumatoid arthritis (1), relapsing polychondritis (1), TINU (1), pars planitis (1), Birdshot (1) and idiopathic uveitis (3). Uveitis pattern was anterior (n=55), posterior (6), panuveitis (6) and intermediate (4).

Prior to CZP, patients had received: methotrexate (37), sulfasalazine (26), azathioprine (14), cyclosporine (10), leflunomide (3), mycophenolate mofetil (3) and cyclophosphamide (1). Previous BT was administered in 48 (67.6%) patients, with a mean of 1.4±1.3 drugs per patient as follows: ADA (n=56), IFX (27), golimumab (14), tocilizumab (5) and etanercept (3). Pregnancy was the reason for prescribing CZP in 19 patients. CZP was administered in monotherapy (n=39) or combined with conventional immunosuppressants (n=32).

After a mean follow-up of 27.1±21.1 months, most of the ocular variables showed a rapid and significantly improvement (Table 1). A decrease in the median number [IQR] of flares of uveitis before and after CZP, (3 [1-4] vs. 0 [0-1], p<0.001) was observed. CZP was discontinued in 15 patients due to remission (n=2), ocular insufficient response (2) and incomplete response of extraocular manifestations (11). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion:

CZP seems to be effective and safe in patients with refractory uveitis due to IMID.

References:

[1]Martín-Varillas JL, et al. Ophthalmology 2018; 125:1444-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.020.

[2]Atienza-Mateo B, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71:2081-2089. doi: 10.1002/art.41026.

[3]Santos-Gómez M, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34(6 Suppl 102):S34-S40. PMID: 27054359

[4]Vegas-Revenga N, et al. Am J Ophthalmol 2019; 200:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.12.019

[5]Calvo-Río V, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014; 32 (4 Suppl 84):S54-7. PMID: 25005576

Table 1.Baseline1stweek1stMonth6thMonth1styear2ndyearBCVA (mean±SD)0.68±0.270.72±0.27*0.79±0.25*0.84±0.24*0.85±0.25*0.87±0.22*Improvement in AC Cells, n (%)Patients with AC cells at baseline (n=48)-21 (43.7)30 (62.5)*41 (85.4)*48 (100)*48 (100)*Improvement in Vitritis, n (%)Patients with vitritis at baseline (n=13)-3 (23.1)8 (61.5)*11 (84.6)*13 (100)*13 (100)*OCT (µ) (mean±SD)292.5±47.7294±47.4286.7±41.9*274.7±38.7*272.8±38.9*266.31±36.2*Choroiditis; affected eyes, n, (%)3 (4.2)3 (4.2)2 (2.8)2 (2.8)1 (1.4)0 (0)Retinal Vasculitis; affected eyes, n, (%)2 (2.8)0 (0)1 (1.4)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)

*p<0.001

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0806 FINDINGS CONSISTENT WITH SUBCLINICAL VASCULITIS IN PATIENTS WITH NEW ONSET POLYMYALGIA: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND A META-ANALYSIS OF COHORT DATA

Background:

GCA is characterized by cranial symptoms but imaging techniques show that patients with non-specific symptoms such as systemic inflammation or PMR may have undiagnosed large vessel (LV) GCA1. Although silent GCA in patients with clinically isolated PMR may have consequences for patients’ outcome, little is known about its prevalence and characteristics of affected patients.

Objectives:

To review data on the prevalence of silent GCA in newly diagnosed PMR patients without cranial GCA symptoms and to analyze which characteristics are associated with vascular involvement among PMR patients.

Methods:

We systematically screened PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases and included studies screening for GCA in steroid naïve PMR patients without cranial symptoms consistent with GCA. Authors of the publications that used PET for vasculitis screening were invited to share their individual patient data (IPD) for a meta-analysis. We sought to define patient characteristics that were associated with vasculitis using univariable mixed effects logistic regression models with vascular involvement as the outcome, missing values were imputed using multilevel joint modeling multiple imputation. To fit a multivariable model with the candidate predictors we excluded variables that were hypothesized to have less medical relevance for the outcome and highly correlated inflammation markers (ESR, Lc).

Results:

Out of the 3047 studies screened independently by 2 authors (DG and TD), 13 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These studies (published 1963-2019) reported on 543 PMR patients examined by temporal artery biopsy (n=175), ultrasound (n=110), PET or PET-CT (n=258). 115 PMR patients were diagnosed with GCA (21.2%), with prevalence ranging from 0-92%.

We collected IPD for 243 patients from 4 cohorts using PET and 3 using PET/CT for GCA diagnosis. The overall median age of patients was 72.3 years (IQR 66.4-78.0) and vasculitis was found in 65 patients (26.7%) (table 1).

Table 1.OverallPMRPMR+GCAn (%)243178 (73.3)65 (26.7)Female sex (%)146 (60.1)98 (55.1)48 (73.8)Shoulder girdle pain (%)236 (97.1)174 (97.8)62 (95.4)Pelvic girdle pain (%)174 (71.6)127 (71.3)47 (72.3)Inflammatory back pain (%)No107 (44.0)83 (46.6)24 (36.9)Yes106 (43.6)70 (39.3)36 (55.4)Lower limb pain (%)No87 (35.8)61 (34.3)26 (40.0)Yes81 (33.3)68 (38.2)13 (20.0)Weight loss (%)112 (46.1)78 (43.8)34 (52.3)CRP (mg/l) (median [IQR])46.0 [19.0, 77.7]44.0 [16.9, 74.2]52.0 [27.9, 85.0]ESR (mm/h) (mean (SD))65.2 (30.3)62.7 (30.2)72.3 (29.7)Hemoglobin (g/dl) (mean (SD))12.1 (1.5)12.2 (1.5)11.7 (1.6)Thrombocytes (1e+09/ml) (mean (SD))341.9 (106.3)323.9 (103.2)375.8 (104.6)

In the univariable analyses the following factors were most strongly associated with vasculitic PET findings: female sex (OR 2.31, CI 1.17-4.58), inflammatory back pain (OR 2.73, CI 1.32-5.64), temperature >37° (OR 1.83, CI 0.90-3.7), weight loss (OR 1.83, CI 0.96-3.51), thrombocytosis (i.e., patients with a thrombocyte count 1 SD above mean have an OR of 1.51, CI 1.05-2.18), anemia (i.e., 1 g/dl decrease in Hb below mean corresponds to an OR of 1.25, CI 1.00-1.56). Patients with lower limb pain were less likely to have vasculitis (OR 0.43, CI 0.19–0.95). The estimated ORs were very similar in the multivariable model although the 95%CIs became wider.

Conclusion:

Although the prevalence across published studies showed substantial variation, 6 out of 13 studies reported a prevalence of silent GCA in 18-40% of all PMR patients. The exploratory analysis of the collected IPD identified female sex, inflammatory back pain, fever, weight loss, absence of lower leg pain, thrombocytosis and anemia as factors associated with LV-GCA. These findings should be validated in future prospective cohort studies. The presence or absence of these factors may further aid in diagnosing LV-GCA in PMR patients.

References:

[1]Buttgereit F, Dejaco C, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2442–58.

Acknowledgements:

The study is funded by the “Schweizerische Stiftung für die Erforschung der Muskelkrankheiten (SSEM)”.

Disclosure of Interests:

Daniele Silvio Gozzoli: None declared, Andrea Hemmig: None declared, Lars Hemkens: None declared, Laura Werlen: None declared, Hannah Ewald: None declared, Christoph Berger: None declared, Diego Kyburz Grant/research support from: DK reports personal fees from Abbvie, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work, Stephan Imfeld: None declared, Markus Aschwanden: None declared, Mihaela Stegert: None declared, Dario Camellino: None declared, Marco Amedeo Cimmino: None declared, Corrado Campochiaro Grant/research support from: personal fees from Roche, Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, Liesbet Henckaerts: None declared, Daniel Blockmans Speakers bureau: Paid speaker for Roche, Consultant of: Paid consultant for Roche, Patricia Moya: None declared, Hector Corominas: None declared, Russell Buchanan: None declared, Claire Owen Speakers bureau: CO has received speaking honoraria from Roche, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer, and meeting sponsorship from Roche, UCB and Janssen, Yannick van Sleen: None declared, Elisabeth Brouwer Speakers bureau: E. Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017, 2018 which were paid to the UMCG, Consultant of: E. Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017, 2018 which were paid to the UMCG, Hiroyuki Ymashita: None declared, Thomas Daikeler: None declared

AB0666 PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF SERUM KREBS VON DEN LUNGEN-6 GLYCOPROTEIN CIRCULATING LEVELS IN COVID-19 PNEUMONIA: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Background:

Currently, there are no biomarkers to predict respiratory worsening in patients with Coronavirus infectious disease, 2019 (COVID- 19) pneumonia.

Objectives:

We aimed to determine the prognostic value of Krebs von de Lungen-6 circulating serum levels (sKL-6) predicting COVID- 19 evolving trends.

Methods:

We prospectively analyzed the clinical and laboratory characteristics of 375 COVID- 19 patients with mild lung disease on admission. sKL-6 was obtained in all patients at baseline and compared among patients with respiratory worsening.

Results:

45.1% of patients developed respiratory worsening during hospitalization. Baseline sKL-6 levels were higher in patients who had respiratory worsening (median [IQR] 303 [209-449] vs. 285.5 [15.8-5724], P=0.068). The best sKL-6 cut-off point was 408 U/mL (area under the curve 0.55; 33% sensitivity, 79% specificity). Independent predictors of respiratory worsening were sKL-6 serum levels, age >51 years, time hospitalized, and dyspnea on admission. Patients with baseline sKL-6 ≥ 408 U/mL had a 39% higher risk of developing respiratory aggravation seven days after admission. In patients with serial determinations, sKL-6 was also higher in those who subsequently worsened (median [IQR] 330 [219-460] vs 290.5 [193-396]; p<0.02).

Conclusion:

sKL-6 has a low sensibility to predict respiratory worsening in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia. Baseline sKL-6 ≥ 408 U/mL is associated to a higher risk of respiratory worsening. sKL-6 levels are not useful as a screening tool to stratify patients on admission but further research is needed to investigate if serial determinations of sKL-6 may be of prognostic use.

References:

[1]Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054-62. 5.

[2]Tian W, Jiang W, Yao J, Nicholson CJ, Li RH, Sigurslid HH, et al. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020.

[3]Wang D, Li R, Wang J, Jiang Q, Gao C, Yang J, et al. Correlation analysis between disease severity and clinical and biochemical characteristics of 143 cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):519.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0770 DESCRIBING A COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS ACCORDING TO THE BODY MASS INDEX: EXPERIENCE IN A JOINT RHEUMATOLOGY-DERMATOLOGY CLINIC

Background:

Obesity is a predictor for the development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with a negative prognostic impact.

Objectives:

We aimed to describe and characterize patients with PsA according to the Body Mass Index (BMI) in a joint Rheumatology-Dermatology unit (PAIDER).

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with PsA according to CASPAR criteria visited between May 2012 and May 2019 at the PAIDER clinic of our center. Data on demographic and anthropometric features, serologic findings, source of referral, cardiovascular risk factors and biological treatment were collected from clinical records. Patients were classified according to the WHO International Classification of nutritional status in normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 Kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 Kg/m2) and obesity (BMI≥30 Kg/m2). A descriptive analysis was performed, and the differences between groups were evaluated using Chi2, T-Student and ANOVA tests. P-values <0.05 were accepted as significant.

Results:

During the study period 393 patients (50.6% women) with a mean age of 52.47 ± 13.21 years were evaluated. Baseline characteristics are shown in table 1.

Table 1.Baseline characteristicsTotaln=393Female, n (%)199 (50,6)Age, yrs, mean ±SD52,47 (13,21)Source of referral, n (%) Dermatology117 (29,8) Rheumatology219 (55,7) Primary Care and Others22 (5,6)Smoker, n (%)97 (25,8)High Blood Pressure (HBP), n (%)106 (27,7)Diabetes, n (%)48 (12,5)Hypercholesterolemia, n (%)98 (25,8)Hyperuricemia, n (%)32 (8,6)HLA-B27 positive, n (%)68 (21,6)BMI, Kg/m2, mean ±SD28,15 (5,87)Biological treatment, n (%)166 (43,2)

The mean BMI was 28.15 ± 5.87 kg/m2. 112 patients (32%) were overweight with a mean BMI of 27.46 ± 1.55 kg/m2and 118 patients (34%) were obese with a mean BMI of 34.42 ± 5.08 kg/m2. Of the obese patients, 80 (67.8%) had obesity grade 1, 28 (23.7%) grade 2 and 10 (8.5%) grade 3.

Characteristics of the patients according to BMI categories are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.Characteristics according to BMINormal weightn= 118Overweightn= 112Obesityn=118P valueFemale, n (%)66 (55,9)52 (46,4)62 (52,5)nsAge, yrs, mean ±SD47,92 (14,08)54,71 (11,75)54,48 (11,54)<0,001Source of referral, n (%)Ns Dermatology35 (33,7)37 (35,2)34 (30,9) Rheumatology63 (60,6)61 (58,1)70 (63,6) Primary Care and Others6 (5,8)7 (6,7)6 (5,5)Smoker, n (%)37 (33)23 (21,1)31 (26,7)nsHigh Blood Pressure (HBP), n (%)12 (10,5)37 (34,3)41 (35)<0,001Diabetes, n (%)7 (6)9 (8,3)30 (25,6)<0,001Hypercholesterolemia, n (%)19 (17)24 (22,2)45 (38,5)0,001Hyperuricemia, n (%)5 (4,4)7 (6,8)19 (16,7)0,004HLA-B27, n (%)27 (28,7)17 (17,9)13 (12,6)0,016BMI, Kg/m2, media ±DE22,58 (1,78)27,46 (1,55)34,42 (5,08)-Biological treatment, n (%)47 (41,2)45 (40,9)66 (55,9)0,032

We observed that mean age was significantly higher in obese patients (p <0.001), as well as the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors such as HBP (p <0.001), Diabetes (p <0.001), dyslipidemia (p = 0.001) and hyperuricemia (p = 0.004). Obese patients also received more biological therapy (p=0.032). A higher prevalence of HLA-B27 was observed in patients with normal weight (p=0.016). No differences were found according to BMI regarding gender and source of referral.

Conclusion:

- Almost 70% of patients with PsA visited in the PAIDER clinic of our center have a BMI above normal and more than a third of them are obese, mostly grade 1.

- In our joint clinic there are no differences in BMI regarding the source of referral of the patients.

- Patients with obesity are older, have more cardiovascular comorbidities and receive more biological treatment significantly, which increases the complexity of their management and worsens the prognosis.

Disclosure of Interests:

Andrea García-Guillén: None declared, Ana Laiz: None declared, Anna Lopez-Ferrer: None declared, HyeSang Park: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Berta Magallares: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Ana Milena Millán Arciniegas: None declared, Cesar Díaz-Torné: None declared, Sicylle Jeria: None declared, Hector Corominas: None declared

SAT0270 TOCILIZUMAB IN REFRACTORY TAKAYASU ARTERITIS. OPEN-LABEL NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 53 PATIENTS OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) was recently approved for Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) in Japan based on the results of the TAKT trial(1).However, data in clinical practice in Europe and America are scarce(2).

Objectives:

To assess efficacy and safety of TCZ in TAK of clinical practice in Spain.

Methods:

Observational, open-label multicentre study of 53 TAK patients treated with TCZ due to refractoriness or adverse events of previous therapy. Outcomes variables were improvement of clinical features, acute phase reactants and glucocorticoid-sparing effect.

Results:

53 patients (46w/7m); mean age, 40.6±14.6 years at TCZ onset. TCZ was started after a median of 12 [3.0-48.0] months from TAK diagnosis. In addition to systemic corticosteroids and before TCZ they received conventional immunosuppressant drugs (n=42) and biologic therapy (n=14). TCZ was prescribed as standard I.V. (n=42; 79.2%) or subcutaneous (n=11; 20.8%). The initial dose was 8 mg/kg/IV/4 weeks or 162 mg/SC/week, respectively. TCZ was used in monotherapy or combined with immunosuppressants (n=32; 60.4%): methotrexate (n=27), azathioprine (n=2), cyclosporine (n=3). Main clinical features at TCZ onset were: malaise (n=30),limb claudication (n=22), headache (n=18), fever (n=14), abdominal pain (n=10), and chest pain (n=9). Most of the patients experienced a rapid and maintained clinical, analytical improvement(TABLE).After a median follow-up of 18.0 [7.0-45.0] months, TCZ was discontinued in 20 patients due to: sustained remission (n=6), relapse (n=6), adverse event (n=5), gestation (n=3). Most relevant adverse side effects were serious infections: pneumonia (n=2), herpes zoster (n=1), abdominal sepsis (n=1).

Table.Basal(N=53)Month 1(N=53)Month 3(N=46)Month 6(N=44)Month 12(N=34)Clinical improvement, n/N(%)Complete17/53 (32.1)19/46 (41.3)23/44 (52.3)26/34 (76.5)Partial30/53 (54.6)26/46 (56.5)18/44 (40.9)8/34 (23.5)No improvement6/53 (11.3)1/46 (2.2)3/44 (6.8)0/34 (0.0)Analytical markers,ESR (mm/1sth),median [IQR]35.0 [16.0-52.0]7.5 [3.0-14.0] *3.5 [2.0-8.0]*5.0[2.0-6.0]*5.0 [2.0-8.5]*CRP (mg/dL),median [IQR]1.7 [0.6 -3.5]0.21 [0.05-0.6]*0.14 [0.05-0.5]*0.14 [0.04-0.4]*0.10 [0.03-0.30]*Hb (g/dL),mean±SD12.3±1.512.8±1.2*12.9±1.3*12.9±1.4*12.9±1.4*Prednisone dose (mg/day),median [IQR]30.0 [15.0-50.0]20.0 [10.0-37.5]*10.0 [5.0-20.0]*5.0 [5.0-12.5]*5.0 [0.0-7.5]*

*Wilcoxon test p < 0.001.

Conclusion:

TCZ appears to be effective and safe in patients with refractory TAK in clinical practice.

References:

[1]Nakaoka Y et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:348-354

[2]Loricera J et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34: S44-53.

Disclosure of Interests:

D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Pilar Bernabéu: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Beatriz González-Alvarez: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Esteban Rubio Romero: None declared, SALVADOR GARCÍA MORILLO: None declared, Mauricio Minguez: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido Consultant of: Yes, I have received fees for scientific advice (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis), Speakers bureau: Yes, I have received fees as a speaker (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis), Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Sheila Melchor: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Beatriz Bravo: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J Salvatierra: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, C. Romero-Gómez: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Javier Mendizabal: None declared, Francisco Miguel Ortiz Sanjuan: None declared, I. Pérez de Pedro: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma. MSD

AB0489 BETA 2 MICROGLOBULIN AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN CRYOGLOBULINEMIA NON ASSOCIATED WITH HEPATOTROPIC VIRUSES

Background:

Cryoglobulinemia (CG) is a rare phenomenon related to haematological disorders, infections and autoimmune diseases. Age and renal involvement are known prognostic markers.

Objectives:

To describe the differential clinical features and the prognostic factors in a cohort of patients diagnosed with CG non-associated with hepatotropic viruses.

Methods:

A descriptive, retrospective study of a cohort comprised of 252 cryoglobulin positive samples, obtained from the immunology laboratory database of a tertiary hospital attending 450,000 people over 1 year. 186 patients with CG positive samples were included, 87 of which were not associated with neither hepatitis B nor C virus. Demographic, clinical, serological and pathological data were collected. Nonparametric variables were compared using a Wilcoxon test.

Results:

Out of 186 reviewed patients, 87 (46.7%) are included in this study. The mean age at CG diagnosis was 60 (± 16) years. Mixed CG was the predominant subtype, detected in 66 (75.9%) patients, 10 of which (11.5%) were associated with glomerulonephritis (GN) with compatible biopsy, 17 (19.5%) with peripheral neuropathy (PN), 29 (33.3%) with non-erosive arthritis and 10 (11.5%) with leukocytoclastic vasculitis confirmed by skin biopsy. The clinical, epidemiological and serological characteristics of the sample are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Ing et al’s Nomogram of parsimonious model.

Table 1.

Clinical, epidemiological and serical characteristics of patients with CG

Sex, female / male, n (%)65/22 (74.7/25.3)Age at diagnosis, years ± SD60 ± 16CG subtype, n (%)- Type 1, n (%)27 (30)- Mixed, n (%)61 (70)ASSOCIATED DISEASES- pSS, n (%)37 (42,5)- LES, n (%)9 (10,3)- SSc, n (%)7 (8,05)CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS- Skin, n (%)30 (34,5)- Purpura, n (%)14(16)- Ulcers, n (%)5 (5,7)- Acral ischemia, n (%)2 (2,3)- Acrocyanosis by cold, n (%)7 (8)- Raynaud, n (%)19 (21,8)- Peripheric Neuropathy, n (%)17 (19,5)- Non-erosive arthritis, n (%)29 (33,3)- Glomerulonephritis, n (%)10 (11,5)LABORATORY- β2M +(>1.8 mg/L) mean3.9- RCP (mg/L) p503.7- ESR (mm/hour) p5028- RF + (>20 UI/mL) p50124- Anti Ro52 + /Anti Ro60 + n, (%)42 (48.3)- Low C3 n, (%)48 (55.1)- Low C4 n, (%)36 (41.4)

In the comparative analysis of patients with CG and Beta 2 microglobulin (β2M), CG and rheumatoid factor (RF), those with high β2M (>1.8 mg / L) presented significantly more GN (p0.016) and PN (p0.013). However, the association of RF with either GN (p0.948) or PN (p0.645) was not significant. Also, high β2M was significantly related to complement consumption of C4 (p: 0.015) but not of C3 (p: 0.063). In the 30 (34.5%) patients with skin manifestations, high β2M showed no statistically significant association. The main systemic autoimmune diseases associated were primary Sjögren’s Syndrome (pSS) 37 (42.5%), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) 9 (10.3%) and Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) 7 (8.05%).

Conclusion:

A direct association between presence of elevated levels of β2M and the existence of progression to glomerulonephritis and peripheral neuropathy is found in our cohort. No correlation is found between the presence of CG and other serological markers of autoimmunity except low C4. CG with elevated β2M does not associate with greater skin involvement or arthritis.

References:

[1]A.C. Desbois et al. Cryoglobulinemia: An update in 2019. Joint Bone Spine (2019)

[2]Cacoub P, Cryoglobulinemia Vasculitis, The American Journal of Medicine (2015)

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SAT0217 PERFORMANCE OF ACR/EULAR 2019, SLICC 2012 AND ACR 1997 CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA IN A COHORT OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS WITH LONGSTANDING DISEASE

Background:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with variable clinical features and a complex physiopathology. In 2019, EULAR and ACR have jointly developed new classification criteria with both high sensitivity and specificity. These criteria have the particularity of including the presence of ANA as an obligatory entry criterion and the existence of clinical and immunological domains with weighted scores.

Objectives:

To evaluate the performance and characteristics of the ACR/EULAR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1997 classification criteria in a cohort of SLE patients with longstanding disease.

Methods:

Descriptive observational study that enrolled a cohort of SLE patients with longstanding disease followed in a tertiary level hospital. Demographic and clinical data were gathered along with the fulfillment of classification criteria. The sensitivity of each classification criteria and the statistically significant associations between criteria fulfillment and clinical and immunological data were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed using the Chi2, T-student and ANOVA tests. Statistical significance was assumed in p values <0.05.

Results:

A total of 79 patients (88.6% women) with a mean age of 51.8±14 years, disease duration of 15.2±11.5 years and SLEDAI of 2.65±2.1 were included. The sensitivity of the different classification criteria was 51.9% for ACR 1997, 87.3% for SLICC 2012 and 86.1% for ACR/EULAR 2019 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sensitivity and average scores.

ACR/EULAR 2019SLICC 2012ACR 1997Sensitivity (%)86.187.351.9Average score of patients classified as SLE(±SD)18.6±5.85.3±1.45±0.9Average score of patients NOT classified as SLE(±SD)6.1±2.52.8±0.42.8±0.8

51.9% of patients met all three classification criteria, 29.1% met SLICC 2012 and ACR/EULAR 2019, 5% only met SLICC 2012 and 3.7% exclusively met ACR/EULAR 2019. 11.4% of patients did not meet any classification criteria and were characterized by having a low SLEDAI (0.6±0.9) and fulfilling only skin domains (alopecia or oral ulcers), antiphospholipid antibodies or hypocomplementemia.

Statistically significant associations were found between meeting ACR/EULAR 2019 classification criteria and the presence of low C3 and C4 (p<0.04), DNA (p<0.001), lupus nephritis III-IV (p<0.05) and arthritis (p<0.001), highlighting that all patients with arthritis met these criteria.

In the SLICC 2012 evaluation, significant associations were found between meeting these criteria and the presence of arthritis (p<0.01), renal involvement (p<0.04), leukopenia/lymphopenia (p=0.05), DNA (p<0.03) and hypocomplementemia (p=0.02).

Fullfilment of ACR 1997 was associated to the presence of malar rash (p<0.001), discoid lupus (p<0.05), photosensitivity (p<0.001) and oral ulcers (p<0.04), as well as arthritis (p<0.001), serositis (p=0.02), renal (p<0.05) and hematologic (p=0.05) involvement.

The Kappa concordance coefficient among classification criteria is detailed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Kappa concordance coefficient.

ACR/EULAR 2019 - SLICC 2012ACR/EULAR 2019 - ACR 1997SLICC 2012 - ACR 1997Kappa concordance coefficient0.610.270.30

Conclusion:

The ACR/EULAR 2019 classification criteria maintain a high sensitivity similar to the SLICC 2012 in SLE patients with longstanding disease, both of which are much higher than ACR 1997. Patients with serological, articular or renal involvement are more likely to meet SLICC 2012 or ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria. It is noteworthy the relevance of dermatological manifestations in ACR1997 classification criteria against the increased weight that a better understanding of SLE physiopathology has provided to analytic and immunological criteria in the subsequent classification criteria.

Disclosure of Interests:

David Lobo Prat: None declared, Berta Magallares: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, HyeSang Park: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Ignasi Gich: None declared, Ana Laiz: None declared, Cesar Díaz-Torné: None declared, Ana Milena Millán Arciniegas: None declared, Susana P. Fernandez-Sanchez: None declared, Hector Corominas: None declared

FRI0442 APPROPRIATE USE OF SEROLOGY TESTS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF LYME DISEASE. EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN AREA

Background:

Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystemic animal-borne disease caused by spirochetes of theBorrelia burgdorferi s.lcomplex and transmitted by ticks of the speciesIxodes ricinus. In Spain, most cases occur in rural areas of the north-east region with a peak of maximum incidence between spring and early autumn. The diagnosis is based on a history of potential exposure to ticks, the recognition of characteristic clinical manifestations and serological testing.

Objectives:

To assess the suitability of serological study for the diagnosis of LD in an urban area.

Methods:

Retrospective observational study that included all LD serology tests made between April 2017 and September 2019 at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona covering a population of 450,000 people. Demographic data and the medical department that requested the serology test were collected along with serology test results. The medical records of patients with positive serology were consulted to identify which patients were finally diagnosed with LD along with their clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome.

Results:

A total of 574 serological tests were included and 78 (13.59%) of them were positive. Only 1.04% (6) of all serological tests belonged to patients finally diagnosed with LD. The department that made most requests was Neurology (37.3%) followed by Infectious Diseases (21%), Internal Medicine (14.5%), Emergency Medicine (4.7%), Dermatology (4.5%), Critical Care Medicine (2.3%) and Rheumatology (2.1%). 50% of the diagnosed patients were women with a mean age of 57.7±7.7DE years. In 50% of diagnosed cases, patients remembered a tick bite during activities in the mountain or rural areas. The most common clinical manifestations were erythema migrans (67%), non-inflammatory arthralgias (50%), fatigue and malaise (67%), together with one case of meningoencephalitis and one of knee monoarthritis. All diagnosed patients received antibiotic treatment with ceftriaxone (33%) or doxycycline (66%). Only one patient presented post-Lyme syndrome.

The serological test for LD in our center had a total individual cost of 15.75 eur, so the cost of the 574 requests was 9,040.5 eur. 7,812 eur corresponded to negative results and 1,134 eur to false positive results.

Conclusion:

Our study indicates the overuse of diagnostic testing for LD with implications for patient care and cost-effective health management. In the absence of a history of potential exposure to infected vector ticks or characteristic clinical manifestations, unnecessary microbiological tests should not be performed.

Disclosure of Interests:

David Lobo Prat: None declared, Luís Sainz Comas: None declared, Virginia Pomar: None declared, Ana Milena Millán Arciniegas: None declared, HyeSang Park: None declared, Andrea García-Guillén: None declared, Sicylle Jeria: None declared, Ana Laiz: None declared, Berta Magallares: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya: None declared, Cesar Díaz-Torné: None declared, Susana P. Fernandez-Sanchez: None declared, Hector Corominas: None declared

Renal Artery Dissection in a Young Woman: Diagnoses Beyond Fibromuscular Dysplasia

A 31-year-old woman presented at the emergency room after experiencing colic pain in the right iliac fossa for 5 days. She had previously consulted another center, where deterioration of renal function had been identified and abdominal computed tomography (CT) angiography had shown a dissection of the right renal artery, with areas suggestive of infarction in the right kidney, as well as an aneurysm in the left renal artery and a smaller left kidney. The patient had no relevant family or personal history except posttraumatic carotid-cavernous fistula in 2014, which had been treated with embolization. In our hospital, the patient was hypertensive and acute renal failure was confirmed, accompanied by an increase in lactate dehydrogenase and isomorphic microhematuria. After a new CT Scan, in addition to the lesions described in the renal arteries, another aneurysm in the splenic artery and an aneurysm of the right femoral artery were identified. Antihypertensive treatment was initiated with calcium antagonists and anticoagulation. Subsequent renal arteriography confirmed the dissection of the right renal artery, which could not be repaired, and a coated stent was placed in the left renal artery to exclude the aneurysm. The splenic artery lesion was treated 2 months later. The etiological diagnosis in this young woman was challenging. The presence of visceral aneurysms suggested a differential diagnosis comprising fibromuscular dysplasia, vasculitis, and collagenopathies. Using a multidisciplinary approach and directed anamnesis, the presence of frequent sprains, joint hypermobility, and skin fragility was confirmed. Blood immunology and CT angiography including the thoracic and cervical territories were normal. Echocardiography revealed tricuspid insufficiency. All these data suggested the presence of a collagen-like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vascular form). The diagnosis was confirmed by the genetic study, which showed a pathogenic mutation in the COL3A1 gene. Currently, the patient is asymptomatic with recovered renal function following treatment with a beta-blocker and antiplatelet therapy.

Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe fecal incontinence in men

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation and percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation have been described previously as effective treatments for fecal incontinence. Nevertheless, there does not exist any study that compares the efficiency of both. The aim of this study was to compare the use of SNS and PPTNS in males with FI.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study on men with FI treated with SNS or PTNS in the Coloproctology Unit of the University General Hospital of Elche and Reina Sofia of Murcia between January 2010 and December 2011. Preoperative assessment included physical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal endosonography. Anal continence was evaluated using the Wexner continence grading system. Quality of life was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of life Scale.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included (ten patients SNS and nine PPTNS). SNS improved FI in nine of the ten patients. The mean Wexner score decreased significantly from a median of 14 (12-16) (preoperative) to 4 (1-8) (6-month revision) (p = 0.007). PTNS improved FI in seven of the nine patients. The mean Wexner score decreased significantly from a median of 12 (11-19) (preoperative) to 5 (4-7) (6-month revision) (p = 0.018). Both treatments produced symptomatic improvement without statistical differences between them.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study was nonrandomized with a relatively small number of patients. PPTNS had similar efficiency to the SNS in our men population. However, more studies are necessary to exclude selection bias and analyze long-term results.

Field Efficacy of a Metarhizium anisopliae-Based Attractant-Contaminant Device to Control Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Biological control of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) using entomopathogenic fungi is being studied as a viable control strategy. The efficacy of a Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae)-based attractant-contaminant device (ACD) to control C. capitata was evaluated in a medium-scale (40 ha) 2-yr field trial using a density of 24 ACD per ha. Results showed that this density was adequate to efficiently reduce fruitfly populations and that the inoculation dishes (IDs) needed replacing mid-season to provide protection for the entire season. In this study, fungal treatment was even more effective than conventional chemical treatment. Population dynamics in fungus-treated fields along with the infectivity study of field-aged IDs in the laboratory found that the ACD remained effective for at least 3 mo. The results suggest M. anisopliae-based ACD can be used to control C. capitata in the field. The implications of its use, especially as a tool in an integrated pest management program, are discussed.

IL-6 blockade reverses the abnormal STAT activation of peripheral blood leukocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients

Considering the interplay of multiple STATs in response to cytokines, we investigated how IL-6 and its blocking affect STAT signaling in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Leukocytes obtained from RA patients before and after tocilizumab treatment and healthy donors (HDs) were cytokine-stimulated and STAT phosphorylation was analyzed by cytometry. RA patients had significantly fewer pSTAT1+, pSTAT3+, and pSTAT6+ monocytes and pSTAT5+ lymphocytes than HDs. After 24weeks of treatment, percentages of IFNγ-induced pSTAT1+ and IL-10-induced pSTAT3+ monocytes in RA patients increased, reaching levels comparable to HDs. pSTAT1+ and pSTAT3+ cells correlated inversely with RA disease activity index and levels of pSTAT+ cells at baseline were higher in patients with good EULAR response to tocilizumab. IFNγ-induced pSTAT1+ cells correlated inversely with memory T cells and anti-CCP levels. IL-10-induced pSTAT3+ cells correlated with Treg/Teff ratio. Our findings suggest that IL-6 blocking reduces the inflammatory mechanisms through the correction of STAT1 and STAT3 activation status.

Effect on anal pressure of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence

AIM

Previous studies on percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for faecal incontinence do not report anal pressure changes. In the present study the effect of percutaneous PTNS on anal manometry was determined.

METHOD

This was a prospective observational study of patients with faecal incontinence. They underwent one 30-min session of PTNS weekly for 12 consecutive weeks. Patients who showed improvement were given six more sessions at 2-weekly intervals. Anal manometry was performed before and after treatment. Clinical data including the Wexner score, psychological testing, quality of life using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score and the contents of a continence diary were recorded before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included in the study of whom 17 (70.83%) demonstrated some degree of clinical or manometric improvement at 3 months. Before treatment 18 patients had urgency of <1 min. At 3 and 6 months this had risen to 5 min in 62.5% and 70.83% (P < 0.001). The anal resting pressure increased from 21.7 to 37.6 mmHg (P = 0.021), the maximum squeeze pressure from 58.2 to 72.2 mmHg (P = 0.045) and the Wexner score fell from 15 to 10 (P = 0.018) at 6 months. Predictive factors for a response included fewer than three incontinent episodes per week (P = 0.027). Negative predictive factors included episiotomy and an initial Wexner score of > 12 (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous PTNS was effective in over 70% of patients in the present study with improvements in urgency, anal pressures and Wexner score.

Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term clinical, manometric and quality of life results

BACKGROUND

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a complex and multifactorial health problem. Treatment has to be individualised, analysing the aetiology and gravity in every case. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been shown to effectively improve treatment of FI.

METHODS

Fifty patients with severe FI treated with SNS between March 2002 and December 2010 were analysed. Preoperative assessment included physical examination, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Anal continence was evaluated using the Wexner continence grading system. Quality of life was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of life Scale (FIQLS). Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Wexner score, FIQLS and the ability to defer defecation were assessed at each visit.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent a permanent implant. The overall mean follow-up period was 55.52 ± 31.84 months. After 6 months, SNS significantly improved FI and positively impacted quality of life, as evidence by significant improvements in all 4 scales of the FIQLS. Anorectal manometry showed a trend towards an increase in maximum resting pressure and maximum pressure. After the first assessment at 6 months, Wexner score and FIQLS remained stable. Ability to defer defecation was also maintained. During follow-up, 3 patients (6 %) experienced implant site pain and episodes of extremity pain and paresthesias that were refractory to medical management and required device explantation. The implant site infection rate was 2 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of our long-term results confirms the safety and effectiveness of SNS in the management of patients with FI.

Applicability, safety and efficiency of outpatient treatment in uncomplicated diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

In most cases of diverticulitis, inflammation is mild, and the only treatment required is a clear liquid diet and antibiotics. Until recently, patients were given this treatment as inpatients with the consequent expenditure of resources. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of an outpatient treatment protocol with oral antibiotics in selected patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis in comparison with inpatient intravenous treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective non-randomized study between January 2007 and December 2009. We included all patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, at the Emergency Department of the University General Hospital of Elche. We compared the efficacy, safety and costs of hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics and outpatient treatment with oral antibiotics. Seventy-six patients were included in the study. Forty-four of them underwent intravenous treatment with Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h + Ciprofloxacin 400 mg/12 h (hospital treatment group) and 32 took oral antibiotics Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h and Ciprofloxacin 500 mg/12 h (outpatient group).

RESULTS

Outpatient treatment is viable in almost 95 % of those patients suffering from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Treatment was effective in resolving inflammation, and there were no complications in the majority of cases (94 %). Only 2 patients (6 %) required admission after outpatient treatment. The results further reflect complications and relapse rates similar to those of patients admitted to hospital and treated with intravenous antibiotics. There are no significant statistical differences (p = 0.86) between inpatients and outpatients. It is possible to save approximately 1,600 € per patient with outpatient treatment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment has demonstrated a safety and efficiency similar to inpatient treatment, producing an important reduction in expenses and medical resources.

Pharmacological identification of P2X1, P2X4 and P2X7 nucleotide receptors in the smooth muscles of human umbilical cord and chorionic blood vessels

To ascertain the role of extracellular adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) receptors in human placenta circulation, we identified and pharmacologically characterized the P2X receptor population in its superficial vessels. Total RNA was extracted from segments of chorionic and umbilical arteries and veins of terminal placentae delivered by vaginal or Caesarian births. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by sequencing of the products, identified the presence of P2X 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7mRNAs in smooth muscle from chorionic and umbilical arteries and veins. Umbilical vessels proximal to the fetus expressed the same population of P2X subtypes, except for the P2X(5), but additionally expressed the P2X(2). Rings of chorionic vessels contracted upon addition of nucleotides and analogs with the following relative rank order of potencies in arteries and veins: alpha,beta-methyleneATP>beta,gamma-methyleneATP>PNP>ATP=diBzATP>2-MeSATP>ADP>AMP; in umbilical vessels alpha,beta-methyleneATP was at least 100-fold more potent than ATP. Nucleotide potency was less than that of PGF(2alpha) or endothelin-2, but had the same magnitude as serotonin. ATP-desensitized receptors evidenced cross desensitization to alpha,beta-methyleneATP, 2-MeSATP and diBzATP, effect not observed when desensitization was elicited by alpha,beta-methyleneATP, confirming the presence of various P2X receptor subtypes in the smooth muscles of these vessels. The vasocontractile efficacy of alpha,beta-methyleneATP was unaltered by endothelium removal, while that of ATP was significantly attenuated and those elicited by 2-MeSATP were blunted, indicating the presence of additional endothelial nucleotide receptors. These results suggest that P2X receptors participate in the humoral regulation of placental blood flow.

Anticardiolipin antibodies in classic pediatric hemolytic-uremic syndrome: a possible pathogenic role

Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies have been associated with thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia and an increased risk of thrombosis in different vascular locations, even in the absence of lupus. The classic hemolytic-uremic syndrome is a postinfectious acute renal failure characterized by hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and the presence of widespread glomerular thrombosis in the kidney, with pathogenic mechanisms that remain to be identified. In order to establish the frequency of aCL antibodies in this syndrome and to identify a possible role in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations, 17 patients were studied during the reactant phase of the disease looking for an association between the presence of aCL antibodies (isotypes IgG, IgA and IgM) and the main clinical variables of the syndrome. In 8 patients IgG aCL was present, 2 patients had IgM aCL, and 1 had IgA antibodies on the solid-phase ELISA aCL assays, but no association could be demonstrated with the clinical variables studied. Although it might correspond to an epiphenomenon related to the triggering intestinal infection, a pathogenic role cannot be discarded and additional studies should be performed.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of new analogues of the active fungal metabolites N-(2-methyl-3-oxodecanoyl)-2-pyrroline and N-(2-methyl-3-oxodec-8-enoyl)-2-pyrroline (II)

New analogues of the bioactive enamides isolated from P. brevicompactum (2 and 3) have been synthesized to improve the biological activities. Two different structural modifications have been introduced: substitution of the aliphatic side chain present in the natural products (1-4) by other groups frequently found in other active compounds and use of other nitrogen-containing five-membered rings with different degrees of oxidation. In this way, the insecticidal and fungicidal activities have been improved. Thus, compound 9, which possess a 3-pyrroline ring, exhibited important insecticidal activity against third-instar nymphs of Oncopeltus fasciatus Dallas (100% mortality at 7.5 microg/cm(2)). Remarkable fungicidal activity was also found, and preliminary structure-activity relationships could be established.