A one-arm surgical trial of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients before and 12 months after Bilateral Internal Ramus Distraction of the mandible (BIRD)

BACKGROUND

An innovative approach for the primary and definitive treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adult patients is presented: Bilateral Internal Ramus Distraction of the mandible (BIRD), which is a slow, progressive and more stable procedure to advance the mandibular bone. This study investigated whether this surgical approach is useful to cure OSA.

METHODS

Study design was of an interventional (surgical) one-arm trial of OSA patients assessed before and 12 months after BIRD. All patients were evaluated by pre- and post-operative polysomnography and three-dimensional scans. The amount of skeletal advancement, percentage of upper airway volume increase and postoperative value of mandibular occlusal plane were the predictor variables. Changes in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and percentage of time with saturation under 90% (TC90) were the main outcome variables.

FINDINGS

Thirty-two subjects with a mean ± SD age of 41.9 ± 13.3 years and 87.5% male were included, and they were followed-up 32 ± 14.2 months. AHI was 47.9 ± 23.1 per hour before surgery and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was 13.4 ± 4.4. Postoperative AHI was 4.8 ± 5.6 per hour 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001), with 81.2% of the patients considered cured (AHI<5) and 18.8% suffering from a mild-to-moderate residual OSA. ESS decreased to 1.9 ± 1.8 at the end of the surgical treatment (P < 0.001). 3D changes revealed an upper airway volume increase of 188.4% ± 73.5% (P < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Lengthening the mandibular ramus by distraction osteogenesis to cure OSA appears to be more effective and safer when compared to other surgical protocols, especially in very severe cases with initial AHI>50/h. Titration of the mandibular advancement weekly using respiratory polygraphy allows better healing control and customization of the skeletal advancement, enhancing the aesthetic result.

Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis: special attention to treatment planning

PURPOSE

To demonstrate our experience using internal devices for unidirectional distraction osteogenesis in treating different mandibular hypoplasias (with or without maxillary deformities). An algorithmic table for diagnosis, and treatment planning is presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty internal distraction devices were used in 16 patients with mandibular hypoplasia. Deficiency in length of the mandible was calculated on three-dimensional computed tomography scans. The device was activated by a transcutaneous pin on the fifth postoperative day. Distraction was achieved at rates of 0.5 mm/12 h. After a variable period of consolidation the devices were removed. Mean follow-up was 18 months.

RESULTS

Successful distraction osteogenesis was achieved in all patients. No premature consolidation or pseudoarthrosis was observed. Improvement of facial aesthetics was produced in all cases. Final occlusion was excellent in those cases where no simultaneous maxillary deformity was present. Orthodontic treatment was applied in all cases. Results remained stable one year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The occlusal results obtained in this series show that we can plan distraction as a definitive treatment in cases with isolated mandibular hypoplasia. When an additional maxillary deformity is present, mandibular distraction must be performed first if indicated, but a maxillary procedure will be necessary later.

Distraction osteogenesis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hypoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices: a report of 8 cases

PURPOSE

This report presents the results of distraction osteogenesis using unidirectional extraoral and intraoral devices in 8 patients with different grades of vertical mandibular ramus hypoplasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients with hypoplastic mandibles underwent unilateral lengthening of the ascending ramus using unidirectional extraoral or intraoral devices. Intraoral mandibular distraction was performed on 5 patients with deficiencies of the vertical ramus up to 24 mm. External devices were used in 3 patients with more severe hypoplasias. An intraoral osteotomy was performed, and progressive distraction at rates of 0.5 mm/12 hours was initiated after 5 days. Once the desired length was reached, the device was maintained in place for 8 to 12 weeks. Three-dimensional computed tomography scans were taken in all the patients to plan the procedure and to compare the changes postoperatively.

RESULTS

Successful distraction osteogenesis was achieved in all patients. The amount of mandibular lengthening ranged from 17 to 32 mm. Complications with the external devices such as rotation of the proximal bony fragment (2 cases) and loosening of the external screws at the end of the consolidation period (1 case) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the intraoral device can be used as the method of choice for distraction osteogenesis of the ascending ramus of the mandible in patients with large deficiencies. Preoperative and postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomographic scans are essential in treatment planning.