1
|
Hoorens A, Borbath I, Vandamme T, Verslype C, Demetter P, Cuyle PJ, Ribeiro S, Van Damme N, Geboes KP. Belgian guidelines for pathology reporting of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal tract. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2023; 86:345-351. [PMID: 37428168 DOI: 10.51821/86.2.11309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Since neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare tumors, registration of patient data in national and multinational registries is recommended. Indeed, this will facilitate multicenter studies on the epidemiology, efficacy and safety of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors as well as for neuroendocrine carcinomas. In Belgium, data on patient and tumor characteristics of all newly diagnosed malignancies have been collected in the Belgian Cancer Registry since 2004 including anonymized full pathological reports. The Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumor (DNET) registry collects information on classification, staging, diagnostic tools and treatment in a prospective national online database. However, the terminology, classification and staging systems of neuroendocrine neoplasms have changed repeatedly over the past 20 years as a result of a better understanding of these rare tumors, by joining forces internationally. These frequent changes make it very difficult to exchange data or perform retrospective analyses. For optimal decision making, for a clear understanding and to allow reclassification according to the latest staging system, several items need to be described in the pathology report. This paper provides an overview of the essential items in reporting neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hoorens
- Department of Pathology, UZ Gent, C Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | - I Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels,Belgium
| | - T Vandamme
- Department of Oncology, UZ Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - C Verslype
- Department of Gastroenterology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Demetter
- Department of Pathology, Jules Bordet Institute, Anderlecht, Belgium
| | - P J Cuyle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda Bonheiden, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - S Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - N Van Damme
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Sint-Joost-ten-Node, Belgium
| | - K P Geboes
- Department of Gastroenterology, UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martinelli E, Cremolini C, Mazard T, Vidal J, Virchow I, Tougeron D, Cuyle PJ, Chibaudel B, Kim S, Ghanem I, Asselain B, Castagné C, Zkik A, Khan S, Arnold D. Real-world first-line treatment of patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: the CAPSTAN CRC study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100603. [PMID: 36368253 PMCID: PMC9832736 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRAFV600E mutations occur in 8%-12% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cases and are associated with poor survival. European guidelines recommend combination (doublet or triplet) chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in first line. However, an unmet need remains for more effective treatments for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS CAPSTAN CRC is a European, retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluating real-world treatment practices for patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC treated between 1 January 2016 and 31 January 2020. The primary objective was to describe first-line treatment patterns. Secondary objectives included describing baseline demographics, mutational testing procedures, treatment effectiveness, and safety. RESULTS In total, 255 patients (median age 66.0 years; 58.4% female) with BRAFV600E-mutant unresectable mCRC from seven countries were included. Most had right-sided tumors (52.5%) and presented with synchronous disease at diagnosis (66.4%). Chemotherapy plus targeted therapy (68.7%) was preferred at first line over chemotherapy alone (31.3%). The main first-line treatments were FOLFOX plus bevacizumab (27.1%) and FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) with/without bevacizumab (27.1%/19.2%). Median duration of first-line treatment was 4.9 months. Overall, 52.5% received second-line treatment. Across all first-line regimens, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 6.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3-6.7] months and 12.9 (95% CI 11.6-14.1) months, respectively. Triplet plus targeted therapy was associated with more adverse events (75.0%) compared with triplet chemotherapy alone (50.0%) and doublet chemotherapy alone (36.1%). Multivariate analysis identified low body mass index and presence of three or more metastatic sites as significant prognostic factors for PFS. CONCLUSIONS This study is, to date, the largest real-world analysis of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC, providing valuable insights into routine first-line treatment practices for these patients. The data highlight the intrinsic aggressiveness of this disease subgroup, confirming results from previous real-world studies and clinical trials, and stressing the urgent need for more effective treatment options in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Martinelli
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
| | - C Cremolini
- Oncologia Medica, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - T Mazard
- Institut de Recherche en Cancerologie de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier University, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - J Vidal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital del Mar - IMIM, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Virchow
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - D Tougeron
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital and University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - P-J Cuyle
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - B Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Franco-Britannique - Fondation Cognacq-Jay, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - S Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - I Ghanem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - C Castagné
- Pierre Fabre, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - A Zkik
- Pierre Fabre, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - S Khan
- Pierre Fabre, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cuyle PJ, Geboes K, Carton S, Casneuf V, Decaestecker J, De Man M, Demolin G, Deroose CM, De Vleeschouwer C, Flamen P, Hendlisz A, Hoorens A, Janssens J, Karfis I, Lybaert W, Machiels G, Monsaert E, Sinapi I, Van Cutsem E, Vandamme T, Borbath I, Verslype C. Current practice in approaching controversial diagnostic and therapeutic topics in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm management. Belgian multidisciplinary expert discussion based on a modified Delphi method. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2020; 83:643-653. [PMID: 33321023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare, with marked clinical and biological heterogeneity. Consequently, many controversial areas remain in diagnosis and optimal treatment stratification for NEN patients. We wanted to describe current clinical practice regarding controversial NEN topics and stimulate critical thinking and mutual learning among a Belgian multidisciplinary expert panel. PATIENTS AND METHODS A 3-round, Delphi method based project, coordinated by a steering committee (SC), was applied to a predefined multidisciplinary NEN expert panel studying the following controversial topics : factors guiding therapeutic decision making, the use of somatostatin analogues (SSA) in adjuvant setting, the interference between non-radioactive and radioactive SSAs, challenging small intestine neuroendocrine tumor (NET) cases, the approach of the carcinoid syndrome, the role of chemotherapy in well differentiated NET, the relevance of NET G3 and neuroendocrine carcinoma subclassification and the role of imaging techniques in NEN management. RESULTS A high level of consensus exists regarding the necessary diagnostic work-up, use of imaging techniques and interference between non-radioactive and radioactive SSAs. However, the prognostic impact of tumor functionality might be overrated and adequate diarrhea differential diagnostic work-up in these patients is underused. Significant differences are seen between individual experts and centers regarding treatment preferences both on the treatment modality level, as well as the choice of specific drugs (e.g. chemotherapy regimen). CONCLUSIONS A Delphi-like multi-round expert discussion proves useful to boost critical thinking and discussion among experts of different background, as well as to describe current clinical practice and stimulate mutual learning in the absence of high-level scientific guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P-J Cuyle
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - K Geboes
- Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Carton
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - V Casneuf
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - J Decaestecker
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, AZ Delta Hospital, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - M De Man
- Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - G Demolin
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien St-Joseph, Liège, Belgium
| | - C M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C De Vleeschouwer
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, Mariaziekenhuis Noord-Limburg, Pelt, Belgium
| | - P Flamen
- Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Hendlisz
- Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Hoorens
- Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J Janssens
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium
| | - I Karfis
- Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - W Lybaert
- Medical Oncology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - G Machiels
- Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Monsaert
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium
| | - I Sinapi
- Medical Oncology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Vandamme
- NETwerk, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - I Borbath
- Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Verslype
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cuyle PJ, Schoofs N, Bossuyt P, Moons V, Van Olmen G, Hiele M, Christiaens P. Single-centre experience on use of videocapsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in 120 consecutive patients. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2011; 74:400-406. [PMID: 22103044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Capsule endoscopy (CE) has become first choice for evaluation of the small bowel in case of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). The influence of clinical factors on CE diagnostic yield remains controversial and little is known about the exact impact of CE on management and outcome. We aimed to identify the ideal candidates for CE examination in daily practice by reviewing our own data and the available literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data of 120 consecutive patients with OGIB (33 overt - 87 occult) that underwent CE in a single centre. RESULTS Complete evaluation of the small bowel was achieved in 82.5%, with only one case of capsule retention. The overall diagnostic yield was 47.5% and no difference was noted in the overt versus the occult group. Only the presence of cardiovascular comorbidity was associated with a statistically significant increase in diagnostic yield (p = 0,041). Arterio-venous malformation (AVM) was diagnosed most frequently in 68.4% of positive studies. Specific management alterations were made in 22 patients (18.3%) following CE, mostly guided by a positive result (91%) (p = 0,0001). CONCLUSION In daily practice it remains very difficult to predict pathology detection rate on CE as well as to estimate the impact on further management and outcome in the individual patient. Diagnostic yield is significantly higher in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity than in those without.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Cuyle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|