Genitourinary small-cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Small-cell carcinomas (sccs) of the genitourinary (gu) tract are rare systemic diseases, and there is no standard treatment strategy for patients with this malignancy. The objectives of the present study were to report the management and outcome of patients with scc of the gu tract treated at a tertiary-care institution from 1982 to 2009.

METHODS

In a chart review of all patients diagnosed with scc of the gu tract between 1982 and 2009, data on demographics, clinical and pathologic characteristics, treatment, and patient outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

The 58 patients identified had scc in the following primary sites: urinary bladder (n = 35), prostate (n = 17), and upper urinary tract (n = 6). In 38 patients (66%), the scc was of pure histology; in the remainder, histology was mixed. Overall, 28 patients had limited-stage disease; 24 had extensive-stage disease; and staging was unknown in 6 patients. Median survival for the entire cohort was 7.5 months, with extensive-stage disease being identified as a poor prognostic factor (survival was 22.0 months for limited-stage patients and 4.1 months for extensive-stage patients, p < 0.001). Based on site, prostate patients fared worst, with a median survival of only 5.1 months. Compared with best supportive care, treatment was associated with better outcomes (median survival: 12.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Small-cell cancer of the gu tract is an aggressive cancer, with a poor prognosis overall. Although there is no standard of care, patients should be treated using a multimodality approach analogous to that used in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer.

A phase 2 study of patupilone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel: Canadian Urologic Oncology Group study P07a

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical activity of patupilone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had progressive disease within 6 months of receiving docetaxel. Patupilone was administered 10 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a confirmed≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median time to progression after prior docetaxel was 1.4 months (range 0-5.7). Gastrointestinal serious adverse events occurred in four of the six initial patients leading to a reduction of the starting dose of patupilone to 8 mg/m2 for subsequent patients. Grade 3-4 toxicity at this dose included diarrhea (22%), fatigue (21%), and anorexia (10%). One patient experienced grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity. A PSA decline of ≥50% occurred in 47% of patients. A partial measurable disease response occurred in 24% of assessable patients. A patient-reported pain response was observed in 59% of assessable patients. Median time to PSA progression was 6.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7-8.0] and median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI 9.8-15.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Patupilone at 8 mg/m2 was tolerable, had antitumor activity, and was associated with symptomatic improvement in patients previously treated with docetaxel.

A phase II study of patupilone in patients (pts) with metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who have progressed after docetaxel

5139

Background: Chemotherapy for pts with CRPC who have progressed after docetaxel remains to be defined. Patupilone is an epothilone with broad spectrum pre-clinical activity including in taxane resistant models. Methods: Multicenter, 2-stage design. Pts with metastatic CRPC with progressive disease during or within 6 months of receiving docetaxel were eligible. Patupilone was initially given 10mg/m 2 IV every 3 weeks. PSA response rate (≥50% decline) was the primary endpoint (H0 = 15%, H1 = 25%, α = 0.1, β = 0.2). Secondary endpoints were measurable disease response, serial pain and analgesics scores, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 83 pts were enrolled from March 2007-June 2008. 401 cycles administered (median 5, range 1–15). Baseline characteristics (range): median age 67 (47–85), PSA 212 (2.6–11520), hemoglobin 118 (89–160), median time to progression after docetaxel 1.0 months (0.0–6.0), number of prior chemotherapy regimens 1:2:3+ in 45:28:10 pts, ECOG PS 0–1:2 in 73:10 pts, disease in bone/lymph nodes/viscera in 76/47/14 pts respectively. In the first 6 pts, gastrointestinal serious adverse events (AE) occurred in 4 pts (diarrhea and vomiting) which lead to a dose reduction of patupilone to 8 mg/m2 for subsequent patients. Grade 3/4 related adverse events at this dose included fatigue (16%), diarrhea (13%) and anorexia (5%). There were no grade 3/4 hematologic AEs. In 78 pts evaluable for PSA response, PSA declines of ≥30% and ≥50% have occurred in 44/78 (56%) and 35/78 (45%) with a confirmed PSA response in 25 pts (32%). Partial response occurred in 5% and stable disease in 64% of 44 evaluable pts. Pain response (2 point decline on 6 point scale) occurred in 36 (51%) of 71 pts eligible for analysis. Median PFS for PSA and non-PSA outcomes (measurable disease/symptomatic progression or death) was 7.6 months (3.7–11.5) and 5.6 months (3.9–7.3) respectively. Follow up for OS is continuing. Conclusions: Patupilone 8 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was well tolerated and associated with encouraging PFS, PSA and pain responses in pts with docetaxel resistant/refractory disease. Further investigation of patupilone in this population is warranted.

[Table: see text]

An open label safety and efficacy phase 2a study of the N-cadherin (N-cad) antagonist ADH-1 in subjects with N-cadherin expressing solid tumors

3567

Background: Malignant transformation and invasive capacity is highly correlated with N-cad, a cell adhesion molecule expressed on tumor cells and vascular endothelium. ADH-1, a cyclic pentapeptide (CHAVC), is a functional inhibitor of N-cad, and produces apoptosis and tumor vascular disruption in preclinical models. We report results from a Phase 2a study of intravenous (IV) ADH-1 (q 3 W, modified to qW) in subjects with N-cad+ solid tumors. Methods: Subjects with the following N-cad+ refractory tumors with measurable disease were eligible: renal cell (RCC); hepatocellular (HCC); adrenocortical (ACC); gastroesophageal (GE); NSCLC; HNSCC; and breast (HSNCC and breast subjects were only eligible for q3W schedule). ADH-1 was administered at 500 mg/m2 q 3 W, or 600 mg/m2 in the qW schedule. Intra-subject dose escalation was permitted at cycle 3 to 600 mg/m2 (900 mg/m2 with the qW schedule) in the absence of significant toxicity, tumor response or progression. Results: Tumor samples from 159 subjects were tested for N-cad, and 90 were N-cad+ (N-cad+/number tested: GE 13/48, HCC 29/35; NSCLC 16/33; RCC 27/28; ACC 3/8; HNSCC 2/6; Breast 0/1). Forty subjects, 10 on the q3W and 30 on the qW schedule (19 HCC; 7 RCC; 6 NSCLC; 6 GE; 1 ACC; 1 HNSCC) received 121 cycles of ADH-1. The drug was well tolerated, with commonly reported adverse events being Grade 1 or 2 in severity. One subject with HCC had pre-existing renal insufficiency, developed Grade 2 nausea and vomiting 11 days after the 3rd cycle of ADH-1 administered q 3W, leading to non-oliguric renal failure. Following an initial period of recovery, she developed sepsis and died; these events were considered to not be related to study drug. A second subject with HCC developed a hemiparesis due to a Grade 3 intracranial hemorrhage from a previously unknown metastatic brain lesion, 5 days after the 1st dose of ADH-1. There were no complete or partial responses; 32 subjects had SD for =2 cycles, 8 had SD for =4 cycles (4 HCC, ACC, GE, RCC, HNSCC), 6 had SD for =6 cycles (3 HCC, GE, RCC, HNSCC). The longest duration on study was 12 cycles (RCC). Conclusions: ADH-1 was well tolerated and prolonged SD was noted in several subjects.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A pilot study of the liposomal MUC1 vaccine BLP25 in prostate specific antigen failures after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy have few therapeutic options other than androgen deprivation therapy. Targeted therapies in this group are appropriate because the optimal timing of the initiation of hormonal therapy in this patient population is unknown. A single institution pilot trial was performed using BLP25 liposome vaccine in hormone naïve patients with prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy to determine if prostate specific antigen progression could be halted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy were enrolled. Primary end points were efficacy and safety of the MUC1 BLP25 liposomal vaccine. Changes in prostate specific antigen doubling time were also evaluated. Patients received a single intravenous dose of cyclophosphamide, followed by vaccinations with BLP25 liposome vaccine for up to 1 year. Prostate specific antigen was measured at baseline and during treatment, and prostate specific antigen doubling time was calculated for these intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients with a median age of 60 years were enrolled. All patients received cyclophosphamide and 15 of 16 completed the primary treatment period. Ten patients completed the maintenance period. After the 8-week primary treatment period 8 of 16 patients had stable or decreased prostate specific antigen. At the last on-study prostate specific antigen measurement 1 patient maintained stable prostate specific antigen but all others had progression. However, 6 of the 16 patients had greater than 50% prolongation of prostate specific antigen doubling time compared to pre-study prostate specific antigen doubling time.

CONCLUSIONS

BLP25 liposome vaccine shows promise for prolonging prostate specific antigen doubling time in hormone naïve men with biochemical failure after prostatectomy and little morbidity. This could potentially translate into the deferral of hormonal therapy. Further testing in this population of patients is warranted.

Dose escalation phase of a phase I/II study of GTI-2501, an antisense to the R1 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) and docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

2078

Background: GTI-2501 (GTI) is a 20-mer oligonucleotide that is complementary to the R1 subunit of the RNR mRNA. The R1 protein is overexpressed in multiple tumour cell lines. GTI displays anti-tumour activity against prostate cancer xenografts in mice as a single agent and in combination with mitoxantrone. GTI also adds to the anti-tumour efficacy of taxanes in breast cancer xenografts in mice. A Phase 1 study of a 14 day continuous infusion of GTI in patients with solid tumours showed no dose limiting toxicities at doses up to 210.9 mg/m2/day. The objective of this dose escalation phase of a phase I/II study was to define a safe phase II dose of GTI in combination with docetaxel (D) in men with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods: Men with metastatic HRPC were enrolled at 3 centres in Canada. GTI was given as a 14d continuous IV infusion every 21d with D IV infusion started 2 hrs prior to the end of the GTI infusion. Planned dose escalation cohorts are summarized in table . Results: 13 men were enrolled to the 3 cohorts. All patients are evaluable for toxicity. There was one possible DLT - an episode of grade 4 neutropenia reported at cycle 2 day 1 in the highest dose cohort - but the duration of neutropenia could not be confirmed. 3 additional patients were accrued to that cohort with no DLTs. The most common gr 3/4 toxicity was attributable to D (10 pts with Gr 3/4 neutropenia). The observed incidence of Gr 3/4 neutropenia was expected since patients had weekly CBCs. Only 1 patient had febrile neutropenia. 11 pts had fatigue (4 Gr 3) related to D and /or GTI. Other GTI attributable adverse events were Gr 1/2 including transient rises in transaminases and PTT. The pharmacokinetic data which is summarized in the table will be presented in full at the meeting. Conclusions: GTI can be given safely at its highest planned dose with standard doses of D. A Phase II evaluation of the GTI + D combination is planned for men with HRPC.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Fatal haemorrhagic myocarditis secondary to cyclophosphamide therapy

Haemorrhagic myocarditis is a rare but important complication of cyclophosphamide therapy. Echocardiographic identification of the disorder can be made. We believe that the ultrasound features of this disorder have not been previously reported.

Placebo-associated remissions in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial of interferon gamma-1b for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The Canadian Urologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

To determine the validity of using an historical maximum spontaneous regression rate (reportedly 0-1.1% in those with lung metastases after nephrectomy) in clinical trials of treatments for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as the eligibility criteria for most studies will select patients with better performance status (and thus excluding those who are unlikely to respond) and more modern staging methods would potentially reduce the number of false-positives.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicentre randomized,placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was recently completed in which 197 patients with metastatic RCC from 17 study centres across Canada were randomized to receive placebo or recombinant interferon gamma-1b (60 microg/m2) subcutaneously once every 7 days until disease progression. All tumour responses were validated by an independent response committee unaware of the treatment.

RESULTS

The median (95% confidence interval) overall response rate (complete, CR, and partial, PR) for those on interferon-gamma was 4 (1.4-11.5)% and for those on placebo was 6 (2. 5-13.2)% (P = 0.75). In the six patients who were receiving placebo the CR and PR (three each) was considered to represent spontaneous remission. Of these six patients (aged 44-64 years) five had undergone nephrectomy, one a tumour embolization, four had clear cell carcinoma and one an adenocarcinoma, and all had regression of lung and/or lymph node metastases.

CONCLUSION

The lack of efficacy of interferon-gamma in this trial underlines the importance of continued research to identify alternative therapeutic agents or combinations of agents in phase II studies. However, the threshold response rate for initiating phase III trials should be increased to 18% in the phase II trials, i.e. three times the response rate on placebo.

A phase II trial of triamcinolone hexacetanide for symptomatic recurrent malignant ascites

Ascites is a common complication of advanced cancer and frequently requires paracentesis to reduce symptoms of pain, anorexia, and dyspnea. For many patients repeat paracenteses are required at short intervals. We prospectively studied 15 patients with recurrent ascites of malignancy to determine if intraperitoneal triamcinolone hexacetonide, a slowly metabolized corticosteroid, produced objective and symptomatic responses. After biochemical, radiological, and symptom assessment and the establishment of the interval between paracenteses, patients underwent large-volume paracentesis followed by intraperitoneal triamcinolone hexacetonide 10 mg/kg. Patients were followed after treatment for assessment of symptoms and physical signs of ascites. Repeat paracentesis was performed when symptomatic ascites recurred. Symptomatic ascites recurred in 13 of 15 patients, but the interval between paracenteses was extended from 9.5 +/- 1.6 days to 17.5 days (P = 0.0086). Symptom questionnaire scores assessing well-being, nausea, abdominal pain, dyspnea, appetite, appearance, and change in abdominal size on a scale from 0 to 6 averaged 3.2 +/- 0.3 at entry and 2.5 +/- 0.2 at the 2-week assessment (P = 0.026). Self-assessed symptoms, feeling of well-being, abdominal distention, and physical appearance improved significantly. The mean serum cortisol decreased from baseline, suggesting that some systemic corticosteroid absorption occurred. Thirteen of 15 patients have died, with a median survival of 42 days. Potential adverse effects included 1 episode each of transient abdominal pain, bacterial peritonitis, and localized herpes zoster infection. In patients with ascites of malignancy, intraperitoneal triamcinolone hexacetonide appears to postpone the requirement for repeat paracentesis and improve symptoms of malignant ascites.

Prostate cancer: 9. Treatment of advanced disease

A 70-year-old man is referred to a urologist for recommendations on the management of metastatic prostate cancer. His cancer was diagnosed 5 years ago, and he underwent radical prostatectomy at that time. The tumour was confined to the prostate gland (Gleason score 7), and during surgery the lymph nodes were assessed as being clear of cancer. Before the surgery, the patient's prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level had been 8 ng/mL. After the prostatectomy, PSA was at first undetectable, but recently the PSA level rose to 2 ng/mL and then, at the most recent test, to 16 ng/mL. A bone scan was ordered to investigate back discomfort, which has been persistent but easily controlled with acetaminophen. Unfortunately, the bone scan shows several sites of metastatic disease. The man's medical history includes type 2 diabetes, which has developed during the past 3 years and which is controlled by diet, as well as asymptomatic hypertension, which is managed by means of a thiazide diuretic. The patient asks what treatments are available, what impact they are likely to have on his disease and what risks are associated with the therapies.

Seminoma with isolated central nervous system relapse, and salvage with craniospinal irradiation

We report a case of a patient with isolated central nervous system relapse of classical seminoma, refractory to intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy, but successfully salvaged with craniospinal axis irradiation. A 44-year-old man with bulky Stage II classic seminoma obtained complete remission with four cycles of cisplatin etoposide combination chemotherapy, but relapsed with lumbar vertebral metastases with epidural spinal cord compression 5 months after completion of primary treatment. He underwent laminectomy, local radiotherapy, and salvage chemotherapy. Two months later he developed cranial nerve palsies, and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed leptomeningeal disease. After brain radiotherapy, systemic and intrathecal chemotherapies were begun but tumor recurred around the cauda equina, producing paraparesis. The patient received salvage craniospinal irradiation, with resolution of paraparesis and cranial nerve palsies. Thirty months after completion of craniospinal radiotherapy, he remains in complete remission. We suggest consideration of craniospinal axis irradiation as salvage therapy in patients with isolated central nervous system relapse of seminoma.

Genitourinary small cell carcinoma: determination of clinical and therapeutic factors associated with survival

PURPOSE

We assessed the prognostic impact of genitourinary small cell carcinoma tumor and patient characteristics, and therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 180 patients with genitourinary small cell carcinoma in which patient and tumor characteristics, therapy, followup duration and survival status had been documented. Patient age, sex, primary site, histological features, tumor size, stage, locoregional therapy, systemic chemotherapy and hormonal manipulations were analyzed for association with survival.

RESULTS

There were 106 cases of bladder, 60 prostatic, 8 renal and 6 ureteral small cell carcinoma. Median survival was 10.5 months overall, and 7 and 13 months for prostatic and bladder small cell carcinoma, respectively (p <0.0001 log rank analysis). In all cases metastatic disease at presentation (p <0.008, risk ratio 1.9) predicted poor survival on multivariate analysis. Radical surgery (p <0.0001, risk ratio 0.34) and cisplatin chemotherapy (p <0.0001, risk ratio 0.20) were the only factors that predicted improved survival on multivariate analysis. For prostatic small cell carcinoma primary surgical therapy (p <0.012, risk ratio 0.46) was the only parameter that predicted survival on univariate analysis. For bladder small cell carcinoma only cisplatin chemotherapy (p <0.0001, risk ratio 0.15) predicted survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Genitourinary small cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis, which is worse in prostatic than bladder disease. Patient and tumor characteristics were not determinants of survival when prostatic and bladder small cell carcinoma were analyzed individually. For prostatic disease only primary surgical therapy was associated with prolonged survival, while for bladder disease cisplatin chemotherapy was associated with a favorable prognosis. We recommend considering primary surgical therapy for prostatic and cisplatin based chemotherapy for bladder small cell carcinoma.

Interferon gamma-1b compared with placebo in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Most trials of immunomodulators in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma have been uncontrolled and subject to selection bias. The objective of this blinded, placebo-controlled study was to compare overall response rates, time to disease progression, and survival of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma treated with recombinant human interferon gamma-1b or placebo.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proved metastatic renal-cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive interferon gamma-1b (60 microg per square meter of body-surface area subcutaneously once weekly) or placebo. The primary tumor had been treated by nephrectomy or angioinfarction at least three weeks previously. Patients were evaluated for radiologic evidence of progression, and all responses were independently reviewed by a committee that was unaware of the treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma were enrolled at 17 centers in Canada. One hundred eighty-one patients could be evaluated; of these, 91 were assigned to receive interferon gamma-1b and 90 were given placebo. The groups were well balanced in terms of prognostic factors. Two thirds of all patients had Karnofsky scores of 90 or 100, and more than half had two or more metastatic sites. Grade I and II toxicity, mostly chills, fever, asthenia, or headaches, was reported in 91 percent and 61 percent, respectively, of the patients in the interferon group, as compared with 76 percent and 63 percent in the placebo group. Life-threatening drug-related events were rare, occurring in 1 percent of patients in the interferon group. No significant differences between groups were observed in overall response rates, time to disease progression, or survival. The overall response rate was 4.4 percent (3.3 percent complete response and 1.1 percent partial response) in the interferon group and 6.6 percent (3.3 percent complete response and 3.3 percent partial response) in the placebo group (P=0.54), with a rate of durable complete response of 1 percent in both groups. The median time to disease progression was 1.9 months in both groups (P=0.49), and there was no significant difference in median survival (12.2 months with interferon vs. 15.7 months with placebo, P=0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in outcome was observed in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were treated with interferon gamma-1b as compared with placebo. These results emphasize the necessity of testing the efficacy of immunomodulators in randomized studies.

Prostate specific antigen decreases after withdrawal of antiandrogen therapy with bicalutamide or flutamide in patients receiving combined androgen blockade

PURPOSE

We determined whether decreases in prostate specific antigen (PSA) would occur after withdrawal of double-blinded antiandrogen therapy with flutamide or bicalutamide for clinical progression or increasing PSA concentration in patients receiving combined androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PSA concentrations were determined weekly for at least 6 weeks and then every other week for 6 weeks in 22 patients with stage D2 prostate cancer. All patients were withdrawn from antiandrogen therapy (8 flutamide and 14 bicalutamide) due to progression or an increasing PSA concentration. Objective response was evaluated before antiandrogen withdrawal and at week 12.

RESULTS

In 4 of 8 patients (50%) withdrawn from flutamide and 4 of 14 (29%) withdrawn from bicalutamide serum PSA concentrations decreased by 50% or more. PSA responses after withdrawal of flutamide therapy occurred within the first few days, whereas those after withdrawal of bicalutamide therapy occurred within 4 to 8 weeks. Of 4 patients assessed for objective response 2 had stable disease and 2 had progression. A PSA response was observed in the 2 patients with stable disease but not the 2 with progression.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stage D2 prostate cancer and disease progression or an increasing PSA concentration, withdrawal of antiandrogen therapy with bicalutamide or flutamide may result in a PSA response. The time to PSA response is longer with bicalutamide than with flutamide. The clinical significance of the antiandrogen withdrawal phenomenon is unknown.

A controlled trial of Casodex (bicalutamide) vs. flutamide, each in combination with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Casodex Combination Study Group

Between January 1992 and September 1993, 813 patients with stage D2 prostate cancer were enrolled in a multicentre, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy) trial and randomised to antiandrogen therapy with Casodex (bicalutamide, 50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily) and to luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue therapy with Zoladex (goserelin, 3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide (7.5 mg every 28 days). Time to treatment failure was the primary efficacy endpoint. At a median follow-up time of 49 weeks, there was a significant (p = 0.005) difference between groups in time to treatment failure in favour of Casodex plus LHRH analogue. Overall, 168 (42%) of 404 patients in the Casodex plus LHRH analogue group and 218 (53%) of 409 patients in the flutamide plus LHRH analogue group reached a treatment failure endpoint. Although a cause-specific treatment-failure analysis was not performed, the difference between groups in treatment failure attributed to adverse events (mainly diarrhoea) was evident primarily in the first 7 months of therapy. The difference between groups in treatment failure for objective progression was most evident after 1 year of therapy. With further follow-up (median time of 95 weeks), the result for time to treatment failure, although no longer statistically significant, were consistent with the previous finding of an improvement in time to treatment failure associated with Casodex plus LHRH analogue therapy. With a median of 95 weeks of follow-up, 34% of deaths had occurred. The survival analysis was not dissimilar between the 2 groups. At 49 weeks median follow up, the incidence of diarrhoea was significantly (p < 0.001) lower among patients in the Casodex plus LHRH analogue group. Diarrhoea led to withdrawal from therapy for 2 patients in the Casodex plus LHRH analogue group, compared with 25 patients in the flutamide plus LHRH analogue group. In conclusion, Casodex plus LHRH analogue is well tolerated and effective with an improvement in time to treatment failure over flutamide plus LHRH analogue. Survival was not dissimilar between the 2 treatment groups.

Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group

OBJECTIVES

To review the outcome of therapy with maximal androgen blockade and compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy), multicenter study with a 2 x 2 factorial design. A total of 813 patients were allocated 1:1 to bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily), plus 2:1 to goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days).

RESULTS

At the time of analysis (median follow-up, 49 weeks), bicalutamide plus LHRH-A was associated with a statistically significant improvement in time-to-treatment failure, the primary endpoint, when compared with flutamide plus LHRH-A. The results with longer follow-up (median, 95 weeks) support previous findings of an improved time-to-treatment failure with bicalutamide plus LHRH-A; however, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. A treatment failure endpoint was reached by 68% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group, compared with 72% of patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.03; P = 0.10). The upper one-sided 95% confidence limit for survival was 1.00, meeting the definition for equivalence (< 1.25). With longer follow-up, overall mortality was 34%, with equivalent survival between groups: 32% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group died, compared with 35% in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-1.11; P = 0.29). The upper one-sided 95% confidence limit for survival was 1.07, meeting the definition for equivalence (< 1.25). Diarrhea occurred in 24% of patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group compared with 10% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, bicalutamide plus LHRH-A is effective and well tolerated. Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer.

Neoadjuvant combined modality program with selective organ preservation for invasive bladder cancer: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase II trial 8802

PURPOSE

This phase II study was designed to evaluate effectiveness and toxicity of a combined chemoradiotherapy program with selective bladder preservation in the management of patients with invasive bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-one eligible patients with invasive bladder cancer stages T2M0 to T4AM0 suitable for radical cystectomy received two courses of methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV regimen) followed by radiotherapy with 39.6 Gy and concurrent cisplatin. After complete urologic evaluation, operable patients who achieved complete response were selected for bladder preservation and treated with consolidation cisplatin-radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 91 eligible patients, 85 underwent complete urologic evaluation and 68 (75%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 59% to 84%) had documented complete responses. Fourteen operable patients with residual tumor underwent immediate cystectomy. Of 70 patients treated with consolidation cisplatin-radiotherapy, 36 subsequently developed bladder recurrences, 23 of which were invasive. Patients with invasive recurrence (n = 16), extensive noninvasive recurrence (n = 6), or severe treatment complications (n = 1) underwent salvage cystectomy. Thus, a total of 37 of 91 patients (40%) required cystectomy. The 4-year cumulative risk of invasive local failure (which includes induction failures) was 43% (95% CI, 33% to 53%). The 4-year actuarial risk of distant metastasis was 22% (95% CI, 13% to 31%). The 4-year actuarial survival rate of the entire group was 62% (95% CI, 52% to 72%). The 4-year actuarial rate of survival with bladder intact was 44% (95% CI, 34% to 54%).

CONCLUSION

Initial results of this combined chemoradiotherapy program show that bladder preservation can be achieved in the majority of patients, and that overall survival is similar to that reported with aggressive surgical approaches. Long-term survival and quality-of-life assessments require longer follow-up study.

A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Casodex Combination Study Group

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy), multicenter study with a 2 x 2 factorial design. Eight hundred thirteen patients were allocated 1:1 to bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) and flutamide (250 mg three times daily) and 2:1 to goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) and leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days).

RESULTS

With a median duration of follow-up of 49 weeks, time to treatment failure, the primary endpoint, was significantly (P = 0.005) better for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group than for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. Patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group were 34% more likely to fail treatment over the given time period, as indicated by the hazard ratio of 0.749 (95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.92) for bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A. Results for secondary endpoints (survival, quality of life, and subjective response) were similar between groups. Diarrhea occurred in 24% of patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group, compared with 10% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, bicalutamide plus LHRH-A is well tolerated and provides superior efficacy to flutamide plus LHRH-A with respect to time to treatment failure. Assessment of the effects of these regimens on longer term survival requires additional time for follow-up.

Use of palliative end points to evaluate the effects of mitoxantrone and low-dose prednisone in patients with hormonally resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II study was designed to assess the effects of mitoxantrone with prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who had progressed on hormonal therapy. The methods of assessment included quality-of-life analyses, pain indices, analgesic scores, and the National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP) criteria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks plus prednisone 10 mg orally daily. All had a castrate serum testosterone and Eastern Cooperation Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < or = 3, and had not received prior chemotherapy. Every 3 weeks, analgesic intake was scored, and a present pain intensity (PPI) record and visual analog scale (VAS) describing pain were collected. Every 6 weeks, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core quality-of-life questionnaire plus a prostate-specific module were completed. A palliative response was defined as a decrease in analgesic score by > or = 50% or a decrease in PPI by > or = two integers without any increase in the other.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were entered onto the study. Nine of 25 (36%) assessable patients achieved a palliative response maintained for > or = two cycles (range, two to eight or more). Improvements in mean PPI and VAS pain scores after each cycle of therapy (P < .05) were seen. Quality-of-life analysis showed improvements in social and emotional functioning, and in pain and anorexia. Using NPCP criteria, one patient achieved a partial response (PR) and 12 had stable disease; one of seven patients with measurable disease had a PR. No serious nonhematologic toxicity was experienced, and there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Mitoxantrone with low-dose prednisone is a well-tolerated treatment regimen that has some beneficial effects on disease-related symptoms and quality of life for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Combined modality program with possible organ preservation for invasive bladder carcinoma: results of RTOG protocol 85-12

PURPOSE

This Phase II study was designed to test the tolerance and effectiveness of concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. Objectives were to determine toxicity, complete response rate, bladder preservation rate, and survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with invasive bladder cancer, clinical Stages T2-4, NO-2 or NX, MO were treated with pelvic radiotherapy 40 Gy in 4 weeks and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22. Complete responders were given an additional 24 Gy bladder boost plus a third dose of cisplatin; patients with residual tumor after 40 Gy were assigned radical cystectomy.

RESULTS

The complete remission rate following cisplatin and 40 Gy for evaluable cases was 31/47 (66%). Acute toxicity was acceptable with only two patients not completing induction therapy. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors were more likely to achieve complete remission. Of fully evaluable patients, 28/42 (67%) achieved complete remission with induction therapy, 11 remain continuously in remission, and eight have relapsed with bladder as the only site of failure. Five of these eight cases relapsed with noninvasive tumor. Of the 14 patients who failed to achieve complete remission, only three remain disease-free. Median survival is not reached, with 17/42 (19/48) deaths reported. Actuarial survival is 64% at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

This combined cisplatin-radiotherapy regimen was moderately well-tolerated and associated with tumor clearance in 66% of patients treated. Isolated bladder recurrences with invasive carcinoma are infrequent. Better definition of pretreatment selection criteria is needed if combined modality treatment is to achieve disease control and organ preservation for patients with bladder cancer.

Gemcitabine in advanced renal cell carcinoma. A phase II study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine (2', 2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) an anticancer agent with activity in preclinical models, was felt to be a promising new chemotherapy drug which warranted testing in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with histologically proven metastatic or locally recurrent renal cell carcinoma and bidimensionally measurable disease were accrued to a phase II study of gemcitabine administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day treatment cycle. Initial doses of gemcitabine were 800 mg/m2; doses in subsequent cycles were escalated to a maximum of 1250 mg/m2, toxicity permitting.

RESULTS

One partial response was seen for a response rate of 6%. Hematologic toxicity was not severe with this dosing schedule; however, two patients developed dyspnea with bronchospasm after repeated injections of drug.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose and schedule of gemcitabine employed results in only a modest response rate in patients with advanced renal carcinoma. Investigators should be aware of the possibility of dyspnea and bronchospasm developing shortly after gemcitabine administration.

A randomised, double-blind comparison of granisetron with high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone and diphenhydramine for cisplatin-induced emesis. An NCI Canada Clinical Trials Group Phase III Trial

151 patients (149 evaluable) receiving their first course of chemotherapy containing cisplatin in a dose of at least 50 mg/m2 were randomised to receive either a single dose of intravenous granisetron 80 micrograms/kg or intravenous metoclopramide 2 mg/kg every 2 h for five doses plus a single dose of dexamethasone 10 mg and diphenhydramine. After 24 h, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to nausea or vomiting: in the granisetron group 46% of patients had no emesis, versus 44% of the standard group. Granisetron is an antiemetic agent with efficacy similar to that of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone.

Megestrol acetate in the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the prostate

Although current hormonal therapy of prostate cancer may not appear to have altered survival appreciably, there have been considerable changes that may significantly affect the future management of this disease. A number of new hormonal agents have been introduced that still require definition of their therapeutic efficacy. Megestrol acetate, a hormonal agent with multiple sites of action in androgen metabolism, has recently been investigated in the treatment of patients with metastatic and locally advanced disease, and in those patients whose disease progresses with other hormonal therapies. Megestrol acetate plus mini-dose diethylstilbestrol (DES) is associated with fewer side effects than standard-dose DES and has equivalent therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease. In patients with locally advanced disease that may benefit from hormonal cytoreduction, megestrol acetate is effective and well tolerated. Megestrol acetate has a role in the palliation of patients with progressive disease despite initial hormonal therapy. Considerable controversy surrounds the therapy of carcinoma of the prostate; further studies are required to define optimal hormonal therapy.

A phase II study of recombinant tumor necrosis factor in renal cell carcinoma: a study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Canada Clinical Trials Group conducted a phase II study of recombinant tumor necrosis factor (rTNF) given intravenously daily for 5 days every other week, in measurable metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Two of 26 patients responded with responses lasting greater than 200 days. Toxicity was severe including rigors, fever, headache, fatigue, hypotension, and localized pain. We conclude that rTNF, given as described, has only modest antitumor activity in renal cell carcinoma and produces considerable toxicity. We plan no further studies of rTNF in this disease.

Phase II study of 2'-deoxycoformycin in patients with renal cell carcinoma. A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study

The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group undertook a phase II study of 2'-deoxycoformycin in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. When 2'-deoxycoformycin 4 mg/m2 was administered intravenously weekly for three weeks then every two weeks no significant antitumor activity was noted in 19 evaluable patients. Toxic effects experienced were as expected, consisting primarily of nausea/vomiting, anorexia, and lethargy. It is concluded that 2'-deoxycoformycin at this dose and schedule has no clinical activity in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Phase I study of 2'-deoxycoformycin in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2'-Deoxycoformycin (2'-dCF), a tight-binding inhibitor of adenosine deaminase, was administered to 26 pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a Phase I study. Doses ranged from 0.25 to 1.0 mg/kg given i.v. for 3 consecutive days. Common toxicity included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hepatocellular enzyme elevations, and conjunctivitis. Lymphopenia occurred in all patients. The most serious adverse effects were acute tubular necrosis and central nervous system toxicity, which appeared to be dose related. In addition, two patients given the 0.75-mg/kg dose developed severe hepatic toxicity, although this could not be ascribed definitively to 2'-dCF. Antitumor activity was observed in eight patients, two of whom experienced a complete remission. Inhibition of lymphoblast adenosine deaminase activity was noted in the majority of cases and was observed at all doses. Antileukemic activity occurred at doses of 2'-dCF which were not associated with limiting toxicities. These results suggest that 2'-dCF is active against acute lymphoblastic leukemia and that a starting dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day be utilized in Phase II studies.