Alternative Tissue Fixation Protocols Dramatically Reduce the Impact of DNA Artifacts, Unraveling the Interpretation of Clinical Comprehensive Genomic Profiling

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples represent the cornerstone of tissue-based analysis in precision medicine. Targeted next-generation sequencing panels are routinely used to analyze a limited number of genes to guide treatment decision-making for advanced-stage patients. The number and complexity of genetic alterations to be investigated are rapidly growing; in several instances, a comprehensive genomic profiling analysis is needed. The poor quality of genetic material extracted from FFPE samples may impact the feasibility/reliability of sequencing data. We sampled 9 colorectal cancers to allow 4 parallel fixations: (1) neutral buffered formalin (NBF), (2) acid-deprived formalin fixation (ADF), (3) precooled ADF (coldADF), and (4) glyoxal acid free (GAF). DNA extraction, fragmentation analysis, and sequencing by 2 large next-generation sequencing panels (OCAv3 and TSO500) followed. We comprehensively analyzed library and sequencing quality controls and the quality of sequencing results. Libraries from coldADF samples showed significantly longer reads than the others with both panels. ADF-derived and coldADF-derived libraries showed the lowest level of noise and the highest levels of uniformity with the OCAv3 panel, followed by GAF and NBF samples. The data uniformity was confirmed by the TSO500 results, which also highlighted the best performance in terms of the total region sequenced for the ADF and coldADF samples. NBF samples had a significantly smaller region sequenced and displayed a significantly lower number of evaluable microsatellite loci and a significant increase in single-nucleotide variations compared with other protocols. Mutational signature 1 (aging and FFPE artifact related) showed the highest (37%) and lowest (17%) values in the NBF and coldADF samples, respectively. Most of the identified genetic alterations were shared by all samples in each lesion. Five genes showed a different mutational status across samples and/or panels: 4 discordant results involved NBF samples. In conclusion, acid-deprived fixatives (GAF and ADF) guarantee the highest DNA preservation/sequencing performance, thus allowing more complex molecular profiling of tissue samples.

Glyoxal acid-free (GAF) histological fixative is a suitable alternative to formalin: results from an open-label comparative non-inferiority study

Formalin, an aqueous solution of formaldehyde, has been the gold standard for fixation of histological samples for over a century. Despite its considerable advantages, growing evidence points to objective toxicity, particularly highlighting its carcinogenicity and mutagenic effects. In 2016, the European Union proposed a ban, but a temporary permission was granted in consideration of its fundamental role in the medical-diagnostic field. In the present study, we tested an innovative fixative, glyoxal acid-free (GAF) (a glyoxal solution deprived of acids), which allows optimal tissue fixation at structural and molecular level combined with the absence of toxicity and carcinogenic activity. An open-label, non-inferiority, multicentric trial was performed comparing fixation of histological specimens with GAF fixative vs standard phosphate-buffered formalin (PBF), evaluating the morphological preservation and the diagnostic value with four binary score questions answered by both the central pathology reviewer and local center reviewers. The mean of total score in the GAF vs PBF fixative groups was 3.7 ± 0.5 vs 3.9 ± 0.3 for the central reviewer and 3.8 ± 0.5 vs 4.0 ± 0.1 for the local pathologist reviewers, respectively. In terms of median value, similar results were observed between the two fixative groups, with a median value of 4.0. Data collected indicate the non-inferiority of GAF as compared to PBF for all organs tested. The present clinical performance study, performed following the international standard for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices, highlights the capability of GAF to ensure both structural preservation and diagnostic value of the preparations.

Tissue Fixation with a Formic Acid-Deprived Formalin Better Preserves DNA Integrity over Time

INTRODUCTION

Optimization of pre-analytic procedures and tissue processing is a basic requirement for reliable and reproducible data to be obtained. Tissue fixation in formalin represents the extensively favored method for surgical tissue specimen processing in diagnostic pathology; however, formalin fixation exerts a blasting effect on DNA and RNA.

METHODS

A formic acid-deprived formaldehyde solution was prepared by removing acids with an ion-exchange basic resin and the concentrated, acid-deprived formaldehyde (ADF) solution was employed to prepare a 4% ADF solution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2-7.4. Human (n = 27) and mouse (n = 20) tissues were fixed in parallel and similar conditions in either ADF or neutral buffered formalin (NBF). DNAs and RNAs were extracted, and fragmentation analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Besides no significant differences in terms of extraction yield and absorbance ratio, ADF fixation reduced DNA fragmentation, i.e., the largest fragments (>5,000 bp) were significantly more prevalent in the DNAs purified from ADF-fixed tissues (p < 0.001 in both cohorts). Moreover, we observed that DNA preservation is more stable in ADF-fixed tissue compared to NBF-fixed tissues.

CONCLUSION

Although DNA fragmentation in FFPE tissues is a multifactor process, we showed that the removal of formic acid is responsible for a significant improvement in DNA preservation.