Junctional Tachycardia

Junctional tachycardia (JT) is typically considered to have an automatic mechanism originating from the distal atrioventricular node. When there is 1:1 retrograde conduction via the fast pathway, JT would resemble the typical form of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Atrial pacing maneuvers have been proposed to exclude AVNRT and suggest a diagnosis of JT. However, after excluding AVNRT, one should consider the possibility of an infra-atrial narrow QRS re-entrant tachycardia, which can exhibit features that resemble AVNRT as well as JT. Pacing maneuvers and mapping techniques should be performed to assess for infra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia before concluding that JT is the mechanism of a narrow QRS tachycardia. Distinguishing JT from typical AVNRT or infra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia has notable implications regarding the approach to ablation of the tachycardia. Ultimately, a contemporary review of the evidence on JT raises some questions as to the mechanism and source of what has traditionally been considered JT.

Concomitant Mitral Valve Re-Repair for Mixed Congenital and Degenerative Mitral Disease, Tricuspid Repair, and Cox-Maze Procedure in a College Athlete

A significant proportion of patients undergoing repair of congenital mitral valve disease will require a subsequent reoperation. During somatic growth, mitral valve repair is preferable to replacement as it allows for annular growth, preservation of ventricular function, and avoidance of lifelong anticoagulation. Techniques to facilitate successful re-repairs for congenital and non-rheumatic mixed degenerative mitral valve disease are not well-described in the literature. Description of the encountered pathology and surgical maneuvers utilized in this case provides real-world tools to help surgeons deal with limited orifice availability, fibrosis, and multilevel lesions. We describe a mitral valve re-repair in a young athlete for a rare cleft posterior mitral leaflet, with a simultaneous tricuspid valve repair and Cox-Maze procedure. We focus on technical pearls that address specific anatomic challenges within our surgical approach.

Characteristics and Longer-Term Outcomes of Contemporary Patients <18 Years of Age With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

We describe characteristics and outcomes of contemporary pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (PHC) patients. We studied 398 consecutive pediatric HC patients (<18 years, median 14 years, 65% boys) seen at our center between 2002 and 2018. Baseline clinical and pediatric echocardiographic data was collected. Left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG), LV fractional shortening and Z-score for left ventricular (LV) wall thickness were calculated. Sudden cardiac death (SCD), appropriate internal defibrillator discharge (ICD), myectomy, and orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) were composite primary endpoint. A total of 133 (33%) had symptoms (71 [18%] dyspnea, 77 [19%] angina, and 19 [5%] syncope), 109 (27%) were on beta-blockers; 179 (45%) had family history of HC. A total of 146 (37%) underwent genetic testing (of which 91 (62%) were HC-gene positive). Basal septal LV thickness, septal LV z-score and fractional shortening were 1.2 ± 0.6 cm, 4.8 ± 5.6, and 42% ± 8, whereas 23% had extreme LV hypertrophy (z-score > 6) and 8% had LVOTG >30 mm Hg (range 0 to 139 mm Hg). At a median of 5.9 years (interquartile range 2.4, 9), there were 23 (6%) ICD's placed, and 47 (12%) primary composite events (9 [2%] deaths, 3 [1%] appropriate ICD discharge, 29 [7%] myectomy, and 8 [2%] OHT). There were no in hospital deaths following myectomy/OHT. Presence of symptoms (Hazard ratio or HR 2.45), ventricular tachycardia (HR 1.52), and higher basal septal LV z-score (HR 1.10) were independently associated with primary composite outcomes. LV septal z-score >4 was independently associated with events on spline analysis. Rate of SCD/appropriate ICD discharge was 0.5%/year. In conclusion, contemporary PHC patients seen at an experienced center have excellent outcomes with presence of symptoms and higher LV septal thickness associated with primary composite events.

2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry

Ambulatory ECG (AECG) is very commonly employed in a variety of clinical contexts to detect cardiac arrhythmias and/or arrhythmia patterns which are not readily obtained from the standard ECG. Accurate and timely characterization of arrhythmias is crucial to direct therapies that can have an important impact on diagnosis, prognosis or patient symptom status. The rhythm information derived from the large variety of AECG recording systems can often lead to appropriate and patient-specific medical and interventional management. The details in this document provide background and framework from which to apply AECG techniques in clinical practice, as well as clinical research.

P- and R-wave Amplitude Sensed by Reveal LINQ™ Loop Recorder in Pediatric Patients

Implantable loop recorders are commonly used to sense arrhythmias. The purpose of this study is to assess the P- and R-wave amplitudes at implantation (I) and follow-up (F) following insertion of the Reveal LINQ™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) in an institutional review board-approved, multicenter study performed on pediatric patients younger than 18 years old. Collected data included demographics, presence of congenital heart disease (CHD), P- and R-wave-sensed amplitude at I and F, and the method of implant (i.e. mapping or standard.) P waves were manually measured and R-wave sensing was recorded by the device. A total of 87 patients had a Reveal LINQ™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) device implanted; the mean patient age was 11.8 years (0.5 years to 18 years) with 48% of patients being female and 19% of patients having CHD; mapping was used in 43% of patients. The Reveal LINQ™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) experienced no change in average sensed R-wave amplitude at either I or F (1.28 mV vs 1.26 mV, p = NS). There was no difference in sensed R-wave amplitude noted with or without mapping used at I (1.29 mV vs 1.26 mV, p = NS) or F (1.48 mV vs 1.18 mV, p = NS). Additionally, no difference could be found in R-wave sensing of patients with CHD or without CHD at I (1.26 mV vs 1.4 mV, p = NS) or F (1.32 mV vs 1.32 mV, p = NS). R-wave sensing trended towards being inversely proportional to patient body surface area (BSA) (p = NS). P waves were detected on 48% of tracings in all patients at I and/or F, irrespective of whether the Reveal LINQ™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) device was placed with mapping. The R wave was (0.37–3.5 mV) at I and (0.3–3 mV) (p = NS) at F when P waves were detected. From these results, it can be said that the Reveal LINQ™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) has an excellent ability to sense R-wave amplitude in pediatric patients. No significant difference in the sensing ability of the device could be identified with respect to the presence of CHD, use of mapping or BSA. P waves tended to be identified when there was a higher baseline R-wave amplitude.