A Squeaking Knee Is a Rare Complication of ACL Surgery: A Case Report

CASE

We report a rare case of a 36-year-old woman who underwent anterior cruciate ligament surgery (ACL), which was complicated by a squeaking knee postoperatively. The squeaking noise was likely due to migrating nonabsorbable suture engaging with the articular surface and created significant psychological stress but had no impact on the functional outcome of the patient. We eliminated the noise with an arthroscopic debridement of the suture that had migrated from the tibial tunnel.

CONCLUSION

A squeaking knee after ACL surgery due to migrating suture is a rare complication that, in this case, improved with surgical debridement and diagnostic imaging seems to have a limited role.

A Bibliometric Analysis of 4 Major Foot and Ankle Surgery Journals

Research publication is a central to the scientific process and comprehensive bibliometric analysis is a leading way to better understand trends within research. Currently, there are limited bibliometric analyses of literature pertaining to foot and ankle surgery. This study aims to quantify the volume of research and investigate what may affect publication and citation. Journals associated with the 3 major orthopedic foot and ankle societies (Foot & Ankle International[FAI], Foot and Ankle Surgery, and The Foot) and one podiatric college (Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery®) were evaluated from January 2009 to December 2018 using Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize article characteristics and regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with a country's current and future productivity and an article's citation rate. A total of 4994 articles were published over the 10-year period, with the largest contributor of publications being the United States of America (USA), who produced 2096 (41.8%) publications. Regression analysis found no association between a country's productivity and gross domestic product or population. There was no significant relationship between a country's baseline publication rate and future publication rate. The variables significantly associated with an increased citation count were; the number of years since publication, the number of authors, publication in FAI and if the article was a review. To our knowledge this is the largest bibliometric analysis of foot and ankle publications. The majority of research is being produced by the USA, but there are numerous complex factors associated with citation and publication rates. Further research is required to fully assess these factors and characterize the state of foot and ankle surgery research.

Readability of foot and ankle consent forms in Queensland

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to conduct a readability analysis on both patient take-home information and consent forms for common foot and ankle procedures. Our hypothesis was that the objective reading skills required to read and comprehend the documentation currently in use would exceed the recommendations in place by both national and international bodies.

METHODS

The current Queensland Health consent forms are divided into specific subsections. The readability of consent form subsections C and G (sections containing detailed information on risks of the procedure and pertaining to informed patient consent specifically) and patient take-home information (provided as take-home leaflet from the consent form which is procedure specific) was assessed by an online readability software program using five validated methods calculated by application of the algorithms for (i) Flesch-Kincaid grade level, (ii) the SMOG (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook), (iii) Coleman-Liau index, (iv) automated readability index and the (v) Linsear Wriste formula.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation reading grade level of risk (section C), grade level of patient consent (section G) and grade level for procedure-specific take-home patient information were 8.7 ± 0.9, 11.6 ± 1.2 and 7.5 ± 0.2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The readability of sections C and G of the Queensland Health consent form exceeds the recommendations by national and international bodies, but the patient take-home information appears suitable. Consideration should be given to lower the reading grade level of patient consent forms to better reflect the reading grade of the Australian population.