Impact of nutritional vitamin D supplementation on parathyroid hormone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common and major complication in chronic kidney disease (CKD), reflecting the increase of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in response to reduced vitamin D signalling and hypocalcaemia. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of nutritional vitamin D (NVD) (cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol) on SHPT-related biomarkers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed to identify relevant randomized control trials to be included in the meta-analysis. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to pool study-level results. Effects were studied within NVD study arms and relative to control groups (placebo/no treatment); the former in order to identify the effect of actively altering biomarkers levels.

RESULTS

Reductions in PTH from supplementation with NVD were small when observed within the NVD study arms (pooled reduction: 10.5 pg/mL) and larger when compared with placebo/no treatment (pooled reduction: 49.7 pg/mL). NVD supplementation increased levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in both analyses (increase within NVD study arm: 20.6 ng/mL, increase versus placebo/no treatment: 26.9 ng/mL). While small and statistically non-significant changes in phosphate and fibroblast growth factor 23 were observed, NVD supplementation caused calcium levels to increase when compared with placebo/no treatment (increase: 0.23 mg/dL).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that supplementation with NVD can be used to increase 25(OH)D to a certain extent, while the potential of NVD to actively reduce PTH in non-dialysis-CKD patients with SHPT is limited.

Extended-Release Calcifediol Effectively Raises Serum Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Even in Overweight Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

INTRODUCTION

Obesity increases the risk of vitamin D insufficiency, which exacerbates secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease. Recent studies suggest that serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels of ≥50 ng/mL are necessary to produce significant reductions in elevated parathyroid hormone levels in nondialysis patients. Data from real-world and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving these patients were examined for (1) relationships between vitamin D treatments and the achieved levels of serum 25OHD and between serum 25OHD and body weight (BW)/body mass index (BMI); and (2) the impact of BW/BMI on achieving serum 25OHD levels ≥50 ng/mL with extended-release calcifediol (ERC) treatment or vitamin D supplementation (cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol).

METHODS

Data obtained from nondialysis patients participating in two real-world studies, one conducted in Europe (Study 1) and the other (Study 2) in the USA, and in two US RCTs (Studies 3 and 4) were analyzed for serum 25OHD outcomes after treatment with ERC, vitamin D supplements, or placebo.

RESULTS

More than 50% of subjects treated with vitamin D supplements in both real-world studies (Studies 1 and 2) failed to achieve serum 25OHD levels ≥30 ng/mL, a level widely viewed by nephrologists as the threshold of adequacy; only 7.3-7.5% of subjects achieved levels ≥50 ng/mL. Data from the European study (Study 1) showed that serum 25OHD levels had significant and nearly identical inverse relationships with BW and BMI, indicating that high BW or BMI thwarts the ability of vitamin D supplements to raise serum 25OHD. One RCT (Study 3) showed that 8 weeks of ERC treatment (60 μg/day) raised serum 25OHD levels to ≥30 and 50 ng/mL in all subjects, regardless of BW, while cholecalciferol (300,000 IU/month) raised serum 25OHD to these thresholds in 56% and 0% of subjects, respectively. The other RCT (Study 4) showed that ERC treatment (30 or 60 μg/day) successfully raised mean serum 25OHD levels to at least 50 ng/mL for subjects in all BW categories, whereas no increases were observed with placebo treatment.

CONCLUSION

Real-world studies conducted in Europe and USA in nondialysis patients (Studies 1 and 2) showed that vitamin D supplements (cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol) were unreliable in raising serum total 25OHD to targets of 30 or 50 ng/mL. In contrast, ERC was demonstrated to be effective in one real-world study (Study 2) and two RCTs (Studies 3 and 4) conducted in US nondialysis patients in raising serum 25OHD to these targeted levels irrespective of BW.

Evaluation of Therapies for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Associated with Vitamin D Insufficiency in Chronic Kidney Disease

Introduction

Parathyroid hormone-lowering responses after administration of three different therapies capable of raising serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) were evaluated in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), vitamin D insufficiency (VDI), and stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

Sixty-nine adult subjects with intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) ≥85 and <500 pg/mL and VDI (25OHD <30 ng/mL) were randomized after ≥4-week washout to 2 months of open-label treatment with: (1) extended-release calcifediol (ERC) 60 μg/day; (2) immediate-release calcifediol (IRC) 266 μg/month; (3) high-dose cholecalciferol (HDC) 300,000 IU/month; or (4) paricalcitol plus low-dose cholecalciferol (PLDC) 1 or 2 μg and 800 IU/day, used as reference hormone replacement therapy. Serum 25OHD, calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), plasma iPTH, and adverse events were monitored weekly. No clinically significant differences were observed at baseline between treatment groups.

Results

Sixty-two subjects completed the study per protocol (PP; 14-17 per group). Mean (SD) 25OHD and iPTH at baseline were 20.6 (6.6) ng/mL and 144.8 (90) pg/mL, respectively. Mean 25OHD increased at end of treatment (EOT) to 82.9 (17.0) ng/mL with ERC (p < 0.001) and 30.8 (11.6) ng/mL with HDC (p < 0.05), but remained unchanged with IRC and PLDC. EOT 25OHD levels reached ≥30 ng/mL in all subjects treated with ERC and in 44% with HDC. All subjects attained EOT 25OHD levels ≥50 ng/mL with ERC versus none with other therapies. iPTH response rates at EOT (≥10, 20 or 30% below baseline) were similar for ERC and PLDC; rates for IRC and HDC were much lower. No significant changes from baseline were observed in ionized or corrected total Ca or P in any group. One episode of hypercalcemia (>10.3 mg/dL) occurred with PLDC. Hyperphosphatemia (>5.5 mg/dL) occurred once with ERC, eight times with HDC, 3 times with IRC, and twice with PLDC.

Conclusion

ERC was highly effective in both raising serum 25OHD and decreasing iPTH in patients with SHPT, VDI, and stage 3 or 4 CKD. iPTH-lowering response rates with ERC were similar to daily PLDC, the reference therapy; rates with IRC or HDC were significantly lower. ERC is an attractive alternative to vitamin D hormone therapy in CKD patients.

P0891META-ANALYSIS OF NUTRITIONAL VITAMIN D FOR THE TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS WITH NON-DIALYSIS CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Background and Aims

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly associated with mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a critical component of CKD-MBD characterized by excessive PTH secretion and parathyroid hyperplasia. SHPT develops in CKD because of disturbances in CKD-MBD parameters such as increases in serum phosphate and fibroblast growth factor 23, and reductions in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) and serum calcium. Low vitamin D levels play a critical role in the development and progression of SHPT. Nutritional vitamin D (NVD) supplements are being frequently used to address SHPT, especially in early CKD. The objective of this meta-analysis (MA) was to evaluate the effectiveness of the NVDs cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol in reducing PTH and increasing 25(OH)D in patients with non-dialysis CKD (ND-CKD).

Method

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) to be included in the MA. All analyses were performed using both random and fixed effects models with inverted-variance weighting. Comparisons were made between the effects of NVDs relative to placebo-treated or untreated patients and between the baseline and end-of-study values of the patients treated with the NVDs, i.e. the effects in treated patients only.

Results

A total of 14 RCTs comprising 974 patients were included in the analyses. Overall reductions in PTH were small when compared to baseline (reduction of 10.95 pg/ml, 95 % confidence interval (CI): -15.99 to -5.91 pg/ml), while reductions in PTH were approximately three times larger when compared to placebo-treated or untreated patient groups (reduction of 34.35 pg/ml, 95 % CI:-47.47 to -21.24 pg/ml). This indicated a limited potential to actively lower PTH with NVDs as the relative effect on PTH when compared to placebo-treated or untreated patient groups was driven to a large degree by increases in PTH in the comparator arms. Treatment with NVDs tended to increase levels of 25(OH)D both when compared to placebo-treated or untreated patients (increase of 26.54 ng/ml, 95 % CI: 24.62 to 28.46 ng/ml) and when only the changes in treated patients were considered (increase of 21.49 ng/ml, 95 % CI: 20.54 to 22.44 ng/ml). However, large variations in effect sizes on levels of 25(OH)D were observed, making judgements about the size of any true treatment effect difficult. Average levels of 25(OH)D in treated patients at the end of the study period were &gt;30 ng/ml in all but two RCTs and &gt;50 ng/ml in only five of the included RCTs. No clear relationship was observed between study length (range: 4 to 144 weeks) or doses administered (range: 14 000 to 75 000 UI weekly average) and effects on 25(OH)D or PTH.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that treatment with NVDs is not efficacious to reliably and consistently lower PTH in ND-CKD patients with SHPT. Although treatment with NVDs can potentially be used to correct vitamin D insufficiency, our results suggest that the potential of NVD treatment to raise 25(OH)D levels to &gt;50 ng/ml, a level needed to reduce PTH, is limited.

Real-world assessment: effectiveness and safety of extended-release calcifediol and other vitamin D therapies for secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD patients

Introduction

Extended-release calcifediol (ERC), active vitamin D hormones and analogs (AVD) and nutritional vitamin D (NVD) are commonly used therapies for treating secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in adults with stage 3–4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and vitamin D insufficiency (VDI). Their effectiveness for increasing serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) and reducing elevated plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH), the latter of which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, has varied across controlled clinical trials. This study aimed to assess real-world experience of ERC and other vitamin D therapies in reducing PTH and increasing 25D.

Methods

Medical records of 376 adult patients with stage 3–4 CKD and a history of SHPT and VDI from 15 United States (US) nephrology clinics were reviewed for up to 1 year pre- and post-ERC, NVD or AVD initiation. Key study variables included patient demographics, concomitant usage of medications and laboratory data. The mean age of the study population was 69.5 years, with gender and racial distributions representative of the US CKD population. Enrolled patients were grouped by treatment into three cohorts: ERC (n = 174), AVD (n = 55) and NVD (n = 147), and mean baseline levels were similar for serum 25D (18.8–23.5 ng/mL), calcium (Ca: 9.1–9.3 mg/dL), phosphorus (P: 3.7–3.8 mg/dL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: 30.3–35.7 mL/min/1.73m²). Mean baseline PTH was 181.4 pg/mL for the ERC cohort versus 156.9 for the AVD cohort and 134.8 pg/mL (p < 0.001) for the NVD cohort. Mean follow-up during treatment ranged from 20.0 to 28.8 weeks.

Results

Serum 25D rose in all cohorts (p < 0.001) during treatment. ERC yielded the highest increase (p < 0.001) of 23.7 ± 1.6 ng/mL versus 9.7 ± 1.5 and 5.5 ± 1.3 ng/mL for NVD and AVD, respectively. PTH declined with ERC treatment by 34.1 ± 6.6 pg/mL (p < 0.001) but remained unchanged in the other two cohorts. Serum Ca increased 0.2 ± 0.1 pg/mL (p < 0.001) with AVD but remained otherwise stable. Serum alkaline phosphatase remained unchanged.

Conclusions

Real-world clinical effectiveness and safety varied across the therapies under investigation, but only ERC effectively raised mean 25D (to well above 30 ng/mL) and reduced mean PTH levels without causing hypercalcemia.