A randomized comparison of intravenous versus lumbar and thoracic epidural fentanyl for analgesia after thoracotomy

Administration of large doses of fentanyl is a popular method to provide postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy. It is however unclear whether epidural lumbar (L) or epidural thoracic (T) administration of fentanyl confers any major advantage over intravenous (iv) infusion. Using a randomized prospective study design, we compared the potential benefits of L, T, and iv fentanyl administration after thoracotomy in 50 patients. Epidural catheters were not injected during surgery. Postoperatively a fentanyl infusion (5 micrograms/ml) was started at 1 microgram.kg-1.h-1 after a bolus of 1 microgram/kg and adjusted to maintain a score < or = 30/100 at rest using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Data were prospectively collected before surgery, at fixed intervals during the 48 h of fentanyl infusions, and the day of discharge. There was no difference between the groups in overall quality of analgesia at rest and after coughing, quantity of fentanyl delivered (L = 1.15 +/- 0.38, T = 1.22 +/- 0.23, iv = 1.27 +/- 0.3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1), incidence of pruritus needing treatment (L = 2, T = 1, iv = 0 patients), need to decrease fentanyl infusion rate because of side effects (L = 2, T = 2, iv = 4 patients), importance of pulmonary infiltrates, or arterial blood gas values. One patient (L group) needed naloxone (0.04 mg iv). Intravenous patients were more frequently nauseated (P = .009) and needed boluses of fentanyl more often (L = 3 +/- 9, iv = 6 +/- 12, T = 4 +/- 8; P = .04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of neck position and head elevation on intracranial pressure in anaesthetized neurosurgical patients: preliminary results

This study reports the collective effect of the positions of the operating table, head, and neck on intracranial pressure (ICP) of 15 adult patients scheduled for elective intracerebral surgery. Patients were anesthetized with propofol, fentanyl, and maintained with a propofol infusion and fentanyl. Intracranial pressure was recorded following 20 minutes of stabilization after induction at different table positions (neutral, 30 degrees head up, 30 degrees head down) with the patient's neck either 1) straight in the axis of the body, 2) flexed, or 3) extended, and in the five following head positions: a) head straight, b) head angled at 45 degrees to the right, c) head angled at 45 degrees to the left, d) head rotated to the right, or e) head rotated the left. For ethical reasons, only patients with ICP < or = 20 mm Hg were included. Intracranial pressure increased every time the head was in a nonneutral position. The most important and statistically significant increases in ICP were recorded when the table was in a 30 degree Trendelenburg position with the head straight or rotated to the right or left, or every time the head was flexed and rotated to the right or left-whatever the position of the table was. These observations suggest that patients with known compromised cerebral compliance would benefit from monitoring ICP during positioning, if the use of a lumbar drainage is planed to improve venous return, cerebral blood volume, ICP, and overall operating conditions.

Pharmacological treatment of chronic pain - the need for CHANGE

BACKGROUND

Although chronic pain affects around 20% of adults in Europe and the USA, there is substantial evidence that it is inadequately treated. In June 2009, an international group of pain specialists met in Brussels to identify the reasons for this and to achieve consensus on strategies for improving pain management.

SCOPE

Literature on chronic pain management was reviewed, and information presented to and discussed by a panel of experts.

FINDINGS

It was agreed that guidelines are not universally accepted by those involved in pain management, and pain treatment seems to be driven mainly by tradition and personal experience. Other factors include poor communication between patients and physicians, the side effects of analgesic drugs, and limited individualisation of therapy. Difficulty in maintaining the balance between adequate pain relief and acceptable tolerability, particularly with strong opioids, can lead to the establishment of a 'vicious circle' that alternates between lack of efficacy and unpleasant side effects, prompting discontinuation of treatment. The medical community's understanding of the physiological differences between nociceptive pain and neuropathic pain, which is often more severe and difficult to treat, could be improved. Increasing physicians' knowledge of the pharmacological options available to manage these different pain mechanisms offers the promise of better treatment decisions and more widespread adoption of a multi-mechanistic approach; this could involve loosely combining two substances from different drug classes, or administering an analgesic with two different mechanisms of action. In some circumstances, a single compound capable of addressing both nociceptive and neuropathic pain is desirable.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve patient outcomes, a thorough understanding of pain mechanisms, sensitisation and multi-mechanistic management is required. Universal, user-friendly educational tools are therefore required to familiarise physicians with these topics, and also to improve communication between physicians and their pain patients, so that realistic expectations of treatment can be established.

A holistic approach to chronic pain management that involves all stakeholders: change is needed

Chronic pain affects a large proportion of the population, imposing significant individual distress and a considerable burden on society, yet treatment is not always instituted and/or adequate. Comprehensive multidisciplinary management based on the biopsychosocial model of pain has been shown to be clinically effective and cost-efficient, but is not widely available. A literature review of stakeholder groups revealed many reasons for this, including: i) many patients believe healthcare professionals lack relevant knowledge, and consultations are rushed, ii) general practitioners consider that pain management has a low priority and is under-resourced, iii) pain specialists cite non-adherence to evidence-based treatment, sub-optimal prescribing, and chronic pain not being regarded as a disease in its own right, iv) nurses', pharmacists' and physiotherapists' skills are not fully utilized, and v) psychological therapy is employed infrequently and often too late. Many of the issues relating to physicians could be addressed by improving medical training, both at undergraduate and postgraduate levels - for example, by making pain medicine a compulsory core subject of the undergraduate medical curriculum. This would improve physician/patient communication, increase the use of standardized pain assessment tools, and allow more patients to participate in treatment decisions. Patient care would also benefit from improved training for other multidisciplinary team members; for example, nurses could provide counseling and follow-up support, psychologists offer coping skills training, and physiotherapists have a greater role in rehabilitation. Equally important measures include the widespread adoption of a patient-centered approach, chronic pain being recognized as a disease in its own right, and the development of universal guidelines for managing chronic non-cancer pain. Perhaps the greatest barrier to improvement is lack of political will at both national and international level. Some powerful initiatives and collaborations are currently lobbying policy-making bodies to raise standards and reduce unnecessary pain - it is vital they continue.

The development of chronic pain: physiological CHANGE necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to treatment

Chronic pain is currently under-diagnosed and under-treated, partly because doctors' training in pain management is often inadequate. This situation looks certain to become worse with the rapidly increasing elderly population unless there is a wider adoption of best pain management practice. This paper reviews current knowledge of the development of chronic pain and the multidisciplinary team approach to pain therapy. The individual topics covered include nociceptive and neuropathic pain, peripheral sensitization, central sensitization, the definition and diagnosis of chronic pain, the biopsychosocial model of pain and the multidisciplinary approach to pain management. This last section includes an example of the implementation of a multidisciplinary approach in Belgium and describes the various benefits it offers; for example, the early multidimensional diagnosis of chronic pain and rapid initiation of evidence-based therapy based on an individual treatment plan. The patient also receives continuity of care, while pain relief is accompanied by improvements in physical functioning, quality of life and emotional stress. Other benefits include decreases in catastrophizing, self-reported patient disability, and depression. Improved training in pain management is clearly needed, starting with the undergraduate medical curriculum, and this review is intended to encourage further study by those who manage patients with chronic pain.

Effects of infused sodium acetate, sodium lactate, and sodium beta-hydroxybutyrate on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation rates in lean humans

Infusion of sodium acetate in lean humans results in a decrease in respiratory exchange ratio, which may be advantageous in patients with respiratory failure. However, this potential decrease in respiratory work was observed to be offset by significant thermogenesis. The metabolic effects of sodium acetate, sodium lactate, and sodium beta-hydroxybutyrate, infused at a rate of 20 mumol.kg-1.min-1 for 3 h, was monitored in six healthy human volunteers. Respiratory exchange ratio decreased from 0.85 +/- 0.02 at baseline to 0.75 +/- 0.02, 0.75 +/- 0.02, and 0.80 +/- 0.02, after acetate, lactate, or beta-hydroxybutyrate, respectively (P < 0.05 for each). Acetate produced a larger thermic effect (22.7% of energy infused) than did lactate (16.3%) or beta-hydroxybutyrate (13.6%). Thus, sodium salts of organic acids may potentially decrease the respiratory requirements by decreasing the respiratory exchange ratio. However, this effect is partially offset by the thermic effect of these substrates. The maximal doses and safety of these anions during larger infusion periods remain to be determined.

Make a CHANGE: optimising communication and pain management decisions

The major objectives of the CHANGE PAIN International Advisory Board are to enhance understanding of chronic pain and to develop strategies for improving pain management. At its second meeting, in November 2009, evidence was presented that around one person in five in Europe and the USA experiences chronic pain, and the delay before referral to a pain specialist is often several years. Moreover, physicians' pharmacological approach to chronic pain is inconsistent, as evidenced by the huge variation in treatment between different European countries. It was agreed that efficient communication between physician and patient is essential for effective pain management, and that efficacy/side-effect balance is a key factor in choosing an analgesic agent. The multifactorial nature of chronic pain produces various physical and psychological symptoms, so the management of chronic pain should be tailored to the individual. Pharmacological therapy must be matched to the causative mechanisms responsible, or it is likely to prove ineffective and risk the development of a 'vicious circle'; doses are increased because of inadequate pain relief, but this increases side-effects so doses are reduced, pain relief is then inadequate, so doses are increased, and so on. Pain management decisions should not therefore be based solely on the severity of pain. Based on the concept of individual treatment targets (ITT), the CHANGE PAIN Scale was adopted - a simple, user-friendly assessment tool to improve communication between physician and patient. The 11-point NRS enables the patient to rate the current pain intensity and to set a realistic individual target level. On the reverse are six key parameters affecting the patient's quality of life; clinicians simply need to agree with patients whether improvement is needed in each one. Regular use can establish the efficacy and tolerability of pain management, and the rate of progress towards individual treatment targets.

Treatment for chronic low back pain: the focus should change to multimodal management that reflects the underlying pain mechanisms

Chronic low back pain: Chronic pain is the most common cause for people to utilize healthcare resources and has a considerable impact upon patients' lives. The most prevalent chronic pain condition is chronic low back pain (CLBP). CLBP may be nociceptive or neuropathic, or may incorporate both components. The presence of a neuropathic component is associated with more intense pain of longer duration, and a higher prevalence of co-morbidities. However, many physicians' knowledge of chronic pain mechanisms is currently limited and there are no universally accepted treatment guidelines, so the condition is not particularly well managed.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis should begin with a focused medical history and physical examination, to exclude serious spinal pathology that may require evaluation by an appropriate specialist. Most patients have non-specific CLBP, which cannot be attributed to a particular cause. It is important to try and establish whether a neuropathic component is present, by combining the findings of physical and neurological examinations with the patient's history. This may prove difficult, however, even when using screening instruments. Multimodal management: The multifactorial nature of CLBP indicates that the most logical treatment approach is multimodal: i.e. integrated multidisciplinary therapy with co-ordinated somatic and psychotherapeutic elements. As both nociceptive and neuropathic components may be present, combining analgesic agents with different mechanisms of action is a rational treatment modality. Individually tailored combination therapy can improve analgesia whilst reducing the doses of constituent agents, thereby lessening the incidence of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper outlines the development of CLBP and the underlying mechanisms involved, as well as providing information on diagnosis and the use of a wide range of pharmaceutical agents in managing the condition (including NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, opioids and anticonvulsants), supplemented by appropriate non-pharmacological measures such as exercise programs, manual therapies, behavioral therapies, interventional pain management and traction. Surgery may be appropriate in carefully selected patients.

Prolonged intrathecal fentanyl analgesia via 32-gauge catheters after thoracotomy

We hypothesized that intrathecal fentanyl infusion would provide excellent analgesia, require lower doses than necessary for the epidural or intravenous route of administration, and reduce the incidence and/or severity of side effects. Accordingly, we studied 12 patients during 48 h after thoracotomy (three pneumonectomies, six lobectomies, and three multiple resections of metastases or pleural surgery). The mean dose of fentanyl infused intrathecally was 0.81 +/- 0.26 microgram.kg-1 x h-1, and plasma fentanyl concentrations ranged between 0.49 +/- 0.19 and 0.72 +/- 0.34 ng/ml. Four patients needed a supplementary bolus of intrathecal fentanyl. Pain scores decreased below 30/100 within 1 h when measured at rest but required 24 h to decrease to the same level during coughing. Pulmonary function tests returned to approximately 50% of preoperative values within 1 h of fentanyl infusion. Mean respiratory rates averaged 19 +/- 4, and no episode of apnea was detected. Pruritus, nausea, and headache occurred, respectively, in four, one, and zero patients. Excessive pressure in the infusion system occurred frequently, limiting fentanyl infusion in two patients. All catheters were removed intact; however, one broke outside of the patient's back. This study demonstrates that intrathecal fentanyl infusion can safely provide rapid and intense analgesia but that current 32-gauge intrathecal catheters are not well suited for prolonged postoperative use.

The chronic pain conundrum: should we CHANGE from relying on past history to assessing prognostic factors?

BACKGROUND

Despite limited empirical support, chronic pain has traditionally been defined mainly on the basis of its duration, which takes no account of the causative mechanisms or its clinical significance.

SCOPE

For this commentary on current pain management practice, the CHANGE PAIN Advisory Board considered the evidence for adopting a prognostic definition of chronic pain. The rationale underlying this approach is to take psychological and behavioural factors into account, as well as the multidimensional nature of pain. Measures of pain intensity, interference with everyday activities, role disability, depression, duration and number of pain sites are used to calculate a risk score, which indicates the likelihood of a patient having pain in the future. The consistency of a prognostic definition with the concept of integrated patient care was also considered.

FINDINGS

When this method was compared with the number of pain days experienced over the previous 6 months--in patients with back pain, headache or orofacial pain--it was a better predictor of clinically significant pain 6 months later for all three pain conditions. Further evidence supporting this approach is that several factors other than the duration of pain have been shown to be important prognostic indicators, including unemployment, functional disability, anxiety and self-rated health. The use of a multifactorial risk score may also suggest specific measures to improve outcomes, such as addressing emotional distress. These measures should be undertaken as part of an integrated pain management strategy; chronic pain is a biopsychosocial phenomenon and all aspects of the patient's pain must be dealt with appropriately and simultaneously for treatment to be effective.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a prognostic definition and wider adoption of integrated care could bring significant advantages. However, these measures require improved training in pain management and structural revision of specialist facilities, for which political support is essential.

O2 consumption by the fick method. Methodologic factors

This study aimed to compare O2 consumption (VO2) determination by the gas-exchange (VO2GE) and Fick (VO2F) methods in cardiac surgical patients. A total of 10 mechanically ventilated postoperative patients were studied prospectively. Thermodilution was performed using three randomly applied techniques: room temperature saline injected at end expiration, room temperature saline randomly injected in the respiratory cycle, and iced saline injected at end expiration. The influence of the number of thermodilution determinations was assessed by comparing results from 2 and 10 injections. The variability of VO2F was greater than that of VO2GE. There was no bias between VO2GE and VO2F values using injectate at room temperature. Accuracy and precision were not improved by increasing the number of cardiac output determinations from 2 to 10. A significant bias was observed using ice-cold injectate, VO2F being 18.0 +/- 15.4 ml/min/m2 lower than VO2GE (p = 0.001). Published results when comparing VO2F and VO2GE are discrepant. However, a significant bias was found in all studies using cold injectate, with lower VO2F values. We conclude that iced injectate should not be used to assess VO2 in critically ill patients.

Minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome

Failed back surgery syndrome has become unfortunately a common clinical entity. FBSS does not have one specific treatment because it does not have one specific cause. Some features are shared with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and some pathological processes are specific. Both pathologies are leading causes of disability in the industrialized world and costly medical and surgical treatments are continuously used despite their limited efficacy. Nonetheless, evidence based practice guidelines are systematically developed. In this chapter we cautiously review the vast, complex and at times contradictory literature regarding the treatment of FBSS. Interventional Pain literature suggests that there is moderate evidence (small randomized or non randomized or single group or matched case controlled studies) for medial branch neurotomy and limited evidence (non experimental one or more center studies) for intra-discal treatments in mechanical low back pain. There is moderate evidence for the use of transforaminal epidural steroid injections, lumbar percutaneous adhesiolysis and spinal endoscopy for painful lumbar radiculopathy and spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal pumps mostly after spinal surgery. In reality there is no gold standard for the treatment of FBSS but, these results seem promising.

Do minimally invasive procedures have a place in the treatment of chronic low back pain?

Chronic low back pain is the leading cause of disability in the industrialized world. Medical and surgical treatments remain costly despite limited efficacy. The field of 'interventional pain' has grown enormously and evidence-based practice guidelines are systematically developed. In this article, the vast, complex and contradictory literature regarding the treatment of chronic low back pain is reviewed. Interventional pain literature suggests that there is moderate evidence (small randomized, nonrandomized, single group or matched-case controlled studies) for medial branch neurotomy and limited evidence (nonexperimental one or more center studies) for intradiscal treatments in mechanical low back pain. There is moderate evidence for the use of transforaminal epidural steroid injections, lumbar percutaneous adhesiolysis and spinal endoscopy for painful lumbar radiculopathy, and spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal pumps mostly after spinal surgery. In reality, there is no gold standard for the treatment of chronic low back pain, but these results appear promising.

Patients' Perceptions of Chronic Pain During the Economic Crisis: Lessons Learned from Greece

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is well known to be influenced by various social factors; however, the impact of financial issues on pain has not been extensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the economic crisis on pain and quality of life in Greek patients suffering from chronic pain.

STUDY DESIGN

The study employed a prospective, open-label design.

SETTING

The study setting was the Pain Unit of Attikon University Hospital in Athens, Greece.

METHODS

The study surveyed 200 randomly selected outpatients with chronic pain during two different time periods (2012 and 2016). Patients completed a structured questionnaire to assess the impact of the economic crisis on multiple aspects of pain and pain management, health care, and quality of life. Personality characteristics and stress were also evaluated using the DASS-42 and the LOT-R questionnaires.

RESULTS

Most patients in both periods believed that the economic crisis led to a worsening of their symptoms (75%) and quality of life (97%). Most patients (97.5%) also believed that the intensity of their pain would have been improved if their financial status had been better. Their main concerns about the future were "the possibility of not having access to health care facilities and medication" (94.5%), "stress" (43%), and "fear of financial strain" (30.5%). Higher levels of anxiety, stress, and pessimism were associated with higher levels of pain and lower quality of life.

LIMITATIONS

The study is based on a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified impacts of the financial crisis on chronic pain and quality of life, pointing to the need for measures to solve this problem.

KEY WORDS

Pain, global financial crisis, quality of life, quality of health care, psychosocial factors.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the advent of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), advances in technology have allowed for improvement and treatment of various conditions, especially chronic pain. Additionally, as the system has developed, the ability to provide different stimulation waveforms for patients to treat different conditions has improved. The purpose and objective of the paper is to discuss basics of waveforms and present the most up-to-date literature and research studies on the different types of waveforms that currently exist. During our literature search, we came across over sixty articles that discuss the various waveforms we intend to evaluate.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are several publications on several waveforms used in clinical practice, but to our knowledge, this is the only educational document teaching on waveforms which provides essential knowledge. There is a gap of knowledge related to understanding wave forms and how they work.

[Novelties in interventional pain techniques]

The clinical application of new interventional technology begins with its conception, passes through a scientific validation and finally should be accepted as part of current clinical practice. One way of scientifically validating these techniques is analyzing present practice, available resources and patient outcome. The first part of this article describes the stages in the creation of a quality management system (ISO 9001) which we carried out, in order to judiciously realize these novel interventions. In the second part two techniques indicated in low back and leg pain are described. The first is spinal endoscopy, a three dimensional procedure designed to diagnose and treated painful lumbar radiculopathy. The second is intra-discal electro-therapy (IDET), indicated in discogenic pain. Albeit novel, these techniques are of promising nature, and their qualitative analysis, via rigorous certification is, we think, of interest.

The Effects and Mechanisms of Phytochemicals on Pain Management and Analgesic

Phytochemicals can be an essential treatment for chronic pain. This narrative review will summarize and critically analyze the evidence surrounding these substances in pain management. We will introduce phytochemicals, discuss their associated mechanisms, and comment on their viability for potential treatment. There have been decades of research on phytochemical therapies for pain management, but the authors limited the scope of the investigation to the last 25 years. This literature review will serve as a foundation for the pain practitioner to understand where these treatments fit in the paradigm for chronic pain treatment. Assess the integration of phytochemicals within pain management fully.

Neuromodulation Techniques for Headache Management

This narrative review aims to summarize evidence regarding the current utilization and future applications of neuromodulation in patients with headaches, with special attention paid to migraine and chronic cluster headache. A search was conducted in PubMed in August of 2023 to survey the current literature on neuromodulation for the treatment of headache. In total, the search yielded 1989 results, which were further filtered to include only systematic reviews published between 2022 to 2023 to capture the most up-to-date and comprehensive research on this topic. The citation lists of these articles were reviewed to find additional research on neuromodulation and supplement the results presented in this paper with primary literature. Research on the use of neuromodulation for the treatment of headache has predominantly focused on four neuromodulation techniques: peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Outcome measures reported in this article include impact on migraine and headache frequency and/or pain intensity, adverse effects of the neuromodulation technique, and associated costs, when available. We found that neuromodulation has developed utility as an alternative treatment for both chronic cluster headaches and migraines, with a reduction in frequency and intensity of headache most elucidated from the articles mentioned in this review.

Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

BACKGROUND

Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain.

METHODS

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.