External Validation of a Tool to Identify Low-Risk Patients With Isolated Subdural Hematoma and Preserved Consciousness

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The SafeSDH Tool was derived to identify patients with isolated (no other type of intracranial hemorrhage) subdural hematoma who are at very low risk of neurologic deterioration, neurosurgical intervention, or death. Patients are low risk by the tool if they have none of the following: use of anticoagulant or nonaspirin antiplatelet agent, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) <14, more than 1 discrete hematoma, hematoma thickness >5 mm, or midline shift. We attempted to externally validate the SafeSDH Tool.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥16 with a GCS ≥13 and isolated subdural hematoma who presented to 1 of 6 academic and community hospitals from 2005 to 2018. The primary outcome, a composite of neurologic deterioration (seizure, altered mental status, or symptoms requiring repeat imaging), neurosurgical intervention, discharge on hospice, and death, was abstracted from discharge summaries. Hematoma thickness, number of hematomas, and midline shift were abstracted from head imaging reports. Anticoagulant use, antiplatelet use, and GCS were gathered from the admission record.

RESULTS

The validation data set included 753 patients with isolated subdural hematoma. Mortality during the index admission was 2.1%; 26% of patients underwent neurosurgical intervention. For the composite outcome, sensitivity was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97 to 100), and specificity was 31% (95% CI 27 to 35). The tool identified 162 (21.5%) patients as low risk. Negative likelihood ratio was 0.03 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.11).

CONCLUSION

The SafeSDH Tool identified patients with isolated subdural hematoma who are at low risk for poor outcomes with high sensitivity. With prospective validation, these low-risk patients could be safe for management in less intensive settings.

Can video-based telehealth examinations of the abdomen safely determine the need for imaging?

There is little evidence on the reliability of the video-based telehealth physical examinations. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a physician-directed abdominal examination using telehealth. This was a prospective, blinded observational study of patients >19 years of age presenting with abdominal pain to a large, academic emergency department. In addition to their usual care, patients had a video-based telehealth examination by an emergency physician early in the visit. We compared the in-person and telehealth providers' decisions on imaging. Thirty patients were enrolled and providers' recommendations for imaging were YES (telehealth: 18 (60%); in-person: 22 (73%)), UNSURE (telehealth: 9 (30%); in-person: 2 (7%)) and NO (telehealth: 6 (20%); in-person: 3 (10%)). There were 20 patients for whom both telehealth and in-person providers were not unsure; of these, 16 (80%, 95% confidence interval 56.3-94.3%) patients had a provider agreement on the need for imaging. While the use of video-based telehealth may be feasible for patients seeking emergency department care for abdominal pain, further study is needed to determine how it may be safely deployed. Currently, caution should be exercised when evaluating the need for abdominal imaging remotely.

Can tablet video-based telehealth assessment of the abdomen safely determine the need for abdominal imaging? A pilot study

Objective

There is limited evidence on the reliability of video-based physical examinations. We aimed to evaluate the safety of a remote physician-directed abdominal examination using tablet-based video.

Methods

This was a prospective observational pilot study of patients >19 years old presenting with abdominal pain to an academic emergency department July 9, 2021-December 21, 2021. In addition to usual care, patients had a tablet video-based telehealth history and examination by an emergency physician who was otherwise not involved in the visit. Both telehealth and in-person clinicians were asked about the patient's need for abdominal imaging (yes/no). Thirty-day chart review searched for subsequent ED visits, hospitalizations, and procedures. Our primary outcome was agreement between telehealth and in-person clinicians on imaging need. Our secondary outcome was potentially missed imaging by the telehealth physicians leading to morbidity or mortality. We used descriptive and bivariate analyses to examine characteristics associated with disagreement on imaging needs.

Results

Fifty-six patients were enrolled; the median age was 43 years (interquartile range: 27-59), 31 (55%) were female. The telehealth and in-person clinicians agreed on the need for imaging in 42 (75%) of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%-86%), with moderate agreement with Cohen's kappa ((k = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.15-0.67). For study patients who had a procedure within 24 hours of ED arrival (n = 3, 5.4%, 95% CI: 1.1%-14.9%) or within 30 days (n = 7, 12.5%, 95% CI: 5.2%-24.1%), neither telehealth physicians nor in-person clinicians missed timely imaging.

Conclusion

In this pilot study, telehealth physicians and in-person clinicians agreed on the need for imaging for the majority of patients with abdominal pain. Importantly, telehealth physicians did not miss the identification of imaging needs for patients requiring urgent or emergent surgery.

The Utility of Computed Tomography Angiogram in Patients with Mild Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) differ significantly in their mortality and management. Although computed tomography angiography (CTA) is critical to guide timely interventions in aSAH, it lacks recognized benefit in assessing tSAH. Despite this, CTA commonly is included in tSAH evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if any clinically significant cerebral aneurysms are identified on CTA in emergency department (ED) patients with a tSAH.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of consecutive blunt head trauma patients ages ≥ 16 years with Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) ≥ 13 who presented to an academic ED (100,000 annual visits) over a 7-year period. Those included had a CT-diagnosed SAH and underwent head CTA. The primary endpoint was the detection of any clinically significant brain aneurysms.

RESULTS

There were 297 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-six patients (8.8%) had an incidental aneurysm discovered; one underwent elective outpatient intervention. Aneurysm-positive patients were more likely to be female (69.2% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.003), age 60 years or older (80.8% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.005), and be on anticoagulation (42.3% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.03). There were no differences between the aneurysm-positive and -negative patients with respect to GCS, history of hypertension, or mechanism of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

In this 7-year retrospective chart review, CTA in patients with tSAH and GCS ≥ 13 did not reveal any clinically relevant cerebral aneurysms. One incidental aneurysm later underwent outpatient neurovascular intervention. In the absence of specific clinical concerns, CTA has minimal value in well-appearing patients with a tSAH.

External Validation of a Tool to Predict Neurosurgery in Patients with Isolated Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND

Subdural hematoma (SDH) is the most common form of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Orlando and colleagues derived a prediction tool for neurosurgical intervention, the "Orlando Tool," consisting of (a) maximum thickness of hematoma, and (b) presence of acute-on-chronic (AOC) hematoma. This study externally validated the Orlando Tool.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients aged ≥16 years with a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥13, and a computed tomography-documented isolated, traumatic SDH, who presented to a university-affiliated, urban, 100,000-annual-visit emergency department from 2009-2015. The primary outcome was neurosurgical intervention. Thickness of hematoma and presence of AOC hematoma were abstracted from cranial computed tomography scan reports by 2 trained physician abstractors.

RESULTS

A total of 607 patients with isolated SDH were included in the validation dataset. Median hematoma thickness was 6 mm. AOC hematoma was noted in 13% of patients. Mortality was 2.5%, and 15.7% of patients underwent neurosurgery. The Orlando Tool had an area under the curve of 0.93 in the validation, comparable to 0.94 reported in their derivation set. At the prespecified cutoff of 9.96% risk, the tool had a 88% (95% CI, 80-94) sensitivity in the validation cohort compared with 94% in the derivation cohort. The specificity of 82% (95% CI, 78-85) was comparable with 84% in the derivation group. Negative likelihood ratio was 0.14 (95% CI, 0.08-0.25), compared with 0.09 in derivation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Orlando Tool accurately predicts neurosurgical intervention in patients with isolated, traumatic SDH and preserved consciousness.

Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department with ICU admission: A trigger tool for diagnostic error

BACKGROUND

It is believed that patients who return to the Emergency Department (ED) and require admission are thought to represent failures in diagnosis, treatment or discharge planning. Screening readmission rates or patients who return within 72 h have been used in ED Quality Assurance efforts. These metrics require significant effort in chart review and only rarely identify care deviations.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the yield of reviewing ED return visits that resulted in an ICU admission. This study was conducted to evaluate the yield of reviewing ED return visits that resulted in an ICU admission. We planned to assess if the return visits with ICU admission were associated with deviations in care, and secondarily, to understand the common causes of error in this group.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients presenting to a university affiliated ED between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015 and returned within 14 days requiring ICU admission.

RESULTS

From 1,106,606 ED visits, 511 patients returned within 14 days and were admitted to an ICU. 223 patients returned for a reason related to the index visit (43.6%). Of these related returns, 31 (13.9%) had a deviation in care on the index visit. When a standard diagnostic process of care framework was applied to these 31 cases, 47.3% represented failures in the initial diagnostic pathway.

CONCLUSION

Reviewing 14-day returns leading to ICU admission, while an uncommon event, has a higher yield in the understanding of quality issues involving diagnostic as well as systems errors.

Seizure frequency in patients with isolated subdural hematoma and preserved consciousness

Background: Seizures are a complication of subdural hematoma (SDH), and there is substantial variability in the use of seizure prophylaxis for patients with SDH. However, the incidence of seizures in patients with SDH without severe neurotrauma is not clear. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of and factors associated with seizures in patients with isolated SDH (iSDH) without severe neurotrauma. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, we identified adults with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≥13 and computed tomography (CT)-documented iSDH. The primary outcome was clinical seizure frequency. Seizure medication use was also assessed. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used to assess association. Results: Of 643 patients with iSDH, 14 (2.2%) had seizures during hospitalization. Of 630 patients (98%) not receiving seizure medication prior to SDH, 522 (82.9%) received levetiracetam. Of the patients who received a seizure medication, 12 (2.3%) had a seizure, while of the 121 patients who did not receive seizure medications, 2 (1.9%) had a seizure (p = .49). In multivariable regression, the only variable significantly associated with seizure was thickness of subdural hematoma (OR 1.16, p = .005). Conclusion: In patients with iSDH and preserved consciousness, in-hospital seizures were rare regardless of seizure medications use.

Rapid Discharge After Interfacility Transfer for Mild Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage: Frequency and Associated Factors

Introduction

Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TIH), brain injury with radiographic hemorrhage, is a common emergency department (ED) presentation, and encompasses a wide range of clinical syndromes. Patients with moderate and severe neurotrauma (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 13) with intracranial hemorrhage require care at a trauma center with neurosurgical capabilities. However, many patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (mTIH), defined as radiographic bleeding and GCS ≥ 13, do not require operative intervention or intensive care unit monitoring, but are still routinely transferred to tertiary care centers. We hypothesized that a significant proportion of patients are managed non-operatively and are discharged within 24 hours of admission.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational study of consecutive patients age ≥ 16 years, GCS ≥ 13 who were transferred to an urban, medical school-affiliated, 100,000 annual visit ED over a seven-year period with blunt isolated mTIH. The primary outcome was discharge within 24 hours of admission. We measured rates of neurosurgical intervention, computed tomography hemorrhage progression, and neurologic deterioration as well as other demographic and clinical variables.

Results

There were 1079 transferred patients with isolated mTIH. Of these, 92.4% were treated non-operatively and 35.8% were discharged within 24 hours of presentation to the tertiary ED. Patient characteristics associated with rapid discharge after transfer include a GCS of 15 (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 – 4.4), subdural hematoma ≤ 6mm (OR 3.1, 95% CI, 2.2 – 4.5) or the presence of an isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR 1.7, 95% CI, 1.3 – 2.4). Of patients with length of stay < 24 hours, 79.8% were discharged directly from the ED or ED observation unit.

Conclusion

Patients transferred to tertiary care centers are frequently discharged after brief observation without intervention. Risk can be predicted by clinical and radiographic data. Further prospective research is required to determine a safe cohort of patients who could be managed at community sites.

A natural language processing algorithm to extract characteristics of subdural hematoma from head CT reports

PURPOSE

Subdural hematoma (SDH) is the most common form of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, and radiographic characteristics of SDH are predictive of complications and patient outcomes. We created a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to extract structured data from cranial computed tomography (CT) scan reports for patients with SDH.

METHODS

CT scan reports from patients with SDH were collected from a single center. All reports were based on cranial CT scan interpretations by board-certified attending radiologists. Reports were then coded by a pair of physicians for four variables: number of SDH, size of midline shift, thickness of largest SDH, and side of largest SDH. Inter-rater reliability was assessed. The annotated reports were divided into training (80%) and test (20%) datasets. Relevant information was extracted from text using a pattern-matching approach, due to the lack of a mention-level gold-standard corpus. Then, the NLP pipeline components were integrated using the Apache Unstructured Information Management Architecture. Output performance was measured as algorithm accuracy compared to the data coded by the two ED physicians.

RESULTS

A total of 643 scans were extracted. The NLP algorithm accuracy was high: 0.84 for side of largest SDH, 0.88 for thickness of largest SDH, and 0.92 for size of midline shift.

CONCLUSION

A NLP algorithm can structure key data from non-contrast head CT reports with high accuracy. The NLP is a potential tool to detect important radiographic findings from electronic health records, and, potentially, add decision support capabilities.

Evaluation of a Low-risk Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Intracranial Hemorrhage Emergency Department Observation Protocol

OBJECTIVES

Among emergency physicians, there is wide variation in admitting practices for patients who suffered a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) with an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementing a protocol in the emergency department (ED) observation unit for patients with mild TBI and ICH.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board. Study subjects were patients ≥ 18 years of age with an International Classification of Diseases code corresponding to a traumatic ICH and admitted to an ED observation unit (EDOU) of an urban, academic Level I trauma center between February 1, 2015, and January 31, 2017. Patient data and discharge disposition were abstracted from the electronic health record, and imaging data, from the final neuroradiologist report. To measure kappa, two abstractors independently collected data for presence of neuro deficit from a 10% random sample of the medical charts. Using a multivariable logistic regression model with a propensity score of the probability of placement in the EDOU before and after protocol implementation as a covariate, we sought to determine the pre-post effects of implementing a protocol on the composite outcome of admission to the floor, intensive care unit, or operating room from the EDOU and the proportion of patients with worsening findings on repeat computed tomography (CT) head scan in the EDOU.

RESULTS

A total of 379 patients were identified during the study period; 83 were excluded as they were found to have no ICH on chart review. Inter-rater reliability kappa statistic was 0.63 for 30 charts. Among the 296 patients who remained eligible and comprised the study population, 143 were in the preprotocol period and 153 after protocol implementation. The EDOU protocol was associated with an independently statistically significant decreased odds ratio (OR) for admission or worsening ICH on repeat CT scan (OR = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25-0.82, p = 0.009) in the observation unit. After a stay in the EDOU, 26% (37/143) of patients required an inpatient admission before implementation of the protocol and 13% (20/153) of patients required an inpatient admission after protocol implementation. There was no statistically significant difference in log transformed EDOU length of stay (LOS) between the groups after adjusting for propensity score (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

While there was no difference in EDOU LOS, implementing a low-risk mild TBI and ICH protocol in the EDOU may decrease the rate of inpatient admissions from the EDOU. A protocol-driven observation unit may help physicians by standardizing eligibility criteria and by providing guidance on management. As the propensity score method limits our ability to create a straightforward predictive model, a future larger study should validate the results.

Utilization of head CT during injury visits to United States emergency departments: 2012-2015

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown increasing utilization of head computed tomography (CT) imaging of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with an injury-related visit. Multiple initiatives, including the Choosing Wisely™ campaign and evidence-based clinical decision support based on validated decision rules, have targeted head CT use in patients with injuries. Therefore, we investigated national trends in the use of head CT during injury-related ED visits from 2012 to 2015.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of data from the annual United States (U.S.) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012 to 2015. The study population was defined as injury-related ED visits, and we sought to determine the percentage in which a head CT was ordered and, secondarily, to determine both the diagnostic yield of clinically significant intracranial findings and hospital characteristics associated with increased head CT utilization.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2015, 12.25% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.48-13.02%) of injury-related visits received at least one head CT. Overall head CT utilization showed an increased trend during the study period (2012: 11.7%, 2015: 13.23%, p = 0.09), but the results were not statistically significant. The diagnostic yield of head CT for a significant intracranial injury over the period of four years was 7.4% (9.68% in 2012 vs. 7.67% in 2015, p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Head CT use along with diagnostic yield has remained stable from 2012 to 2015 among patients presenting to the ED for an injury-related visit.

A Decision Instrument to Identify Isolated Traumatic Subdural Hematomas at Low Risk of Neurologic Deterioration, Surgical Intervention, or Radiographic Worsening

OBJECTIVES

Subdural hematoma (SDH) is the most common form of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Severity of disease in patients with SDH varies widely. It was hypothesized that a decision rule could identify patients with SDH who are at very low risk for neurologic decline, neurosurgical intervention, or radiographic worsening.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients age ≥ 16 with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≥ 13 and computed tomography (CT)-documented isolated SDH presenting to a university-affiliated, urban, 100,000-annual-visit ED from 2009 to 2015. Demographic, historical, and physical examination variables were collected. Primary outcome was a composite of neurosurgical intervention, worsening repeat CT, and neurologic decline. Univariate analysis was performed and statistically important variables were utilized to create a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 644 patients with isolated SDH were reviewed, 340 in the derivation group and 304 in the validation set. Mortality was 2.2%. A total 15.5% of patients required neurosurgery. A decision instrument was created: patients were low risk if they had none of the following factors-SDH thickness ≥ 5mm, warfarin use, clopidogrel use, GCS < 14, and presence of midline shift. This model had a sensitivity of 98.6% for the composite endpoint, specificity of 37.1%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.037. In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 96.3%, specificity was 31.5%, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.127.

CONCLUSION

Subdural hematomas are amenable to risk stratification analysis. With prospective validation, this decision instrument may aid in triaging these patients, including reducing the need for transfer to tertiary centers.

A prediction model to identify patients without a concerning intraabdominal diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

Patients with abdominal diagnoses constitute 5% to 10% of all emergency department (ED) presentations. The goal of this study is to identify which of these patients will have a nonconcerning diagnosis based on demographic, physical examination, and basic laboratory testing.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from July 2013 to March 2014 discharged with a gastrointestinal (GI) diagnosis who presented to an urban, university-affiliated ED were identified. The cohort was split into a derivation set and a validation set. Using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis, a risk score was created based on the deviation data and then tested on the validation data.

RESULTS

There were 8852 patients with a GI diagnosis during the study period. A total of 7747 (87.5%) of them had a nonconcerning diagnosis. The logistic regression model identified 13 variables that predict a concerning GI diagnosis and created a scoring system ranging from 0 to 20. The area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.81. When dichotomized at greater than or equal to 7 vs less than 7, the risk score has a sensitivity of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88-94), specificity of 46% (95% CI, 44-48), positive predictive value of 17% (95% CI, 15-19) and negative predictive value of 98% (95% CI, 97-99).

CONCLUSION

One can determine with a high degree of certainty, based only on an initial evaluation and screening laboratory work (excluding radiology) whether a patient who presents with a GI-related complaint has a nonconcerning diagnosis. This model could be used as a tool to aid in quality assurance when reviewing patients discharged with GI complaints and with future study, as a secondary triage instrument in a crowded ED environment, and aid in resource allocation.

The management of acute hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: labetalol or nicardipine?

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended doses of labetalol and nicardipine for hypertension (HTN) management in a subset of patients with renal dysfunction (RD).

DESIGN

Randomized, open label, multicenter prospective clinical trial.

SETTING

Thirteen United States tertiary care emergency departments.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Subgroup analysis of the Evaluation of IV Cardene (Nicardipine) and Labetalol Use in the Emergency Department (CLUE) clinical trial. The subjects were 104 patients with RD (i.e., creatinine clearance < 75 mL/min) who presented to the emergency department with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 180 mmHg on 2 consecutive readings and for whom the emergency physician felt intravenous antihypertensive therapy was desirable.

INTERVENTIONS

The FDA recommended doses of either labetalol or nicardipine for HTN management.

MEASUREMENTS

The number of patients achieving the physician's predefined target SBP range within 30 minutes of treatment.

RESULTS

Patients treated with nicardipine were within target range more often than those receiving labetalol (92% vs. 78%, P = 0.046). On 6 SBP measures, patients treated with nicardipine were more likely to achieve the target range on either 5 or all 6 readings than were patients treated with labetalol (46% vs. 25%, P = 0.024). Labetalol patients were more likely to require rescue medication (27% vs. 17%, P = 0.020). Adverse events thought to be related to either treatment group were not reported in the 30-minute active study period, and patients had slower heart rates at all time points after 5 minutes (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In severe HTN with RD, nicardipine-treated patients are more likely to reach a target blood pressure range within 30 minutes than are patients receiving labetalol.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Within 30 minutes of administration, nicardipine is more efficacious than labetalol for acute blood pressure control in patients with RD.

An evidence-based approach to the evaluation and treatment of low back pain in the emergency department

Low back pain is the most common musculoskeletal complaint that results in a visit to the emergency department, and it is 1 of the top 5 most common complaints in emergency medicine. Estimates of annual healthcare expenditures for low back pain in the United States exceed $90 billion annually, not even taking lost productivity and business costs into account. This review explores an evidence-based rationale for the evaluation of the patient with low back pain, and it provides guidance on risk stratification pertaining to laboratory assessment and radiologic imaging in the emergency department. Published guidelines from the American College of Physicians and American Pain Society are reviewed, with emphasis on best evidence for pharmacologic treatments, self-care interventions, and more invasive procedures and surgery in management of low back pain. Utilizing effective and proven strategies will avoid medical errors, provide better care for patients, and help manage healthcare resources and costs.

Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration recommended dosing of nicardipine versus labetalol for the management of hypertensive patients with signs and/or symptoms (S/S) suggestive of end-organ damage (EOD).

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the multicentre prospective, randomised CLUE trial.

SETTING

13 academic emergency departments in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible patients had two systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ≥180 mm Hg at least 10 min apart, no contraindications to nicardipine or labetalol and predefined S/S suggestive of EOD on arrival.

INTERVENTIONS

Medications were administered by continuous infusion (nicardipine) or repeat intravenous bolus (labetalol) for a study period of 30 min or until a specified target SBP ±20 mm Hg was achieved.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Percentage of participants achieving a predefined target SBP range (TR) defined as an SBP within ±20 mm Hg as established by the treating physician.

RESULTS

Of the 141 eligible patients, 49.6% received nicardipine, 51.7% were women and 81.6% were black. Mean age was 52.2±13.9 years. Median initial SBP did not differ in the nicardipine (210.5 (IQR 197-226) mm Hg) and labetalol (210 (200-226) mm Hg) groups (p=0.862). Nicardipine patients were more likely to have a history of diabetes (41.4% vs 25.7%, p=0.05) but there were no other historical, demographic or laboratory differences between groups. Within 30 min, nicardipine patients more often reached the target SBP range than those receiving labetalol (91.4% vs 76.1%, difference=15.3% (95% CI 3.5% to 27.3%); p=0.01). On multivariable modelling with adjustment for gender and clinical site, nicardipine patients were more likely to be in TR by 30 min than patients receiving labetalol (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 10.18, C statistic=0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of hypertension with suspected EOD, patients treated with nicardipine are more likely to reach prespecified SBP targets within 30 min than patients receiving labetalol.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00765648, clinicaltrials.gov.

CLUE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of IV nicardipine versus labetalol use in the emergency department

Introduction

Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of food and drug administration (FDA) recommended dosing of IV nicardipine versus IV labetalol for the management of acute hypertension.

Methods

Multicenter randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients had 2 systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ≥180 mmHg and no contraindications to nicardipine or labetalol. Before randomization, the physician specified a target SBP ± 20 mmHg (the target range: TR). The primary endpoint was the percent of subjects meeting TR during the initial 30 minutes of treatment.

Results

Of 226 randomized patients, 110 received nicardipine and 116 labetalol. End organ damage preceded treatment in 143 (63.3%); 71 nicardipine and 72 labetalol patients. Median initial SBP was 212.5 (IQR 197, 230) and 212 mmHg (IQR 200,225) for nicardipine and labetalol patients (P = 0.68), respectively. Within 30 minutes, nicardipine patients more often reached TR than labetalol (91.7 vs. 82.5%, P = 0.039). Of 6 BP measures (taken every 5 minutes) during the study period, nicardipine patients had higher rates of five and six instances within TR than labetalol (47.3% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.026). Rescue medication need did not differ between nicardipine and labetalol (15.5 vs. 22.4%, P = 0.183). Labetalol patients had slower heart rates at all time points (P < 0.01). Multivariable modeling showed nicardipine patients were more likely in TR than labetalol patients at 30 minutes (OR 2.73, P = 0.028; C stat for model = 0.72)

Conclusions

Patients treated with nicardipine are more likely to reach the physician-specified SBP target range within 30 minutes than those treated with labetalol.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00765648

Clinical predictors of significant findings on head computed tomographic angiography

BACKGROUND

Although head computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a sensitive tool for the evaluation of neurological symptoms in the emergency department (ED), little is known about which clinical signs predict significant CTA findings.

OBJECTIVES

To identify clinical factors that predict significant findings on head CTA in patients presenting to the ED with neurological complaints.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients undergoing head CTA over a 6-month period in an urban, tertiary care ED with an annual volume of 76,000. Significant head CTA findings were defined as clinically significant neurological abnormalities undetected by previous imaging studies. Demographics, chief complaint, results of the neurological examinations (NE), and head non-contrast computed tomography (CT) results were used as predictors of significant head CTA. All predictors with a univariate p < 0.2 using Pearson's chi-squared were entered stepwise into a multivariable logistic regression including odds ratios (OR), with inclusion restricted to p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Chart review yielded 456 cases; 215 (47%) were male. Mean age was 62 (SD 20) years. There were 189 patients (41%) with abnormal CTAs. Multivariable logistic regression indicated five variables that predicted a clinically significant CTA: abnormal CT (OR 3.72), chief complaint of subarachnoid hemorrhage-type headache (OR 2.30), and motor deficit (OR 2.23), visual deficit (OR 2.23), and other focal deficit (OR 2.18) on NE. A chief complaint of trauma (OR 0.23) predicted a normal CTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific historical and focal neurological findings are useful for predicting clinically significant findings on head CTA.

Patient and physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesia

Whereas controversy surrounds emergency department (ED) analgesia administration to patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain, few studies have addressed the level of patient-physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesia. This prospective study was undertaken to assess concordance between emergency physicians and patients on abdominal pain severity. Study subjects were a convenience sample of 30 adults seen in an urban university-affiliated tertiary care ED (annual census 65,000) who had undifferentiated abdominal pain meeting an initial severity threshold of 5 on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) marked by the patient. Patients' and physicians' VAS scores, obtained in blinded fashion at presentation (t0) and at one (t1) and two (t2) hours into the ED stay, were compared with t test (VAS scores) and sign-rank (percent change in VAS scores) analyses. In addition, patients and physicians were asked at each assessment time, in blinded fashion, "Is the pain severe enough to warrant morphine?" The kappa statistic was used to characterize the degree of agreement between physician and patient assessments as to whether opioids were indicated. At t0, t1, and t2, patients' mean VAS scores (7.5, 6.7, and 5.1) were significantly (P < .05) higher than the corresponding physicians' VAS scores (5.3, 4.7, and 3.9). Though VAS scores for physicians started lower than those of patients, the percentage changes in scores from one assessment to the next were similar by Wilcoxon sign-rank testing (P > .50 for time intervals t0 - t1 and t1 - t2). Overall, patients and physicians agreed on the question of whether pain was sufficient to warrant opioids in 71 of 90 (78.9%) assessments; the corresponding kappa statistic of .57 indicated moderate agreement (P < .0001). These results, indicating that patients and physicians usually agree on whether opioids are warranted for abdominal pain, have important implications for further research on ED analgesia in this population.

Elderly patients with closed head trauma after a fall: mechanisms and outcomes

Falls in the elderly leading to closed head trauma represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in that population, but are not well-characterized. The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanism of fall, outcome, and additional risk factors in elderly patients who require cranial computed tomography (CT) scan after a fall. We conducted a retrospective case series of patients age 60 years and older with closed head trauma secondary to falling who underwent CT scan in the emergency department (ED). Data were gathered from ED and hospital records. The setting was an urban Level I trauma center. Our series consisted of 189 patients, of whom 31 (16%) had an abnormal head CT scan and four (2%) required neurosurgery. Cerebral contusions (38%) and subdural hematomas (33%) were the most common lesions seen on CT scan. Falls from standing (76%) were more common than falls on stairs (19%) or from height (5%), but the latter two were more likely to result in an abnormal CT scan (stairs 42%, height 40%). An abnormal neurologic examination was associated with a higher risk of the need for neurosurgery (risk ratio 11.5). We conclude that among elderly patients who fall and present to an ED with evidence of closed head trauma, a significant percentage will have abnormal CT scans but only a small minority will require neurosurgery. While falls from standing are more common, falls on stairs or from height are associated with a higher risk of having an abnormal CT scan. A focal neurologic examination is a strong predictor of the need for neurosurgical intervention.

Elder patients with closed head trauma: a comparison with nonelder patients

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the circumstances surrounding closed head trauma (CHT) in elders, and how they differ from nonelders. The study objective was to compare the 2 populations for outcome (positive cranial CT scan depicting traumatic injury, or the need for neurosurgery), mechanism of injury, and the value of the neurologic examination to predict a CT scan positive for traumatic injury or the need for neurosurgical intervention.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted by collecting a case series of patients with blunt head trauma who underwent CT scanning, and comparing elder (aged > or =60 years) with nonelder patients. The setting was the ED of a university-affiliated Level-1 trauma center.

RESULTS

Twenty percent of the elders and 13% of the nonelders had CT scans positive for traumatic injury, which conferred a risk ratio of 1.58 (95% CI 1.21-2.05). Older women were more at risk for the need for neurosurgery than were younger ones (3.1 vs 0.3%, RR 10.66, 95% CI 1.26-90.46). Among the elders, falls were the dominant mechanism of closed head trauma, followed by motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), then being struck as a pedestrian. In the nonelders, MVCs, falls, and assaults were the most important mechanisms of injury. A focally abnormal neurologic examination imparted an increased risk for both a CT scan positive for traumatic injury (elder 4.39, 95% CI 2.91-6.62; nonelder 7.75, 95% CI 5.53-10.72) and the need for neurosurgery (elder 35.68, 95% CI 4.58-275.89; nonelder 142.58, 95% CI 19.11-1064.22) in both age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist between elder and nonelder victims of CHT with respect to mechanisms of trauma and outcomes (CT scan positive for traumatic injury, or the need for neurosurgery).

Mild head trauma

Patients with mild traumatic brain injury constitute the overwhelming majority of head-injured patients seen in the emergency department. The indications for radiologic imaging in these patients are still undergoing study and revision. The Glasgow Coma Scale is a widely used triage score for head injury, but is less useful at identifying which patients with mild head injuries have intracranial pathology. There have been several retrospective studies and a few prospective studies examining the indications for imaging in mild to moderate head trauma. They all show that it is not easy to predict which patients will have CT abnormalities, and that some of these patients do go on to require neurosurgery. No set of clinical predictors have yet been put together that is capable of identifying all patients who are safe to be discharged without a CT scan. Pharmacologic therapy to help reduce axonal damage after head trauma and thus minimize the postconcussive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury remains a challenge for physicians and neurobiologists into the next century.

Reduced emergency department stabilization time before cranial computed tomography in patients undergoing air medical transport

INTRODUCTION

Advanced patient stabilization skills provided by air medical providers were hypothesized to result in streamlined emergency department (ED) stabilization of patients with head injuries requiring urgent cranial computed tomography (CCT). The goal of this study was to compare initial ED stabilization times between air- and ground-transported patients requiring urgent CCT and emergency neurosurgical hematoma evacuation.

SETTING

Academic Level trauma center (annual ED census 60,000) receiving patients from ground EMS and a nurse/paramedic air medical transport team.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified, from a database of 15 months of ED visits, consecutive group of adults who had CCT performed within 60 minutes of ED arrival and underwent emergent craniotomy for intracranial hematoma. Demographics, hemodynamic status, patient acuity, and time intervals between ED and CCT suite arrivals were compared between air and ground patients using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests (p = 0.05).

RESULTS

Eleven air- and 39 ground-transported patients were eligible. All patient acuity data were similar between groups. Air patients were more likely to be intubated (100% versus 71.8%, p = .04) and had shorter mean ED stabilization times (29 versus 40 minutes, p = .02) than the ground.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that advanced patient stabilization offered by air medical transport may result in reduced ED stabilization time for patients requiring urgent craniotomy.

Predictors of intracranial injury in patients with mild head trauma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of abnormal computed tomography (CT) scans and define high-risk clinical variables in patients with mild head injury.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 13 or greater who presented to the emergency department with blunt head trauma and who underwent cranial CT.

SETTING

Level I trauma center, university ED.

RESULTS

During the 15-month study period, 1,448 patients underwent CT scanning for mild head injury. Abnormalities resulting from the trauma were found in 119 (8.2%), and 11 patients (.76%) required neurosurgical intervention. Patients with higher GCS scores had a greater chance of having a solitary CT abnormality (P = .004). Bicyclists and pedestrians struck by cars were more likely than others to sustain intracranial injury. High-risk clinical variables included the presence of cranial soft-tissue injury, a focal neurologic deficit, signs of basilar skull fracture and age older than 60 years. A strategy using those variables had a sensitivity of 91.6% and a specificity of 46.2% for detecting a CT abnormality. None of the patients missed by this strategy required medical or neurosurgical management for the CT finding.

CONCLUSION

Abnormalities on CT scans in patients with mild head trauma are fairly common, although the need for neurosurgical intervention is rare. Clinical decision rules can be used to identify those patients with more serious intracranial pathology. Such strategies should be validated prospectively in various ED settings.