Patients'satisfaction and experience in treatment with opioid substitution therapy in Spain. The PREDEPO study

The aim of this study was to compare patients' satisfaction, experience, objectives, and opinion based on their current opioid substitution therapy (OST) (buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) or methadone). The PREDEPO study is an observational, cross-sectional, multicentric study performed in Spain. Adult patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving OST were included. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire regarding their current OST. A total of 98 patients were enrolled (B/N: 50%, methadone: 50%). Mean age was 47 ± 8 years old and 80% were male. Treatment satisfaction was similar between groups. The most frequently reported factor for being "very/quite satisfied" was "being able to distribute the dose at different times throughout the day" (44% B/N vs. 63% methadone; p = .122). A significantly lower proportion of patients in the B/N group versus the methadone group reported that having to collect the medication daily was "very/quite annoying" (19% vs. 52%, p = .032). Treatment objectives reported by the majority of patients were similar between groups ("not feeling in withdrawal anymore", "reduce/definitely stop drug use", "improve my health", and "stop thinking about using daily") except for "not having money problems anymore" (73% B/N vs. 92% methadone; p = .012).  These results suggest there are several unmet expectations regarding current OST. There is a need for new treatments that reduce the burden of OUD, avoid the need for daily dosing, and are less stigmatizing which in turn could improve patient management, adherence and, quality of life.

Perception of a New Prolonged-Release Buprenorphine Formulation in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder: The PREDEPO Study

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess the acceptance of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) to switching their opioid dependence treatment (ODT) for a prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB) injection according to their prior ODT (buprenorphine/naloxone [B/N] or methadone).

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective/cross-sectional, multicentre study of adult patients diagnosed with OUD on ODT. Data collected from diaries were analysed to know their interest and opinion on PRB. Questions with fixed response options were included, and several Likert scales were used.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were enrolled (B/N: 50.0%, methadone: 50.0%). The mean age was 46.9 ± 8.43 years and 79.6% were males. PRB was similarly perceived by both groups in most variables analysed, receiving a mean score of 7.2/10 (B/N: 7.4, methadone: 7.0; p = 0.520), and approximately 65% of patients said they were willing to switch to PRB (B/N: 63.3%, methadone: 65.3%; p = 0.833). Of these, a higher percentage in the B/N group considered that switching would be easy/very easy (B/N: 90.3%, methadone: 46.9%; p < 0.001) and that they would start PRB when available (B/N: 64.5%, methadone: 34.3%; p = 0.005). More than 90% would prefer the monthly injection (B/N: 93.6%, methadone: 100%; p = 0.514). One-third of patients in both groups were unsure/would not switch their ODT to PRB (B/N: 36.7%, methadone: 34.7%; p = 0.833). The main reason was administration by injection.

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of patients would switch their treatment for PRB, and most patients on B/N considered that switching would be easy. PRB could be a suitable alternative for OUD management.

Complications Associated With Liver Transplantation in Recipients With Body Mass Index >35 kg/m(2): Would It Be a Poor Prognosis Predictive Factor?

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a global epidemic that continues to increase in a great number of countries, and it has become a major public health problem in Spain. Unfortunately, the impact of obesity on survival in liver transplantation (LT) recipients is underestimated and controversial. The aim of this study was to determine if obesity is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality after LT.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of the records of 180 consecutive patients who had undergone to LT from 2007 to 2013, 11 obese patients with body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m(2) were identified. Their data have been compared with recipients with BMI 20-25 kg/m(2).

RESULTS

There were no differences in demographic data, Child-Pugh score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, or cause of liver failure. BMI >35 kg/m(2) recipients had a significantly higher rate of portal vein thrombosis before LT, compared with the BMI 20-25 kg/m(2) group (36.5% vs 13.9%; P = .041). There were also no differences in development of post-reperfusion syndrome. The groups were also comparable concerning morbidity rate after LT, stay in the intensive care unit, and global hospital stay. However, the mortality rate was significantly higher in the obese group compared with the nonobese group (72.7% vs 38.9%; P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study clearly demonstrate higher mortality rates in obese patients undergoing LT; thus, it is fair to consider obesity as a poor prognosis predictive factor concerning mortality rate.