Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: treatment of new onset epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide-reviewed in the order in which these agents received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration) in the treatment of children and adults with newly diagnosed partial and generalized epilepsies.

METHODS

A 23-member committee, including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy, evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until September 2002, with selected manual searches up until 2003.

RESULTS

There is evidence either from comparative or dose-controlled trials that gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine have efficacy as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adolescents and adults with either partial or mixed seizure disorders. There is also evidence that lamotrigine is effective for newly diagnosed absence seizures in children. Evidence for effectiveness of the new AEDs in newly diagnosed patients with other generalized epilepsy syndromes is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: Treatment of refractory epilepsy: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide) in the treatment of children and adults with refractory partial and generalized epilepsies.

METHODS

A 23-member committee including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until March 2003.

RESULTS

All of the new AEDs were found to be appropriate for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults. Gabapentin can be effective for the treatment of mixed seizure disorders, and gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate for the treatment of refractory partial seizures in children. Limited evidence suggests that lamotrigine and topiramate are also effective for adjunctive treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults and children, as well as treatment of the Lennox Gastaut syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of AED depends upon seizure and/or syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with refractory epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Topiramate and phenytoin pharmacokinetics during repetitive monotherapy and combination therapy to epileptic patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate (TPM) and phenytoin (PHT) in patients with epilepsy by studying their pharmacokinetics (PK) after monotherapy and concomitant TPM/PHT treatment.

METHODS

Twelve patients with epilepsy stabilized on PHT monotherapy were enrolled in this study, with 10 and seven patients completing the phases with 400 and 800 mg TPM daily doses, respectively. TPM was added at escalating doses, and after stabilization at the highest tolerated TPM dose, PHT doses were tapered. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis during the monotherapy phase or the lowest PHT dose after taper and the concomitant TPM/PHT phase. Potential metabolic interaction between PHT and TPM also was studied in vitro in human liver microsomal preparations.

RESULTS

In nine of the 12 patients, PHT plasma concentrations remained stable, with a mean (+/-SD) area under the curve (AUC) ratio (combination therapy/monotherapy) of 1.13 +/- 0.17 (range, 0.89-1.23). Three patients had AUC ratios of 1.25, 1.39, and 1.55, respectively, and with the addition of TPM (800, 400, and 400 mg daily, respectively), their peak PHT plasma concentrations increased from 15 to 21 mg/L, 28 to 36 mg/L, and 27 to 41 mg/L, respectively. Human liver microsomal studies with S-mephenytoin showed that TPM partially inhibited CYP2C19 at very high concentrations of 300 microM (11% inhibition) and 900 microM (29% inhibition). Such high plasma concentrations would correspond to doses in humans that are 5 to 15 times higher than the recommended dose (200-400 mg). TPM clearance was approximately twofold higher during concomitant TPM/PHT therapy

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that the addition of TPM to PHT generally does not cause clinically significant PK interaction. PHT induces the metabolism of TPM, causing increased TPM clearance, which may require TPM dose adjustments when PHT therapy is added or is discontinued. TPM may affect PHT concentrations in a few patients because of inhibition by TPM of the CYP2C19-mediated minor metabolic pathway of PHT.

Rapid initiation of gabapentin: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the tolerability of two different dose-initiation regimens of gabapentin for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures.

BACKGROUND

Patient compliance is a key feature of successful outpatient pharmacologic therapy for epilepsy, and one aspect of compliance is simplicity of initiation. By using a rapid titration rate, leading to a rapid therapeutic gabapentin dose, perhaps there could be an improvement with compliance.

METHODS

Male or female patients, at least 12 years old, with a recent history of partial seizures with or without secondary generalization, were randomized to receive gabapentin (following a blinded placebo period of an undisclosed number of days) as either a Slow initiation (300 mg day 1, 600 mg day 2, then 900 mg/day) or a Rapid initiation (900 mg/day immediately following the placebo lead-in).

RESULTS

Starting gabapentin therapy at an initial therapeutic dosage of 900 mg/day is well tolerated by patients with epilepsy and is as safe as initiating with a titration schedule over 3 days. Of the four most common adverse events (somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, fatigue), only one, dizziness, occurred more often in the nontitrated (Rapid initiation) group than in the titrated (Slow initiation) group.

CONCLUSION

Initiation of gabapentin at 900 mg/day is as well tolerated as is a 3-day titration, except for a higher incidence of dizziness.

Oxcarbazepine monotherapy for partial-onset seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) 2,400 mg/day versus OXC 300 mg/day monotherapy in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy.

BACKGROUND

OXC is primarily metabolized by reductase enzymes and, consequently, has a low propensity to inhibit or induce oxidative enzymes and a minimal potential for drug-drug interactions. The efficacy of OXC as monotherapy was shown in several comparative trials in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and in hospitalized patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial design was chosen to assess the antiepileptic efficacy of OXC as monotherapy in a refractory epilepsy patient population. Outpatients aged 12 years or older with inadequately controlled partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalized seizures, were enrolled. Patients finished the trial by completing the double-blind phase or by meeting one of four predefined exit criteria: a twofold increase in partial seizure frequency in any 28-day period relative to baseline; a twofold increase in the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency relative to baseline; occurrence of a single generalized seizure if none occurred during the 6 months prior to randomization; or prolongation or worsening of generalized seizure duration or frequency requiring intervention. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests were evaluated.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for the OXC 2400 mg/day group (14/34; 41%) than the OXC 300 mg/day group (42/45; 93%). In addition, there was a significant difference in time to exit in favor of the OXC 2400 mg/day group (p = 0.0001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 12% of patients in the OXC 2400 mg/day group were seizure-free compared with none in the 300 mg/day group. OXC was well-tolerated, with dizziness, fatigue, somnolence, and nausea being the most frequent AEs. Most of these AEs were transient and rated as mild to moderate in intensity.

CONCLUSION

OXC is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with partial epilepsy previously receiving treatment with other antiepileptic drugs. The results of this trial are consistent with previous monotherapy trials with OXC.

Topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: open-label treatment of patients completing a randomized controlled trial. Topiramate YL Study Group

PURPOSE

The response to topiramate (TPM) as long-term adjunctive therapy was evaluated in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in a long-term, open-label extension to a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

In 97 patients with LGS (mean age, 11 years), dosages of TPM and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were adjusted to optimal clinical response (mean TPM dosage, 10 mg/kg/day).

RESULTS

For those patients who had completed 6 months of TPM therapy, drop attacks were reduced > or =50% in 55% of patients; 15% of patients had no drop attacks for > or =6 months at the last visit. After treatment up to 3+ years, 71% of patients who started open-label TPM were continuing therapy at the last visit.

CONCLUSIONS

During long-term therapy, TPM is effective and well tolerated in controlling the treatment-resistant drop attacks and seizures associated with LGS.

A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Topiramate YL Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND

Conventional antiepileptic drugs are frequently ineffective against multiple-seizure types of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients >1 year to <30 years of age, with slow spike-and-wave patterns on EEG, seizure types including drop attacks, and either a history of or active atypical absence seizures, were assigned to an 11-week, double-blind treatment phase with either topiramate or placebo. Topiramate was titrated to target doses of approximately 6 mg/kg/d.

RESULTS

For drop attacks, the most severe seizures associated with this syndrome, the median percentage reduction from baseline in average monthly seizure rate was 14.8% for the topiramate group and -5.1% (an increase) for the placebo group (p = 0.041). Topiramate-treated patients demonstrated greater improvement in seizure severity than did placebo-treated patients based on parental global evaluations (p = 0.037). The percentage of patients with a > or = 50% reduction from baseline in major seizures (drop attacks and tonic-clonic seizures) was greater in the topiramate group (15/46 or 33%) than in the control group (4/50 or 8%; p = 0.002). The most common adverse events in both groups were CNS related; there were no discontinuations from topiramate therapy due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Topiramate adjunctive therapy was effective in reducing the number of drop attacks and major motor seizures and in improving seizure severity as determined by parental global evaluation.

Topiramate efficacy in infancy

Topiramate is a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide that has demonstrated efficacy as an antiepileptic drug in adults with partial onset seizures. Experience in children has been limited, but early reports have supported its safety and effectiveness in children as young as 2 years of age. In two infants ages 12 and 9 months, respectively, with partial seizures, the authors report excellent efficacy with good tolerability at doses up to 7.7 mg/kg. Although long-term safety and possible adverse sequelae have not been fully established in children, topiramate may represent an option for infants with high seizure frequency unresponsive to standard antiepileptic drugs.

Topiramate. Clinical profile in epilepsy

Topiramate, a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide, is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults. Topiramate is rapidly absorbed, has linear pharmacokinetics, minimal protein binding and a long half-life facilitating a twice-daily dosage regimen. Topiramate has little effect on the plasma concentrations of other AEDs with the exception of phenytoin, concentrations of which may increase in some patients when topiramate is added to the therapy. Topiramate metabolism is increased when administered with carbamazepine or phenytoin. In the absence of enzyme-inducing AEDs, topiramate is eliminated primarily by renal excretion, with 50 to 80% of a dose excreted as unchanged topiramate. In 6 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, topiramate was shown to be well tolerated and effective as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults. Topiramate consistently reduced seizures across all patient groups defined by age, gender and baseline seizure frequency. Adverse effects were generally mild-to-moderate CNS-related effects and often resolved spontaneously or with slowing of topiramate titration and/or reduction of the dosage of concomitant AEDs. Clinical studies are currently evaluating the effectiveness and safety of topiramate as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in children with partial seizures, in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and in patients with generalised tonic-clonic seizures of non-focal onset. Preliminary findings suggest that topiramate has a broad spectrum of clinical use.

Evaluation of the potential interaction between felbamate and erythromycin in patients with epilepsy

Effects of erythromycin on hepatic CYP450 3A4 isozymes can profoundly influence the metabolism of many therapeutic agents. An open-label, randomized, two-period, crossover study was therefore conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of felbamate before and after a concurrent 10-day regimen (333 mg three times daily) of erythromycin. Patients were receiving either 3,000 or 3,600 mg/day felbamate monotherapy for treatment of epilepsy. Mean dose-normalized values for maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC tau) of felbamate were not statistically different in patients taking felbamate as monotherapy than in patients after erythromycin coadministration. Estimates of time to Cmax (tmax), minimum concentration (Cmin), apparent clearance (Cl/kg), average concentration (Cav), and degree of fluctuation (DFss) were likewise unchanged. The incidence of mild and moderate adverse events increased during coadministration of the two drugs. Because patients with epilepsy can not be treated with erythromycin alone, it could not be determined whether the adverse events were attributable to erythromycin or to the combination of the two drugs. Steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of felbamate were not influenced by erythromycin coadministration.

Tiagabine therapy for complex partial seizures. A dose-frequency study. The Tiagabine Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 regimens of tiagabine as add-on therapy for patients with complex partial seizures (CPSs) that are refractory to other treatment.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on, parallel-group trial with an 8-week baseline period, 12-week experimental period (4 weeks of dose titration and 8 weeks of fixed-dose therapy), and 4-week termination period.

SETTING

Twenty-six centers throughout the United States.

PATIENTS

Three hundred fifty-one patients were enrolled, 318 were entered in the double-blind period, and 271 completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Tiagabine, 16 mg 2 times per day (106 patients); tiagabine, 8 mg 4 times daily (105 patients); and placebo (107 patients). The doses of tiagabine were titrated in 3 steps to the fixed dose.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The median change in the 4-week rate of CPSs from baseline to experimental period.

RESULTS

The median change from baseline was -1.6 CPSs per 4 weeks in the group of patients who were given tiagabine 2 times per day, and it was -1.2 CPSs in the group of patients who were given tiagabine 4 time per day (P = .06 and P = .02, respectively, compared with placebo). The 4-week seizure frequency was reduced by 50% or more in 31% of the patients who were given tiagabine 2 times per day and in 27% of the patients who were given tiagabine 4 times per day vs 10% of the placebo-treated patients (P < or = .001 for each tiagabine-treated group compared with the placebo group). The most frequent adverse events involved the central nervous system and occurred in comparable proportions in the 3 treatment groups. Similar proportions of patients discontinued the study prematurely for adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Tiagabine administered 2 and 4 times daily as add-on pharmacotherapy was effective in reducing CPSs in patients with epilepsy whose conditions were refractory to treatment with other antiepileptic agents, and it was well tolerated.

Topiramate monotherapy for partial onset seizures

PURPOSE

Evaluation of topiramate (TPM) as monotherapy in patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients were evaluated in a double-blind, parallel-group trial. During a 56-day baseline period, patients had at least eight partial onset seizures while being treated with one or two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). After 1-2 weeks of open-label treatment with TPM 100 mg/day, patients were randomly assigned, in equal proportions, to receive double-blind therapy with TPM 100 or 1,000 mg/day in a 5-week conversion and an 11-week monotherapy period. The study endpoint was completion of 112 study days (success) or fulfillment of one or more exit criteria: doubling of average 28-day or highest 2-day baseline seizure rate, a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) if none had occurred at baseline, or significant prolongation of generalized seizure duration.

RESULTS

Time until exit was longer (p = 0.002) and success frequency was higher (p = 0.005) with TPM 1,000 as compared with 100 mg/day. Seizure-rate reductions of > or = 50, > or = 75, or 100% were achieved by 46, 25, and 13% of the 1,000-mg/day group, respectively, as compared with 13, 8, and 0% of the 100-mg/day group, respectively. Most adverse events (AE) were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with TPM 1,000 mg/day for partial onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures was effective, with a favorable safety profile.

Long-term experience with topiramate as adjunctive therapy and as monotherapy in patients with partial onset seizures: retrospective survey of open-label treatment

Because initial studies of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are add-on trials in refractory patient populations, their effectiveness as monotherapy is usually not apparent until relatively later in their development programs. The novel AED topiramate (TPM) has been found efficacious as adjunctive therapy in controlled, randomized trials in adults with partial onset seizures. We report a retrospective analysis of TPM as AED monotherapy in 214 patients from five centers who received TPM in investigational trials. Of this total, 136 (64%) were still receiving TPM at the time of the analysis, with a mean treatment duration of 2.5 years. One-third of the patients have been successfully converted to TPM monotherapy, and 62% of those converted have been seizure-free for at least 3 months. The results of this analysis suggest that TPM may prove to be a valuable new AED for both monotherapy and add-on therapy in partial onset epilepsy.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of topiramate and carbamazepine in patients with epilepsy during monotherapy and concomitant therapy

PURPOSE

We studied the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of topiramate (TPM) as a function of dose and the effects of comedication with carbamazepine (CBZ).

METHODS

We enrolled 12 patients with partial epilepsy receiving chronic stable doses of CBZ 300-800 mg every 8 h. In a 6-week period, TPM was added and doses were increased at approximately 2-week intervals from 100 to 200 to 400 mg every 12 h and stabilized at the highest tolerated dose to as high as 400 mg every 12 h. CBZ was tapered in the next 4 weeks when possible, and TPM was maintained as monotherapy at the highest stabilized dose for 2 more weeks. Plasma and urine samples were collected before TPM dosing, after each TPM dose increase, and during TPM monotherapy.

RESULTS

Dose-normalized results (n = 10) for TPM area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), Cmin(0), and Cavg indicated that TPM exhibits linear plasma pharmacokinetics over the dose range of 100- to 400-mg every 12 h when administered with CBZ. Mean TPM AUC(0-12), Cmax, Cmin(0), and Cavg values were approximately 40% lower during CBZ treatment as compared with those during TPM monotherapy (n = 3). TPM oral and nonrenal clearance rates were approximately two- to threefold higher, whereas TPM renal clearance was unchanged during concomitant CBZ treatment (n = 3). There were no significant changes in total and unbound CBZ and CBZ-epoxide (CBZ-E) pharmacokinetics during TPM administration (n = 10). TPM pharmacokinetics during concomitant CBZ treatment were significantly different from those during TPM monotherapy, suggesting that metabolic clearance of TPM increases when CBZ is coadministered.

CONCLUSIONS

When CBZ is reduced or discontinued, TPM doses may need to be lowered to maintain equivalent plasma concentrations. Adjusting the CBZ dose for pharmacokinetic reasons when TPM is administered as adjunctive treatment does not appear to be necessary.

Follow-up study of risk factors in progressive supranuclear palsy

The cause of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is not known and has been little studied. The one previous controlled epidemiologic survey, performed at our center in 1986, found small-town experience and greater educational attainment as PSP risks, but, in retrospect, these results may have been produced by ascertainment bias. Since that time, several anecdotal reports have implicated heredity and various environmental exposures in the cause of some cases of PSP. To clarify the results of the previous study and to evaluate the more recently implicated candidate factors in a controlled fashion, we mailed a validated 69-item questionnaire to 91 personally examined patients with PSP and 104 unmatched controls with other neurologic conditions for which they had been referred to our tertiary neurologic center. We were able to match 75 subjects from each group by year of birth, sex, and race and subjected them to a separate matched-pair analysis. We allowed surrogates to supply any or all of the responses. Questions concerned hydrocarbon, pesticide, and herbicide exposure; urban/rural living; auto repair and other occupations; head trauma; educational attainment; maternal age; and family history of PSP, parkinsonism, dementia, and other neurologic conditions. A statistically significant finding was that patients with PSP were less likely to have completed at least 12 years of school (matched odds ratio = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.12-0.95, p = 0.022; unmatched odds ratio = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.21-0.89, p = 0.020). We hypothesize that this result may be a proxy for poor early-life nutrition or for occupational or residential exposure to an as-yet unsuspected toxin. Future studies should examine these potential risk factors in PSP.

Felbamate monotherapy for partial-onset seizures: an active-control trial

We evaluated felbamate (FBM) monotherapy in 111 patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial. During the 56-day baseline period, patients had at least eight partial-onset seizures and received one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) at a therapeutic level; a second AED was allowed if at a subtherapeutic level. Patients received either FBM 3,600 mg/d or valproate (VPA) 15 mg/kg/d. The baseline AED at therapeutic levels was discontinued by one-third decrements on study days 1, 14, and 28 and the sub-therapeutic AED, if any, was discontinued completely on study day 1. Study endpoints were completion of 112 study days or fulfilling one or more escape criteria. Criteria for escape relative to baseline were (1) twofold increase in monthly seizure frequency, (2) twofold increase in highest 2-day seizure frequency, (3) single generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTC) if none occurred during baseline, or (4) significant prolongation of GTCs. The primary efficacy variable was the number of patients in each treatment group who met escape criteria. Thirty-seven patients on VPA and 18 on FBM met escape criteria (p < 0.001). Even when we considered FBM dropouts to have fulfilled escape criteria and VPA dropouts to have completed the 112-day trial, the treatment difference remained statistically significant (p = 0.039) in favor of FBM. Adverse experiences with FBM were all mild or moderate in severity. The frequency of adverse experiences was much lower during monotherapy. FBM monotherapy was effective in the treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures and demonstrated a favorable safety profile.