L'enseignement de la chirurgie influence-t-il les résultats des cures de hernies de l'aine ?

AIMS

To evaluate influence of surgical experience on inguinal hernia repair.

PATIENTS

From 1997 to 2003, 380 patients (mean age 55 years old) with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were treated by Lichtenstein technique.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, surgeons were classified in three groups: group 1: hernia repair was performed by an experimented surgeon (consultant or senior registrar) and a young surgical trainee (resident) (161 cases); group 2: surgery was performed by a junior surgeon (resident) under the control of an experimented surgeon (135 cases) and in the group 3 (84 cases), Lichtenstein technique was performed by two residents, alone, supervised by an experimented surgeon, in the operative room. Evaluation criterion were operative time, hospital stay, morbidity, time to return to normal and professional activities, recurrences and chronic pain with a follow up of, at least, 2 years.

RESULTS

The three groups were comparable in term of socio economic data, hernia and follow up. The only significant (P=0.01) difference concern operative time which increased from 20% for group 2 and 3 (residents) compared to the group 1. There was also no difference between junior and senior resident.

CONCLUSION

Lichtenstein hernia repair should be performed by young surgeon in training alone in condition of precise teaching organization and experimented surgeon supervision. For patient, in this condition, there is no trouble in term of surgical results.

[The effect of the learning curve and the experience on the technique and the outcome of laparoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux]

The laparoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by partial (PF) or total (TF) fundoplication is the current surgical treatment of choice after failure of appropriate medical treatment. The overall results with fundoplication include the initial learning period during which the rate of complications, and failures are assumed to be greater. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic treatment for GR in 3 groups of consecutive patients in order to determine the effect of the learning period and the experience on the technique and the outcome. One hundred and fifty patients (84 men and 66 women) with an average age of 52.2 years (18 to 78) were included. Surgery was indicated for failure or early relapse following the end of medical treatment. The preoperative work-up (endoscopy, barium meal or oesophageal pH monitoring) was governed by the clinical picture. The choice between TF and PF was based on the results of pH monitoring. Three groups of 50 patients around were chronologically defined. The parameters that were examined were: the operative technique; the conversion rate; the mortality and morbidity rate; the duration of surgery and hospitalization and the results at short and medium term follow-up. The three groups were comparable with respect to patient characteristics and the nature of their GERD. All patients had an endoscopy, 91% a barium meal, 77.5% underwent esophageal manometry and 67% pH monitoring. One hundred and thirty two patients had a TF and 18 had a PF. Rosetti's type TF became the reference procedure (80.3% in group III) and closure of the diaphragmatic crura was performed systematically in group III (100%). The duration of surgery was significantly reduced between group I and the two other groups (138, 100, 80 mn.). The rate of conversion, due to a variety of causes, decreased from 10.2% to 4% and then 0%. The average duration of hospitalization decreased from 5.8 to 4.2 days (p = 0.01). There was no mortality and the morbidity rate decreased from 14.3% to 4% and then 0%. There was 7 cases of relapse (4.6%), 5 in group 1 (10.2%) and 2 in group II (4%), with no cases in group III although the follow-up is shorter. There is an effect of the learning curve on the outcome of treatment for GR and this must be taken into account in the training of surgeons (training within experienced departments and "guidance" during their initial interventions) and also in publications in order to allow a more accurate comparison of the different treatments for GERD.

The effect of the learning curve on the outcome of laparoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux

The laparoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux (GR) by partial (PF) or total (TF) fundoplication is the current surgical treatment of choice after failure of appropriate medical treatment. The overall results with fundoplication include the initial learning period, during which the rate of complications, conversions, and duration of surgery and hospitalization are assumed to be greater. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic treatment for GR in three groups of consecutive patients to determine the effect of the learning period on outcome. One hundred and fifty-six patients (88 men and 68 women) with an average age of 52.3 years (range, 18-78) were included. Surgery was indicated for failure or early relapse after the end of medical treatment or a symptomatic sliding hernia. The preoperative workup (endoscopy, barium meal, or esophageal pH monitoring) was governed by the clinical picture. The choice between TF and PF was based on the results of pH monitoring. Three groups of patients were chronologically defined. The parameters that were examined were the type of preoperative exploration, the type of fundoplication, the operative technique, the conversion rate, the mortality and morbidity rates, the duration of surgery and hospitalization, and the results at short- and medium-term follow-up. The three groups were comparable with respect to patient characteristics and the nature of their GR. All patients had an endoscopy, 91% had a barium meal, 77.5% underwent esophageal manometry, and 67% had pH monitoring. One hundred and thirty-six patients had a TF and 20 had a PF. Rossetti type TF became the reference procedure (67% in group III) and closure of the diaphragmatic crura was performed systematically in group III (100%). The duration of surgery was significantly reduced between groups I and groups II and III (140, 100, 80 minutes, respectively). The rate of conversion, due to a variety of causes, decreased from 9.8% to 3.8%, and then to 0%. The average duration of hospitalization decreased from 5.8 to 4.2 days (p = 0.01). There was no mortality and the morbidity rate decreased from 15% to 3.8%, and then to 0%. There were seven cases of relapse (4.6%), five in group I (10%) and two in group II (4%), with no cases in group III, although the follow-up in group III was shorter. There is an effect of the learning curve on the outcome of treatment for GR, and this must be taken into account in the training of surgeons (training within experienced departments and guidance during their initial interventions) and also in publications to allow a more accurate comparison of this technique with other treatments for GR.