Small for gestational age-cognitive performance from infancy to adulthood: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cognitive performance from infancy to adulthood is affected by being born small for gestational age (SGA), and if this depends on the SGA reference used. Furthermore, to determine SGA's effect while considering the effects of very preterm/very low birthweight (VP/VLBW), socio-economic status (SES) and parent-infant relationship.

DESIGN, SETTING AND POPULATION

A total of 414 participants (197 term-born, 217 VP/VLBW) of the Bavarian Longitudinal Study.

METHODS

Small for gestational age was classified using neonatal or fetal growth references. SES and the parent-infant relationship were assessed before the infant was 5 months old.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Developmental (DQ) and intelligence (IQ) tests assessed cognitive performance on six occasions, from 5 months to 26 years of age.

RESULTS

The fetal reference classified more infants as SGA (<10th centile) than the neonatal reference (n = 138, 33% versus n = 75, 18%). Using linear mixed models, SGA was associated with IQ -8 points lower than appropriate for gestational age, regardless of reference used (95% CI -13.66 to -0.64 and 95% CI -13.75 to -1.98). This difference narrowed minimally into adulthood. Being VP/VLBW was associated with IQ -16 (95% CI -21.01 to -10.04) points lower than term-born participants. Low SES was associated with IQ -14 (95% CI -18.55 to -9.06) points lower than high SES. A poor parent-infant relationship was associated with IQ -10 points lower than those with a good relationship (95% CI -13.91 to -6.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Small for gestational age is associated with lower IQ throughout development, independent of VP/VLBW birth, low SES or poor parent-child relationship. Social factors effects on IQ comparable to those of SGA and should be considered for interventions.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Small for gestational age is associated with lower cognitive performance from infancy to adulthood.

Transgressive women don't deserve protection: young men's narratives of sexual violence against women in rural Papua New Guinea

Sexual violence against women and girls is commonplace in Papua New Guinea (PNG). While the experiences of women are rightly given central place in institutional responses to sexual violence, the men who perpetrate violence are often overlooked, an oversight that undermines the effectiveness of prevention efforts. This paper draws on interviews conducted with young men as part of a qualitative longitudinal study of masculinity and male sexuality in a rural highland area of PNG. It explores one aspect of male sexuality: men's narratives of sexual violence. Most striking from the data is that the collective enactment of sexual violence against women and girls is reported as an everyday and accepted practice amongst young men. However, not all women and girls were described as equally at risk, with those who transgress gender roles and roles inscribed and reinforced by patriarchal structures, at greater risk. To address this situation, efforts to reduce sexual violence against women and girls require an increased focus on male-centred intervention to critically engage with the forms of patriarchal authority that give license to sexual violence. Understanding the perceptions and experiences of men as perpetrators of sexual violence is a critical first step in the process of changing normative perceptions of gender, a task crucial to reducing sexual violence in countries such as PNG.