Prognostic impact of acute kidney injury following tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Background

A considerable risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) following transcatheter interventions without iodinated contrast agents has also been recognized; however, little is known about the incidence and clinical relevance of post-procedural AKI in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact and predictors of post-procedural AKI following TEER for TR.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 218 consecutive patients who underwent TEER for TR. Post-procedural AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours or of ≥50% within seven days after the procedure, compared to baseline. Procedural success was defined as at least one grade reduction in TR severity upon discharge. We determined the association between post-procedural AKI and the composite outcome consisting of all-cause mortality and re-hospitalization due to heart failure within one year after the procedure.

Results

Overall, the mean age of the patients was 79±7 years, and 46.3% of the patients were male. Post-procedural AKI occurred in 32 patients (14.7%) (Figure 1). Among baseline characteristics, male sex and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/m2 were associated with the occurrence of AKI. In addition, patients without procedural success had a higher incidence of post-procedural AKI (30.4% vs. 1.8%; p=0.024).

Patients with AKI had a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality compared to those without AKI (12.5% vs. 1.1%; p=0.005). Moreover, AKI was associated with the incidence of the composite outcome within one year after TEER for TR (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.11–3.84; p=0.023). In addition, our restricted cubic spline curve showed that a post-procedural increase in the creatinine level within seven days after the procedure was associated with a linear trend of the risk of the composite outcome after TEER (Figure 2).

Conclusions

Post-procedural AKI occurred in 14.7% of patients undergoing TEER for TR, despite the absence of iodinated contrast agents, which was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Male sex and CKD at baseline were related to the occurrence of AKI, and the procedural success of TEER was associated with a lower incidence of AKI. Our findings highlight the clinical impact of AKI following TEER for TR and should help with identifying patients at high risk of AKI.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Right ventricular ejection fraction assessed by computed tomography in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention

Background

The role of right-ventricular (RV) function in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) is poorly understood. Although cardiac computed tomography (CCT) provides elaborate three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the entire anatomy of the RV and theoretically allows to assess the global RV systolic function. Nevertheless, the utility of the functional assessments of the RV using CCT remains unclear in patients undergoing TTVI.

Purpose

This study investigated the association of right-ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) assessed by CCT with clinical outcome in patients undergoing TTVI.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 3D-RVEF by using pre-procedural CCT images in patients undergoing TTVI with either edge-to-edge repair or annuloplasty device. RV dysfunction (RVD) was defined as a CT-RVEF <45%. The primary outcome was a composite outcome, consisting of all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure, within one year after TTVI.

Results

Of 157 patients, 58 (36.9%) presented with CT-RVEF <45%. Patients with CT-RVEF <45% were more likely to be male, to have a previous history of coronary artery disease, and had higher EuroSCORE II and a lower LVEF compared to those with CT-RVEF ≥45%, while the severity of TR was comparable between the groups.

Among the patients with CT-RVEF <45%, acute procedural success was achieved in 93.1%, and in-hospital mortality was 1.7%, which were comparable to those with CT-RVEF ≥45%.

Patients with CT-RVEF <45% had an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class at follow-up compared to baseline; however, CT-RVEF <45% was associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.52–6.88; p=0.002) (Figure 1). Furthermore, CT-RVEF had an additional value to stratify the risk of the composite outcome beyond two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) assessments (Figure 2).

In addition, patients with CT-RVEF <45% exhibited an attenuated association between a reduction in TR to <3+ and a lower incidence of the composite outcome after TTVI compared to those with CT-RVEF ≥45%.

Conclusions

TTVI is safe and feasible regardless of baseline RV function, while RVD, defined as 3D-RVEF <45%, is associated with a higher risk of the composite outcomes within one year after TTVI. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the prognostic benefits of TR reduction might be attenuated in patients with RVD. Given the additional prognostic value of CT-RVEF to the conventional echocardiographic assessments, the assessments of 3D-RVEF with CCT may refine the patient selection for TTVI.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Validation of expert criteria proposed by the “German Cardiac Society” for predicting procedural complexity in transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Background

Following up on the original EVEREST criteria and several years of procedural experience, the German Cardiac Society (GCS) proposed refined criteria indicating morphological complexity in transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) procedures which so far have not been validated.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis of transesophageal echocardiography images of consecutive patients undergoing TEER in two high-volume centres, complexity was classified according to GCS criteria as optimal (neither characteristics of “complex” nor “very complex', see Table 1), complex (any of the “complex” criteria but no “very complex” criteria) and very complex (any of the “very complex” criteria). Associations with the procedural outcome, reintervention, survival, and heart failure rehospitalization were tested.

Results

633 patients (mean age 79 years, range 50 to 96 years, 59% male) were included, with 35% having dominant primary and 65% having dominant secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). 19% of patients were classified as having optimal, 40% as complex, and 41% as very complex morphologies. Successful clip implantation and reduction in MR ≤2 at discharge were achieved in 100% and 97% in the optimal, in 96% and 88% in the complex, and in 95% and 88% in the very complex morphologies, respectively (p for difference 0.13 and 0.42). The rate of successful clip deployment was significantly lower and the rate of reintervention significantly higher in patients with a mitral valve orifice area ≤3 cm2, compared to patients with a mitral valve orifice area >3 cm2. Pathology extent of MR likely requiring >2 clips was significantly associated with a lower rate of MR reduction to grade ≤2. Midterm (median follow-up time 640 days) mortality or hospitalization due to heart failure was significantly higher in patients with a posterior mitral leaflet length of 7–10 mm.

Conclusion

In the setting of experienced heart valve centres only a few of the complexity criteria proposed by the GCS impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. Even in the case of complex or very complex mitral valve morphology, TEER can be performed effectively with reduction of MR to ≤2 in 88% of cases.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Impact of leaflet-to-annulus index on residual tricuspid regurgitation following transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repair

Introduction

Edge-to-edge transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) is a promising treatment option for tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and it is required to identify anatomical parameters to predict the procedural success of TTVR.

Purpose

In this study, we assessed leaflet-to-annulus index (LAI), a simple tool to evaluate the remodeling of tricuspid annulus in relation to the leaflets, and investigated the association of the LAI with residual TR after edge-to-edge TTVR.

Methods

Consecutive 140 patients with symptomatic TR who underwent edge-to-edge TTVR from June 2015 to July 2020 were enrolled. The LAI was calculated using preprocedural transesophageal echocardiography and was defined as follows: (anterior leaflet length + septal leaflet length)/anteroseptal tricuspid annulus diameter (Figure 1). Primary outcome was residual TR ≥3+ at discharge, and patients were allocated into two groups as follows: residual TR ≥3+ and <3+. Secondary outcome was the composite outcome, consisting of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, within one year after TTVR.

Results

Of the 140 patients, 43 patients had residual TR ≥3+ after TTVR. The patients with residual TR ≥3+ had lower LAI compared to those with residual TR <3+ (1.06±0.10 vs. 1.13±0.09; p=0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that LAI was associated with residual TR ≥3+ (odds ratio [by 0.1 increase]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.35–0.94; p=0.02), independently of baseline TR severity, location of TR jet, and coaptation gap size (Table 1). Patients with residual TR ≥3+ had a higher incidence of the composite outcome within one year after TTVR (34.9% vs. 18.6%; log-rank p=0.04) and residual TR ≥3+ was an independent predictor of the composite outcome within one year (hazard ratio: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.01–4.11; p=0.04).

Conclusion

Lower LAI is associated with residual TR ≥3+ after edge-to-edge TTVR, which itself was a significant predictor of the one-year composite outcome. Our findings suggest that LAI is a useful tool to identify patients to be successfully treated with edge-to-edge TTVR.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Table 1

Machine learning identifies clinical parameters to predict mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair

Background

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR) with MitraClip is an important treatment option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation. The lack of appropriate, validated and specific means to risk stratify TMVR patients complicates the evaluation of prognostic benefits of TMVR in clinical trials and practice.

Purpose

We aimed to develop an optimized risk stratification model for TMVR patients using machine learning (ML).

Methods

We included a total of 1009 TMVR patients from three large university hospitals, of which one (n=317) served as an external validation cohort. The primary endpoint was all-cause 1-year mortality, which was known in 95% of patients. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristics. In the derivation cohort, different ML algorithms, including random forest, logistic regression, support vectors machines, k nearest neighbors, multilayer perceptron, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were tested using 5-fold cross-validation in the derivation cohort. The final model (Transcatheter MITral Valve Repair MortALIty PredicTion SYstem; MITRALITY) was tested in the validation cohort with respect to existing clinical scores.

Results

XGBoost was selected as the final algorithm for the MITRALITY Score, using only six baseline clinical features for prediction (in order of predictive importance): blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), mean arterial pressure, body mass index, and creatinine. In the external validation cohort, the MITRALITY Score's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.783, outperforming existing scores which yielded AUCs of 0.721 and 0.657 at best. 1-year mortality in the MITRALITY Score quartiles across the total cohort was 0.8%, 1.3%, 10.5%, and 54.6%, respectively. Odds of mortality in MITRALITY Score quartile 4 as compared to quartile 1 were 143.02 [34.75; 588.57]. Survival analyses showed that the differences in outcomes between the MITRALITY Score quartiles remained even over a timeframe of 3 years post intervention (log rank: p<0.005). With each increase by 1% in the MITRALITY score, the respective proportional hazard ratio for 3-year survival was 1.06 [1.05, 1.07] (Cox regression, p<0.05).

Conclusion

The MITRALITY Score is a novel, internally and externally validated ML-based tool for risk stratification of patients prior to TMVR. These findings may potentially allow for more precise design of future clinical trials, may enable novel treatment strategies tailored to populations of specific risk and thereby serve future daily clinical practice.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Summary Figure

Association of the get with the guidelines heart failure risk score with mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Background

Reliable risk scores in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) are lacking. Heart failure is common in these patients, and risk scores derived from heart failure populations might help stratify TMVR patients.

Methods

Consecutive patients from three Heart Centers undergoing TMVR were enrolled to investigate the association of the “Get with the Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score” (comprising the variables systolic blood pressure, urea nitrogen, blood sodium, age, heart rate, race, history of COPD) with all-cause mortality.

Results

Among 815 patients with available data 177 patients died during a mean follow-up time of 419 days. Estimated one-year mortality by quartiles of the score (0–37; 38–42, 43–47 and more than 47 points) was 6%, 10%, 23% and 30%, respectively (p<0.001). Every increase of one score point was associated with a 9% increase in the hazard of mortality (95% CI 1.06–1.11%, p<0.001). The score was associated with long-term mortality independently of left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function and LogEuroscore, and was equally predictive in primary and secondary mitral regurgitation.

Conclusion

The “Get with the Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score” showed a strong association with mortality in patients undergoing TMVR with additive information beyond traditional risk factors. Given the routinely available variables included in this score, application is easy and broadly possible.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Prognostic impact and post-procedural development of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical impact and post-procedural development of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients undergoing the MitraClip procedure for severe mitral regurgitation.

Methods

In this present multicentre study, we included 940 patients undergoing MitraClip implantation for symptomatic mitral regurgitation from August 2010 to September 2018. Patients were categorized according to concomitant TR (none or mild vs moderate vs severe) and the prognostic impact of TR on 1-year mortality was evaluated. Moreover, in 377 patients, we assessed 3-months echocardiographic controls to further analyse the post-procedural development of TR.

Results

At baseline, concomitant TR was graded none/mild in 393 (42%), moderate in 316 (34%), and severe in 231 (25%) patients. During 1-year follow-up, 141 of 940 (15%) patients died. According to mild/none, moderate and severe TR, mortality rates were 13%, 12%, and 23%, respectively, revealing a higher prevalence of death in patients with severe TR (p=0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test confirmed inferior survival rates for patients with severe TR (p=0.001), while there were no significant difference in survival rates between patients with none/mild vs moderate TR (p=0.561). Regarding 1-year mortality, multivariate cox regression analysis, revealed an odds ratio of 1.739 (1.024–2.953; p=0.041), associated with severe TR. After 3-months follow-up, echocardiography in 377 patients showed following TR grade distributions: 44% none/mild, 37% moderate and 19% severe TR. In 100 patients (27%), TR improved by one or more grades, while 64 patients (17%) showed a TR worsening. In patients with severe TR at baseline, 42 of 91 (46%) patients showed a reduction in TR of one or more grades. Patients with severe TR at baseline, who showed a TR improvement during 3-months follow-up, had lower rates of 1-year mortality (p=0.025). For these patients, in regression analysis, right atrial area was revealed as only predictor of TR improvement after MitraClip procedure [odds ratio 0.958 (0.918–0.999); p=0.046].

Conclusion

One-fourth of patients undergoing MitraClip procedure for mitral regurgitation had concomitant severe tricuspid regurgitation which was predictive for worse prognosis. Post-procedural TR improvement of one or more grades was frequent in these patients and was associated with higher survival-rates.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

MIDA mortality risk score in patients undergoing percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral repair

Background

Recent studies indicate that careful patient selection is key for the percutaneous edge-to-edge repair via MitraClip procedure. The MIDA Score represents a useful tool for patient selection and is validated in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR).

Aim

We here assessed the potential benefit of the MIDA Score for patients with functional or degenerative MR undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair via the MitraClip procedure.

Methods

In the present study, we retrospectively included 520 patients from three Heart Centers undergoing MitraClip implantation for MR. All parameters of the MIDA Score were available in these patients, consisting of the 7 variables age, symptoms, atrial fibrillation, left atrial diameter, right ventricular systolic pressure, left-ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction. According to the median MIDA-Score of 9 points, patients were stratified in to a high and a low MIDA Score group and association with all-cause mortality was evaluated. Moreover, MR was assessed in echocardiographic controls in 370 patients at discharge, 279 patients at 3-months and 222 patients at 12 months after MitraClip implantation.

Results

During 2-years follow-up after MitraClip implantation, 69 of 291 (24%) patients with a high MIDA Score and 25 of 229 (11%) patients with a low MIDA Score died. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test showed inferior rates of death in patients with a low score (p<0.001) and multivariate cox regression revealed an odds ratio of 0.54 (0.31–0.95; p=0.032) regarding 2-year survival in this group. Moreover, one point increase in the MIDA Score was associated with a 1.18-fold increase in the risk for mortality (1.02–1.36; p=0.025). Comparing patients with a high MIDA Score and patients with a low score, post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR tended to be more frequent in patients with a high MIDA Score at discharge (53% vs 43%; p=0.061), 3-months (50% vs 40%; p=0.091) and significantly at 12-months follow-up (52% vs 37%; p=0.029).

Conclusion

The MIDA Mortality Risk Score remained its predictive ability in patients with degenerative or function MR undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. Moreover, a high MIDA score was associated with a higher frequency of post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR, indicating a lower effectiveness of this procedure in these patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

P908 The novel predictor for mortality in patients with functional mitral regurgitation: the modified MIDA-Score

EuroSCORE and STS-Score are used to assess surgical risk in patients with valvular heart diseases. The MIDA- Score has been recently published as a representative predictor for short- and long-term prognosis in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). The adequate assessment of long-term prognosis in patients with functional MR is scarce. We aim to adapt this classical score system for patients with FMR.

We retrospectively included 105 patients with FMR who underwent transcatheter mitral regurgitation therapy (TMVR) between January 2014 and August 2016 in our center. Due to the different underlying pathomechanisms of FMR, annular dilatation and impaired left ventricle function, and more elderly patient population we adapted some cut-off values to FMR patients (Age > 65 to Age > 75; LV-EF ≤ 60% to LV-EF ≤ 45%; sPAP≥50mmHg to sPAP≥45mmHg). Moreover, according to Cox proportional hazard analysis of our patient collective we re-calculated the weights of the risk factors: Age 2 points, Symptoms 1 point, atrial fibrillation 2 points, left atrial diameter 1 point, right ventricle systolic pressure 2 points, left ventricle end-systolic diameter 2 points, left ventricle ejection fraction 2 points. We defined three risk groups according to total points from the risk factors; Grade 1 (0-4 points): low risk, Grade 2 (5-9 points): moderate risk, Grade 3 (10-12 points): high risk.

We retrospectively included 105 patients (76.7 ± 8.8 years, 50,6% female) with symptomatic (functional NYHA class > II ) moderate-to-severe FMR (PISA: 0.7 ± 0.4cm, VC width: 0.8 ± 0.3cm, EROA: 0.22cm2, RegVol: 38.1 ± 19.2ml) at surgical high risk (EuroSCORE II: 5.4 ± 3.8%, STS-Score: 4.7 ± 2.8%). We found all-cause mortality 7% at one-year follow-up. 34.1% of our collective were hospitalized.

The classical MIDA Score was not significantly correlated with mortality and rehospitalization in patients with FMR at follow-up (p = 0.5); however, the modified MIDA score was found to be a strong predictor for mortality and rehospitalization in patients with FMR (AUC: 0.89). According to multivariate analysis, the modified MIDA score was found to be superior compared to the other conventional score systems (The modified MIDA-Score HR: 4.1, p = 0.021; EuroSCORE II; HR: 1.2, p = 0.004, STS-Score; HR: 1.7, p = 0.005).

We performed Cox proportional hazard analysis to assess the weighting factor of the predictors. As a result of this, we found age (HR: 2,95, p = 0.03) as the most reliable parameter to predict the combined outcome.

The 12,5% of grade 1, 27% grade 2, 57% grade 3 patients showed combined endpoint. According to regression analysis, the modified score >9 points found to be a strong predictor for high mortality and rehospitalization (OR: 3.35, p = 0.011).

We found the modified MIDA Score sufficient and extensive to assess outcomes in patients with FMR. The modified MIDA Score offers a sufficient promising tool to predict individual prognosis in patients with FMR.