High Dialysate Calcium Concentration is Associated with Worsening Left Ventricular Function

Dialysate calcium concentration (d[Ca]) might have a cardiovascular impact in patients on haemodialysis (HD) since a higher d[Ca] determines better hemodynamic tolerability. We have assessed the influence of d[Ca] on global longitudinal strain (GLS) by two-dimensional echocardiography using speckle-tracking imaging before and in the last hour of HD. This is an observational crossover study using d[Ca] 1.75 mmol/L and 1.25 mmol/L. Ultrafiltration was the same between interventions; patients aged 44 ± 13 years (N = 19). The 1.75 mmol/L d[Ca] was associated with lighter drop of blood pressure. Post HD serum total calcium was higher with d[Ca] 1.75 than with 1.25 mmol/L (11.5 ± 0.8 vs. 9.1 ± 0.5 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01). In almost all segments strain values were significantly worse in the peak HD with 1.75 mmol/L d[Ca] than with 1.25 mmol/L d[Ca]. GLS decreased from −19.8 ± 3.7% at baseline to −17.3 ± 2.9% and −16.1 ± 2.6% with 1.25 d[Ca] and 1.75 d[Ca] mmol/L, respectively (p < 0.05 for both d[Ca] vs. baseline and 1.25 d[Ca] vs. 1.75 d[Ca] mmol/L). Factors associated with a worse GLS included transferrin, C-reactive protein, weight lost, and post dialysis serum total calcium. We concluded that d[Ca] of 1.75 mmol/L was associated with higher post dialysis serum calcium, which contributed to a worse ventricular performance. Whether this finding would lead to myocardial stunning needs further investigation.

Dynamic tests of parathyroid hormone secretion using hemodialysis and calcium infusion cannot be compared

BACKGROUND

Extracellular Ca++ concentration [Ca++] and parathormone (PTH) are related by a sigmoidal function. The set point of the control system is the [Ca++] that produces a half-maximal inhibition of PTH secretion. Whether or not this set point is abnormal in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP) is controversial.

METHODS

We investigated whether the way [Ca++] is varied [hemodialysis (HD) or calcium gluconate/sodium citrate infusions (INF)] and the way the curve is constructed (four-parameter model or adapted four-parameter, created by Felsenfeld) could influence this set point. We performed dynamic tests of PTH secretion in 12 patients with CRF and SHP during either HD or INF. Both the four-parameter model or adapted four-parameter methods were used, creating four combinations: (a) hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia induced during HD, calculated by Brown's formula (HDB); (b) hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia induced during HD, calculated by Felsenfeld's formula (HDF); (c) hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia induced during infusion, calculated by Brown's formula (INFB); and (d) hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia induced during infusion, calculated by Felsenfeld's formula (INFF).

RESULTS

The set points obtained with HDB correlated perfectly with those obtained with HDF (R2 = 0.999). A similar relationship was found between INFB and INFF (R2 = 0.9997). In contrast, there was no correlation between either HDB and INFB (R2 = 0.0157) or HDF and INFF (R2 = 0.0204).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the calculated [Ca++] set point in patients with CRF and SHP is determined by the way [Ca++] is varied, rather than by the mathematical model used to generate the curves. Further studies are needed to determine the differing physiological mechanisms triggered by HD and INF and the way they influence [Ca++] homeostasis in this setting.