Abstract P5-22-12: Oncological safety of nipple-areola sparing mastectomy in comparison with skin sparing and total mastectomy: Results from a NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center

Nipple-areola sparing mastectomy (NSM) may be offered to some women with breast cancer as an alternative to skin sparing (SSM) or total mastectomy (TM) with excellent cosmetic results and acceptable recurrence risk. The aim of this study is to determine the local/regional recurrence rate of NSM in comparison to SSM and TM at our institution and to determine the factors that may be associated with risk of recurrence. Women who underwent NSM (n=148), SSM (n=660) or TM (n=443) at City of Hope National Medical Center between May 2007 and December 2014 for Stage 0-III breast cancer were identified retrospectively. Exclusions were: women with inflammatory breast cancer and those who had mastectomy for recurrent breast cancer. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Cox regression controlling for age, race/ethnicity, stage, histology, grade, hormone receptor and Her2 receptor status. There were total of 165 NSMs, 704 SSMs and 466 TMs performed for cancer, accounting for the patients with bilateral cancers. The median follow up time was 38, 58 and 55 months for NSM, SSM and TM, respectively. Median (range) age at diagnosis was 49 (23-74) for NSM, 51 (23-90) for SSM and 59 (26-92) for TM. In the NSM group, 76% of patients had invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and 15% had ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS); this was comparable to 73% and 13% in the SSM group and 78% and 9% in the TM group, respectively. The majority of patients who underwent NSM had Stage II disease (45%), which was similar to SSM (43%) and TM (44%). Only 3% of NSM patients had Stage III disease compared to 17% of SSM patients and 29% of TM patients. Most of the patients in all 3 surgical groups received adjuvant chemotherapy (NSM 59%; SSM 52%; TM 51%). Of patients who underwent NSM, 20% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared with 29% of SSM patients and 35% of TM patients. The local/regional recurrence rate per breast was 12/165 (7.3%) for NSM, 23/704 (3.3%) for SSM and 11/466 (2.4%) for TM (n=11). Median time to recurrence was 20, 26 and 16 months for NSM, SSM and TM, respectively. Of the NSMs performed only 1 recurrence occurred at the nipple-areolar complex (0.6%), 9 recurrences were at the chest wall (5.5%) and 2 were at the axilla (1.2%). Eight recurrences after NSM had DCIS in addition to IDC at the time of initial diagnosis while 2 had pure DCIS, 1 had pure IDC and 1 had invasive lobular cancer. There were 8 recurrences with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positivity at the time of initial diagnosis, that converted to ER+, PR-. One third of recurrences after NSM had multifocal disease. There was no significant difference found in adjusted overall survival (p=0.49) and adjusted disease free survival (p=0.10) among NSM, SSM and TM patients. Even though there is higher rate of local/regional recurrence with NSM, there is no difference in overall and disease-free survival at our institution. Presence of DCIS may be an important factor for recurrence. From these data we conclude that NSM is an oncologically acceptable alternative to SSM and TM, with excellent cosmetic results.

Citation Format: Bostanci Z, Wang X, Ottesen R, Nikowitz J, Jones VC, Springer L, Lai L, Taylor L, Vito CA, Paz IB, Niland J, Kruper L, Yim JH. Oncological safety of nipple-areola sparing mastectomy in comparison with skin sparing and total mastectomy: Results from a NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-22-12.

P1-08-05: Age and Survival in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis Controlling for Tumor Subtype

Background: Previous research has suggested that young age at diagnosis is an independent risk factor for breast cancer recurrence and death in women with early stage breast cancer. However, young women are more likely to have aggressive subtypes of breast cancer. No prior studies have adequately controlled for tumor phenotype, including HER-2/neu (HER2) status, in particular. Recent evidence has suggested that the prognostic effect of young age varies by tumor subtype.

Methods: We examined data from women with newly diagnosed Stage 1–3 breast cancer presenting to one of 8 NCCN centers between January 2000 and December 2007. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between age and breast cancer specific survival, controlling for known prognostic factors and treatment. In addition, we conducted stratified analyses by estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 status.

Results: 19,633 women with Stage 1–3 breast cancer eligible for analysis including 2,177 (11%) who were age 40 years or younger at diagnosis. Younger women were more likely to be non-white or Hispanic, more educated, employed, and to have higher stage, high grade, ER-negative, progesterone receptor (PR) negative, and HER2−positive disease, and treated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab (all variables P< 0.0001 by Chi-Square test). 5-year survival among younger women was 94.1 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 92.9−95.3) and 96.3 (95% CI 95.9−96.6) for older women. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model controlling for sociodemographic, disease, and treatment characteristics, women age < 40 or younger at diagnosis had increased mortality compared to older women (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.02−1.56). In stratified analyses, age 40 or less was associated with increased mortality among women with ER-positive disease (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01−2.05), but was not among those with ER-negative disease (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.85−1.55). Younger age was associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality among women with HER2−negative disease (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00−1.68), but this difference did not reach statistical significance among those with HER2−positive disease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.82−2.09). Conclusions: The effect of age on short-term survival of women with early breast cancer appears to vary by breast cancer subtype, particularly ER status. Further research to elucidate differences in breast cancer biology and efficacy of therapy within tumor types by age is warranted.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-05.

P4-20-02: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN): The Disease, the Recurrence Pattern and the Outcome

Background

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a unique clinicopathologic entity that is characterized by rapid progression and aggressive behavior from the onset. The clinical presentation consists of erythema, rapid enlargement of the breast, skin ridging, and a characteristic peau d'orange appearance of the skin secondary to dermal lymphatic tumor involvement. Because of its uncommon presentation leading to frequent misdiagnosis, most reports are from small single institution series which describe a predictable pattern of recurrence in spite of appropriate multidisciplinary treatments. We sought to confirm these observations using the large multi-institutional National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) outcomes database.

Methods: Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed IBC treated between 1999 and 2009 at 12 participating NCCN institutions were identified. The clinical diagnoses of IBC was based on the AJCC definition and staged as clinical T4d, N0-3, M0-1. The baseline pathological characteristics included histological type, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone-receptor (PR), and HER-2/neu status. Pts were classified as receiving multimodality therapy if they received two of the following three treatments: surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy), perioperative (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) systemic therapy, or perioperative radiation therapy.

Results: We identified a cohort of 673 pts with newly diagnosed IBC with a median follow-up of 28.9 months. Of which 195 (29%) had metastatic disease at presentation. The median age at presentation was 52.6 years. Caucasians were 79.4% of the cohort, African American 9.7%, and 11.0% other ethnic groups. Invasive ductal type comprised 84% of histologies. Biomarker assessment revealed ER+ (44.7%), PR+ (34.3%), and Her2/neu+ (33.4%). LVI was documented in 53.3%. Of stage III patients, 75.7% pts received perioperative radiation, 82% received perioperative systemic therapy and 70.7% underwent surgery. All three modalities were received by 64.4% of women. Of the stage III pts, 203 recurred. The most frequent sites of recurrence for were CNS (20.2%), bone (17.2%), chest wall (13.8%), lung (12.3%), liver (11.3%), distant (7.4%) and regional lymph nodes (6.9%). With a median of 30 and 20 months of follow-up for stage III & IV respectively, the median survival was 66 months (95% CI 54–107) for stage III pts and 26 months (95% CI: 22–33) for stage IV Among the 82% of stage III pts who received multimodality therapy, the 5 year and 10 year OS of 62% and 47%.

Discussion: This is a large retrospective multiinstitutional study that confirms the aggressive clinical features, recurrence patterns and adverse prognosis of IBC described in previous single institution series. Even with aggressive multimodal therapy, the long term survival of IBC shorter is than non-IBC. Future investigations are needed to address the aggressive biology of IBC to improve diagnosis and therapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-20-02.

Quality of breast cancer care in NCCN centers as assessed by the ASCO/NCCN quality measures: Overall performance and reasons for nonconcordance

6506

Background: To assess the quality of breast cancer care in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), we compared practice against the ASCO/NCCN quality measures (QM). Methods: Using the NCCN Outcomes Database, we studied the care of women with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer treated at 8 NCCN centers in 2003–6 to determine the proportion whose care was consistent with the 3 QMs (tamoxifen or anastrozole within 1 year of diagnosis for HR+ >1 cm tumors [HT]; post- lumpectomy radiation within 1 year of diagnosis for women <70 yo [RT]; and chemotherapy within 120 days of diagnosis of HR- >1 cm tumors for women <70 yo). Based on chart review, reasons for non-concordant care were classified as: 1) treatment recommended, but declined; 2) MD recommended against treatment; 3) non-recommended treatment administered; or 4) system problem (referral to the relevant specialist not documented or specialist not seen, delayed treatment initiation, or no relevant documentation in the chart). Results: 5,175 women were analyzable on at least one QM. Overall, treatment was consistent with the QM for 6,628/7,265 (91%) of the unique patient-recommendation pairs. Non-concordant care was received by 11% of patients eligible for the HT QM, 5% for the RT QM, and 13% for the chemotherapy QM. The reasons for non-concordance are shown in the table. Conclusions: Overall, breast cancer care in the NCCN is highly concordant with the ASCO/NCCN quality measures. System problems rather than patient refusal or physician recommendations account for the majority of care that deviates from the QM recommendations. This suggests that quality improvement targeting systems rather than physicians would be especially efficient and effective.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.