ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study

BACKGROUND

Advanced recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer-related death in developed countries and new treatments are needed. Previous studies of immune checkpoint blockade showed low objective response rates (ORR) in ROC with no identified predictive biomarker.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II study of pembrolizumab (NCT02674061) examined two patient cohorts with ROC: cohort A received one to three prior lines of treatment with a platinum-free interval (PFI) or treatment-free interval (TFI) between 3 and 12 months and cohort B received four to six prior lines with a PFI/TFI of ≥3 months. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until cancer progression, toxicity, or completion of 2 years. Primary end points were ORR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per blinded independent central review by cohort and by PD-L1 expression measured as combined positive score (CPS). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Cohort A enrolled 285 patients; the first 100 served as the training set for PD-L1 biomarker analysis. Cohort B enrolled 91 patients. ORR was 7.4% for cohort A and 9.9% for cohort B. Median DOR was 8.2 months for cohort A and not reached for cohort B. DCR was 37.2% and 37.4%, respectively, in cohorts A and B. Based on the training set analysis, CPS 1 and 10 were selected for evaluation in the confirmation set. In the confirmation set, ORR was 4.1% for CPS <1, 5.7% CPS ≥1, and 10.0% for CPS ≥10. PFS was 2.1 months for both cohorts. Median OS was not reached for cohort A and was 17.6 months for cohort B. Toxicities were consistent with other single-agent pembrolizumab trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent pembrolizumab showed modest activity in patients with ROC. Higher PD-L1 expression was correlated with higher response.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02674061.

Association between standard clinical and pathological breast cancer characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score: A population-based study

11002

Background: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) aims to quantify chemotherapy benefit in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) patients. We aimed to elucidate the association between the RS and clinical-pathological features in a population-based Israeli cohort. Methods: Study population included all Israeli BC female patients referred to the RS assay from October 2004 until October 2006. Clinical and pathology data were collected upon referral, RS risk was categorized as previously defined (low < 18, intermediate 18–30, high = 31) and chemotherapy benefit was also assessed for each patient using NCCN guidelines, St. Gallen recommendations and Adjuvant! Online. Results: 300 patients were referred to the assay by 70 physicians from 16 institutions. Low, intermediate and high RS were noted in 109 (36 %), 134 (45 %) and 57 (19%) of the patients respectively, compared to 54%, 21% and 25% respectively, in the validation study (JCO;24:3726). Median age was 54 and median tumor size was 1.6 cm. Similar age distribution, tumor size and ER staining intensity were noted in all risk categories. Interestingly, no association has been identified between the RS and the presence of lymph nodes micrometastases. High tumor grade was noted in 15%, 20% and 56%; progesterone expression in 88% 72% 43%; non-infiltrative ductal carcinoma (IDC) 24%, 12% and 6%; and Her2 expression in 2%, 3% and 19% of the low, intermediate and high risk categories respectively (p<0.0001 for all variables). Risk assessment according to clinical guidelines or Adjuvant! Online correlated poorly with the RS. Conclusions: Risk stratification of referred Israeli patients differs from that of the validation study population. Moreover, the RS did not correlate with age, tumor size and ER intensity. The RS correlated with histology, grade, PR and Her2 expression and may be predicted, in specific subsets of patients, using these features. However, RS categorization cannot be predicted by commonly-used clinical predicting tools.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.