Dual conformations for the HIV-1 gp120 V3 loop in complexes with different neutralizing fabs

BACKGROUND

The third hypervariable (V3) loop of HIV-1 gp120 has been termed the principal neutralizing determinant (PND) of the virus and is involved in many aspects of virus infectivity. The V3 loop is required for viral entry into the cell via membrane fusion and is believed to interact with cell surface chemokine receptors on T cells and macrophages. Sequence changes in V3 can affect chemokine receptor usage, and can, therefore, modulate which types of cells are infected. Antibodies raised against peptides with V3 sequences can neutralize laboratory-adapted strains of the virus and inhibit syncytia formation. Fab fragments of these neutralizing antibodies in complex with V3 loop peptides have been studied by X-ray crystallography to determine the conformation of the V3 loop.

RESULTS

We have determined three crystal structures of Fab 58.2, a broadly neutralizing antibody, in complex with one linear and two cyclic peptides the amino acid sequence of which comes from the MN isolate of the gp120 V3 loop. Although the peptide conformations are very similar for the linear and cyclic forms, they differ from that seen for the identical peptide bound to a different broadly neutralizing antibody, Fab 59.1, and for a similar peptide bound to the MN-specific Fab 50.1. The conformational difference in the peptide is localized around residues Gly-Pro-Gly-Arg, which are highly conserved in different HIV-1 isolates and are predicted to adopt a type II beta turn.

CONCLUSIONS

The V3 loop can adopt at least two different conformations for the highly conserved Gly-Pro-Gly-Arg sequence at the tip of the loop. Thus, the HIV-1 V3 loop has some inherent conformational flexibility that may relate to its biological function.

Opposite effects of bezafibrate and gemfibrozil in both normal and hypertriglyceridemic rats

Chow and sucrose-fed rats were used as animal models to study the dose-responses of bezafibrate and gemfibrozil in normolipidemic and hypertriglyceridemic states, respectively. Although both drugs lowered plasma triglycerides (TG) to about the same extent in chow-fed rats, gemfibrozil lowered liver TG as well as plasma total and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), but elevated HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and plasma apo E concentrations. Bezafibrate produced opposite effects, namely, decreased HDL-C, apo E and liver TG, and tended to increase LDL-C. TG lowering for both drugs in chow-fed rats was not due to changes in TG secretion (production) in normal rats but was associated with enhanced LPL activity. In hypertriglyceridemic rats both drugs modestly reduced TG secretion rates about 40% at a dose producing maximal TG lowering, but again, gemfibrozil elevated and bezafibrate lowered HDL-C and apo E. Unlike gemfibrozil, bezafibrate induced the appearance of LDL-C in hypertriglyceridemic rats which was not detected in control animals, and also tended to increase rather than decrease plasma apo B levels. Finally, changes in liver TG concentration (mg/g) in hypertriglyceridemic rats were opposite for these drugs, resulting in significant drug-related differences in liver TG content (mg/organ). From these data we postulate that, although similar with regard to TG lowering activity and mechanisms thereof, gemfibrozil and bezafibrate produce fundamentally different effects on LDL, HDL and apolipoprotein metabolism (apo B and apo E) in rats which may relate to potential differential effects on reverse cholesterol transport and atherogenesis.

Comparison of lifibrol to other lipid-regulating agents in experimental animals

In vitro data suggests that lifibrol lowers plasma cholesterol by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis. We report that lifibrol is far less potent in vitro and in vivo than lovastatin for inhibiting 14C-acetate incorporation into sterols. Moreover, several major differences between lifobrol and lovastatin were noted in various animal models. In contrast, lifibrol exhibited several activities in common with gemfibrozil, another phenoxy-acid-type drug. Specifically, in normal rats lifibrol, like gemfibrozil, lowered plasma non-HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, and increased liver weight and hepatic peroxisomal marker enzyme activities. Lovastatin only lowered plasma triglycerides. In cholesterol-fed rats lifibrol and gemfibrozil lowered non-HDL-cholesterol and elevated HDL-cholesterol while lovastatin was inactive. Finally, lovastatin but not lifibrol exhibited hypocholesterolemic activity in normal guinea pigs and resin-primed dogs. Our interpretation is that these data do not support the notion that lifibrol lowers plasma cholesterol in vivo by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis.