Growth factor release from platelet concentrates: analytic quantification and characterization for clinical applications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinical use of plasma rich in growth factors requires biochemical product control. We aimed to measure and modulate concentrations of growth factors in solutions deriving from platelet apheresis or whole blood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Growth factor concentrations were measured 5', 10', 20', 30', 60' after CaCl2 was added at 40°C to platelet-apheresis products (n = 39) or after 60' in platelet concentrates from whole blood (n = 13). Growth factor release was also obtained in platelet apheresis a) by incubation at 22°C or 40°C for 10' or 30' (n = 4); b) by repeated freeze-thaw (n = 9).

RESULTS

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) isoforms AA and AB and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) concentrations (pg/10(9 ) plt) were 25-60% higher in growth factors solutions from whole blood compared to platelet apheresis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), TGF-β and PDGF isoforms were released early (5-10') during incubation: TGF-β concentration increased also at 30'. FGF and epidermal growth factor (EGF) were released only after 30'. Incubation at 40°C/10' increased VEGF (+70%) and decreased EGF (-30%) and PDGF-BB (-50%) versus 22°C/30'. Shock significantly increased TGF-β (1.6-fold), EGF (1.5-fold), FGF (4.5-fold) and lowered PDGF isoforms (0.2- to 0.5-fold) versus prolonged incubation at 40°C.

CONCLUSION

Platelets from platelet apheresis and whole-blood release all investigated growth factors. The release can be regulated controlling incubation time and/or temperature and performing cell lysis.

Pre-storage leucocyte depletion and transfusion reaction rates in cancer patients

Passenger leucocytes transfused with allogenic blood are responsible for potential adverse effects. The impact of pre-storage leucodepletion (in-line filtration) of all whole blood units on transfusion reaction rate among patients suffering from cancer was retrospectively studied, comparing all reactions following red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during 2 years of pre-storage vs. 2 years of selective (bedside) leucodepletion. During selective leucodepletion, 5165 RBC units - of which 2745 were bedside filtered units- were transfused to 866 patients. Twenty-eight reactions were recorded: 22 (15 in the bedside group) febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) and six allergic reactions (five in the bedside group). The overall percentage of reactions was 0.54 (0.76 for bedside) and 0.42 for FNHTR (0.54 for bedside). During pre-storage leucodepletion, 4116 RBC units were transfused to 841 patients. Eleven reactions were recorded: four FNHTR and seven allergic reactions (urticaria). The percentage of reactions for transfused RBC units was 0.26 (0.09 for FNHTR). Comparison between pre-storage filtration and bedside filtration with regard to FNHTR showed an odds ratio of 2.80 (95% confidence interval = 0.83-14.87) for bedside filtration. The study suggests that, for transfused patients affected by cancer, pre-storage leucodepletion is more effective than selective (bedside) filtration in reducing the incidence of transfusion reactions (FNHTR).