Anaesthetic-surgical guide in the treatment of ascending aorta and surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Sociedad of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy

Aortic pathology is always a challenge for the clinician, and must be diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team due to the technical and technological complexity of the resources used. Ongoing efforts to implement a systematic, protocolized approach involving "Aortic teams" made up of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists, among others are now leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this consensus document drawn up by the Aortic working groups of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) is to disseminate a set of working protocols. The latest consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) define the concept of "AORTIC TEAM"(1). The aortic team should be closely involved from diagnosis to treatment and finally follow-up, and should be formed of cardiac and vascular surgeons working together with anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, radiologists and geneticists. Treatment of aortic pathologies should be centralised in large centres, because this is the only way to effectively understand the natural course of the disease, provide the entire range of treatment options under one umbrella and treat potential complications. A streamlined emergent care pathway (24/7 availability), adequate transportation and transfer capabilities, as well as rapid activation of the multidisciplinary team must be available. In light of the complexity and constant evolution of therapeutic options, we present this first version of the Anaesthesiology and surgical guidelines for surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Some questions will no doubt remain unanswered, and future versions will include new techniques that, though implemented in some centres, are still not widely recommended.

SEDAR/SECCE ECMO management consensus document

ECMO is an extracorporeal cardiorespiratory support system whose use has been increased in the last decade. Respiratory failure, postcardiotomy shock, and lung or heart primary graft failure may require the use of cardiorespiratory mechanical assistance. In this scenario perioperative medical and surgical management is crucial. Despite the evolution of technology in the area of extracorporeal support, morbidity and mortality of these patients continues to be high, and therefore the indication as well as the ECMO removal should be established within a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the area. This consensus document aims to unify medical knowledge and provides recommendations based on both the recent bibliography and the main national ECMO implantation centres experience with the goal of improving comprehensive patient care.

Anaesthetic-surgical guide in the treatment of ascending aorta and surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Sociedad of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy

Aortic pathology is always a challenge for the clinician, and must be diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team due to the technical and technological complexity of the resources used. Ongoing efforts to implement a systematic, protocolized approach involving "Aortic teams" made up of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists, among others are now leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this consensus document drawn up by the Aortic working groups of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) is to disseminate a set of working protocols. The latest consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) define the concept of "AORTIC TEAM"(1). The aortic team should be closely involved from diagnosis to treatment and finally follow-up, and should be formed of cardiac and vascular surgeons working together with anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, radiologists and geneticists. Treatment of aortic pathologies should be centralised in large centres, because this is the only way to effectively understand the natural course of the disease, provide the entire range of treatment options under one umbrella and treat potential complications. A streamlined emergent care pathway (24/7 availability), adequate transportation and transfer capabilities, as well as rapid activation of the multidisciplinary team must be available. In light of the complexity and constant evolution of therapeutic options, we present this first version of the Anaesthesiology and surgical guidelines for surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Some questions will no doubt remain unanswered, and future versions will include new techniques that, though implemented in some centres, are still not widely recommended.

RETRACTED: Anesthesic and surgical guideline for the treatment of the thoraco-abdominal aorta. Consensus Document of the Spanish Societies of Anesthesia and Cardiovascular Surgery

Este artículo ha sido retirado por indicación del Editor Jefe de la revista, después de constatar que parte de su contenido había sido plagiado, sin mencionar la fuente original: European Heart Journal (2014) 35, 2873 926.: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/35/41/2873/407693#89325738 El autor de correspondencia ha sido informado de la decisión y está de acuerdo con la retirada del artículo. El Comité Editorial lamenta las molestias que esta decisión pueda ocasionar. Puede consultar la política de Elsevier sobre la retirada de artículos en https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

[Severe pulmonary hypertension: implications for anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery]

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure greater than 25 mm Hg at rest or greater than 30 mm Hg with exercise, poses a challenge to anesthesiologists during perioperative management. The pathogenesis of PAH is multifactorial and includes genetic factors that explain individual susceptibility and external trigger or risk factors. We report the case of a woman with severe pulmonary hypertension who was waiting for a lung transplant when she was scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We discuss the clinical course and monitoring of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters at the different stages of laparoscopic surgery.

[Pulmonary hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment and anesthetic considerations]

Pulmonary artery hypertension is a rare entity but one that presents genuine challenges during anesthesia mainly because of the high risk of exacerbation and right heart failure during and after surgery. This review covers currently available treatments, the battery of diagnostic procedures at our disposal, and the basic precepts for the perioperative management of patients with this condition. Adequate hemodynamic control and the early use of selective pulmonary vasodilators are absolutely essential.

Lung graft dysfunction in the early postoperative period after lung and heart lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

We present a retrospective study of 9 years of experience in the management of graft dysfunction in the early postoperative period after lung transplantation (LT) and heart lung transplantation (HLT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 190 LT and HLT (22.63% single LT, 71.05% bilateral sequential LT, and 7.36% HLT) performed from 1993 to 2002. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were monitored during the operative technique and critical care for the first 24 hours. We analyzed ischemic time, bypass need, and type of transplant.

RESULTS

Lung graft dysfunction occurred in 37.2% of patients, but only in 12.2% was it severe. Nearly all patients were ventilated on a 50% fraction of inspired oxygen during the first 24-48 hours; 61.56% of patients were extubated before the first 5 postoperative day and 38.43% thereafter. The mean ischemia time for the first lung was 220 +/- 28 minutes: for the second lung, it was 378 +/- 31 minutes. The anesthetic time was 500-600 minutes. The variables associated with a significantly increased graft dysfunction were as follows: bilateral LT, and cardiopulmonary bypass requirement. The residence in the intensive care unit (ICU) was longer for patients with graft dysfunction than for those without that problem. Mortality directly related to graft dysfunction was only 4.07%.

CONCLUSIONS

A correlation among graft ischemia and early postoperative morbidity and duration of ICU stay did not have a significant impact on mortality.

[1990-1996: the experience of the La Fe Lung Transplant Group (Valencia)]

Objective to review the experience of the lung transplantation unit at Hospital La Fe (Valencia). Between February 1990 and March 1996 we performed 40 lung transplants. The following causes were most common: cystic fibrosis (9 cases), emphysema (8), pulmonary fibrosis (8) and bronchiectasis (7). Types of intervention were 27 double lung transplants (25 sequential and 9 blocked), 9 single lung transplants, and 4 heart-lung transplants. We then reviewed the 36 single and double lung transplants. The main exclusion criteria were age over 65 years, malignant disease, kidney or liver disease, severe or non reversible central nervous system disease, and drug addiction. Prior surgery, mechanical ventilation and the presence of Aspergillus were considered lower-order contraindications. Mean patient age was 37.7 years (14-59). Six patients were colonized by Aspergillus before transplantation. Five had undergone earlier surgery and two were mechanically ventilated before the transplant. The most common complication was respiratory infection, which was present in 6 of the 7 patients who died. Other complications in order of frequency were dehiscence and/or bronchial stenosis, corticoid myopathy and postoperative bleeding. The actuarial survival rate of single and double lung transplants was 67.85 after 3 years, and 87.5% in patients with cystic fibrosis. Lung transplantation is a well-established procedure that is gradually being extended to treat more conditions. The main obstacle is the scarcity of donors. The main challenge at present is bronchiolitis obliterans.

[Lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis]

OBJECTIVE

Since 1990 we have performed 40 lung transplants in the Hospital "La Fe" in Valencia. Nine of them have been performed in cystic fibrosis patients, which is the subject of this paper.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The mean age of the patients was 19.8 years, with the youngest patient being 14 years of age. In regards to patient selection, it is important to mention that one had a previous lobectomy, another one a thoracic deformity due to long term atelectasis and one needed intubation for hemoptysis within the 7 days before the lung transplant. Prophylaxis with imipenem and cyprofloxicin, aerosolized colistin and amphotericin B, prompt weaning and intensive respiratory physiotherapy were important for controlling postoperative infection.

RESULTS

With 15.3 months as the mean follow-up (range 36-3), 3 year survival was 87.5%. Pulmonary infection, which was the most frequent complication, had a good response to adequate antibiotic treatment. The main postoperative problem pertained to the bronchial suture with 2 partial dehiscences, 2 stenoses and one bronchopleural fistula by Aspergillus, all of which were resolved with conservative procedures without surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle and long term evolution in these patients shows an excellent quality of life with spirometric and ergometric tests within the normal range.