History of venous leg ulcers

To retrieve the history of venous ulcers and of skin lesions in general, we must go back to the appearance of human beings on earth. It is interesting to note that cutaneous injuries evolved parallel to human society. An essential first step in the pathogenesis of ulcers was represented by the transition of the quadruped man to Homo Erectus. This condition was characterized by a greater gravitational pressure on the lower limbs, with consequences on the peripheral venous system. Furthermore, human evolution was characterized by an increased risk of traumatic injuries, secondary to his natural need to create fire and hunt (e.g. stones, iron, fire, animal fighting). Humans then began to fight one another until they came to real wars, with increased frequency of wounds and infectious complications. The situation degraded with the introduction of horse riding, introduced by the Scites, who first tamed animals in the 7th century BC. This condition exhibited iliac veins at compression phenomena, favouring the venous stasis. With time, man continued to evolve until the modern age, which is characterized by increased risk factors for venous wounds such as poor physical activity and dietary errors (1, 2).

Stigmata in the history: between faith, mysticism and science

Stigmata are one of the most ancient and fascinating mysteries of the Christian religion. The word “stigmata” derives by the Greek “stigma”, that means sign, mark. Classically, stigmata are the sores inflicted on Jesus Christ during his passion and crucifixion. Today, the term stigmatized has been extended to designate several cases of individuals, who show skin sores similar to those of Christ. The Authors report a brief history of stigmata, trying to give an explanation to such a fascinating phenomenon.

Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris with Calcipotriol Betamethasone Dipropionate Combination Followed by Calcipotriol and Assessment of the Adjuvant Basic Use of Urea-Based Emollients

A new combination product containing betamethasone dipropionate and calcipotriol (Dovobet® ointment) has been proven very effective and well tolerated in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Emollients are adjunctive modalities commonly used in psoriasis; however, their actual role in combination with topical drugs as well as well as their compatibility with these drugs have not been well elucidated. In 313 adult patients with psoriasis vulgaris, we studied the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with Dovobet® ointment combined with urea-based emollients (Excipial U®) for 4 weeks, followed by treatment with calcipotriol (Daivonex®) either alone (group A) or combined with urea-containing emollients (Excipial U®, group B) for 8 weeks. Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline, at 4 and 12 weeks, assessing the clinical score for erythema, scaling, infiltration and pruritus, graded on the basis of a 5-point scale. After the initial 4-week treatment, a significant improvement of all clinical parameters was observed (p<0.05). Overall, clinical results improved further during the maintenance treatment phase; significant changes (p<0.05) were observed in each group. Most patients considered treatment efficacy positively at both 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Interestingly, at the end of the study, a greater percentage of patients in group B than in group A judged the efficacy as excellent. Treatment was very well tolerated. Only two patients complained of mild and transient burning sensation during the first days of treatment. The results of this study confirm the great efficacy and tolerability of sequential treatment with Dovobet®, and Daivonex® in psoriasis vulgaris and show the enhanced acceptability of this treatment associated with urea-based emollients.

Increased burn patient survival with once-a-day high dose teicoplanin and netilmicin. An Italian multicenter study

This is the final report of a large, controlled, multicenter Italian study on immuno- and chemotherapy in adult patients with burns affecting 20 to 95% of total body surface area (mean 35%). The antibiotic treatment of burn patients consisted of topical silver sulfadiazine, short-term antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis with pefloxacin (800 mg i.v. qd) for the first 4 days and polychemotherapy with teicoplanin (800 mg i.v. qd) together with netilmicin (300 mg i.m. qd) in one or more cycles of 5-12 days. At random, half of the patients received thymostimulin, 70 mg i.m. qd for the first month and every other day thereafter. The analysis at completion of 634 valid cases showed that when the results are stratified by means of the Roi risk index, 396 of the 530 patients who contracted wound infection (84%) after chemoprophylaxis were in the first three categories and a mean of 95% survived. Of the remaining 134 patients (Roi index 4-5) only 50% survived. There was no difference in survival of the immunotherapy group in comparison with the parallel group without thymostimulin. The short-term antimicrobial prophylaxis prevented wound infection in only 104 of 634 patients (16%) and they were at low risk (84% Roi index 1). Of the bacterial pathogens involved in septic complications Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were prevalent (86%): eradication was achieved in 43% of patients and clinical cure or improvement were seen with combination chemotherapy in 64% of all patients, mainly with only one treatment cycle. This value increased to 79% for the 395 protocol-complying patients and went down to 20% in the 135 non-compliers. The total survival of complier and non-complier patients was 447 of the 530 valid patients (84%). The overall mortality of the 634 evaluable patients was 13.1%, ranging from less than 2% to 68%. Burn mortality was directly proportional to the percentage of burned body surface area, to increasing age and other variables of the Roi index, a 50% mortality being associated with a 72.5% total body surface area burned. Normoergic burn patients had a mortality rate of 9.1% versus 35.7% in anergic patients.

[The use of intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with severe burns]

The parenteral use of whole molecule immunoglobulins is an important instrument for immunotherapy which can be employed in a variety of morbid conditions characterized by immunodeficiency, and therefore also in the management of severe burns. In order to confirm this assumption, the effect of i.v. administration of immunoglobulins has been studied in a group of burn patients and has been compared with the results obtained in the same number of clinically homologous patients not submitted to this treatment. In view of the results obtained, i.v. immunoglobulins can be usefully employed for the control of inflammatory and septic phenomena with reduction of abnormal parameters and a positive influence on the recovery curve.