The novel diagnostic index based on HLA-DRB1 genotype and PD-L1 expression can predict severe irAEs in patients with metastatic melanoma taking immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in up to 50% of patients treated with an anti-CTLA-4 antibody and 30% of patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Severe forms of toxicity are observed in 3% of patients and require systemic steroid therapy and constant monitoring. One of the considered predictor biomarkers of irAEs development is HLA-genotypes. This research aims to evaluate the diagnostic significance of HLA-DRB1 genotypes and other clinical and laboratory parameters to predict the development of irAEs. The study involved 28 patients with metastatic melanoma taking checkpoint inhibitors therapy [nivo 53.6%, Ipi+nivo 32.1%, other (pembro, prolgo) 14.3%]. The PD-L1 expression and HLA-DRB1 genotype were evaluated. After 2-3 months the development of irAES was assessed. The complications of 3-4 grade or multi-organ damage were termed as severe irAEs. Various IrAEs developed in 57.1% (16/28) of patients, while severe irAEs occurred in 35.7% (10/28). Among all patients, HLA-DRB1 genotypes associated with the risk of autoimmune diseases were found in 78.5% (22/28). The PD-L1 expression was detected in 60.7% (17/28) of individuals. Combination treatment increases the risk of toxicity, p = 0.0028, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 56% and a diagnostic specificity of 100% (RR = 2.71, OR = 31.67). An index based on the parameters studied (HLA-DRB1, absence of PD-L1 expression, and type of treatment) was created. It allows assuming the risk of developing severe irAES (p = 0.0126). When comparing this indicator between irAEs 1-2 and irAEs 3-4, the presence of an index value of more than 2 gives a sensitivity for predicting severe toxicity of 40.00% and a specificity of 83.33%.

Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial

BACKGROUND

Integrins are involved in tumour progression and metastasis, and differentially expressed on colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Abituzumab (EMD 525797), a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting integrin αν heterodimers, has demonstrated preclinical activity. This trial was designed to assess the tolerability of different doses of abituzumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan (phase I) and explore the efficacy and tolerability of the combination versus that of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) (phase II part).

METHODS

Eligible patients had KRAS (exon 2) wild-type mCRC and had received prior oxaliplatin-containing therapy. The trial comprised an initial safety run-in using abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg combined with a standard of care (SoC: cetuximab plus irinotecan) and a phase II part in which patients were randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to receive abituzumab 500 mg (arm A) or 1000 mg (arm B) every 2 weeks combined with SoC, or SoC alone (arm C). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and tolerability. Associations between tumour integrin expression and outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

Phase I showed that abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg were well tolerated in combination with SoC. Seventy-three (arm A), 71 (arm B) and 72 (arm C) patients were randomised to the phase II part. Baseline characteristics were balanced. PFS was similar in the three arms: arm A versus SoC, hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.64]; arm B versus SoC, HR 1.11 (95% CI 0.77-1.61). RRs were also similar. A trend toward improved OS was observed: arm A versus SoC, HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.54-1.28); arm B versus SoC, HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.52-1.25). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 72%, 78% and 67% of patients. High tumour integrin αvβ6 expression was associated with longer OS in arms A [HR 0.55 (0.30-1.00)] and B [HR 0.41 (0.21-0.81)] than in arm C.

CONCLUSION

The primary PFS end point was not met, although predefined exploratory biomarker analyses identified subgroups of patients in whom abituzumab may have benefit. The tolerability of abituzumab combined with cetuximab and irinotecan was acceptable. Further study is warranted. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01008475.