Medical management and surgery versus medical management alone for symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation (CARE): a feasibility study and randomised, open, pragmatic, pilot phase trial

BACKGROUND

The highest priority uncertainty for people with symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation is whether to have medical management and surgery or medical management alone. We conducted a pilot phase randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of addressing this uncertainty in a definitive trial.

METHODS

The CARE pilot trial was a prospective, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group trial at neuroscience centres in the UK and Ireland. We aimed to recruit 60 people of any age, sex, and ethnicity who had mental capacity, were resident in the UK or Ireland, and had a symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation. Computerised, web-based randomisation assigned participants (1:1) to medical management and surgery (neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) or medical management alone, stratified by the neurosurgeon's and participant's consensus about the intended type of surgery before randomisation. Assignment was open to investigators, participants, and carers, but not clinical outcome event adjudicators. Feasibility outcomes included site engagement, recruitment, choice of surgical management, retention, adherence, data quality, clinical outcome event rate, and protocol implementation. The primary clinical outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or new persistent or progressive non-haemorrhagic focal neurological deficit due to cerebral cavernous malformation or surgery during at least 6 months of follow-up. We analysed data from all randomly assigned participants according to assigned management. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN41647111) and has been completed.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 27, 2021, and April 28, 2023, 28 (70%) of 40 sites took part, at which investigators screened 511 patients, of whom 322 (63%) were eligible, 202 were approached for recruitment, and 96 had collective uncertainty with their neurosurgeon about whether to have surgery for a symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation. 72 (22%) of 322 eligible patients were randomly assigned (mean recruitment rate 0·2 [SD 0·25] participants per site per month) at a median of 287 (IQR 67-591) days since the most recent symptomatic presentation. Participants' median age was 50·6 (IQR 38·6-59·2) years, 68 (94%) of 72 participants were adults, 41 (57%) were female, 66 (92%) were White, 56 (78%) had a previous intracranial haemorrhage, and 28 (39%) had a previous epileptic seizure. The intended type of surgery before randomisation was neurosurgical resection for 19 (26%) of 72, stereotactic radiosurgery for 44 (61%), and no preference for nine (13%). Baseline clinical and imaging data were complete for all participants. 36 participants were randomly assigned to medical management and surgery (12 to neurosurgical resection and 24 to stereotactic radiosurgery) and 36 to medical management alone. Three (4%) of 72 participants withdrew, one was lost to follow-up, and one declined face-to-face follow-up, leaving 67 (93%) retained at 6-months' clinical follow-up. 61 (91%) of 67 participants with follow-up adhered to the assigned management strategy. The primary clinical outcome occurred in two (6%) of 33 participants randomly assigned to medical management and surgery (8·0%, 95% CI 2·0-32·1 per year) and in two (6%) of 34 participants randomly assigned to medical management alone (7·5%, 1·9-30·1 per year). Investigators reported no deaths, no serious adverse events, one protocol violation, and 61 protocol deviations.

INTERPRETATION

This pilot phase trial exceeded its recruitment target, but a definitive trial will require extensive international engagement.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Feasibility of comparing medical management and surgery (with neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) with medical management alone in people with symptomatic brain cavernoma - protocol for the Cavernomas: A Randomised Effectiveness (CARE) pilot trial

INTRODUCTION

The top research priority for cavernoma, identified by a James Lind Alliance Priority setting partnership was 'Does treatment (with neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) or no treatment improve outcome for people diagnosed with a cavernoma?' This pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to determine the feasibility of answering this question in a main phase RCT.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will perform a pilot phase, parallel group, pragmatic RCT involving approximately 60 children or adults with mental capacity, resident in the UK or Ireland, with an unresected symptomatic brain cavernoma. Participants will be randomised by web-based randomisation 1:1 to treatment with medical management and with surgery (neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) versus medical management alone, stratified by prerandomisation preference for type of surgery. In addition to 13 feasibility outcomes, the primary clinical outcome is symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or new persistent/progressive focal neurological deficit measured at 6 monthly intervals. An integrated QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) evaluates screening logs, audio recordings of recruitment discussions, and interviews with recruiters and patients/parents/carers to identify and address barriers to participation. A Patient Advisory Group has codesigned the study and will oversee its progress.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Yorkshire and The Humber-Leeds East Research Ethics Committee (21/YH/0046). We will submit manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals, describing the findings of the QRI and the Cavernomas: A Randomised Evaluation (CARE) pilot trial. We will present at national specialty meetings. We will disseminate a plain English summary of the findings of the CARE pilot trial to participants and public audiences with input from, and acknowledgement of, the Patient Advisory Group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN41647111.

Aneurysm management in patients over 80 years old with good grade subarachnoid haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

An increasing proportion of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) occurs in older patients, in whom there is widespread variability in treatment rates due to a different balance of risks. Our aim was to compare outcomes of patients over 80 years old with good grade aSAH who underwent treatment of their aneurysm with those who did not.

METHODS

Adult patients with good grade aSAH admitted to tertiary regional neurosciences centres contributing to the UK and Ireland Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Database (UKISAH) and a cohort of consecutive patients admitted from three regional cohorts were included for analysis. Outcomes were functional outcome at discharge, three months and survival at discharge.

RESULTS

In the UKISAH, patients whose aneurysm was treated were more likely to have a favourable outcome at discharge (OR 2.34, CI 1.12-4.91, p = .02), at three months (OR 2.29, CI 1.11-4.76, p = .04), and lower mortality (10% vs. 29%, OR 0.83, CI 0.72-0.94, p < .01). In the regional cohort, a similar pattern was seen, but after correction for frailty and comorbidity there was no difference in survival (HR 0.45, CI 0.12-1.68, p = .24) or favourable outcome at discharge (OR 0.83, CI 0.23-2.94, p = .77) and at three months (OR 1.03, CI 0.25-4.29, p = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

Better early functional outcomes in those undergoing aneurysm treatment appear to be explained by differences in frailty and comorbidity. Therefore, treatment decisions in this patient group are finely balanced with no clear evidence overall of either benefit or harm in this cohort.

Comparison between outcomes of endovascular and surgical treatments of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

The natural history and optimal treatment of previously ruptured anterior communicating artery (ACOM) aneurysms that recur is unknown. This study looks at rates of complications and recurrences of ruptured ACOM aneurysms treated endovascularly and surgically.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study of all patients presenting to a single tertiary neurosurgical centre with the first presentation of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) secondary to a ruptured ACOM aneurysm. Data was collected from November 2012 to September 2018 and included baseline demographics, aneurysm characteristics, management, complications, follow-up imaging, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

137 patients were included in the study. 113 aneurysms were coiled and 19 were clipped. Management decisions were taken by the multidisciplinary team based on aneurysm morphology or the presence of a haematoma exerting mass effect. There were 187.5 patient-years of follow-up, with a median of 3 years (range 0-73 months). Rates of vasospasm, infarction, CSF diversion, rebleed, length of stay, and functional outcome were not significantly different in the two cohorts. There was a statistically significant increase in the risk of ACOM recurrence in the coiled group when compared to the clipped group at one year (p = .0433). 15 patients required further treatment at a median time of 16 months. In a subgroup group analysis of coiled aneurysms, there was no statistical differences in rates of rebleeding or the functional outcome in those that had aneurysm recurrence and those that did not.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests patients with aneurysms treated by endovascular coiling have an increased risk of recurrence versus those treated with clipping. However, the risk of rebleed was not statistically significant. The prevention and impact of recurrence and residual aneurysms remains incompletely understood. Hence, treatment decisions should be taken by patients after they have been given carefully considered recommendations from the multi-disciplinary team.

P115 Subarachnoid haemorrhage with negative initial vascular imaging: a single unit experience

Objectives

To investigate the incidence of vascular abnormality and clinical outcomes in a group of patients presenting with spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and negative initial vascular investigation.

Design

Single centre prospective cohort study.

Subjects

All adult patients with SAH admitted to our unit over a 12 month period.

Methods

Prospective collection of data on secure electronic database. Information pertaining to gender, age, mode of initial and subsequent vascular investigations was acquired. Details regarding clinical outcomes at 30 days and complications were documented.

Results

118 consecutive patients with SAH were admitted to our unit over the 12 month study period. 37 patients had negative initial vascular imaging (37/118=31.4%). M:F=19:18, age range 26–76 years. 32 patients underwent a high quality CT angiogram as initial vascular investigation, 5 patients underwent catheter cerebral angiogram (DSA). The most common modality of further vascular imaging was DSA. 5 vascular abnormalities were detected on subsequent vascular imaging (5/37=13.5%). Hydrocephalus and vasospasm were the commonest complications. Clinical outcomes were very good; all patients had a GOS of 5 at 30 days.

Conclusions

Patients with SAH and negative initial vascular investigation are an important subset of patients with SAH. There is no uniformity in the type of subsequent vascular investigations selected. Our experience is consistent with previously published studies.

Intracranial extramedullary haematopoiesis: A case report

Extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH) is an ectopic production of blood cells to compensate for ineffective haematopoiesis. We report a rare symptomatic presentation of intracranial EMH and discuss its investigation and management. EMH should be considered a differential diagnosis in patients with haemoglobinopathies, haemolytic anaemias and myeloproliferative disorders, who present with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure.

Delayed caroticocavernous fistula after stent-assisted coil embolization of intracavernous carotid aneurysm: should we manage conservatively?

Constructive endovascular techniques remain the mainstay for the treatment of cavernous carotid aneurysms due to their efficacy. However, they do harbor risks of complications, such as thromboembolic events, arterial injuries, and vessel occlusions. A 58-year-old lady presented with delayed caroticocavernous fistula (CCF) 1 month after stent-assisted coil embolization of a cavernous carotid aneurysm (CCA). Following this, her caroticocavernous fistula resolved spontaneously with no further intervention. Our case demonstrates a unique presentation of a CCF as a delayed complication of stent-assisted coil embolization of CCA and the spontaneous resolution of the CCF. Symptomatic CCFs are commonly treated as an emergency in many institutions and the question arises as to whether we should adopt a conservative policy in the light of this case report.

Peri-prosthetic femoral shaft fractures treated with plate and cable fixation

Management of post-operative peri-prosthetic femoral shaft fractures remains difficult and controversial, with no widely accepted form of treatment. Fractures at the tip of a femoral component are associated with poor union rates. We present a series of 15 fractures at the component tip extending proximally in association with a loose cement mantle. All 15 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using a plate and cable system. They were followed to clinical and radiological union, at an average of 3.5 months (range 3-5 months). At final review examination, 13 patients had achieved pre-fracture mobility, with one patient requiring a single walking stick, and one requiring a Zimmer frame. Three patients under-went revision surgery after successful fracture union and rehabilitation, with long stemmed femoral components. The plate and cable procedure is not technically demanding and avoids hip exposure. This form of internal fixation provides immediate fracture stability, allowing early ambulation, hence avoiding the complications and difficulties of other methods of treatment. Such fractures should be acutely treated to achieve fracture union with a plate, cable, and screw internal fixation technique. The loose components can be revised electively, preferably by a revision hip surgeon.