Sexually destroyed or empowered? Silencing female genital cutting in close relationships

Based on fieldwork among Kurdish-Norwegian migrants, this study explored how female genital cutting (FGC) was a silenced topic between mothers and daughters, and between men and women. The silence was often broken when FGC was discussed as a practice that needed to be rejected. The main reasons for rejecting FGC were to support women's rights and to recognise the negative ways in which FGC affected women's sexuality. This way of breaking the silence on FGC was particularly helpful to some husbands and wives in their discussion of how FGC might have affected their sexual relationships. Using theories of migrant women's sexual agency and embodiment, this study examined how the silencing of FGC in close relationships can be interpreted both as a sign of oppression and as a sign of empowerment. The analysis suggests that the stigmatisation that circumcised women can experience from condemnatory public discourse on FGC may sometimes lead to the negotiation of assertive female sexuality.