Mitral valve repair with the edge-to-edge technique: A 20 years single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

For tailored treatment of primary mitral regurgitation (MR), surgeons developed different repair techniques. One of them, the edge-to-edge repair has recently seen a revival, especially for Barlow's disease.

METHODS

This study was designed to assess the outcomes of the edge-to-edge technique in mitral valve (MV) repair. Preoperative, periprocedural, and postoperative data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Between March 1999 and July 2019, a total of 152 patients (mean age: 60 ± 13) received an edge-to-edge repair combined with annuloplasty for degenerative MR at our institution. MR resulted from posterior leaflet prolapse in 23 patients (15.1%), anterior leaflet prolapse in 19 (12.5%), and bileaflet prolapse in 110 (72.4%). Of those who had a bileaflet prolapse, 91 (82.7%) had Barlow's disease. Follow-up was complete in 97.4% (6.4 ± 5.7 years). Echocardiographic assessment was achieved in 85.5% (5.1 ± 5.6 years). Overall survival after 10 years was 73.7 ± 5.0%. Twelve patients required valve-related reoperations due to ring dehiscence (n = 2), leaflet suture dehiscence (n = 2), progression of native valve disease (n = 6), or due to device failure (ring fracture) (n = 2). The cumulative incidence of valve-related reoperation at 10 years was 8.4 ± 3.0% (5.2 ± 4.1% in patients with Barlow's disease). At latest follow-up, echocardiography revealed excellent valve function with no or mild MR in 93 patients (88.6%). The mean gradient was 2.9 ± 1.3 mmHg at discharge and decreased to 2.4 ± 1.3 mmHg. Three patients (2.8%) had more than moderate MR.

CONCLUSION

Edge-to-edge MV repair is a simple method with excellent results in terms of valvular function and durability especially in patients with Barlow's disease.

Functional and Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: One Ring Fits All?

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional saddle-shaped annuloplasty rings have been shown to create a larger surface of leaflet coaptation in mitral valve repair (MVR) for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) which may increase repair durability. For the first time, this study reports mid-term results after MVR for DMR and FMR using a rigid three-dimensional ring (Profile 3D, Medtronic).

METHODS

Between June 2009 and June 2012, 369 patients with DMR (n = 326) or FMR (n = 43) underwent MVR (mean age 62.3 ± 12.6 years). A total of 205 patients (55.6%) underwent isolated MVR and 164 patients (44.4%) a combined procedure. Follow-up examinations were performed in 94.9% (mean 4.9 ± 0.9 years). Echocardiographic assessment was complete in 93.2% (mean 4.3 ± 1.2 years).

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was 1.5% (5/326) for DMR (1.5% for isolated and 1.6% for combined procedures) and 9.3% (4/43) for FMR (0% for isolated and 10.5% for combined procedures). Survival at 6 years was 92.1 ± 1.9% for DMR (92.9 ± 2.6% for isolated and 90.7 ± 2.7% for combined procedures) and 66.4 ± 7.9% for FMR (80.0 ± 17.9% for isolated and 63.7 ± 8.9% for combined procedures). Cumulative risk for mitral valve-related reoperation at 6 years was 0% for FMR and 7.1 ± 1.5% for DMR. At echocardiographic follow-up, one patient presented with mitral regurgitation (MR) more than moderate. The only predictor of recurrent MR after MVR for DMR was residual mild MR at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Repair of FMR with the three-dimensional Profile 3D annuloplasty ring shows excellent mid-term results with regard to recurrence of MR. In cases of DMR, the results are conforming to the current literature.

Six-Month Performance of a 3-Dimensional Annuloplasty Ring for Repair of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) secondary to left-sided heart disease may lead to poor quality of life and reduced long-term survival. This study evaluated clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing tricuspid valve (TV) repair using a rigid three-dimensional ring (Contour 3D, Medtronic) concomitant with another procedure.

METHODS

From September 2011 to July 2015, 112 patients (mean age 70.9 ± 9.0 years) were enrolled at 10 centers in Europe, Israel, and the United States. Inclusion criteria were FTR ≥ moderate and/or tricuspid annular diameter (TAD) ≥ 40 mm. Echocardiography was planned before surgery and at discharge with echocardiographic and clinical follow-ups performed 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Three fourths (74.4%) of patients had higher than moderate TR. Mean TAD was 41.0 ± 7.3 mm; 61.7% of patients were in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV. The most common concomitant procedure was mitral valve repair (57 patients, 53.3%). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.9% (n = 1). The mean EuroSCORE II was 8.9 ± 8.4% (median: 5.9%; interquartile range: 3.5-11.5%). The observed to expected ratio (O/E) based on the median was 0.1. Six deaths occurred during follow-up (three cardiac related). Mean implanted ring size was 30.3 ± 2.7. At 6 months, 94.4% of patients showed ≤ mild TR, and 92.0% were in NYHA class I/II (p < 0.001 vs baseline for both). Mean pressure gradient across the TV was 2.0 ± 1.1 mm Hg; leaflet coaptation length was 7.5 ± 3.3 mm.

CONCLUSION

The Contour 3D annuloplasty ring used for treatment of FTR substantially reduced TR for up to 6 postoperative months with low mean pressure gradients across the TV and significant improvement in NYHA class.

REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01532921.

Is a Profiled Annuloplasty Ring Suitable for Repair of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation? A Single-Center Experience Comprising 200 Patients

Background Various devices have been proposed for ring annuloplasty in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease. This study reports for the first time midterm results with the rigid three-dimensional Medtronic Profile 3D (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) annuloplasty ring. Methods Between June 2009 and June 2011, 200 patients (mean age 61 ± 13 years, 70% male) with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation underwent mitral valve repair using the Medtronic Profile 3D annuloplasty ring. A total of 106 patients (53.0%) underwent isolated mitral valve repair and 94 patients (47.0%) underwent a concomitant procedure such as coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 21), tricuspid valve surgery (n = 49), AF ablation (n = 17), and aortic valve surgery (n = 13). The follow-up is 94.5% complete (mean 2.5 ± 0.5 years). Results Thirty-day mortality was 1.5%. Survival at 3 years was 97.1 ± 1.6% for isolated procedures and 92.4 ± 2.8% for combined procedures (p = 0.137). Freedom from mitral valve-related reoperation at 3 years was 97.1 ± 1.7% for isolated procedures and 95.5 ± 2.2% for combined procedures (p = 0.561). Seven patients (3.5%) required a mitral valve-related reoperation. Two of these reoperations were required for endocarditis, two for ring dehiscence, one for progression of the native disease (flail leaflet), one for leaflet suture dehiscence, and one for persistent systolic anterior motion. Conclusion The three-dimensional Medtronic Profile 3D annuloplasty ring is suitable for mitral valve repair for degenerative diseases. This saddle-shaped annuloplasty device provides excellent early results with a very good functional outcome at midterm either in isolated or combined procedures.

Heterotopic Cervical Heart Transplantation in Mice

The heterotopic cervical heart transplantation in mice is a valuable tool in transplant and cardiovascular research. The cuff technique greatly simplifies this model by avoiding challenging suture anastomoses of small vessels thereby reducing warm ischemia time. In comparison to abdominal graft implantation the cervical model is less invasive and the implanted graft is easily accessible for further follow-up examinations. Anastomoses are performed by pulling the ascending aorta of the graft over the cuff with the recipient's common carotid artery and by pulling the main pulmonary artery over the cuff with the external jugular vein. Selection of appropriate cuff size and complete mobilization of the vessels are important for successful revascularization. Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury can be minimized by perfusing the graft with a cardioplegic solution and by hypothermia. In this article, we provide technical details for a simplified and improved cuff technique, which should allow surgeons with basic microsurgical skills to perform the procedure with a high success rate.

Three-dimensional valve repair-the better care? Midterm results of a saddle-shaped, rigid annuloplasty ring in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

Undersized ring annuloplasty is the treatment of choice for functional mitral regurgitation. However, recurrence of mitral regurgitation within the first years is frequent. The aim of this study was to analyze the functional and clinical outcome after mitral valve repair with the 3-dimensional saddle-shaped Edwards GeoForm (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, Calif) annuloplasty ring in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation.

METHODS

Between November 2006 and November 2012, 70 patients (mean age, 68 ± 10 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 40% ± 15%) with functional mitral regurgitation due to ischemic cardiomyopathy underwent mitral valve repair with the Edwards GeoForm annuloplasty ring. Concomitant procedures, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (75.7%), tricuspid valve repair (25.7%), aortic valve replacement (8.6%), and the Maze procedure (4.3%), were performed in 92.9% of patients. Follow-up is 97% complete (mean, 3.0 ± 1.7 years). Transthoracic echocardiography was obtained 2.4 ± 1.7 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 5.9%. Overall survival at 5 years was 71.3% ± 6.9%. At 4 years, overall freedom from recurrence of mitral regurgitation grade 3+ or greater was 92.5% ± 3.6%, and freedom from recurrence of mitral regurgitation grade 2+ or greater was 71.0% ± 8.7%. Three patients required a mitral valve-related reoperation for ring dehiscence. New York Heart Association functional class improved from 3.6 ± 0.6 to 1.6 ± 0.6 during follow-up (P < .05). Mean mitral valve pressure gradient was 3.3 ± 1.8 mm Hg across all ring sizes at the time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve repair with the 3-dimensional saddle-shaped Edwards GeoForm annuloplasty ring in case of ischemic mitral regurgitation shows a low rate of recurrent regurgitation at 4 years. Clinically relevant mitral stenosis was not detected. The importance of secure anchoring of the device in the mitral annulus has to be emphasized to prevent ring dehiscence.

Role of metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases during cardiopulmonary bypass in rats

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and the tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) regulate matrix remodeling in the heart. Changes in synthesis and release of MMPs and TIMPs are observed after extracorporeal circulation (ECC). Thus, MMPs and TIMPs are supposed to be involved in ECC-mediated cardiac dysfunction. The aim was to examine the role of MMPs and TIMPs in ECC-mediated cardiac dysfunction. Extracorporeal circulation was instituted in rats for 60 min at a flow rate of 120 ml/kg/min. Three groups (n = 10) were studied: group CAO: 60 min ECC without aortic cross-clamping, group CAC: 60 min ECC including 30 min aortic cross-clamping (crystalloid Inzolen(®) cardioplegia), and group CAB: 60 min ECC including 30 min aortic cross-clamping (blood cardioplegia). Left ventricular (LV) function was measured with conductance catheter. Matrix metalloproteinase-activity was determined by zymography and TIMP activity was determined by reverse zymography. Gene expression of MMPs and TIMPs was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Sixty minutes after weaning from bypass, there was a preserved LV function in the CAO and CAB group and an impaired LV function in the CAC group. We observed an increased myocardial activity and an increased myocardial messenger RNA expression of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-4 in all ECC groups, when compared with sham animals. With regard to enzyme activity, there was an imbalance of MMP/TIMP ratio leading to an increased activity of MMP in the CAC group. In terms of gene expression, there was an imbalance of MMP-2/TIMP-4 ratio leading to an increased expression of MMP-2 in the CAC group. MMP-2 contributes to myocardial reperfusion injury in this in vivo model of ECC with cardioplegic arrest.

Hemodynamic characterization of the Sorin Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis at rest and exercise

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Although the long-term clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Sorin Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis has been well described, few data are available with regards to hemodynamic performance. On the basis of its specialized design, with the pericardium mounted on the outside of the stent, the Mitroflow valve is considered to provide optimal opening and orifice areas.

METHODS

Between February 2006 and April 2007, a total of 127 patients (66 females, 61 males; mean age 77.6 +/- 5.2 years) underwent AVR with the Mitroflow valve at the authors' institution. Echocardiography was performed at discharge in 91 patients, while a six-month follow up examination was conducted in 78 (including ergometer hemodynamics in 25 cases).

RESULTS

The mean systolic pressure gradient (MPG) ranged from 19.7 +/- 3.3 mmHg (size 19 valve) to 12.4 +/- 2.4 mmHg (size 27 valve), and the mean effective orifice area (EOA) from 0.96 +/- 0.0 cm2 (size 19 valve) to 2.36 +/- 0.4 cm2 (size 27 valve). The incidence of mild-to-moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was 33% and 10% at the six-month follow up. During exercise (25 W-100 W), the MPG increased from 17.1 +/- 3.6 mmHg to 23.6 mmHg in valve sizes 19 to 21, and from 12.2 +/- 3.6 mmHg to 15.9 +/- 2.5 mmHg in valve sizes 23 to 27. The effective orifice fraction (EOF = EOA/annulus area) was 38 +/- 7%.

CONCLUSION

The Mitroflow valve exhibits an adequate MPG and EOA, as might be expected for a pericardial bioprosthesis. Of note, the gradient increase during exercise was low, especially for the larger valve sizes. Due to its special design, the Mitroflow prosthesis shows a large opening, as demonstrated by the high EOF. These data relating to the EOA of all prosthesis sizes may help surgeons to select the minimum prosthesis size in order to prevent PPM.

Percutaneous cannulation of the femoral vessels for cardiopulmonary bypass

In case of minimally invasive open heart surgery, access for intrathoracic cannulation is limited and therefore femoral vessel cannulation is necessary. Complications after surgical exposure of the femoral vessels are well known. The authors describe their technique for percutaneous femoral vessel cannulation, which allows a safe establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, reduces the incidence of groin complications, and offers excellent cosmetic results.

Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus

OBJECTIVE

Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus is often associated with increased pressure gradients. For this reason, prostheses for completely supra-annular placement have been developed. To evaluate the potential benefit of this design, the present study compared the effectiveness of 1 intra-supra-annular bioprosthesis and 3 completely supra-annular bioprostheses in patients with an aortic annulus diameter of 23 mm or less.

METHODS

Between August 2000 and December 2004, each of 192 patients requiring aortic valve replacement with an intraoperatively measured aortic annulus diameter of 23 mm or less received one of the following bioprostheses: the stented bovine Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis (n = 28) (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy), the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (n = 50) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif), the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna bioprosthesis (n = 70) (Edwards Lifesciences), or the stented porcine Medtronic Mosaic (n = 44) (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) bioprosthesis. After 6 months, hemodynamic data at rest and during exercise were obtained by echocardiography in 142 patients.

RESULTS

The pericardial valves showed lower mean systolic pressure gradients, larger effective orifice areas and indices, and superior effective orifice fractions than did the porcine valve (P < .05) (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount: 10.9 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, 1.59 +/- 0.41 cm2, 0.9 +/- 0.25 cm2/m2, 41.9% +/- 9.6%; Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna 10.1 +/- 3.8 mm Hg, 1.64 +/- 0.38 cm2, 0.93 +/- 0.22 cm2/m2, 45.1% +/- 10.2%; Sorin Soprano 13.5 +/- 5.0 mm Hg, 1.64 +/- 0.32 cm2, 0.92 +/- 0.15 cm2/m2, 45.8% +/- 9.0%; vs Medtronic Mosaic 15.5 +/- 5.2 mm Hg, 1.31 +/- 0.42 cm2, 0.75 +/- 0.24 cm2/m2, 35.2% +/- 10.0%, respectively). The lowest mean systolic pressure gradients were found after the implantation of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna. Effective orifice areas, indices, and fractions of the pericardial valves did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with small aortic roots, transvalvular gradients and effective orifice area showed a tendency to superior results in pericardial valves compared with the porcine bioprosthesis. However, the completely supra-annular design does not necessarily lead to superior hemodynamic results compared with the intra-supra-annular position.

Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method?

BACKGROUND

To predict the occurrence of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (VP-PM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR), the surgeon needs to estimate the postoperative effective orifice area index (EOAI).

AIM

To compare different methods of predicting VP-PM.

METHODS

The effective orifice area (EOA) of 383 patients who had undergone AVR between July 2000 and January 2005 with various aortic valve prostheses was obtained echocardiographically 6 months after the operation. We tested the efficacy of (1) EOAI calculated from the echo data obtained in our own laboratory, (2) indexed geometric orifice area, (3) EOAI estimated from charts provided by prosthesis manufacturers (which are based either on in vitro or on echo data) and (4) EOAI estimated from reference echo data published in the literature to predict VP-PM.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity to predict VP-PM were 53% and 83% (method 1), 80% and 53% (charts based on echo data, parts of method 3) and 71% and 67% (method 4) using reference data derived from echocardiographic examinations. The sensitivity of method 2 and of charts based on in vitro data (parts of method 3) to predict VP-PM was 0-17%. The incidence of severe VP-PM could be reduced from 8.7% to 0.8% after the introduction of the systematic estimation of the EOAI at the time of operation (p = 0.003, method 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The best method of predicting VP-PM is the use of mean (SD) EOAs derived from echocardiographic examinations, whereas the use of in vitro data or the geometric orifice area is unreliable. After the surgeon's anticipation of VP-PM prior to AVR, the incidence of VP-PM could be reduced.

Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position

BACKGROUND

Complete supraannular placement and smaller stent design allow the implantation of a Perimount Magna bioprosthesis with a larger inner diameter than that of a standard Perimount. This study compares the hemodynamic performance and the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) of both prostheses.

METHODS

128 patients underwent aortic valve replacement, receiving either a Magna (n = 57) or a standard (n = 71) prosthesis. Inner aortic annulus diameter was measured intraoperatively by a hegar dilator to match echocardiographically obtained results to the annulus diameter instead of matching them to labelled valve size.

RESULTS

The Magna was significantly superior with respect to mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area in patients with an annulus diameter of 22-23 mm. In patients with an annulus diameter < 22 mm or > 23 mm, there was a non-significant trend towards superior hemodynamics in the Magna group. Severe PPM (effective orifice area index < or = 0.65 cm (2)/m (2)) was present in 11.1% (Magna) vs. 42.1% (Standard) of patients with an annulus diameter < 22 mm; in 0% (Magna) vs. 13.8% (Standard) with an annulus diameter of 22-23 mm; no PPM was seen in patients with annulus diameter > 23 mm in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Perimount Magna had a significantly reduced incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch and superior hemodynamics compared to the standard Perimount.

Hemodynamic evaluation of the Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis in the completely supra-annular aortic position

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

The study aim was to evaluate the clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis in the aortic position.

METHODS

Rest and stress echocardiography were performed at six months after surgery in 57 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with the stented Soprano bioprosthesis. The exercise protocol included workloads of 25, 50, 75 and 100 W, each of 2 min duration.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 1.8% (n = 1). Due to malperfusion of the coronary arteries, two Soprano prostheses had to be replaced by a different prosthesis, and one patient received coronary artery bypass grafts. One patient developed bacterial endocarditis of his prosthesis at seven months postoperatively and died as a result of a fulminant sepsis. There were no other prosthesis-related adverse events. Mean pressure gradients (MPG) ranged from 7.8 to 15.9 mmHg, effective orifice areas (EOA) from 1.25 to 2.98 cm2, EOA index (EOAI) from 0.79 to 1.43 cm2/m2, and EOA fraction from 34 to 45%. Stress echocardiography showed no significant increase in MPG up to 50 W, and MPGs did not exceed 35 mmHg at 75 and 100 W.

CONCLUSION

Initial hemodynamic results showed low MPGs during rest and exercise. The EOAI was large due to completely supra-annular placement of the Soprano valve. The difficulty of complete supraannular placement is that the prosthesis is positioned relatively high, especially in narrow aortic roots, and this may handicap coronary artery perfusion. Patient selection with suitable aortic root anatomy is crucial to achieve the benefit of completely supra-annular implantation without coronary ostium deterioration.

The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Stentless valves are considered to exhibit better hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to stented valves. However, a new generation of stented bioprostheses for completely supra-annular implantation has been designed to optimize the ratio of the effective orifice area (EOA) of the prosthesis and aortic annulus area. The study aim was to determine whether a stentless valve implanted in the subcoronary technique renders larger orifice areas and lower transvalvular pressure gradients at rest and exercise compared to a completely supra-annular stented device.

METHODS

Twenty patients underwent AVR for aortic stenosis with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) Toronto Root stentless porcine bioprosthesis, using a subcoronary implantation technique. Through the authors' institutional database, 20 additional patients were identified who had undergone AVR with the Medtronic Mosaic stented completely supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis. The patient groups were not matched for labeled valve size, but for annulus diameter measured intraoperatively using Hegar's dilators. Hemodynamic performance was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography at discharge (early) and by rest and stress echocardiography at six months postoperatively (mid-term).

RESULTS

Transvalvular mean pressure gradients (MPG) at rest were significantly lower in the stentless group, but cardiac output was similar in both groups. Stress echocardiography also revealed significantly lower gradients at 25 W and 50 W exercise in the stentless group. The EOA index (EOAI), grouped by annulus diameter, tended to be larger in the stentless group and showed no severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM; EOAI <0.65 cm2/m2) which, in contrast, occurred in three patients (15%) in the stented group (p = 0.072).

CONCLUSION

In summary, the SJM Toronto Root porcine stentless bioprosthesis in the subcoronary position showed lower MPGs and larger EOAs at rest and during exercise compared to the Medtronic Mosaic porcine stented bioprosthesis. Therefore, physically active patients in particular may benefit from use of the stentless valve. Because of its larger EOA, a stentless valve should be implanted if severe PPM is expected.

Rest and Exercise Performance of the Medtronic Advantage Bileaflet Valve in the Aortic Position

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate rest and exercise performance and left ventricular mass regression of the Medtronic Advantage (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) prosthesis in the aortic position at 1 year at a single center as part of a multicenter, prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

Between May 2002 and June 2003, 63 consecutive patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a Medtronic Advantage prosthesis (84.1% male; mean age, 56.0 +/- 9.7 years; ejection fraction, 56.5 +/- 15.8%). Valve lesions were stenosis (n = 20), mixed (n = 34), and insufficiency (n = 9). Concomitant procedures were performed in 34.9%. Follow-up was 100% complete. Echocardiographic data were obtained early postoperatively and at 1 year, combined with stress echocardiography by treadmill. Mean pressure gradients, stroke volume, and left ventricular mass were determined by echocardiography. Data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 0%. Valve-related complications were observed in 2 patients (endocarditis, n = 1; thromboembolic event, n = 1). There was no case of antithromboembolic hemorrhage, prosthesis-related explant, or reoperation. One patient showed moderate paravalvular regurgitation. Mean pressure gradients 1 year postoperatively ranged from 6.3 to 11.0 mm Hg across all valve sizes. Left ventricular mass regression at 1 year was 18.4% across all valve sizes (p < 0.001). No severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (effective orifice area index < or = 0.65 cm2/m2) could be observed.

CONCLUSIONS

After 1 year, the Medtronic Advantage valve shows comparable transvalvular mean pressure gradients across the valve sizes used during rest and exercise. This is accompanied by a significant left ventricular mass regression, an important indicator for long-term survival.

Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves

OBJECTIVE

This prospective randomized study compares a porcine with a bovine bioprosthesis in the aortic position with regard to hemodynamic performance during exercise.

METHODS

Between August of 2000 and December of 2002, 136 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with the porcine Medtronic Mosaic (n = 66) or the bovine Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (n = 70) bioprosthesis. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to assess hemodynamic and dimensional data preoperatively and 10 months postoperatively; the latter follow-up included stress echocardiography with treadmill exercise.

RESULTS

At rest and during exercise (25 and 50 W), there was a significant difference in mean pressure gradient between the bovine and the porcine valves with labeled sizes 21 and 23, with superiority of the Perimount prosthesis. There was no difference in effective orifice area and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch among all sizes. The left ventricular mass index decreased significantly within 10 months postoperatively in the size 23 bovine group and the size 25 porcine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show a significant superiority of pressure gradients for the bovine bioprosthesis, especially with small valve sizes, when compared with the porcine device, which is more distinctive during exercise.

Hemodynamic Comparison of Bioprostheses for Complete Supra-Annular Position in Patients With Small Aortic Annulus

OBJECTIVES

The present study evaluates complete supra-annular bioprostheses in patients with an aortic annulus of 18 to 23 mm in diameter.

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus using stented bioprostheses is often associated with unsatisfactory hemodynamic results and high incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch.

METHODS

Between February 2000 and January 2004, 156 patients with aortic valve disease and an aortic annulus of 18 to 23 mm in diameter received the stented bovine Soprano (Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia, Italy) (n = 18), Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (n = 52), Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences) (n = 42), or the stented porcine Mosaic (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) (n = 44) bioprostheses. Intraoperatively, the surgeon measured the aortic annulus diameter by inserting a hegar dilator. Thus, postoperative hemodynamic results could be referred to the patient's aortic annulus diameter instead of referring the results to the labeled valve size. This allows for objective comparisons between different valve types.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in hemodynamic results between the different valve types in patients with an aortic annulus 18 to 20 mm. In patients with an annulus 21 to 23 mm, the Magna was significantly superior to the other investigated devices in mean pressure gradient, effective orifice area, and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch. There was no significant difference between the complete supra-annular bioprostheses Mosaic and Soprano and the intra-supra-annular Perimount valve.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an aortic annulus of 18 to 20 mm in diameter, hemodynamic performance is independent of the implanted stented valve type and the annular position. Root enlargement or stentless valves may be beneficial alternatives. Patients with annulus diameter 21 to 23 mm benefit from the Magna in complete supra-annular position leading to superior hemodynamic results.

The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Edwards Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position, and to evaluate prosthesis-specific differences in valve sizing and valve-size labeling.

METHODS

Between August 2000 and September 2002, 139 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Mosaic (n = 67) or Perimount (n = 72) bioprosthesis. Intraoperatively, the internal aortic annulus diameter was measured by insertion of a gauge (Hegar dilator), while prosthesis size was determined by using the original sizers. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to determine hemodynamic and dimensional data. As the aim of AVR is to achieve a maximal effective orifice area (EOA) within a given aortic annulus, the ratio of EOA to patient aortic annulus area was calculated, the latter being based on annulus diameter measured intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 2.2% (Mosaic 3.0%; Perimount 1.4%; p = NS). Upsizing (using a prosthesis larger in labeled valve size than the patient's measured internal aortic annulus diameter) was possible in 28.4% of Mosaic patients and 8.3% of Perimount patients. The postoperative mean systolic pressure gradient ranged from 10.5 to 22.2 mmHg in the Mosaic group, and from 9.4 to 12.6 mmHg in the Perimount group; it was significantly lower for 21 and 23 Perimount valves than for 21 and 23 Mosaic valves. The EOA ranged from 0.78 to 2.37 cm2 in Mosaic patients, and from 0.95 to 2.12 cm2 in Perimount patients. When indexing EOA by calculating the ratio of EOA to patient aortic annulus area to adjust for variables such as patient anatomy and valve dimensions, there was no significant difference between the two bioprostheses.

CONCLUSION

Comparisons of absolute EOA values grouped by the manufacturers' valve sizes are misleading because of specific differences in geometric dimensions. The EOA:patient aortic annulus area ratio provides a new hemodynamic index which may facilitate objective comparisons between different valve types.