Description of a Lung Cancer Hotspot: Disparities in Lung Cancer Histology, Incidence, and Survival in Kentucky and Appalachian Kentucky

INTRODUCTION

Kentucky is recognized as the state with the highest lung cancer burden for more than 2 decades, but how lung cancer differs in Kentucky relative to other US populations is not fully understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined lung cancer reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program by Kentucky and the other SEER regions for patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. Our analyses included histologic types, incidence rates, stage at diagnosis, and survival in Kentucky and Appalachian Kentucky relative to other SEER regions.

RESULTS

We found that both squamous cell carcinomas and small-cell lung cancers represent larger proportions of lung cancer diagnoses in Kentucky and Appalachian Kentucky than they do in the SEER registries. Furthermore, age-adjusted cancer incidence rates were higher in Kentucky for every subtype of lung cancer examined. Most notably, for Appalachian women the rate of small-cell carcinomas was 3.5-fold higher, and for Appalachian men the rate of squamous cell carcinoma was 3.1-fold higher, than the SEER rates. In Kentucky, lung cancers were diagnosed at later stages and lung cancer survival was lower for adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinomas than in SEER registries. Squamous cell carcinomas and small-cell carcinomas were most lethal in Appalachian Kentucky.

CONCLUSION

Together, these data highlight the considerable disparities among lung cancer cases in the United States and demonstrate the continuing high burden and poor survival of lung cancer in Kentucky and Appalachian Kentucky. Strategies to identify and rectify causes of these disparities are discussed.

Dose-escalation study of vemurafenib with sorafenib or crizotinib in patients with BRAF-mutated advanced cancers

BACKGROUND

BRAF inhibitors are effective in melanoma and other cancers with BRAF mutations; however, patients ultimately develop therapeutic resistance through the activation of alternative signaling pathways such as RAF/RAS or MET. The authors hypothesized that combining the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib with either the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib or the MET inhibitor crizotinib could overcome therapeutic resistance.

METHODS

Patients with advanced cancers and BRAF mutations were enrolled in a dose-escalation study (3 + 3 design) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vemurafenib with sorafenib (VS) or vemurafenib with crizotinib (VC).

RESULTS

In total, 38 patients (VS, n = 24; VC, n = 14) were enrolled, and melanoma was the most represented tumor type (VS, 38%; VC, 64%). In the VS arm, vemurafenib 720 mg twice daily and sorafenib 400 mg am/200 mg pm were identified as the MTDs, DLTs included grade 3 rash (n = 2) and grade 3 hypertension, and partial responses were reported in 5 patients (21%), including 2 with ovarian cancer who had received previous treatment with BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors. In the VC arm, vemurafenib 720 mg twice daily and crizotinib 250 mg daily were identified as the MTDs, DLTs included grade 3 rash (n = 2), and partial responses were reported in 4 patients (29%; melanoma, n = 3; lung adenocarcinoma, n = 1) who had received previous treatment with BRAF, MEK, and/or ERK inhibitors. Optional longitudinal collection of plasma to assess dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA demonstrated the elimination of BRAF-mutant DNA from plasma during therapy (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Vemurafenib combined with sorafenib or crizotinib was well tolerated with encouraging activity, including among patients who previously received treatment with BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors.

Phase 1 study of the combination of vemurafenib, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma and other advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

BRAF inhibitors are effective against selected BRAFV600 -mutated tumors. Preclinical data suggest that BRAF inhibition in conjunction with chemotherapy has increased therapeutic activity.

METHODS

Patients with advanced cancers and BRAF mutations were enrolled into a dose-escalation study (3+3 design) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with advanced cancers and BRAF mutations were enrolled and received vemurafenib (480-720 mg orally twice a day), carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5-6 intravenously every 3 weeks), and paclitaxel (100-135 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks). The MTD was not reached, and vemurafenib at 720 mg twice a day, carboplatin at AUC 5, and paclitaxel at 135 mg/m2 were the last safe dose levels. DLTs included a persistent grade 2 creatinine elevation (n = 1), grade 3 transaminitis (n = 1), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 1). Non-dose-limiting toxicities that were grade 3 or higher and occurred in more than 2 patients included grade 3/4 neutropenia (n = 5), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (n = 5), grade 3 fatigue (n = 4), and grade 3 anemia (n = 3). Of the 19 patients, 5 (26%; all with melanoma) had a partial response (PR; n = 4) or complete response (CR; n = 1); these responses were mostly durable and lasted 3.1 to 54.1 months. Of the 13 patients previously treated with BRAF and/or mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors, 4 (31%) had a CR (n = 1) or PR (n = 3). Patients not treated with prior platinum therapy had a higher response rate than those who did (45% vs 0%; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of vemurafenib, carboplatin, and paclitaxel is well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging activity, predominantly in patients with advanced melanoma and BRAFV600 mutations, regardless of prior treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors.

Lung Cancer in the Older Patient

Cancers of the lung and bronchus are the leading cause of cancer deaths in men and women in the United States, and two-thirds of new lung cancer cases are diagnosed in patients over age 65. There are few dedicated clinical trials in the elderly, leading to both undertreatment and overtreatment biases. Even fit older adults experience age-related decline in physiologic reserve, and additional issues of polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, and inadequate social support are not uncommon, leading to disparities in treatment and survival. This review discusses the challenges in balancing benefits and harms in management of lung cancer in elderly patients.

Meta-analysis of pemetrexed plus carboplatin doublet safety profile in first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer studies

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis compared safety profiles (selected drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) of first-line pemetrexed plus carboplatin (PCb) area under the concentration-time curve 5 mg/min•mL (PCb5) or 6 mg/min•mL (PCb6), two widely used regimens in clinical practice for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 21 days with either of two carboplatin doses for up to 4-6 cycles. Safety profiles of PCb doses were compared using three statistical analysis methods: frequency table analysis (FTA), generalized linear mixed effect model (GLMM), and the propensity score method. Efficacy outcomes of PCb5 and PCb6 regimens were summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 486 patients mainly from the US, Europe, and East Asia were included in the analysis; 22% (n = 105) received PCb5 in one trial and 78% (n = 381) received PCb6 in four trials. The FTA comparison demonstrated that PCb5 vs PCb6 was associated with a statistically significantly lower incidence of TEAEs, including all-grade thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, and vomiting, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. In the GLMM analysis, PCb5 patients were numerically less likely to experience all-grade and grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The propensity score regression analysis showed PCb5 group patients were significantly less likely than PCb6 group patients to experience all-grade hematologic TEAEs and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anemia. After applying propensity score 1:1 matching, FTA analysis showed that the PCb5 group had significantly less all-grade and grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. Overall efficacy outcomes, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, were similar between the two carboplatin doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledging the limitations of this meta-analysis of five trials, heterogeneous in patient's characteristics and trial designs, the results show that the PCb5 regimen was generally associated with a better safety profile than PCb6 across three statistical approaches, with no apparent impact on survival outcomes.

Phase I dose-escalation study of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus and the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat in patients with advanced malignancy

Preclinical models suggest that histone deacetylase (HDAC) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have synergistic anticancer activity. We designed a phase I study to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of combined mTOR inhibitor sirolimus (1 mg-5 mg PO daily) and HDAC inhibitor vorinostat (100 mg-400 mg PO daily) in patients with advanced cancer. Seventy patients were enrolled and 46 (66%) were evaluable for DLT assessment since they completed cycle 1 without dose modification unless they had DLT. DLTs comprised grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 6) and grade 3 mucositis (n = 1). Sirolimus 4 mg and vorinostat 300 mg was declared RP2D because MTD with sirolimus 5 mg caused significant thrombocytopenia. The grade 3 and 4 drug-related toxic effects (including DLTs) were thrombocytopenia (31%), neutropenia (8%), anemia (7%), fatigue (3%), mucositis (1%), diarrhea (1%), and hyperglycemia (1%). Of the 70 patients, 35 (50%) required dose interruption or modification and 61 were evaluable for response. Partial responses were observed in refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (-78%) and perivascular epithelioid tumor (-54%), and stable disease in hepatocellular carcinoma and fibromyxoid sarcoma. In conclusion, the combination of sirolimus and vorinostat was feasible, with thrombocytopenia as the main DLT. Preliminary anticancer activity was observed in patients with refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, perivascular epithelioid tumor, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

BRAF mutation testing with a rapid, fully integrated molecular diagnostics system

Fast and accurate diagnostic systems are needed for further implementation of precision therapy of BRAF-mutant and other cancers. The novel Idylla^TMBRAF Mutation Test has high sensitivity and shorter turnaround times compared to other methods. We used Idylla to detect BRAF V600 mutations in archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples and compared these results with those obtained using the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test or MiSeq deep sequencing system and with those obtained by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory employing polymerase chain reaction–based sequencing, mass spectrometric detection, or next-generation sequencing. In one set of 60 FFPE tumor samples (15 with BRAF mutations per Idylla), the Idylla and cobas results had an agreement of 97%. Idylla detected BRAF V600 mutations in two additional samples. The Idylla and MiSeq results had 100% concordance. In a separate set of 100 FFPE tumor samples (64 with BRAF mutation per Idylla), the Idylla and CLIA-certified laboratory results demonstrated an agreement of 96% even though the tests were not performed simultaneously and different FFPE blocks had to be used for 9 cases. The Idylla^TMBRAF Mutation Test produced results quickly (sample to results time was about 90 minutes with about 2 minutes of hands on time) and the closed nature of the cartridge eliminates the risk of PCR contamination. In conclusion, our observations demonstrate that the Idylla test is rapid and has high concordance with other routinely used but more complex BRAF mutation–detecting tests.

Sleep quality and its association with fatigue, symptom burden, and mood in patients with advanced cancer in a clinic for early-phase oncology clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist about sleep quality for patients with advanced cancer in phase 1 clinical trials. Poor sleep quality is often not captured as an adverse event, and its association with fatigue, one of the most frequently reported adverse events, is not documented routinely. This article describes sleep quality and its relation with fatigue, symptom burden, and mood in patients recruited from an early-phase clinic for targeted therapy.

METHODS

Sleep, fatigue, symptom burden, and mood were assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Brief Fatigue Inventory, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), and the Brief Profile of Mood States, respectively; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was determined from medical records.

RESULTS

The sample (n = 256) was 51.2% female, 90% had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and the mean age was 58 ± 0.8 years. Poor sleepers (global PSQI score > 5) constituted 64% of the sample. In separate multiple regression models, poor sleepers had higher levels of fatigue (P < .001), symptom burden (P < .001), and overall mood disturbance (P < .001) than good sleepers. Also, compared with good sleepers, poor sleepers had greater fatigue-related and symptom-related interference with daily activities (all P values < .001). The MDASI disturbed-sleep item correlated well with the global PSQI score (Pearson's r = 0.679, P < .001), and this suggests its usefulness as a patient-reported outcome screener of sleep quality in early-phase clinical trials clinics.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor sleep quality was a significant problem in the current study and was associated with greater fatigue, symptom burden, and mood disturbance. Sleep quality should be routinely assessed in patients with advanced cancer who are participating in early-phase clinical trials. Cancer 2016;122:3401-3409. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes

A Bayesian model and design are described for a phase I-II trial to jointly optimise the doses of a targeted agent and a chemotherapy agent for solid tumors. A challenge in designing the trial was that both the efficacy and toxicity outcomes were defined as four-level ordinal variables. To reflect possibly complex joint effects of the two doses on each of the two outcomes, for each marginal distribution a generalised continuation ratio model was assumed, with each agent's dose parametrically standardised in the linear term. A copula was assumed to obtain a bivariate distribution. Elicited outcome probabilities were used to construct a prior, with variances calibrated to obtain small prior effective sample size. Elicited numerical utilities of the 16 elementary outcomes were used to compute posterior mean utilities as criteria for selecting dose pairs, with adaptive randomisation to reduce the risk of getting stuck at a suboptimal pair. A simulation study showed that parametric dose standardisation with additive dose effects provides a robust, reliable model for dose pair optimisation in this setting, and it compares favourably with designs based on alternative models that include dose-dose interaction terms. The proposed model and method are applicable generally to other clinical trial settings with similar dose and outcome structures.

BRAF Mutation Testing in Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Patients with Advanced Cancers Using a Rapid, Automated Molecular Diagnostics System

Cell-free (cf) DNA from plasma offers an easily obtainable material for BRAF mutation analysis for diagnostics and response monitoring. In this study, plasma-derived cfDNA samples from patients with progressing advanced cancers or malignant histiocytosis with known BRAF(V600) status from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors were tested using a prototype version of the Idylla BRAF Mutation Test, a fully integrated real-time PCR-based test with turnaround time about 90 minutes. Of 160 patients, BRAF(V600) mutations were detected in 62 (39%) archival FFPE tumor samples and 47 (29%) plasma cfDNA samples. The two methods had overall agreement in 141 patients [88%; κ, 0.74; SE, 0.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.85]. Idylla had a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 0.60-0.83) and specificity of 98% (95% CI, 0.93-1.00). A higher percentage, but not concentration, of BRAF(V600) cfDNA in the wild-type background (>2% vs. ≤ 2%) was associated with shorter overall survival (OS; P = 0.005) and in patients with BRAF mutations in the tissue, who were receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors, shorter time to treatment failure (TTF; P = 0.001). Longitudinal monitoring demonstrated that decreasing levels of BRAF(V600) cfDNA were associated with longer TTF (P = 0.045). In conclusion, testing for BRAF(V600) mutations in plasma cfDNA using the Idylla BRAF Mutation Test has acceptable concordance with standard testing of tumor tissue. A higher percentage of mutant BRAF(V600) in cfDNA corresponded with shorter OS and in patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors also with shorter TTF. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6); 1397-404. ©2016 AACR.

Actionable mutations in plasma cell-free DNA in patients with advanced cancers referred for experimental targeted therapies

Cell-free (cf) DNA in the plasma of cancer patients offers an easily obtainable source of biologic material for mutation analysis. Plasma samples from 157 patients with advanced cancers who progressed on systemic therapy were tested for 21 mutations in BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, and PIK3CA using the BEAMing method and results were compared to mutation analysis of archival tumor tissue from a CLIA-certified laboratory obtained as standard of care from diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Results were concordant for archival tissue and plasma cfDNA in 91% cases for BRAF mutations (kappa = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 – 0.88), in 99% cases for EGFR mutations (kappa = 0.90, 95% CI 0.71– 1.00), in 83% cases for KRAS mutations (kappa = 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.80) and in 91% cases for PIK3CA mutations (kappa = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 – 0.85). Patients (n = 41) with > 1% of KRAS mutant cfDNA had a shorter median survival compared to 20 patients with </= 1% of KRAS mutant DNA (4.8 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.008). Similarly, 67 patients with > 1% of mutant cfDNA (BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, or PIK3CA) had a shorter median survival compared to 33 patients with </= 1% of mutant cfDNA (5.5 vs. 9.8 months, p = 0.001), which was confirmed in multivariable analysis.

Erratum: Actionable mutations in plasma cell-free DNA in patients with advanced cancers referred for experimental targeted therapies

The Abstract is incorrect in PubMed. The corrected Abstract is provided here.

Abstract 2407: Multiplex KRAS G12/G13 mutation testing of 16ng of unamplified cell-free DNA from plasma of patients with advanced cancers using Droplet Digital PCR

Background: Cell-free (cf) DNA from the plasma of cancer patients offers an easily obtainable, low-risk, inexpensive and repeatedly applicable source of biologic material for mutation analysis of druggable targets and monitoring molecular changes in tumor(s) during and after therapeutic interventions. Novel, multiplex, and accurate diagnostic systems using low amounts of DNA are needed for further development of plasma cfDNA testing in personalized therapy.

Methods: cfDNA from plasma samples of patients with advanced cancers who progressed on systemic therapy was purified and 16 ng of DNA was tested with a KRAS multiplex assay to distinguish wild-type allele from 7 of the most common mutations in in the G12/G13 hotspot of exon 2 using the QX200 Droplet Digital PCR™ platform (Bio-Rad, Pleasanton, CA). Results were compared to mutation analysis of archival primary or metastatic tumor tissue obtained at different points of clinical care from a CLIA-certified laboratory.

Results: cfDNA was extracted from plasma samples of 94 patients with advanced cancers (colorectal, n = 60; melanoma, n = 9; non-small cell lung, n = 9; appendiceal, n = 3; ovarian, n = 3; endometrial, n = 3; other cancers, n = 7). KRAS G12/G13 mutations were detected in 62% (58/94) of plasma samples and in 68% (64/94) of archival tumor samples, resulting in concordance in 84 (89%) of patients (kappa = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63- 0.90) with sensitivity 88% (95% CI 0.77-0.94), specificity 93% (95% CI 0.78-0.99), positive and negative predictive values 97% (95% CI 0.88-0.99) and 78% (95% CI 0.61-0.90), respectively. Overall, 8 patients had KRAS G12/G13 mutation in the tumor, but not in cfDNA and 2 patients had KRAS G12/G13 mutation in cfDNA, but not in the tumor. Of interest, 1 of 2 patients with KRAS G12/G13 mutation (colorectal cancer) in cfDNA, but not in the tumor, experienced rapid disease progression after 1 cycle of cetuximab with chemotherapy. Discrepancies will be addressed with testing of tissue samples using the Bio-Rad QX200 system and repeating cfDNA testing with an increased amount of DNA. Results will be presented at the meeting.

Conclusions: Multiplex detecting of KRAS G12/G13 mutations in a low amount of unamplified cfDNA from plasma using the Bio-Rad QX200 platform is a noninvasive alternative to mutation testing of tumor tissue with an acceptable level of concordance and sensitivity, and should be investigated further for testing of KRAS mutation status in patients with cancer.

Citation Format: Helen J. Huang, Dawne N. Shelton, Siqing Fu, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Ralph G. Zinner, Jennifer J. Wheler, Aung Naing, David S. Hong, Gerald S. Falckook, Scott Kopetz, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Bryan K. Kee, George A. Karlin-Neumann, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Filip Janku. Multiplex KRAS G12/G13 mutation testing of 16ng of unamplified cell-free DNA from plasma of patients with advanced cancers using Droplet Digital PCR. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2407. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2407

Abstract 2689: Overcoming BRAF/MEK resistance using vemurafenib with crizotinib or sorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced cancers: phase I study

Background: BRAF inhibitors are effective in advanced melanoma and other cancers with BRAF V600mutations; however, patients ultimately develop therapeutic resistance through activation of alternative signaling pathways such as HGF/MET, PDGFR and CRAF. We hypothesized that combining the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and MET inhibitor crizotinib or PDGFR/CRAF inhibitor sorafenib can increase efficacy by overcoming intrinsic and acquired resistance.

Methods: We designed a phase I study (3+3 design) to determine the safety of vemurafenib (240-960 mg PO BID q 28 days) with crizotinib (250 mg PO daily or BID q 28 days) in arm A or sorafenib (200 mg PO daily to 400mg PO BID q 28 days) in Arm B in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced cancers. Endpoints included maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicities (DLT), safety, response (RECIST 1.1) and plasma cell-free DNA mutation analysis.

Results: To date, 29 patients (Arm A, n = 11, vemurafenib 240-960mg PO BID with crizotinib 250mg PO daily; Arm B, n = 18, vemurafenib 240-720mg PO BID with sorafenib 200 mg PO BID to 400/200 mg PO), median age of 53 (33-76) years; median number of 3 (1-5) prior therapies including 22 (76%) patients with prior BRAF or MEK inhibitors were treated. Patients (melanoma 17/29, 59%; papillary thyroid cancer 4/29, 14%; colorectal cancer 3/29, 10%; lung adenocarcinoma 2/29, 7%; other 3/29, 10%) had BRAF V600E (n = 24), V600K (n = 3) or other BRAF mutations (n = 2). The MTDs have not been reached and no DLTs have been observed. Significant drug related toxicities included grade (G) 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1) in arm A and G3 hypertension (n = 1), G3 headache (n = 1), G3 diarrhea (n = 1) in Arm B. In Arm A, 3 of 11 (27%) patients (melanoma refractory to BRAF monotherapy, -40% for 7.9 months; melanoma refractory to BRAF monotherapy, -36% for 6.0+ months and lung adenocarcinoma, -50% for 13.9 months) attained a partial response (PR) and 1 (9%) patient (melanoma refractory to MEK inhibitor, +3% for 12.5 months) with stable disease (SD) &gt; 6 months. In Arm B, 3 of 18 (17%) patients (melanoma, -46% for 7.6 months; lung adenocarcinoma, -61% for 7.3 months and ovarian cancer refractory to MEK inhibitor, -50% for 18.7 months) attained a PR and 3 (17%) patients (papillary thyroid refractory to MEK inhibitor, -10% for 28.4 months; papillary thyroid cancer refractory to BRAF inhibitor, -6% for 7.3+ months and melanoma refractory to BRAF monotherapy -8% for 7.5 months) attained SD &gt; 6 months. In patients with longitudinal assessment of plasma cfDNA changes in the amount of BRAF mutant DNA corresponded with clinical course (data will be presented).

Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that vemurafenib in combination with crizotinib or sorafenib are well tolerated with encouraging activity in patients previously treated with BRAF or MEK inhibitors.

Citation Format: Shumei Kato, Aung Naing, Gerald Falchook, Veronica R. Holley, Vivianne M. Velez-Bravo, Sapna Patel, Ralph G. Zinner, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, David S. Hong, Razelle Kurzrock, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Filip Janku. Overcoming BRAF/MEK resistance using vemurafenib with crizotinib or sorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced cancers: phase I study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2689. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2689

Abstract P2-05-03: Anastrozole and everolimus in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Safety profile, activity and associations of molecular alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

Background

Combining aromatase inhibitors with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer has demonstrated clinical efficacy. There is limited data on associations between molecular signatures and activity.

Patients and Methods

We evaluated the combination of anastrozole and everolimus in 56 patients with HR-positive, metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective was to establish safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as serious grade 3 or 4 toxicities related to treatment that occurred during cycle 1. Dose level 1 was anastrozole 1mg PO QD and everolimus 5 mg PO QD and dose level 2 was anastrozole 1 mg PO QD and everolimus 10 mg PO QD (a dose level -1 included everolimus 2.5 mg PO QD). Secondary endpoints included evaluation of antitumor activity and molecular associations with response. When tissue was available, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was performed using genomic libraries selected for all exons of 236 (or 182) cancer-related genes sequenced to average depth of &gt;500× in a CLIA laboratory (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA). An analysis was then performed for all classes of genomic alterations.

Results

The median age was 59 (range, 37-82) and the median number of prior therapies in the metastatic setting was 3 (range, 0-13). The initial oral daily dose of anastrozole 1 mg oral and everolimus 10 mg PO daily was well tolerated. Five dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were seen at full doses, including grade 3 thrombocytopenia (1 patient), grade 3 neutropenia (1 patient), grade 3 increased liver enzymes (1 patient), grade 3 hyperglycemia (1 patient) and, grade 3 mucositis (1 patient). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicities were neutropenia (5%), increased liver enzymes (5%), and hyperbilirubinemia (3%). Of the 56 patients on study, 36 were tested for at least one molecular alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Twelve of these 36 patients had NGS analysis of their tumor tissue. Eighteen of 36 patients (50%) tested had at least one alteration in the pathway, including mutations in PIK3CA (n=16), PIK3R1 (n=1), and AKT1 (n=2); PTEN protein loss (n=1); and, AKT3 amplification (n=1). Sixteen of 56 evaluable patients (29%) achieved stable disease (SD) /partial response (PR)/complete response (CR) ≥ 6 months (n = 3 (5%) with PR/CR). Thirteen of the 16 patients who achieved SD/PR/CR ≥ 6 months were tested for a genetic alteration in PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and 7 of these patients (54%) had at least one alteration in the pathway, including mutations in PIK3CA (n=6), PIK3R1 (n=1), and AKT1 (n=1); PTEN loss (n=1); and AKT3 amplification (n=1).

Conclusions

Combination anastrozole 1 mg and everolimus 10 mg is well tolerated and is active in heavily-pretreated patients with HR-positive breast cancer. The presence of a molecular alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway did not predict for clinical activity of this combination.

Citation Format: Jennifer J Wheler, Filip Janku, Stacy L Moulder, Aung Naing, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Gerald S Falchook, Ralph G Zinner, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Siqing Fu, David S Hong, Johnique T Atkins, Roman Yelensky, Vince Miller, Philip J Stephens, Vincente Valero, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Razelle Kurzrock. Anastrozole and everolimus in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Safety profile, activity and associations of molecular alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-03.

Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplification and therapy response in the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status.

RESULTS

Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12; 95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%). No patient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response.

CONCLUSION

MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population.

Triple-negative breast cancer patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center in phase I trials: improved outcomes with combination chemotherapy and targeted agents

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have poor treatment outcomes. We reviewed the electronic records of consecutive patients with metastatic TNBC treated in phase I clinic at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) between Augu st 2005 and May 2012. One hundred and six patients received at least 1 phase I trial. Twelve of 98 evaluable patients (12%) had either complete response (CR; n = 1), partial response (PR; n = 7), or stable disease ≥ 6 months (SD; n = 4). Patients treated on matched therapy (n = 16) compared with those on nonmatched therapy (n = 90) had improved SD ≥ 6 months/PR/CR (33% vs. 8%; P = 0.018) and longer progression-free survival (PFS; median, 6.4 vs. 1.9 months; P = 0.001). Eleven of 57 evaluable patients (19%) treated with combination chemotherapy and targeted therapy had SD ≥ 6 months/PR/CR versus 1 of 41 evaluable patients (2%) treated on other phase I trials (P = 0.013), and longer PFS (3.0 vs. 1.6 months; P < 0.0001). Patients with molecular alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway treated on matched therapy (n = 16) had improved PFS compared with those with and without molecular alterations treated on nonmatched therapy (n = 27; 6.4 vs. 3.2 months; P = 0.036). On multivariate analysis, improved PFS was associated with treatment with combined chemotherapy and targeted agents (P = 0.0002), ≤ 2 metastatic sites (P = 0.003), therapy with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors for those with cognate pathway abnormalities (P = 0.018), and treatment with antiangiogenic agents (P = 0.023). In summary, combinations of chemotherapy and angiogenesis and/or PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with metastatic TNBC.

Synergy between VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors and chemotherapy agents in the phase I clinic

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that chemotherapy synergizes with VEGF/VEGFR (VEGF/R) inhibitors in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients treated on phase I protocols between December 2004 and July 2013 (n = 1,498) were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was clinical benefit, defined as stable disease ≥ 6 months, complete response, or partial response. Two odds ratios (OR) for achieving clinical benefit were calculated: one for patients treated with VEGF/R inhibitors (OR with VEGF/R) and another for patients treated without (OR without VEGF/R). To compare these two ORs, an interaction term was included in the multivariate model: (chemotherapy/factor of interest)×(VEGF/R). We took significant interaction terms (Pinteraction < 0.05) to suggest effect modification (either synergy or antagonism) with VEGF/R inhibitors.

RESULTS

All patients treated with VEGF/R inhibitors exhibited higher OR for clinical benefit than those who were not [OR = 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-2.4; P < 0.0001]. Use of chemotherapy agents concomitant with VEGF/R inhibitors was associated with significantly higher OR for clinical benefit compared with chemotherapy use without VEGF/R inhibitors [OR with VEGF/R = 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.5) vs. OR without VEGF/R = 0.4 (95% CI, 0.3-0.6), Pinteraction = 0.02]. Specifically, the antimetabolite class was associated with the greatest increase in OR for clinical benefit [OR with VEGF/R = 2.7 (95% CI, 1.5-4.7) vs. OR without VEGF/R = 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.3), Pinteraction = 0.004].

CONCLUSIONS

VEGF/R inhibitor was found to synergize with chemotherapeutics. This effect was most pronounced with the antimetabolite class.

Abstract 5607: BRAF and KRAS mutation testing in plasma cell-free DNA with ICE COLD-PCR in patients with advanced cancers

Background: Cell-free (cf) DNA in the plasma of cancer patients offers an easily obtainable, low-risk, inexpensive, and repeatedly available source of biologic material for mutation analysis and monitoring of molecular changes throughout cancer therapy.

Methods: DNA in plasma from patients with advanced cancers who progressed on systemic therapy was tested for BRAF V600 and KRAS G12 and G13 mutations using the ICE COLD-PCR platform. ICE COLD-PCR, “Improved and Complete Enrichment COamplification at Lower Denaturation,” selectively amplifies mutant DNA by exploiting differences in denaturation temperatures between mutant DNA duplexes and normal “wild-type” DNA duplexes. KRAS Exon 2 and BRAF Exon 15 ICE COLD-PCR was performed on plasma samples. Amplicons were analyzed using Sanger sequencing and results were compared to the mutation status of archival primary or metastatic tumor tissue as determined in a CLIA-certified laboratory during routine clinical care.

Results: Plasma samples from 77 patients with advanced cancers and known tumor tissue BRAF and/or KRAS mutation status (colorectal cancer, n=38; melanoma, n=17; non-small cell lung cancer, n=7; other cancers, n=15) were obtained before treatment and, if possible, sequentially during therapy and tested for BRAF (42), KRAS (34) or BRAF and KRAS (1) mutations in cfDNA. BRAF mutations were detected in 93% (40/43) of archival tumor samples compared to 70% (30/43) of plasma cfDNA samples (agreement 77%). In addition, 20 patients treated with systemic therapy had serial plasma samples collected and the change in relative abundance of BRAF-mutant compared to wild-type cfDNA corresponded with the clinical course of 15 patients and was discrepant for 1 patient; in 5 patients no BRAF mutated cfDNA was detected at any time point. KRAS mutations were detected in 83% (29/35) of archival tumor samples compared to 74% (26/35) of plasma cfDNA samples (agreement 80%). In addition, 12 patients treated with systemic therapy had serial plasma collected and the change in relative abundance of KRAS-mutant compared to wild-type cfDNA corresponded with clinical course in 10 patients; in 2 patients no KRAS mutated cfDNA was detected at any time point.

Conclusions: Detection of BRAF and KRAS mutations in cfDNA can provide a fast and noninvasive alternative to mutation testing in tumor tissue with a potential to be used for monitoring response to cancer therapy.

Citation Format: Filip Janku, Ben Legendre, Katherine Richardson, Gerald S. Falchook, Aung Naing, Veronica R. Holley, Siqing Fu, David S. Hong, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Jennifer J. Wheler, Ralph G. Zinner, Vivek Subbiah, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Daniel D. Karp, Vanda M. Stepanek, Goran Cabrilo, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Agop Y. Bedikian, Bryan K. Kee, Cathy Eng, Michael J. Overman, Kevin B. Kim, Amy Kruempel, Jaclyn Pope, Courtney Cubrich, Grant Wu, Marcia Lewis, Razelle Kurzrock. BRAF and KRAS mutation testing in plasma cell-free DNA with ICE COLD-PCR in patients with advanced cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5607. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5607

Abstract LB-170: Droplet digital PCR detection and longitudinal monitoring of BRAF mutations in cell-free urinary DNA of patients with metastatic cancers or Erdheim-Chester disease

Background: Detection and monitoring of oncogenic mutations in cell-free urinary DNA opens the possibility of a new paradigm for a truly non-invasive method of individualized care for metastatic cancer patients, which would enable the quantitation of mutational tumor load and respective concordance to therapeutic responsiveness followed by detection of emerging genomic alterations underlying acquired resistance.

Methods: Cell-free DNA was isolated from single and/or multiple sequential urine samples from patients with advanced cancers or Erdheim-Chester disease and BRAF V600E mutation in the tumor tissue from a CLIA-certified laboratory, who progressed on systemic therapy. Assays for quantitative assessment of BRAF V600E mutation in cell-free urinary DNA were developed using digital droplet PCR methodology (RainDance, MA) with enrichment of mutation-containing DNA fragments by pre-amplification of the BRAF gene. Detection limits were established as wild-type (&lt;0.05% of mutant copies), low-mutant (0.05%-0.107%), mutant (&gt;0.107%).

Results: Cell-free DNA was extracted from urine of 33 patients with diverse advanced cancers (melanoma, n=11; colorectal cancer, n=8; non-small cell lung cancer, n=4; papillary thyroid carcinoma, n=4; other, n=4) or Erdheim-Chester disease (n=1) with BRAF V600E mutation in the tumor tissue. Of these 33 patients, 25 (76%) had the same mutation in urinary cell-free DNA (mutant, n=14; low-mutant, n=11). In addition, 17 patients had longitudinal analysis of percentage of BRAF V600E mutation to wild-type in sequentially collected urine samples and the dynamics of BRAF V600E mutation in the urine correlated with response to therapy in 13 (76%) of them.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that detecting BRAF V600E mutation in cell-free DNA from urine can offer a noninvasive alternative to mutation testing of tumor tissue with acceptable concordance and should be investigated further for testing and monitoring of mutation status in patients with cancer and Erdheim-Chester disease.

Citation Format: Filip Janku, Gerald S. Falchook, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Aung Naing, Veronica R. Holley, David S. Hong, Vivek Subbiah, Daniel D. Karp, Ralph G. Zinner, Siqing Fu, Jennifer J. Wheler, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Vanda M. Stepanek, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Lorieta Leppin, Latifa Hassaine, Karena Kosco, Jason C. Poole, Cecile Rose T. Vibat, Mark G. Erlander. Droplet digital PCR detection and longitudinal monitoring of BRAF mutations in cell-free urinary DNA of patients with metastatic cancers or Erdheim-Chester disease. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-170. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-LB-170

A phase 2 cooperative group adjuvant trial using a biomarker-based decision algorithm in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (SWOG-0720, NCT00792701)

BACKGROUND

This cooperative group adjuvant phase 2 trial in patients with completely resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer with tumor diameters measuring ≥ 2 cm was designed to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of assigning patients to therapy or observation using a molecularly based decision algorithm.

METHODS

At least a lobectomy and sampling of recommended mediastinal lymph node stations, good Zubrod performance status, adequate organ function, and a formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor specimen were required. Excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) were analyzed using immunofluorescence-based in situ automated quantitative image analysis and categorized as high or low using prespecified cutoff values. Patients with high ERCC1 and RRM1 were assigned to observation and all others to 4 cycles of cisplatin and gemcitabine. Feasibility was defined as treatment assignment within 84 days from surgery in > 85% of patients. Secondary objectives were to estimate the 2-year survival.

RESULTS

Treatment assignment met the feasibility criteria in 88% of eligible patients (71 of 81 patients). The collective 2-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 80% and 96%, respectively. Protein levels for RRM1 fell within the previously established range, ERCC1 levels were slightly lower than expected, and they were significantly correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.4). The rates of assignment of patients to observation (22%) and chemotherapy (78%) were as expected.

CONCLUSIONS

Gene expression analysis for treatment assignment is feasible. Survival results are encouraging and require future validation. Real-time performance of quantitative in situ ERCC1 and RRM1 analysis requires further development.

Assessing PIK3CA and PTEN in early-phase trials with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors

Despite a wealth of preclinical studies, it is unclear whether PIK3CA or phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene aberrations are actionable in the clinical setting. Of 1,656 patients with advanced, refractory cancers tested for PIK3CA or PTEN abnormalities, PIK3CA mutations were found in 9% (146/1,589), and PTEN loss and/or mutation was found in 13% (149/1,157). In multicovariable analysis, treatment with a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor was the only independent factor predicting response to therapy in individuals harboring a PIK3CA or PTEN aberration. The rate of stable disease ≥6 months/partial response reached 45% in a subgroup of individuals with H1047R PIK3CA mutations. Aberrations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are common and potentially actionable in patients with diverse advanced cancers. This work provides further important clinical validation for continued and accelerated use of biomarker-driven trials incorporating rational drug combinations.

Abstract C203: BRAF and KRAS mutation testing in cell-free DNA and circulating tumor cells from blood of patients with metastatic cancers

Background: Cell-free (cf) DNA and circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the blood of cancer patients offer an easily obtainable, low-risk, inexpensive, and repeatedly available source of biologic material for mutation analysis and monitoring of molecular changes throughout cancer therapy.

Methods: DNAs from plasma and CTC from patients with advanced cancers who progressed on systemic therapy were tested for BRAF V600 and KRAS G12/G13 mutations using the ICE-COLD-PCR platform. ICE COLD-PCR, "Improved and Complete Enrichment COamplification at Lower Denaturation” selectively amplifies mutant DNA by exploiting differences in denaturation temperatures between mutant DNA duplexes and normal “wild-type” DNA duplexes. KRAS Exon 2 and BRAF Exon 15 ICE COLD-PCR was performed on plasma samples, and from matched CTCs collected using ScreenCell® MB kits (ScreenCell, Sarcelles, France). Amplicons were analyzed by Sanger sequencing methods and results were compared to the mutation status of the archival primary or metastatic tumor tissue as determined in a CLIA-certified lab.

Results: Blood samples from 59 patients with advanced cancers (colorectal cancer, n=32; melanoma, n=12; non-small cell lung cancer, n=7; other cancers, n=8), were obtained before treatment and, if possible, sequentially during therapy and tested for BRAF (30), KRAS (29) or BRAF and KRAS (1) mutations. BRAF mutations were detected in 97% (30/31) of archival tumor samples compared to 65% (20/31) of cfDNA samples (agreement 68%) and to 3% (1/31) of CTC samples (agreement 6%). KRAS mutations were detected in 90% (26/29) of archival tumor samples compared to 86% (25/29) of cfDNA samples (agreement 83%) and to 10% (3/29) of CTC samples (agreement 21%); however, CTCs had different KRAS mutation subtypes than those in tumor tissue. Of interest, in 3 patients with serial blood collection for cfDNA BRAF mutations, 2 (melanoma, Erdheim-Chester disease) had BRAF V600E cfDNA mutations at baseline, which disappeared during the response to subsequent therapy. Another patient (melanoma) did not have a BRAF V600E cfDNA mutation immediately after being taken off BRAF inhibitor therapy due to intolerance, but a BRAF V600E cfDNA mutation emerged when the patient was treated with non-BRAF targeting therapy. In 2 patients with serial blood collections for cfDNA KRAS mutations, 2 (colorectal cancer) did not have KRAS cfDNA mutations at baseline, but KRAS cfDNA mutations (G13D, G12D, respectively) emerged following disease progression and subsequent therapy. Conclusions: Detection of BRAF and KRAS mutations in cfDNA can provide a fast and noninvasive alternative to mutation testing in tumor tissue. Although these mutations can be also detected in CTC, the level of concordance with tumor tissue results is low.

Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):C203.

Citation Format: Filip Janku, Ben Legendre, Katherine Richardson, Gerald S. Falchook, Aung Naing, Veronica R. Holley, David S. Hong, Ralph G. Zinner, Siqing Fu, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Vivek Subbiah, Daniel D. Karp, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Jennifer J. Wheler, Vanda M. Stepanek, Goran Cabrilo, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Amy Kruempel, Jaclyn Pope, Courtney Cubrich, Grant Wu, Yanggu Shi, Marcia Lewis, Razelle Kurzrock. BRAF and KRAS mutation testing in cell-free DNA and circulating tumor cells from blood of patients with metastatic cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C203.

Abstract B175: Detection and monitoring of BRAF and KRAS mutations in cell-free urinary DNA of metastatic cancer patients by droplet digital PCR

Background: Detection and monitoring of oncogenic mutations in cell-free urinary DNA opens the possibility of a new paradigm for a truly non-invasive method of individualized care for metastatic cancer patients, enabling the quantitation of mutational tumor load and respective concordance to therapeutic responsiveness followed by detection of emerging genomic alterations underlying acquired resistance.

Methods: Cell-free DNA was isolated from single and/or multiple sequential urine samples from patients with advanced cancers and BRAF V600E, KRAS G12D or G12V mutations in the tumor tissue from a CLIA-certified laboratory, who progressed on systemic therapy. Assays for quantitative assessment of BRAF V600E, KRAS G12D and G12V mutations in cell-free urinary DNA were developed using droplet digital PCR methodology (RainDance, MA) with enrichment of mutation-containing DNA fragments by pre-amplification of BRAF and KRAS genes. Mutation sensitivity of at least 0.03% was achieved by spike-in experiments of input DNA from cell-lines containing BRAF and KRAS mutations. Healthy controls (N=6) yielded baseline signals that were ∼10-fold less than observed for 0.03% sensitivity.

Results: Cell-free DNA was extracted from urine of 25 patients with diverse advanced cancers (colorectal cancer, n=8; melanoma, n=7; non-small cell lung cancer, n=6; papillary thyroid carcinoma, n=2; appendiceal carcinoma, n=1; and glioblastoma, n=1) with BRAF V600E (N=18), KRAS G12D (N=5) and KRAS G12V (N=2) in the tumor tissue. Of 18 patients with BRAF V600E mutations in the tumor, 17 (94%) had the same mutation in urinary cell-free DNA. In addition, all 5 (100%) patients with KRAS mutations (G12D, n=5; G12V, n=2) in the tumor tissue DNA had these same mutations in urinary cell-free DNA.A total of 5 patients with BRAF V600E mutations had longitudinal analysis of percentage of cell-free urinary DNA BRAF V600E mutation to wild-type in sequentially collected urine samples. Although the numbers are small the detected amount of BRAF mutant copies are in agreement with a clinical course.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that detecting BRAF V600E, KRAS G12D, and G12V mutations in cell-free DNA from urine can offer a noninvasive alternative to mutation testing of tumor tissue with excellent concordance, and should be investigated further for testing and monitoring of mutation status in patients with cancer.

Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B175.

Citation Format: Filip Janku, Gerald S. Falchook, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Aung Naing, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Veronica R. Holley, Daniel D. Karp, Ralph G. Zinner, Siqing Fu, Jennifer J. Wheler, David S. Hong, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Vanda M. Stepanek, Rayjalakshmi Luthra, Lorieta Leppin, Latifa Hassaine, Karena Kosco, Jason C. Poole, Mark G. Erlander. Detection and monitoring of BRAF and KRAS mutations in cell-free urinary DNA of metastatic cancer patients by droplet digital PCR. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B175.

Combining erlotinib and cetuximab is associated with activity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (including squamous cell carcinomas) and wild-type EGFR or resistant mutations

Preclinical data suggest that combined EGF receptor (EGFR) targeting with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody may be superior over single-agent targeting. Therefore, as part of a phase I study, we analyzed the outcome of 20 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with the combination of erlotinib and cetuximab. EGFR mutation status was ascertained in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment-approved laboratory. There were 10 men; median number of prior therapies was five. Overall, two of 20 patients (10%) achieved partial response (PR), one of whom had a TKI-resistant EGFR insertion in exon 20, time to treatment failure (TTF) = 24+ months, and the other patient had squamous cell histology (EGFR wild-type), TTF = 7.4 months. In addition, three of 20 patients (15%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 six months (one of whom had wild-type EGFR and squamous cell histology, and two patients had an EGFR TKI-sensitive mutation, one of whom had failed prior erlotinib therapy). Combination therapy with ertotinib plus cetuximab was well tolerated. The most common toxicities were rash, diarrhea, and hypomagnesemia. The recommended phase II dose was erlotinib 150 mg oral daily and cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly. In summary, erlotinib and cetuximab treatment was associated with SD ≥ six months/PR in five of 20 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (25%), including individuals with squamous histology, TKI-resistant EGFR mutations, and wild-type EGFR, and those who had progressed on prior erlotinib after an initial response. This combination warrants further study in select populations of non-small cell lung cancer.

Phase I dose-escalating study of TAS-106 in combination with carboplatin in patients with solid tumors

Background TAS-106 was designed to inhibit RNA synthesis by blocking RNA polymerases I, II, and III. Methods This was a single-center, open-label, phase I study to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and biologic effects of the combination of TAS-106 and carboplatin, following a standard 3 + 3 design. This phase I trial was comprised of a regimen of a 60-min IV infusion of carboplatin on day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by a 24-h infusion of TAS-106, also on day 1 of each cycle. Results 39 patients were treated (21 male, 18 female, median age 62 years, range 21–80 years). Median number of prior therapies was 4. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was 3 mg/m² TAS-106 with AU 4 carboplatin. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with and without growth factor support. While no patients achieved a complete or partial response, four patients had stable disease lasting ≥4 months, including one patient each with ovarian, non-small cell lung, basal cell and colorectal cancer. Conclusions In summary, the combination of TAS-106 and carboplatin was well-tolerated, and further studies in non-small cell lung and ovarian cancer are warranted to assess the efficacy of this drug combination.

Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in a phase I clinic

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in phase I clinical trials have not been systematically analyzed.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of consecutive patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who were treated in the Phase I Clinical Trials Program at MD Anderson from August 2004 to May 2009.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients (51 men, 34 women) treated on various phase I protocols were identified. The median age was 62 years (range, 30-85). The median number of previous systemic therapies was two (range, 0-5). A partial response was observed in eight patients (9.5%) and stable disease lasting >4 months was observed in 16 patients (19%). The median overall survival time was 10.6 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 2.8 months, which was 0.6 months shorter than the median PFS of 3.4 months following prior second-line therapy. Factors predicting longer survival in the univariate analysis were an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) score of 0-1, no prior smoking, two or fewer organ systems involved, a hemoglobin level ≥ 12 g/dL, liver metastases, a history of thromboembolism, and a platelets count > 440 × 10(9)/L. In the multivariate analysis, a PS score of 0-1 and history negative for smoking predicted longer survival. Sixty-two (73%) patients had grade ≤ 2 toxicity, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Phase I clinical trials were well tolerated by selected patients with advanced NSCLC treated at M.D. Anderson. Nonsmokers and patients with a good PS survived longer. PFS in our population was shorter in smokers/ex-smokers and patients with a PS score of 2. It is reasonable to refer pretreated patients with a good PS to phase I clinical trials.

Comparison of patient outcomes according to histology among pemetrexed-treated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer in two phase II trials

INTRODUCTION

Recent phase III studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have demonstrated differential efficacy for pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology. The results of 2 phase II studies of pemetrexed and a platinum agent (carboplatin or oxaliplatin) were pooled to determine whether outcomes in the studies differed by tumor histology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus carboplatin area under the curve of 6 (n = 89) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2 (n = 41); both regimens were administered every 21 days. The primary endpoint of both trials was response rate. Treatment arms were pooled, and Cox models with main effects for squamous histology were used to assess overall survival and progression-free survival. Cofactor adjustments incorporated terms for performance status, disease stage, and sex.

RESULTS

More than three quarters of enrolled patients had a nonsquamous histology. Mean age was 59.9 years for patients with nonsquamous histology and 63.7 years for patients with squamous histology. Response rates were 30% for patients with nonsquamous histology and 17.2% for patients with squamous histology. Overall survival was 10.5 months for patients with nonsquamous histology and 9.8 months for patients with squamous histology (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.52-1.74). Progression-free survival was 5.6 months for patients with nonsquamous histology and 4.7 months for patients with squamous histology (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.43-1.19).

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with pemetrexed/ platinum doublets, nonsquamous histology was associated with better outcomes. The benefit of pemetrexed treatment among patients with nonsquamous histology is consistent with the results reported from previous studies.

Phase II study of vinorelbine and docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer as frontline and second-line therapy

OBJECTIVES

Combination chemotherapy with third-generation, nonplatinum agents (ie, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes, or camptothecins) represents a well-tolerated frontline treatment option for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and might play a role as salvage therapy as well. The aim of this phase 2 study was to investigate the use of docetaxel and vinorelbine in the frontline and second-line setting in patients with incurable non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients (42 untreated, 36 previously treated) were administered vinorelbine (20 mg/m) on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel (75 mg/m for untreated patients; 60 mg/m for previously treated patients for cycle 1, increased to 75 mg/m for the subsequent cycles in the absence of grade 3 fever/neutropenia) on day 8, repeated every 21 days, with routine filgrastim support.

RESULTS

The most common grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting (5% each). Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 55% of the patients, however only 5% experienced febrile neutropenia. Response rates were 13% in the chemotherapy-naive cohort and 9% in previously treated patients. Median time to progression was 2.9 and 3.0 months and median overall survival was 15.0 and 6.2 months, for the frontline and second-line patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with historical controls, in the first-line setting, the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine did not demonstrate increased efficacy advantages over platinum- or other nonplatinum-based doublets. In the second-line setting, single agent chemotherapy is as effective as, and less toxic than the docetaxel-vinorelbine combination, and the former remains the cytotoxic treatment of choice.

Phase II trial of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for second-line therapy of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: NCCTG and SWOG study N0426

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed combined with bevacizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to correlate allelic variants in pemetrexed-metabolizing genes with clinical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously treated NSCLC received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) intravenous) combined with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenous) every 3 weeks. The primary end point, evaluated using a one-stage Fleming design for detecting a true success rate of at least 70%, was the proportion of patients who were progression free and on treatment at 3 months. Polymorphisms in genes responsible for pemetrexed transport (reduced folate carrier [SLC19A1]) and metabolism (folylpolyglutamate synthase [FPGS] and gamma-glutamyl hydrolase [GGH]) evaluated in germline DNA (blood) were correlated with treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-eight evaluable patients (14 females and 34 males) received a median of four cycles (range, one to 20 cycles). The most common grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (13%), dyspnea (10%), and thrombosis (10%). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic AEs were neutropenia (19%) and lymphopenia (13%). Twenty-four (57%; 95% CI, 41% to 72%) of the first 42 patients met the success criteria. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 8.6 and 4.0 months, respectively. The exon 6 (2522)C-->T polymorphism in SLC19A1 correlated with 3-month progression-free status (P = .01) and with PFS (P = .05). The IVS1(1307)C-->T polymorphism in GGH correlated with OS (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The study did not meet its primary end point. However, the median PFS time of 4 months is promising. Pharmacogenetic studies in larger cohorts are needed to definitively identify polymorphisms that predict for survival and toxicity of pemetrexed.

Pharmacokinetic study of the phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (TRIBUTE) of paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with erlotinib or placebo in patients with advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

PURPOSE

To assess the pharmacokinetics and evaluate potential drug-drug interactions between erlotinib, paclitaxel and carboplatin.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

1,079 previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled and randomized in a phase III trial (TRIBUTE) to receive either erlotinib or placebo in combination with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV over 3 h and carboplatin at a calculated dose to achieve an AUC 6 mg∙min/mL. To determine possible drug-drug interaction with this combination, a subset of 24 (12 erlotinib, 12 placebo) patients were enrolled onto an intensive pharmacokinetic (IPK) substudy group at a single site. All IPK patients received either erlotinib 150 mg/day or placebo-controlled tablets. Analyses were completed using validated analytical methodologies. Non-compartmental modeling was utilized to estimate PK parameters.

RESULTS

Complete blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis was obtained in 21 of 24 patients. Mean AUC(0-τ) for erlotinib and the OSI-420 metabolite were 29,997 ng∙h/mL and 3,020 ng∙h/mL, respectively. Mean (SD) paclitaxel clearances (L/h/M(2)) were 11.7 (3.4) and 12.7 (6.7) in the placebo and erlotinib treatment groups, respectively. The resultant paclitaxel AUC(0-∞) (ng∙h/mL) was 18,400 (5,300) for the placebo group and 17,800 (5,500) for the erlotinib group. For carboplatin, the mean (SD) clearances (L/h) were 16.8 (3.9) and 16.1 (4.4) for the placebo and erlotinib groups, respectively. The resultant carboplatin AUC(0-∞) (ng/mL∙h) were 49,900 (9,700) for the placebo group and 48,400 (11,900) for the erlotinib group. No significant differences were observed in these paclitaxel or carboplatin pharmacokinetic group comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of erlotinib to a standard chemotherapy regimen for NSCLC did not alter the systemic exposures (AUC(0-∞)) of paclitaxel (p = 0.80) and carboplatin (p = 0.756) when erlotinib-treated patients were compared to placebo-treated patients. The pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and its metabolite OSI-420 did not appear to be altered by the concomitant administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin.

Algorithmic guided screening of drug combinations of arbitrary size for activity against cancer cells

The standard treatment for most advanced cancers is multidrug therapy. Unfortunately, combinations in the clinic often do not perform as predicted. Therefore, to complement identifying rational drug combinations based on biological assumptions, we hypothesized that a functional screen of drug combinations, without limits on combination sizes, will aid the identification of effective drug cocktails. Given the myriad possible cocktails and inspired by examples of search algorithms in diverse fields outside of medicine, we developed a novel, efficient search strategy called Medicinal Algorithmic Combinatorial Screen (MACS). Such algorithms work by enriching for the fitness of cocktails, as defined by specific attributes through successive generations. Because assessment of synergy was not feasible, we developed a novel alternative fitness function based on the level of inhibition and the number of drugs. Using a WST-1 assay on the A549 cell line, through MACS, we screened 72 combinations of arbitrary size formed from a 19-drug pool across four generations. Fenretinide, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, and bortezomib (FSB) was the fittest. FSB performed up to 4.18 SD above the mean of a random set of cocktails or "too well" to have been found by chance, supporting the utility of the MACS strategy. Validation studies showed FSB was inhibitory in all 7 other NSCLC cell lines tested. It was also synergistic in A549, the one cell line in which this was evaluated. These results suggest that when guided by MACS, screening larger drug combinations may be feasible as a first step in combination drug discovery in a relatively small number of experiments.

Phase I trial of motexafin gadolinium in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Motexafin gadolinium is a novel antineoplastic drug that disrupts cancer cell antioxidant systems, thus contributing to cellular death. In patients with lung cancer, motexafin gadolinium has been shown to increase the time to neurologic progression when given in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy in randomized phase III studies. Preclinical data suggest that this drug might also enhance the antineoplastic effects of chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this one-arm, open label, phase I, dose-escalation study, we administered docetaxel (75 mg/m2), cisplatin (75 mg/m2), and motexafin gadolinium every 3 weeks to patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Twenty-one patients were treated at one of four motexafin dose levels.

RESULTS

The maximal tolerated motexafin dose was 10 mg/kg on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of febrile neutropenia, hypertension, myocardial ischemia, and pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates. Other common grade 3-4 adverse events across all cohorts that did not appear to be exacerbated by motexafin gadolinium included granulocytopenia, fatigue, dehydration, nausea, and vomiting. Two episodes of myocardial ischemia and one sudden death of unknown cause were observed. Response rates were partial response (10%), stable disease (60%), and disease progression (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen studied was tolerable and showed activity in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The recommended doses for future phase II trials are motexafin gadolinium 10 mg/kg, docetaxel 75 mg/m2, and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks. Caution is advised in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.

Phase I Clinical and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Oral CI-1033 in Patients with Refractory Cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of CI-1033 given daily for 7 days of a 21-day cycle. Tumor response and changes in erbB receptor tyrosine kinase activity in tumor and skin tissue were examined, and modulation of potential biomarkers in plasma was explored.

DESIGN

This was a dose-finding phase I study in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Patients were evaluated for safety, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response. Pharmacodynamic markers, such as Ki67, p27, and erbB receptor status, were assessed in tumor and skin tissue using immunohistochemical and immunoprecipitation methodologies. Plasma biomarkers HER2, vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-8, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 were evaluated using immunologic techniques.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Dose-limiting toxicity (emesis, persistent rash, and mouth ulcer) was observed at 750 mg. The maximum tolerated dose was 650 mg. There were no confirmed objective responses. CI-1033 treatment showed down-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor, HER2, and Ki67 in a variety of tumor tissues and up regulation of p27 in skin tissue. Plasma HER2 was reduced following CI-1033 administration, but no consistent change in vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-8, or matrix metalloproteinase-9 was noted. CI-1033 plasma concentrations were proportional to dose.

CONCLUSION

The safety and pharmacokinetic profile of CI-1033 was favorable for multidose oral administration. Evidence of modulation of erbB receptor activity in tumor and skin tissue was accompanied by changes in markers of proliferation and cell cycle inhibition. Additional clinical trials are warranted in defining the role of CI-1033 in the treatment of cancer and further assessing the utility of antitumor markers.

Many Patients 80 Years and Older with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Can Tolerate Chemotherapy

People 80 years of age and older constitute 17.8% of all lung cancer patients in the United States. Because the life expectancies of 80-year-old men and women are 87.3 years and 89.0 years, respectively, non-small cell lung cancer shortens lives in addition to causing morbidity. In this retrospective study, all patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer 80 years of age and older treated at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with one or more follow-ups were identified from the database for the years 1997 to 2004. A cohort of patients younger than 80 years old was matched based on treatment year, race, histology, and gender in a 2:1 ratio. Of 13,690 thoracic oncology patients, 496 (3.6%) were 80 years of age and older, of whom 46 met the criteria. In older and younger patients, respectively, platinum doublets were given in 43% versus 79% (p < 0.0001), the response rate was 41% versus 47%, the median progression-free survival was 5.55 versus 3.91 months (p = 0.216), and the median overall survival was 10.7 versus 9.8 months (p = 0.43). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were similar. Our data indicate that selected patients 80 years of age and older may tolerate and benefit from chemotherapy, and prospective evaluation of these patients is indicated.

Asian Ethnicity as a Predictor of Response in Patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Gefitinib on an Expanded Access Program

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the potential role of East Asian ethnicity or origin in predicting response to gefitinib in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A chart review was done of all patients treated with gefitinib at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center on the Expanded Access Program.

RESULTS

There were 223 patients with advanced-stage NSCLC who were enrolled. Of these, 182 received >or= 1 dose, and 160 were evaluable for response. The partial response rate was 8.8%, and the stable disease rate was 26.3%. Median time to progression was 2.5 months, and median survival was 6.8 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 35.3% and 12.4%, respectively. Partial responses were seen in 7 of 12 patients (58.3%) of East Asian origin compared with 7 of 131 patients who were white (5.3%). This difference was statistically significant when controlling for histology, smoking status, hemoglobin, and diarrhea. Never smoking and diarrhea were also independent predictors of response.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, in a multivariate analysis, we observed a positive relationship between East Asian origin and response to gefitinib. These findings might help determine which patients will likely benefit from gefitinib.

Phase 1 clinical and pharmacokinetics evaluation of oral CI-1033 in patients with refractory cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral CI-1033, a pan-erbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor, administered over 14 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle.

DESIGN

Phase 1, multicenter trial involving patients with solid tumors that are refractory to standard therapy. CI-1033 was administered initially at 300 mg/day to a minimum cohort of three patients. Dose escalation proceeded at </=40% increments. Patients were evaluated for toxicity, pharmacokinetic profile, and evidence of response.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients entered the trial and were evaluable for safety assessment. Dose-limiting toxicity (diarrhea, rash, and/or anorexia) occurred at the 560 mg dose level; the maximum tolerated dose was 450 mg. No patients achieved objective responses and six patients achieved stable disease. Plasma CI-1033 concentrations increased with increasing dose. CI-1033 was not eliminated in urine to any appreciable extent.

CONCLUSIONS

CI-1033 is suitable for phase 2 testing at the 450 mg/day dose level when administered for 14 days in a 21-day cycle. The pharmacokinetic profile is consistent with biologically relevant plasma concentrations over the dosing interval.

Phase II study of pemetrexed in combination with carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The primary objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a pemetrexed-carboplatin combination as first-line therapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1, Stage IIIB (malignant effusion) or IV disease, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment was pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 given intravenously and carboplatin area under the serum concentration-time curve = 6 given intravenously on Day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles; patients could receive additional cycles at the discretion of the treating physician and patient. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and dexamethasone prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (31 men and 19 women) were treated. The median age was 62 years. Ninety-six percent of patients had Stage IV disease, and 88% had a performance status of 1. The median number of cycles was 6; 15 patients received 8 or more cycles. There was Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 11 (22%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively; Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 1 (2%) and 0 patients, respectively. Three patients (6%) experienced Grade 3 nonhematologic side effects (diarrhea, neutropenic pneumonia, and fatigue). No patients had sensory neuropathy or alopecia >Grade 1. The partial response rate was 24%, median time to progression 5.4 months, 1-year survival 56.0%, and median survival 13.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an active, very well-tolerated regimen. Trials focused on how to integrate this doublet with novel agents are warranted.

Pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of the clinical data

Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeting antimetabolite that has first-line and second-line activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies have shown significant efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile of the combination of pemetrexed plus platinum as first-line therapy for NSCLC. Second-line activity against NSCLC was demonstrated in a phase III trial comparing single-agent pemetrexed with docetaxel; in that trial, survival was comparable between these agents but side effects were significantly less for patients who received pemetrexed. Pemetrexed is also an active agent against mesothelioma. A phase III trial comparing pemetrexed plus cisplatin with cisplatin alone showed for the first time a regimen that improves survival in this disease and led to FDA approval of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin for mesothelioma. As a radiosensitizer, pemetrexed has been well-tolerated when given concurrent with chest radiation, and a phase I study is under way assessing its tolerability in combination with carboplatin in this setting. Pemetrexed is clearly a useful agent in the treatment of thoracic malignancies, and is worthy of further study in combination with other drugs having novel mechanisms of action.

Pemetrexed in advanced NSCLC: a review of the clinical data

The novel multitargeted antimetabolite pemetrexed (Alimta), recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of mesothelioma when combined with cisplatin, is also active in first- and second-line non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a phase III trial comparing single-agent pemetrexed vs docetaxel (Taxotere) as second-line therapy in advanced NSCLC, survival was shown to be comparable between these agents, but side effects were significantly less frequent and severe for patients who received pemetrexed. In the frontline setting, phase II studies have shown significant activity and a very favorable toxicity profile of the combination of pemetrexed with a platinum agent. Pemetrexed has been well tolerated at systemic doses as a radiosensitizer when given as concurrent chest radiation, and a phase I study is under way to assess its tolerability in combination with carboplatin (Paraplatin) in this setting. Pemetrexed is an important addition to the armamentarium of medicines used to treat thoracic malignancies, and merits study in combination with other drugs having novel mechanisms of action.

Trastuzumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with Her2-overexpressing, untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer: report of a phase II trial and findings regarding optimal identification of patients with Her2-overexpressing disease

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with Her2-overexpressing stages IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to study the relationship between results from the two methods for determining levels of Her2 overexpression. Chemonaive patients were eligible if they had stages IIIB or IV NSCLC with either a Her2 score of at least 1+ by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis or a serum Her2 shed antigen level of at least 15 ng/ml by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Treatment consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day one plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) days one and eight plus trastuzumab 4 mg/kg day one and 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter on a 21-day cycle for six cycles followed by weekly maintenance trastuzumab therapy. Of the 21 patients enrolled, 8 (38%) patients had a partial response. The 1-year survival rate was 62% (13/21). Median time to progression was 36 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed no interaction between trastuzumab and gemcitabine plus cisplatin. In patients screened for this study, Her2 expression was zero in 283/360 (79%); 1+ in 32/360 (9%); 2+ in 27/360 (8%); and 3+ in 18/360 patients (5%). Serum Her2 shed antigen was >15 ng/ml in 27/ 288 (9%) patients. Of patients who had both Her2 assays, 24% (4/17) with ELISA scores >15 ng/ml had IHC scores of 3+, compared with only 2% (3/145) of the patients <15 ng/ml and 4% (7/162) of all patients. The addition of trastuzumab to cisplatin and gemcitabine was well tolerated, but further study will be required to determine whether this combination is superior to chemotherapy alone. This may be demonstrated if only those patients with Her2, having a score of IHC 3+ were eligible. Since IHC 3+ is rare in NSCLC, performing IHC in only those patients with serum Her2 shed antigen >15 ng/ml would greatly increase the efficiency of IHC screening though at the cost of excluding nearly half the patients with Her2 scores of 3+ on IHC analysis. Thus, if sequential screening consisting of serum ELISA followed by IHC analysis is implemented, it may make a trastuzumab trial feasible but should ultimately be supplanted by another screening system if trastuzumab is shown to be beneficial to some patients with IHC Her2 scores of 3+.

Effects of amifostine on acute toxicity from concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer: report of a randomized comparative trial

PURPOSE

To determine the ability of amifostine to reduce the severity and/or incidence of the acute toxicities of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) for non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with inoperable, nonmetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy were randomized to one of two treatment groups. Arm 1 patients received thoracic RT (total dose, 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions of 1.2 Gy b.i.d. 5 d/wk), plus oral etoposide (50 mg b.i.d. 30 min before thoracic RT for 10 days, repeated on Day 29) and cisplatin (50 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1, 8, 29, and 36). Arm 2 patients received the same treatment plus amifostine (500 mg i.v. 20-30 min before any treatment the first 2 days of each week). Acute effects were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were enrolled between November 1998 and January 2001. The minimal follow-up was 24 months, and the median follow-up of living patients was 31 months. The patient and tumor characteristics were equally distributed between the patients in the two arms. The median survival time was 20 months in Arm 1 patients and 19 months in Arm 2 patients. The maximal esophageal toxicity was mild (Grade 1) in 23%, moderate (Grade 2) in 42%, and severe (Grade 3-4) in 35% of patients in Arm 1; the corresponding rates for the Arm 2 patients were 48%, 35%, and 16% (p = 0.021). Severe pneumonitis occurred in 16% of the Arm 1 and none of the Arm 2 patients (p = 0.020, chi-square test). Neutropenic fever occurred in 39% of Arm 1 and 16% of Arm 2 patients (p = 0.046, chi-square test). Mild hypotension, dysgeusia, and sneezing were significantly more frequent among the patients in Arm 2.

CONCLUSION

Amifostine reduced the severity and incidence of acute esophageal, pulmonary, and hematologic toxicity resulting from concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy and RT. Amifostine had no apparent effect on survival in these patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, suggesting that it does not have a tumor-protective effect.

Prostate-specific antitumor activity by probasin promoter-directed p202 expression

p202, an interferon (IFN) inducible protein, arrests cell cycle at G1 phase leading to cell growth retardation. We previously showed that ectopic expression of p202 in human prostate cancer cells renders growth inhibition and suppression of transformation phenotype in vitro. In this report, we showed that prostate cancer cells with stable expression of p202 were less tumorigenic than the parental cells. The antitumor activity of p202 was further demonstrated by an ex vivo treatment of prostate cancer cells with p202 expression vector that showed significant tumor suppression in mouse xenograft model. Importantly, to achieve a prostate-specific antitumor effect by p202, we employed a prostate-specific probasin (ARR2PB) gene promoter to direct p202 expression (ARR2PB-p202) in an androgen receptor (AR)-positive manner. The ARR2PB-p202/liposome complex was systemically administered into mice bearing orthotopic AR-positive prostate tumors. We showed that parenteral administration of an ARR2PB-p202/liposome preparation led to prostate-specific p202 expression and tumor suppression in orthotopic prostate cancer xenograft model. Furthermore, with DNA array technique, we showed that the expression of p202 was accompanied by downregulation of G2/M phase cell-cycle regulators, cyclin B, and p55cdc. Together, our results suggest that p202 suppresses prostate tumor growth, and that a prostate-specific antitumor effect can be achieved by systemic administration of liposome-mediated delivery of ARR2PB-p202.