A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) Principles

BACKGROUND

A deviated nose is a common problem among patients for both cosmetic and functional reasons. The correction remains a major challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon. Unrecognized nasal septal deviations stand as the primary reason for failed rhinoplasty outcomes. There is a paucity of data in the literature about septoplasty classifications and technical details in preservation rhinoplasty (PR) for various crooked noses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the various septum deviations according to the nasal axis. Moreover, a treatment algorithm is suggested with technical details based on PR principles.

RESULTS

The directions and curvature of the cartilaginous deviation of crooked nose such as C-shaped, reverse C-shaped, straight axis deviations (I-shaped), and S-shaped are described. According to the deviation, a septoplasty classification (Type 1-Type 4) is suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of septal deviation, different PR techniques are proposed to achieve the desired straight nasal dorsum with an optimal functional outcome. Compared to the classical L-strut concept, the quadrangular cartilage remains preserved in the swinging door technique. The cartilage might be further used in the future for grafting in the hybrid structural/preservation technique if needed, ultimately saving rib cartilage and/or conchal cartilage. Finally, surgery time is reduced, and patient's morbidity remains minimal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Free fibula flap for lower limb salvage after tumour resection

Context:

Post-tumour resection lower limb salvage.

Aim/Introduction:

Resection of tumours of the femur and tibia around the knee and ankle joints results in large bony defects. Often arthrodesis is an alternative; in case, adequate functional motors cannot be preserved or due to economic constraints. Thus, in an immunocompromised patient, the vascularised fibula is the best form of reconstruction. The vascularised fibular flap (pedicled/free) can be used in combination with an allograft. We refer to such a combination reconstruction as ‘allocombo’. The vascularised fibular graft hypertrophies in due course of time, and till that period, the allograft provides the required mechanical strength to allow early ambulation.

Subjects and Methods:

A retrospective study of 24 cases of vascularised fibular graft for lower limb reconstruction was conducted from February 2003 to March 2014. The average defect size was 15.5 cm and the average length of fibula harvested was 24.35 cm. A total of 19 free fibular flaps and 5 pedicled fibula were done. Mean age was 26 years. Fibula was nestled in the allograft obtained from the tissue bank.

Results:

The mean follow-up time was 52 months. Free flap success rate was 96%. Successful healing was achieved at 45 ends (97.8%). Radiological evidence of union at osteotomy sites occurred at an average of 6.8 months. Eight patients eventually succumbed to disease. At the final follow-up, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional score of the evaluable patients was 26 (range 20–30).

Conclusions:

Pedicled fibula is a good option if the defect is within 14 cm of the knee joint at the femoral end. The vessels have to curve around the fibular head, thus its removal improves the reach of the pedicle. The flap is easy to harvest with predictable vascular anatomy and it can provide a large amount of vascularised bone and skin paddle. It results in early ambulation, rehabilitation and reduced morbidity. We realised that fixation is easier and chances of vascular injury are less in free as compared to pedicled fibula.